RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify plasma microRNA (miRNA) biomarkers for stratifying and monitoring patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with FOLFIRINOX, and to investigate their functional roles. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: FOLFIRINOX has become a standard therapy for patients with advanced PDAC and can be used to potentially downstage disease. However, only a subset of patients respond, and biomarkers to guide decision-making are urgently needed. METHODS: We used microarray-based profiling to discover deregulated miRNAs in pre- and postchemotherapy plasma samples from patients based on their progression-free survival (PFS) after FOLFIRINOX. Nine candidate plasma miRNAs were validated in an independent cohort (n = 43). The most discriminative plasma miRNA was correlated with clinicopathological factors and survival, and also investigated in an additional cohort treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Expression patterns were further evaluated in matched tumor tissues. In vitro studies explored its function, key downstream gene-targets, and interaction with 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. RESULTS: Plasma miR-181a-5p was significantly downregulated in non-progressive patients after FOLFIRINOX. In multivariate analysis, this decline correlated with improved PFS and overall survival, especially when combined with CA19-9 decline [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.153, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.067-0.347 and HR = 0.201, 95% CI, 0.070-0.576, respectively]. This combination did not correlate with survival in patients treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Tissue expression of miR-181a-5p reflected plasma levels. Inhibition of miR-181a-5p coupled with oxaliplatin exposure in pancreatic cell lines decreased cell viability. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma miR-181a-5p is a specific biomarker for monitoring FOLFIRINOX response. Decline in plasma miR-181a-5p and CA19-9 levels is associated with better prognosis after FOLFIRINOX and may be useful for guiding therapeutic choices and surgical exploration.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/sangre , Regulación hacia Abajo , MicroARNs/sangre , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , MicroARNs/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.85.
Asunto(s)
Exosomas/genética , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/genética , ARN Mensajero/biosíntesis , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/sangre , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Exosomas/efectos de los fármacos , Exosomas/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Melanoma/sangre , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/biosíntesis , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/inmunología , ARN Mensajero/sangre , ARN Mensajero/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The RESORCE trial showed that regorafenib improves overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma progressing during sorafenib treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.78; pâ¯<0.0001). This exploratory analysis describes outcomes of sequential treatment with sorafenib followed by regorafenib. METHODS: In RESORCE, 573 patients were randomized 2:1 to regorafenib 160â¯mg/day or placebo for 3â¯weeks on/1 week off. Efficacy and safety were evaluated by last sorafenib dose. The time from the start of sorafenib to death was assessed. Time to progression (TTP) in RESORCE was analyzed by TTP during prior sorafenib treatment. RESULTS: HRs (regorafenib/placebo) for OS by last sorafenib dose were similar (0.67 for 800â¯mg/day; 0.68 for <800â¯mg/day). Rates of grade 3, 4, and 5 adverse events with regorafenib by last sorafenib dose (800â¯mg/day vs. <800â¯mg/day) were 52%, 11%, and 15% vs. 60%, 10%, and 12%, respectively. Median times (95% CI) from the start of sorafenib to death were 26.0â¯months (22.6-28.1) for regorafenib and 19.2â¯months (16.3-22.8) for placebo. Median time from the start of sorafenib to progression on sorafenib was 7.2â¯months for the regorafenib arm and 7.1â¯months for the placebo arm. An analysis of TTP in RESORCE in subgroups defined by TTP during prior sorafenib in quartiles (Q) showed HRs (regorafenib/placebo; 95% CI) of 0.66 (0.45-0.96; Q1); 0.26 (0.17-0.40; Q2); 0.40 (0.27-0.60; Q3); and 0.54 (0.36-0.81; Q4). CONCLUSIONS: These exploratory analyses show that regorafenib conferred a clinical benefit regardless of the last sorafenib dose or TTP on prior sorafenib. Rates of adverse events were generally similar regardless of the last sorafenib dose. LAY SUMMARY: This analysis examined characteristics and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with regorafenib after they had disease progression during sorafenib treatment. Regorafenib provided clinical benefit to patients regardless of the pace of their disease progression during prior sorafenib treatment and regardless of their last sorafenib dose. The sequence of sorafenib followed by regorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma may extend survival beyond what has been previously reported. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01774344.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
FOLFIRINOX is a standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (aPC). The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) FOLFOXIRI regimen demonstrated efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate activity and tolerability of FOLFOXIRI regimen in patients with aPC and to explore putative prognostic factors. One hundred thirty-seven consecutive aPC patients were treated with FOLFOXIRI in our institution between 2008 and 2014. Clinical, laboratory and pathological data were collected and their association with activity, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated. After a median follow up of 30 months, median PFS and OS were 8.0 months (95% CI 6.19-9.81) and 12 months (95% CI 9.75-14.25), respectively. Response rate was 38.6%, while disease-control rate 72.2%. At multivariate analysis liver metastases (p = 0.019; Hazard Ratio, HR, 0.59, 95% Confidence Interval, CI, 0.380.96), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 1 (p = 0.001; HR 2.26, 95%CI 1.42-3.59) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)> 4 (p= 0.002; HR: 2.42; 95% CI 1.38-4.25) were associated with poorer OS. We categorized 119 pts with complete available data as good-risk (0 factors, 38 pts), intermediate-risk (1 factor, 49 pts) and poor-risk (≥2 factors, 32 pts). Median OS for these three groups were 17.6, 11.1 and 7.4 months, respectively (p < 0.001). FOLFOXIRI is active and feasible in aPC. Prognosis of aPC pts treated with FOLFOXIRI is influenced by easily available factors: our analysis revealed ECOG PS, liver metastases and NLR as the most important predictors of survival. These factors could be helpful for treatment decision and clinical trial design.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Leucocitos , Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neutrófilos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the combination of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as third-line chemotherapy (CT) in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patients pretreated with platinum derivatives, fluoropyrimidines, and taxanes. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of mGC patients treated with third-line FOLFIRI at our institution from 2009 to 2014. Eligible patients should be treated with a fluoropyrimidine-platinum first-line CT and a subsequent taxane-based second-line CT. FOLFIRI consisted of irinotecan 180 mg/m2 and leucovorin 200 mg/m2, followed by 5-fluorouracil 2,800 mg/m2 (administered as 48-hour i.v. continuous infusion from day 1 to 3), with cycles repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate (RR) was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.0, while progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included. The majority (97%) had good performance status (0-1 according to ECOG), while median PFS after first-line and second-line CT was 5.2 and 4.4 months, respectively. Two patients experienced an objective response (RR: 6%), while 14 patients achieved disease stabilization (disease control rate: 42%). Median PFS and OS from the start of third-line CT were 3.3 and 7.5 months, respectively. Hematological and nonhematological grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon and included neutropenia (6.1%), diarrhea (9.1%), vomiting (3%), and asthenia (3%). Febrile neutropenia was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: Third-line CT with FOLFIRI may be an option in heavily pretreated mGC patients with preserved performance status and organ function. This regimen has a favorable safety profile, and signs of activity have been observed after standard first- and second-line CT.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Astenia/inducido químicamente , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Irinotecán , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Estudios Prospectivos , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Retratamiento , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: FOLFIRINOX is a standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (aPC) and no accepted second-line regimen exists. MATERIAL & METHODS: We enrolled 71 aPC patients progressed to modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) treated with second-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: Five partial responses (7.1%) and 19 (27.1%) disease stabilizations were reported. After a median follow-up of 20.1 months, median progression-free survival was 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.1-2.9 months) and median overall survival was 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.3-7.1 months). At multivariate analysis, CA19.9 level ≥ 59 upper normal limit resulted associated with worse survival (hazard ratio: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.12-4.78; p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Salvage chemotherapy could be useful for a subgroup of aPC patients. Prognostic factors might be helpful to identify patients with greater benefit.