Development and psychometric testing of the care dependence perception questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: This multicentre study aimed to develop a measure of the perception of care dependence in patients diagnosed with cancer and to test its psychometric properties. METHODS: The questionnaire was developed based on findings emerged from a meta-synthesis and from qualitative studies conducted in three hospitals in Italy. The draft questionnaire was tested for face and content validity and pilot-tested with patients. The questionnaire was completed by care-dependent patients with cancer. Test-retest was conducted to verify stability. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed using a Maximum Likelihood robust estimator. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The Scale-Content Validity Index was 0.92. The final 15-item questionnaire was completed by 208 patients admitted to two hospitals. The EFA yielded a two-factor model including a positive and a negative perception of care dependence. Factor score determinacy coefficients, Cronbach's alpha coefficients, composite reliability coefficients and Intraclass Correlations Coefficients yielded satisfactory results confirming internal consistency and stability. The hedonic balance score is also available as a single indicator of subjective well-being. The study provides initial validation of the Care DEeP Questionnaire that can be used by cancer nurses to assess positive and negative patient experiences with care dependence and to personalise and improve their care.

Finding meaning in life: an exploration on the experiences with dependence on care of patients with advanced cancer and nurses caring for them.

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer are likely to face increasing levels of care dependence. Adult patients who become care dependent on others can experience this condition as one of suffering and humiliation. The nurse-patient relationship plays a key role in the experience of dependence. Understanding patients' and nurses' perceptions of care dependence is crucial to addressing the impact it has on the lives of both. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of patients with cancer and nurses caring for them. METHODS: A multicentre qualitative study was conducted in Italy using semi-structured interviews with patients with advanced cancer admitted to 3 hospitals, and 9 focus groups with nurses working in oncology wards of 2 hospitals. Data were analysed with inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients and 44 nurses participated in the study. Three common themes were identified: within dependence, the relationship is a lifeline; dependence is influenced by internal and external factors and dependence generates changes. Dependence impacts on patients' and nurses' lives and implies a process of personal maturing for both. Patients learn the humility to ask for help by exposing their vulnerability. Nurses become aware that a trusting relationship helps patients to accept dependence, and they learn to self-transcend in order to build it. CONCLUSIONS: Striving to build positive relationships implies a change in nurses' and patients' lives. In this way, they come to understand important aspects of life and find meaning in difficult situations. Further studies should explore also homecare settings and patients' families.

[Validation of the Italian version of the GHAA-9 m questionnaire on patient satisfaction in digestive Endoscopy]. / Validazione della versione italiana del questionario GHAA-9 m sulla soddisfazione del paziente in endoscopia digestiva.

BACKGROUND: There isn't a validated questionnaire in Italian language to evaluate the quality perceived by the patient in Digestive Endoscopy. OBJECTIVE: validation of the translation of a questionnaire from English to Italian language to measure the level of patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: we conducted a prospective study on validation in Italian of a short questionnaire adapted for Endoscopy by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the GHAA-9m. It's been tested with the technique of the questionnaire/interview on 80 outpatients who underwent in the month of September 2014 to endoscopic examinations of the gastrointestinal tract. The patients were divided into 2 groups of 40 patients: group 1 was administered before the questionnaire and subsequently the interview was conducted, on the contrary on the group 2 was administered before the interview and subsequently the questionnaire. The results of the two groups were compared using the inter-rater agreement. It was also evaluated the internal consistency of the questions. RESULTS: The results show that the instrument is experienced as simple and quick to use for patients. Data analysis allowed us to conclude that the Italian translation is valid and consistent. In the phase of the interview there were some aspects that suggest, in a development of this tool, some changes that could increase the accuracy and informational content. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of the questionnaire GHAA-9m has good validity, reliability, and shows property valuation comparable to those of the American version and can therefore be used in daily practice Digestive Endoscopy.

The Care Dependency Scale: A cross validation study in inpatients with cancer.

PURPOSE: Inpatients with cancer are likely to experience care dependency and would benefit from nurses' evaluation of such dependency. The Care Dependency Scale (CDS) is a 15-item instrument widely used to assess patients' dependency in different populations and settings. This study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the proxy Italian version of the CDS in inpatients with cancer. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional cross-validation study was conducted between February 2016 and October 2017 in a convenience sample of 517 adult patients with cancer admitted to four hospitals in Italy. The sample was randomly divided into two subsamples. The factor structure of the CDS based on previous studies was tested on a subsample through confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). The best fitting model was cross-validated through CFA on the second subsample and on the total sample. RESULTS: The sample mean age was 65.68 years, 51.5% were male. The CFAs performed on the first subsample (n = 258), on the second subsample (n = 259) and on the total sample yielded acceptable fit indexes. The factors Physical care dependency and Psychosocial care dependency with a second-order factor were confirmed. Reliability in terms of internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The Care Dependency Scale is a tool able to assess the level of care dependency in patients with cancer with adequate validity and reliability. The Care Dependency Scale can help to distinguish between physical and psychosocial needs and to create a base for personalized patient care.