Think Twice: De-implementation of Laboratory Testing After Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Clinically unindicated laboratory testing contributes to low-value care. Most postoperative day 1 laboratory tests after colorectal surgery are normal. However, no published interventions have shown that reducing overall postoperative laboratory testing is safe. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of reducing postoperative laboratory testing after colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This is a quality improvement study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at an academic center with an enhanced recovery after surgery program that included 5 daily laboratory tests until discharge. PATIENTS: All adults undergoing colorectal or small-bowel surgery formed intervention and nonintervention cohorts based on surgeons who chose to opt into the study. Preimplementation (November 2019-October 2021), there were 545 intervention and 577 nonintervention patients. Postimplementation (November 2021-March 2023), there were 448 intervention and 437 nonintervention patients. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention included 3 postoperative day 1 laboratory tests and subsequent clinically indicated laboratory tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included laboratory tests and days free of laboratory work. RESULTS: Postintervention, the intervention group had a 33% reduction in laboratory tests per hospital stay, a 26% reduction in laboratory tests per day, and a 49% increase in laboratory test-free days. There was no difference in length of stay (4 vs 4; p = 0.79) or readmissions (14.9% vs 12.9%; p = 0.39). The nonintervention group had no significant changes in laboratory work or laboratory test-free days, with no differences in length of stay (4 vs 4; p = 0.49) or readmissions (11.1% vs 11.0%; p = 0.96). LIMITATIONS: Demographics and complication rates were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention targeting reflexive laboratory testing after colorectal surgery resulted in safe, significant, sustained reductions in postoperative laboratory work, with substantial cost savings. These findings prompted a change in the laboratory order set to an opt-out system, and laboratory work reduction approaches have been implemented within other surgical divisions. Continuation and spread of these efforts are instrumental for prioritization of high-value surgical care. See Video Abstract . PINSELO DOS VECES ELIMINACIN DE LAS PRUEBAS DE LABORATORIO DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA COLORRECTAL: ANTECEDENTES:Las pruebas de laboratorio clínicamente no indicadas contribuyen a una atención de bajo valor. La mayoría de los análisis de laboratorio del primer día post operatorios de una cirugía colorrectal son normales. Sin embargo, ninguna intervención publicada ha demostrado que reducir las pruebas de laboratorio post operatorias generales sea seguro.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue investigar el impacto de reducir las pruebas de laboratorio pos toperatorias después de la cirugía colorrectal.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio de mejora de la calidad.AJUSTES:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un centro académico con un programa mejorado de recuperación después de la cirugía que incluye 5 laboratorios diarios hasta el alta.PACIENTES:Todos los adultos sometidos a cirugía colorrectal o de intestino delgado formaron cohortes de intervención y no intervención basadas en los cirujanos que optaron por participar en el estudio. Antes de la implementación (noviembre de 2019 - octubre de 2021) había 545 pacientes con intervención y 577 sin intervención. Después de la implementación (noviembre de 2021 - marzo de 2023) hubo 448 pacientes con intervención y 437 sin intervención.INTERVENCIONES:La intervención incluyó 3 laboratorios post operatorios del primer día y laboratorios posteriores clínicamente indicados.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las medidas de resultado incluyeron pruebas de laboratorio y días sin laboratorio.RESULTADOS:Después de la intervención, el grupo de intervención tuvo una reducción del 33 % en laboratorios por estancia hospitalaria, una reducción del 26 % en laboratorios por día y un aumento del 49 % en los días sin laboratorio. No hubo diferencias en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (4 frente a 4; p = 0,79) ni en los reingresos (14,9% frente a 12,9%; p = 0,39). El grupo de no intervención no tuvo cambios significativos en el trabajo de laboratorio o en los días sin laboratorio, sin diferencias en la duración de la estadía (4 versus 4; p = 0,49) o reingresos (11,1% versus 11,0%; p = 0,96).LIMITACIONES:No se informaron datos demográficos ni tasa de complicaciones.CONCLUSIONES:Una intervención dirigida a pruebas de laboratorio reflexivas después de la cirugía colorrectal resultó en reducciones seguras, significativas y sostenidas en el trabajo de laboratorio post operatorio, con ahorros sustanciales de costos. Estos hallazgos provocaron un cambio en el orden del laboratorio establecido hacia un sistema de exclusión voluntaria, y se han implementado enfoques de reducción del trabajo de laboratorio en otras divisiones quirúrgicas. La continuación y difusión de estos esfuerzos son fundamentales para priorizar la atención quirúrgica de alto valor. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Digital Ink and Surgical Dreams: Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Essays in Residency Applications.