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Retratamiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poor and is largely influenced by associated liver comorbidities. Moreover, effective treatment alternatives are limited; with the exception of the multitargeted inhibitor sorafenib, established options in the treatment of advanced HCC no longer amenable with ablative or locoregional procedures are lacking. In light of the limited efficacy of chemotherapy in this setting, great efforts have been made in the definition of targetable molecular pathways with a central role in the progression of HCC. Targeting angiogenesis, growth factor receptors, intracellular transduction pathways, or mechanisms of gene-expression regulation represents the main way to improve patient outcome. At the same time, identifying clinical and biological factors, which may help selecting patients with higher chances of benefit, is essential in order to hasten drug development and maximize treatment efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, without activating mutations and with PD-L1≥50%, Pembrolizumab monotherapy is the therapeutic standard in Europe. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retrospectively the safety and efficacy of this drug and to investigate potential prognostic factors in daily clinical practice. METHODS: From September 2017 to September 2019, 205 consecutive patients from 14 Italian Medical Oncology Units were enrolled in the study. Gender, Age (> or <70 years), ECOG-PS (0-1 or 2), histology (squamous or nonsquamous), presence of brain, bone and liver metastases at baseline, PD-L1 score (>90% or <90%), smoking status (never or former or current) were applied to the stratified log-rank. Cox's proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 15.2 months, median progression-free and overall survival (mPFS and mOS) were 9.2 months (95% C.I., 4.8-13.5) and 15.9 months (95% C.I., not yet evaluable), respectively. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 2 had mPFS of 2.8 months (95% C.I., 2.1-3.4) and mOS of 3.9 months (95% C.I., 2.5-5.3). Patients with liver metastases at diagnosis had an mPFS of 3.2 months (95% C.I., 0.6-5.8) and an mOS of 6.0 months (95% C.I., 3.7-8.4). At multivariate analysis for OS gender, ECOG-PS 2, and presence of liver metastases were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Patients with ECOG-PS 2 derived little benefit from the use of first-line pembrolizumab. In patients with liver metastases, the association of pembrolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy could be a better option than pembrolizumab alone.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antígeno B7-H1 , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Colorectal liver metastases (CLM) represent a major challenge for oncologists and surgeons. In fact, in this setting, the optimal treatment of patients can achieve a long-term survival and sometimes a definitive cure of disease. In recent years, improvements in both medical therapies and surgical approaches have led to an increased rate of patients considered amenable for surgery on CLM. New perspectives in the management of CLM underline the need for a comprehensive assessment of patient and tumor characteristics, to integrate technical and prognostic issues into an individualized therapeutic strategy in different patient subgroups. The multidisciplinary evaluation from the onset and during treatment remains the key element to maximizing the benefit of more intensive treatment modalities.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Hígado/patología , Hígado/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Panitumumab , Pronóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an increased mortality in nursing homes due to its quick spread and the age-related high lethality. RESULTS: We observed a two-month mortality of 40%, compared to 6.4% in the previous year. This increase was seen in both COVID-19 positive (43%) and negative (24%) residents, but 8 patients among those testing negative on the swab, tested positive on serological tests. Increased mortality was associated with male gender, older age, no previous vitamin D supplementation and worse "activities of daily living (ADL)" scores, such as Barthel index, Tinetti scale and S.OS.I.A. CONCLUSION: Our data confirms a higher geriatric mortality due to COVID-19. Negative residents also had higher mortality, which we suspect is secondary to preanalytical error and a low sensitivity of the swab test in poorly compliant subjects. Male gender, older age and low scores on ADL scales (probably due to immobility) are risk factors for COVID-19 related mortality. Finally, mortality was inversely associated with vitamin D supplementation. DESIGN: In this observational study, we described the two-month mortality among the 157 residents (age 60-100) of a nursing home after Sars-CoV-2 spreading, reporting the factors associated with the outcome. We also compared the diagnostic tests for Sars-CoV-2.