Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País como asunto
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 93(10): 1018-24, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25060716

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if ultrasound-determined occipito-transverse position early in the second stage of labor is associated with operative delivery. DESIGN: Retrospective review of two prospective cohort studies. SETTING: An Australian tertiary referral hospital. POPULATION: Women with term, cephalic singleton pregnancies. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from two prospective studies. Logistic regression was undertaken to assess the independent contribution of the occipito-transverse position to operative delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Operative delivery (cesarean section, forceps or vacuum extraction). RESULTS: Among 422 women included, the occipito-transverse position was present in 80, occipito-anterior in 303 and the occipito-posterior in 39. Compared with occipito-anterior, the adjusted odds ratio for operative delivery was 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.2-3.8, p = 0.02) for the occipito-transverse position, and 7.4 (95% confidence interval 3.2-17) for the occipito-posterior position. Factors that independently predicted operative delivery were nulliparity, abnormal second stage cardiotocography, maternal place of birth and epidural analgesia. The length of second stage of labor was longer for the occipito-transverse group than for the occipito-anterior group (median 2 h 7 min vs. 1 h 36 min, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The occipito-transverse position early in the second stage of labor was associated with an increased operative delivery rate.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Presentación en Trabajo de Parto , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Monitoreo Fetal/métodos , Monitoreo Fetal/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nacimiento a Término/fisiología , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 53(3): 265-70, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23346873

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of occipito-posterior position in the second stage of labour on operative delivery. METHODS: Double-blinded prospective cohort study of ultrasound determined occiput-posterior position during the second stage of labour compared with occiput-anterior position. The primary outcome was operative (caesarean section, forceps or vacuum) delivery. RESULTS: A total of 68% (13/19) women in the occiput-posterior group, and 27% (39/141) in the occiput-anterior group had an operative delivery (unadjusted: P < 0.001). Caesarean section was performed in 37% and 5%, respectively (P < 0.001). The occiput-posterior group had a longer second stage (mean 2 h 59 minutes vs 1 h 54 minutes; P = 0.001) and larger infants (mean 3723 g vs 3480 g, P = 0.024). In the logistic regression, occiput-posterior position, nulliparity, abnormal second stage cardiotocograph and epidural analgesia were independent predictors for operative delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Occiput-posterior position early in the second stage of labour is strongly associated with operative delivery. There is potential to explore interventions such as manual rotation.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Extracción Obstétrica , Presentación en Trabajo de Parto , Segundo Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Forceps Obstétrico , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Extracción Obstétrica por Aspiración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda