Phase II randomized study of whole-brain radiation therapy with or without concurrent temozolomide for brain metastases from breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To improve the therapeutic index of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer, we investigated the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with temozolomide (TMZ) in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II multicenter prospective randomized study included patients with newly diagnosed intraparenchymal BMs from breast cancer, unsuitable for surgery or radiosurgery. All patients received conformal WBRT (3 Gy × 10-30 Gy), with or without concomitant TMZ administered at a dosage of 75 mg/m(2)/day during the irradiation period. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) 6 weeks after the end of treatment, defined as a partial or complete response on systematic brain MRI (modified WHO criteria). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), neurologic symptoms, and tolerability. RESULTS: Between February 2008 and November 2010, 100 patients were enrolled in the study (50 in the WBRT + TMZ arm, 50 in the WBRT arm). Median age was 55 years (29-79). Median follow-up was 9.4 months [1.0-68.1]. ORRs at 6 weeks were 36% in the WBRT arm and 30% in the WBRT + TMZ arm (NS). In the WBRT arm, median PFS was 7.4 months and median OS was 11.1 months. In the WBRT + TMZ arm, median PFS was 6.9 months and median OS was 9.4 months. Treatment was well tolerated in this arm: the most common ≥grade 2 acute toxicity was reversible lymphopenia. CONCLUSION: WBRT combined with TMZ did not significantly improve local control and survival in patients with BMs from breast cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00875355.

Clinical practice of breast cancer protontherapy: A single-centre experience from selection to treatment.

PURPOSE: Breast protontherapy efficiently limits cardiac, lung and contralateral breast exposure, which may clinically translate into better late tolerance profile compared with classic photon techniques. While breast protontherapy is already implemented in the United States and in some European countries, clinical experience of breast cancer protontherapy is currently limited in France. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical practice of breast cancer protontherapy at the Institut Curie in order to implement this technique at a larger scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from all breast cancer patients that have been addressed to the protontherapy centre of Orsay (CPO, Institut Curie) for adjuvant breast protontherapy were retrieved. We analysed why these patients were ultimately treated with protontherapy or not. RESULTS: Between November 2019 and November 2020, eleven breast cancer patients have been evaluated for adjuvant protontherapy at the CPO. Two of them were ultimately treated with proton beams; adjuvant breast protontherapy therapy was well tolerated. The nine other patients were not treated with protontherapy due to lack of availability of protontherapy treatment rooms in acceptable time limits, at the time of patient evaluation. CONCLUSION: Despite dosimetric advantages and excellent clinical tolerance, lack of availability of protontherapy machines currently limits wider implementation of breast protontherapy.

[Immunotherapy and radiotherapy for management of breast cancer: Rational and overview on clinical practice]. / Immunothérapie et radiothérapie dans la prise en charge du cancer du sein : rationnel et synthèse de la littérature sur les applications cliniques actuelles.

The discovery of immunotherapy led to understand the major role of immune system during the tumor process. Conventional treatments, such as chemotherapy, are directly tumoricidal. New drugs are developed to target specifically the immune system to make it regain its ability to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. Radiotherapy is used for a long time for its local action, but its systemic role, based on its impact on immunity, is now better known. Breast cancer was wrongly considered poorly immunogenic and put aside the amazing progress in this new area of treatment. In this article, we would like to present the pre-clinical and clinical rationales to associate immunotherapy to radiotherapy in the management of breast cancer.

Protontherapy of head and neck paragangliomas: A monocentric study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy of paragangliomas of the head and neck, rare benign tumours developed close to crucial structures such as cranial nerves and vascular tissues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with a paraganglioma of the head and neck were treated from 2001 to 2014 with image-guided proton therapy. Neurological and ear nose throat symptoms were collected in addition to audiometric testing, before and after the treatment. Acute and late toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 52.6years (range: 18.2-65.8years). Proton therapy was the exclusive treatment in six patients and four patients had a postoperative radiotherapy. Median dose was 50.4Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE; range: 45.0-67.0Gy). With a median follow-up of 24.6months (range: 6.7-46.2 months), local tumour control rate was 100% (stable, n=10). No upper grade 2 acute toxicity was reported. To the latest news, seven patients had controlled symptoms (improved, n=1, stabilized, n=6). One patient out of seven with initial tinnitus had a decrease in his symptoms, while the six other patients had a sustained stabilization. CONCLUSION: Proton beam therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment modality of skull base paragangliomas, with documented functional benefit. A longer follow-up is planned in order to assess local control and long-term toxicities.

[Follow-up after radiation therapy for cervical cancer]. / Suivi après radiothérapie pour un cancer du col utérin.

Radiation therapy plays a central role in treatment strategies of cervical cancer. Follow-up after external pelvic radiation therapy and brachytherapy is based upon French and international specific recommendations. It aims to assess early tumour response, and to detect local or metastatic recurrences which can be suitable for salvage treatment. Follow-up after radiation therapy for cervical cancer should also assess gastro-intestinal, urinary and sexual toxicities which may have an impact on quality of life. This is a major concern in the evaluation of the results of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and MRI-guided brachytherapy, which should lead to a better local control and to a better bowel tolerance.

[Radiotherapy plus concomitant systemic therapies for patients with brain metastases from breast cancer]. / Place de l'association radiothérapie encéphalique et thérapies systémiques dans le traitement des métastases cérébrales d'un cancer du sein.

The incidence of brain metastases from breast cancer is increasing with diagnosis and therapeutics progress, especially with systemic therapies. The occurrence of multiple brain metastases remains a delicate situation when surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery are not indicated, nor available. Treatment strategy is based on the patient's general condition and extracranial disease status. Whole brain radiation therapy remains the gold standard local treatment but its efficacy is limited with a median overall survival of 6 months. New strategies are needed for increasing survival and patients' quality of life. Combining radiation therapy and chemotherapy has been a subject of interest. This article sums up the different radiotherapy plus concomitant systemic therapies combinations for the treatment of brain metastases from breast cancer.