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Casas de Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , Actividades Cotidianas , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Pandemias , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores Sexuales , Vitamina D/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: After meals, highly acidic gastric juice is present in the subcardial region, the so-called acid pocket. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have a higher frequency of acidic reflux. Our aim was to investigate the possible differences in subcardial pH in GERD over 24 h and the role of hiatal hernia (HH), using a wireless capsule. METHODS: A total of 14 healthy volunteers (4 men, 24-60 years), 10 GERD patients without HH (4 men, 25-68 years), and 11 GERD patients with HH >or=3 cm (2 men, 46-74 years) underwent 24-h wireless pH monitoring 2 cm below the squamocolumnar junction. All patients had increased 24-h acid reflux. A standardized lunch was given to all study subjects. RESULTS: No capsule detached during the 24-h recording. Median 24-h pH was similar in healthy subjects, and in patients without and with HH, median: 1.4 (interquartile range: 1.2 -1.9), 1.5 (1.3 -1.7), and 1.4 (1.3 -1.7), respectively. Similar results were seen in the supine period. Median pH after the standardized meal was often highly acidic, 2.7 (1.5 - 3.2), 1.9 (1.6 - 2.3), and 2.5 (1.6 - 3.2), respectively. The first minute with a median pH <2 occurred 14 min (4 - 49), 14 min (6 - 25), and 20 min (4 - 43), respectively, P=NS, after the end of the meal. Similar data were observed on pooling all meals together. CONCLUSIONS: Subcardial pH is confirmed to be highly acidic early after meals, but it is similar over 24 h in healthy subjects and GERD patients independent of the presence of HH.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Monitorización del pH Esofágico/instrumentación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Hernia Hiatal/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Impedancia Eléctrica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Determinación de la Acidez Gástrica , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posprandial , Valores de Referencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Posición Supina , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The evaluation of molecular targets in gastric cancer has demonstrated the predictive role of HER2 amplification for trastuzumab treatment in metastatic gastric cancer. Besides HER2, other molecular targets are under evaluation in metastatic gastric tumors. However, very little is known about their role in resected tumors. We evaluated the expression of HER2, EGFR, MET, AKT1 and phospho-mTOR in resected stage II-III adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with resected stomach (63%) or gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas (27%) were evaluated. Antibodies anti-HER2, EGFR, MET, AKT1 and phospho-mTOR were used for immunostaining of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides. Using FISH, HER2 amplification was evaluated in cases with an intermediate (+2) staining. RESULTS: EGFR overexpression (11%) was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (3-year OS: 47% vs 77%; Log-Rank p= 0.033). MET overexpression (36%) was associated with a trend for a worse survival (3-year OS: 65% vs 77%; Log-Rank p= 0.084). HER2 amplification/overexpression and mTOR hyper-phosphorylation were observed in 13% and 48% of tumors, respectively. AKT1 overexpression (8%) was not a prognostic factor by itself (p= 0.234). AKT1 and EGFR overexpression was mutually exclusive and patients with EGFR or AKT1 overexpression experienced a poor prognosis (3-year OS: 52% vs. 79%, Log-Rank p= 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: EGFR is confirmed a poor prognostic factor in resected gastric cancers. We firstly describe a mutually exclusive overexpression of EGFR and AKT1 with potential prognostic implications, suggesting the relevance of this pathway for the growth of gastric cancers.