INTRODUCTION: Large language models like Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) are increasingly used in academic writing. Faculty may consider use of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated responses a form of cheating. We sought to determine whether general surgery residency faculty could detect AI versus human-written responses to a text prompt; hypothesizing that faculty would not be able to reliably differentiate AI versus human-written responses. METHODS: Ten essays were generated using a text prompt, "Tell us in 1-2 paragraphs why you are considering the University of Rochester for General Surgery residency" (Current trainees: n = 5, ChatGPT: n = 5). Ten blinded faculty reviewers rated essays (ten-point Likert scale) on the following criteria: desire to interview, relevance to the general surgery residency, overall impression, and AI- or human-generated; with scores and identification error rates compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups for %total points (ChatGPT 66.0 ± 13.5%, human 70.0 ± 23.0%, P = 0.508) or identification error rates (ChatGPT 40.0 ± 35.0%, human 20.0 ± 30.0%, P = 0.175). Except for one, all essays were identified incorrectly by at least two reviewers. Essays identified as human-generated received higher overall impression scores (area under the curve: 0.82 ± 0.04, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Whether use of AI tools for academic purposes should constitute academic dishonesty is controversial. We demonstrate that human and AI-generated essays are similar in quality, but there is bias against presumed AI-generated essays. Faculty are not able to reliably differentiate human from AI-generated essays, thus bias may be misdirected. AI-tools are becoming ubiquitous and their use is not easily detected. Faculty must expect these tools to play increasing roles in medical education.

Exposure to Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Medications Increases the Incidence of Pouchitis After Restorative Proctocolectomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is the most frequent complication after IPAA in patients with ulcerative colitis. Antibiotics represent the mainstay of treatment, suggesting a crucial role of dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of this condition. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents have been shown to adversely impact the gut microbiome and local host immunity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of prior exposure to biologics on the development of pouchitis in patients who have ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary-care IBD center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent restorative proctocolectomy between 2000 and 2010 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the incidence of pouchitis. RESULTS: Four hundred seventeen patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent IPAA were included. The incidence of pouchitis was 40.4%. There were no differences in patient demographics, disease-specific factors, surgical approach, and short-term postoperative complications between patients who developed pouchitis compared to those that did not. Patients exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents or preoperative steroids were significantly more likely to develop pouchitis (anti-tumor necrosis factor: 47.9% vs 36.5%, p = 0.027; steroids: 41.7% vs 23.3%, p = 0.048). However, on multivariable analysis, only anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy was an independent predictor for pouchitis (p = 0.05). Pouchitis was not associated with adverse long-term outcomes. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective design was a limitation of this study. CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis with at least a 5-year follow-up, anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure was the only independent risk factor for the development of pouchitis. These agents may "precondition" the pouch to develop pouchitis through alterations in the microbiome and/or local host immunity of the terminal ileum. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B19. LA EXPOSICIÓN A MEDICAMENTOS ANTI-TNF AUMENTA LA INCIDENCIA DE POUCHITIS DESPUÉS DE LA PROCTOCOLECTOMÍA RESTAURADORA EN PACIENTES CON COLITIS ULCEROSA:: La pouchitis es la complicación más frecuente después de la anastomosis anal de bolsa ileal en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa. Los antibióticos representan el pilar del tratamiento, lo que sugiere un papel crucial de la disbiosis en la patogénesis de esta afección. Se ha demostrado que los agentes anti-TNF tienen un impacto adverso en la microbiota intestinal y en la inmunidad local del huésped.El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el efecto de la exposición previa a terapía biológica sobre el desarrollo de la pouchitis en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa.Estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles.Centro de tercer nivel de atención en enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales.Pacientes consecutivos con colitis ulcerosa que se sometieron a proctocolectomía restaurativa entre 2000-2010.Incidencia de pouchitis.Cuatrocientos diecisiete pacientes con colitis ulcerativa se sometieron a anastomosis anal de bolsa ileal. La incidencia de pouchitis fue del 40.4%. No hubo diferencias en la demografía del paciente, los factores específicos de la enfermedad, el abordaje quirúrgico y las complicaciones postoperatorias a corto plazo entre los pacientes que desarrollaron pouchitis en comparación con los que no lo hicieron. Los pacientes expuestos a agentes anti-TNF o esteroides preoperatorios fueron significativamente más propensos a desarrollar pouchitis (anti-TNF: 47.9% vs 36.5%, p = 0.027; esteroides: 41.7% vs 23.3%, p = 0.048). Sin embargo, en el análisis multivariable, solo la terapia anti-TNF fue un predictor independiente para la pouchitis (p = 0.05). La pouchitis no se asoció con resultados adversos a largo plazo.Diseño retrospectivo.En una gran cohorte de pacientes sometidos a anastomosis anal de bolsa ileal para la colitis ulcerosa con al menos 5 años de seguimiento, la exposición a terapía anti-TNF fue el único factor de riesgo independiente para el desarrollo de pouchitis. Estos agentes pueden "precondicionar" la bolsa para desarrollar una pouchitis a través de alteraciones en el microbioma y / o inmunidad local del huésped del íleon terminal. Vea el Resumen del video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B19.

Abnormal Pouchogram Predicts Pouch Failure Even in Asymptomatic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic complications after restorative total proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis alter functional outcomes and quality of life and may lead to pouch failure. Routine contrast enema of the pouch assesses anastomotic integrity before ileostomy reversal, but its clinical use is challenged. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to assess the relationship among preoperative clinical characteristics, abnormal pouchography, and long-term pouch complications. DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center between 2000 and 2010. PATIENTS: Ulcerative colitis patients with IPAA undergoing pouchography before ileostomy closure were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, incidence of pouch-related complications, and findings on pouchogram were recorded. Primary outcome was pouch failure, defined as excision or permanent diversion of the ileoanal pouch. Independent predictors of pouch failure were determined by multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients with ulcerative colitis were included. Contrast extravasation was seen in 27 patients (10.3%): 14 (51.9%) were clinically asymptomatic at the time of pouchogram. Six (22.2%) of 27 patients with extravasation developed pouch failure despite normalization of the pouchogram before ileostomy closure. Forty patients (15.3%) were found to have pouch-anal anastomotic stenosis; only 1 developed pouch failure. Pre-IPAA serum albumin and hemoglobin levels were inversely associated with contrast extravasation (serum albumin: OR = 0.42; hemoglobin: OR = 0.77; p < 0.05). Contrast extravasation was associated with delayed takedown operation (average = 67 d), increased risk (OR = 5.25; p < 0.01), and shorter time (median = 32.0 vs 72.5 mo; HR = 5.88; p < 0.05) to pouch failure, as well as increased risk of pouch-related complications (p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective nature and small number of patients who developed pouch failure. CONCLUSIONS: Pouchography before ileostomy takedown is useful in identifying patients with ulcerative colitis at risk for postoperative complications. Radiologic resolution of IPAA-related leak does not reliably predict healing; caution is warranted in this subgroup. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A818.

Intestinal Stomas-Postoperative Stoma Care and Peristomal Skin Complications.

Intestinal stomas are necessary for several colon and rectal conditions and represent a major change in the new ostomate's daily life. Though dehydration is the most frequent etiology requiring readmission, irritant contact dermatitis and a host of other peristomal skin conditions are more common complications for ostomates. Wound, ostomy, and continence nurses are invaluable resources to both ostomy patients and providers. A few simple interventions can prevent or resolve most common peristomal complications. Good stoma care is possible in a resource-poor environment.

Dynamic Article: Tandem Robotic Technique of Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision and Rectus Abdominis Muscle Harvest for Immediate Closure of the Pelvic Floor Defect.