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Terapia Combinada , Receptores ErbB/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although sorafenib is the upfront standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), molecular predictors of efficacy have not been identified yet. In the ALICE-1 study, rs2010963 of VEGF-A and VEGF-C proved to be independent predictive factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis. The ALICE-1 study results were confirmed in the ALICE-2 study, in which VEGF and VEGFR SNPs were analyzed. In the ePHAS study we analyzed the SNPs of eNOS. In univariate analysis, patients homozygous for an eNOS haplotype (HT1: T-4b at eNOS-786/eNOS VNTR) had significantly shorter median PFS and OS than those with other haplotypes. These data were confirmed in the validation set. METHODS: This nonpharmacological, interventional, prospective multicenter study aims to determine whether eNOS, HIF-1, VEGF, Ang2 and VEGFR polymorphisms play a role in predicting the objective response rate, PFS, and OS of advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib. The study will involve 160 advanced HCC patients with Child-Pugh class A disease. The primary aim is to validate the prognostic or predictive roles of eNOS, Ang2, HIF-1, VEGF and VEGFR polymorphisms in relation to the clinical outcome (PFS) of HCC patients treated with sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data may suggest that polymorphism analysis of the VEGF, VEGFR-2, HIF and eNOS genes can identify HCC patients who are more likely to benefit from sorafenib.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neovascularización Patológica/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Angiopoyetina 2/genética , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/genética , Masculino , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo III/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genética , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial VascularRESUMEN
Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is still lacking of reliable markers to monitor tumor response. CA 19-9 is the only biomarker approved, despite it has several limitations in sensitivity and specificity. Since mutations of KRAS occur in more than 90% of tumors, its detection in circulating free tumor DNA (cftDNA) could represent a biomarker to monitor chemotherapy response. Twenty-seven advanced PDAC patients given first-line 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin or gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel were enrolled. Three ml of plasma were collected: 1) before starting chemotherapy (baseline); 2) at day 15 of treatment; and 3) at each clinical follow-up. cftDNA was extracted and analysed for KRAS mutations (mutKRAS) by digital droplet PCR. Nineteen patients displayed a mutKRAS in baseline plasma samples. There was a statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with increase vs. stability/reduction of cftDNA in the sample collected at day 15 (median PFS 2.5 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.03; median OS 6.5 vs 11.5 months, p = 0.009). The results of this study demonstrate that cftDNA mutKRAS changes are associated with tumor response to chemotherapy and support the evidence that mutKRAS in plasma may be used as a new marker for monitoring treatment outcome and disease progression in PDAC.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , ADN Tumoral Circulante/análisis , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Proteínas Mutantes/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Plasma/química , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Recently, the development of the third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-small molecule inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) rociletinib had failed. In this review, the wide-ranging aspects of the evolution of EGFR-TKIs were collected, with a special focus on rociletinib. The influence of different oncogenic mutations on EGFR activity was also discussed. Resistance to the first (erlotinib, gefitinib)- and second (afatinib)-generation EGFR-TKIs provided the rationale behind the development of the third-generation inhibitors (rociletinib, osimertinib). On the basis of these data, a comparison of their efficacy on the different mutated EGFRs and the respective resistance mechanisms is further reported. Moreover, the evolution and results of the clinical trials of rociletinib (TIGER trials) are compared with the trials on osimertinib, another third-generation EGFR-TKI that now has been granted US Food and Drug Administration approval. The reasons behind the arrest in the further development of rociletinib are put in the perspective of future drug development.
RESUMEN
Epigenetic mechanisms are involved in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer pathogenesis. Insights into the molecular basis of GI carcinogenesis led to the identification of different epigenetic pathways and signatures that may play a role as therapeutic targets in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and non-colorectal GI tumors. Among these alterations, O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation is the most investigated biomarker and seems to be an early and frequent event, at least in CRC. Loss of expression of MGMT as a result of gene promoter methylation has been associated with interesting activity of alkylating agents in mCRC. However, the optimal methods for the definition of the MGMT status and additional predictive factors beyond MGMT in GI malignancies are lacking. Here we review the current role of MGMT methylation and other epigenetic alterations as potential treatment targets in GI tumors.
Asunto(s)
Metilación de ADN , Metilasas de Modificación del ADN/genética , Enzimas Reparadoras del ADN/genética , Epigénesis Genética , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/genética , Farmacogenética , Proteínas Supresoras de Tumor/genética , HumanosRESUMEN
Pancreatic cancer is an extremely aggressive disease; although progress has been made in the last few years, the prognosis of these patients remains dismal. FOLFIRINOX is now considered a standard treatment in first-line setting, since it demonstrated an improved overall and progression-free survival vs gemcitabine alone. However, the enthusiasm over the benefit of this three-drug regimen is tempered by the associated increased toxicity profile, and many efforts have been made to improve the feasibility of this schedule. After a more recent phase III trial showing an improved outcome over gemcitabine, the combination of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel emerged as another standard first-line treatment. However, this treatment is also associated with more side effects. In addition, despite initial promising data on the predictive role of SPARC levels, recent studies showed that these levels are not associated with nab-paclitaxel efficacy. The choice to use this treatment over FOLFIRINOX is therefore a topic of debate, also because no validated biomarkers to guide FOLFIRINOX treatment are available. In the era of actionable mutations and target agents it would be desirable to identify molecular factors or biomarkers to predict response to therapy in order to maximize the efficacy of treatment and avoid useless toxic effects for non-responding patients. However, until today the milestone of treatment for pancreatic cancer remains chemotherapy combinations, without predictive or monitoring tools existing to optimize therapy. This review analyzes the state-of-the-art treatments, promises and limitations of targeted therapies, ongoing trials and future perspectives, including potential role of microRNAs as predictive biomarkers.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicina de Precisión , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Irinotecán , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a predictor of clinical outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, its predictive role in the clinical outcomes of sorafenib treatment has been poorly documented. The correlation between LDH levels and clinical outcomes in HCC patients treated with sorafenib and included in the nationwide Italian database ITA.LI.CA was investigated here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ITA.LI.CA database contains data for 5,136 HCC patients. All patients treated with sorafenib treatment and with available LDH values were considered. Overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were compared in patients with LDH levels above and below a defined threshold, determined through an ROC analysis. An explorative analysis investigated the relationship between the variation of LDH levels during treatment and response to sorafenib. RESULTS: Baseline LDH levels were available for 97 patients. The most accurate cutoff value for LDH concentration was 297 U/L. Patients with LDH values above (n=45) and below (n=52) this threshold showed equal OS (12.0 months) and TTP (4.0 months) values. Data on LDH levels during sorafenib treatment were reported for 10 patients. LDH values decreased in 3 patients (mean difference = -219 U/L) who also reported a prolonged OS and TTP versus those with unmodified/increased LDH (OS: NE (not evaluated) vs. 8.0 months, p=0.0083; TTP: 19.0 vs. 3.0 months, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefits of sorafenib do not seem to be influenced by baseline LDH. According to the results of an explorative analysis, however, a decreased LDH concentration during sorafenib might be associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/sangre , L-Lactato Deshidrogenasa/sangre , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangre , Anciano , Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After progression to a standard first-line platinum and gemcitabine combination (GP), there is no established second-line therapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (aBTC). Indeed, literature data suggest limited activity of most second-line agents evaluated so far. METHODS: We collected a large retrospective series of aBTC patients treated with second-line chemotherapy after progression to a first-line GP regimen at different Italian institutions. We then pooled the data with those reported in previous studies, which were identified with a Medline search and the on-line abstract datasets of major international oncology meetings. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were included in the multicenter survey: response rate (RR) with second-line chemotherapy was low (3.4 %), with median PFS and OS of 3.0 months and 6.6 months, respectively. At multivariate analysis, preserved performance status, low CA19.9 levels and absence of distant metastases were favorable prognostic factors. Data from other five presented or published series were identified, for a total of 499 patients included in the pooled analysis. The results confirmed marginal activity of second-line chemotherapy (RR: 10.2 %), with limited efficacy in unselected patient populations (median PFS: 3.1 months; median OS: 6.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis highlights the limited value of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line GP combination in aBTC. While waiting for effective biologic agents in this setting, ongoing randomized trials will identify the optimal second-line chemotherapy regimen and validate prognostic factors for individual patient management.