BACKGROUND: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for distal rectal cancers involves cylindrical excision of the mesorectum with wide division of the levator ani muscles. Although this technique has been shown to decrease local cancer recurrence and improve survival, it leaves the patient with a considerable pelvic floor defect that may require reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: We developed an innovative technique of robotic extralevator abdominoperineal excision combined with robotic harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle flap for immediate reconstruction of the pelvic floor defect. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review pilot study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer center. PATIENTS: Three patients who underwent robotic extralevator abdominoperineal excision with robotic rectus abdominis flap harvest for distal rectal adenocarcinoma were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes included operative time, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, wound complications, incidence of perineal hernia, persistent pain, and functional limitations. RESULTS: Three patients underwent this procedure. The median operative time was 522 minutes with median hospital stay of 6 days. One patient experienced perineal wound complication requiring limited incision and drainage followed by complete healing of the wound by secondary intention. The other 2 patients did not experience any wound complications. Longest follow-up was 16 months. None of the patients developed perineal hernias during this time period. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size and retrospective nature were limitations. CONCLUSIONS: This technique confers multiple advantages including improved visualization and dexterity within the pelvis and accurate wide margins at the pelvic floor. An incisionless robotic flap harvest with preservation of the anterior rectus sheath obviates the risk of ventral hernia while providing robust tissue closure of the radiated abdominoperineal excision wound. This technique may result in faster postoperative recovery, decreased morbidity, improved functional outcomes and cosmesis. Further studies are needed to prospectively analyze this approach (Supplemental Digital Content 1, video abstract, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A188).

A naturally occurring brominated furanone covalently modifies and inactivates LuxS.

Halogenated furanones, a group of natural products initially isolated from marine red algae, are known to inhibit bacterial biofilm formation, swarming, and quorum sensing. However, their molecular targets and the precise mode of action remain elusive. Herein, we show that a naturally occurring brominated furanone covalently modifies and inactivates LuxS (S-ribosylhomocysteine lyase, EC 4.4.1.21), the enzyme which produces autoinducer-2 (AI-2).

Imprecision in patient reports of dizziness symptom quality: a cross-sectional study conducted in an acute care setting.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify precision in patient reports of different attributes of dizziness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we interviewed consecutive adult patients with dizziness at 2 urban academic emergency departments (EDs) from July 2, 2005, to August 26, 2005. We excluded patients who were too sick for an interview or who posed a risk to the interviewer. We included those who were "dizzy, light-headed, or off-balance" for 7 days or less or previously "bothered" by the same conditions. We assessed descriptions of dizziness quality elicited by 4 questions in different formats (open-ended, multiresponse, single-choice, and directed). Clarity was assessed qualitatively (vague, circular) and quantitatively (overlap of types of dizziness). Consistency was measured by frequency of mismatched responses across question formats. Reliability was determined by test-retest. RESULTS: Of 1,342 patients screened, 872 (65%) were dizzy, light-headed, or off-balance in the past 7 days (n=677) or previously bothered by dizziness (n=195). Among these 872 patients with dizziness, 44% considered dizziness "the main reason" or "part of the reason" for the ED visit. Open-ended descriptions were frequently vague or circular. A total of 62% selected more than 1 dizziness type on the multiresponse question. On the same question, 54% did not pick 1 or more types endorsed previously in open description. Of 218 patients not identifying vertigo, spinning, or motion on the first 3 questions, 70% confirmed "spinning or motion" on directed questioning. Asked to choose the single best descriptor, 52% picked a different response on retest approximately 6 minutes later. By comparison, reports of dizziness duration and triggers were clear, consistent, and reliable. CONCLUSION: Descriptions of the quality of dizziness are unclear, inconsistent, and unreliable, casting doubt on the validity of the traditional approach to the patient with dizziness. Alternative approaches, emphasizing timing and triggers over type, should be investigated.

A stereospecific colorimetric assay for (S,S)-adenosylmethionine quantification based on thiopurine methyltransferase-catalyzed thiol methylation.

S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet) which is biologically synthesized by AdoMet synthetase bears an S configuration at the sulfur atom. The chiral sulfonium spontaneously racemizes to form a mixture of S and R isomers of AdoMet under physiological conditions or normal storage conditions. The chirality of AdoMet greatly affects its activity; the R isomer is not accepted as a substrate for AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases. We report a stereospecific colorimetric assay for (S,S)-adenosylmethionine quantification based on an enzyme-coupled reaction in which (S,S)-AdoMet reacts with 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoic acid to form AdoHcy and 2-nitro-5-methylthiobenzoic acid. The transformation is catalyzed by recombinant human thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT, EC 2.1.1.67) and is associated with a large spectral change at 410 nm. Accumulation of the S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) product, a feedback inhibitor of TPMT, slows the assay. AdoHcy nucleosidase (EC 3.2.2.9) irreversibly cleaves AdoHcy to adenine and S-ribosylhomocysteine, significantly shortening the assay time to less than 10 min. The assay is linear from 5 to at least 60 microM (S,S)-AdoMet.