Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(7): 410, 2024 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839667

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Alopecia is a common side-effect of chemotherapy and can be extremely distressing to patients. Scalp cooling can be used to reduce hair loss, but the optimal duration of cooling remains unclear. Our aim was to determine whether increasing the duration of scalp cooling improves hair preservation. METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative, non-metastatic, breast cancer received scalp cooling during adjuvant chemotherapy: three cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by three cycles of paclitaxel. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (n=18) wore a Paxman cooling cap during each infusion and for 30 min post-infusion while Group B (n=19) wore the cap from 30 min before to 2 h after each infusion. All patients were asked to complete a questionnaire recording hair loss/regrowth, adverse events, and quality of life. Success of treatment was defined as <50% hair loss. RESULTS: The success rates after each of the three cycles did not differ significantly between the two groups (EC: Group A: 40%, Group B: 44%; paclitaxel: Group A: 50%, Group B: 36%; p>0.05). Hair regrowth was significantly higher in Group B at the 8-week follow-up, but not at the 6-month follow-up. Head discomfort affected more patients in Group B than in Group A during the first session (94% vs. 62%, respectively; p=0.039). CONCLUSION: Long duration scalp cooling during chemotherapy might increase patients' discomfort and does not appear to improve hair preservation.


Asunto(s)
Alopecia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias de la Mama , Ciclofosfamida , Epirrubicina , Paclitaxel , Calidad de Vida , Cuero Cabelludo , Humanos , Alopecia/prevención & control , Alopecia/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos Piloto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Adulto , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Epirrubicina/efectos adversos , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Pharmacol Res ; 136: 56-61, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30142421

RESUMEN

Δ4-abiraterone (Δ4A) is an activemetabolite of abiraterone (ABI), which is approved in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The contribution of Δ4A to the clinical antitumor activity of ABI remains unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between plasma Δ4A concentration and survival in 36 mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/day) plus prednisone (10 mg/day). Plasma trough ABI and Δ4A concentrations were monthly assayed using liquid chromatography during the first 3 months of treatment. ABI and Δ4A Cmin were defined as the mean of trough concentrations measured for each patient. Predictive factors regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored using univariate Cox model. Mean plasma ABI and Δ4A Cmin were 12.6 ± 6.8 ng/mL and 1.6 ± 1.3 ng/mL, respectively. The mean metabolic ratio Δ4A/ABI was of 0.18 ± 0.25. In regard with in vitro pharmacodynamic data, effective plasma concentrations for ABI and Δ4A were reached in 30 patients (83.3%) and only 2 patients (5.6%), respectively. Higher Δ4A Cmin was associated with shorter OS (Hazard ratio, HR 1.54; CI95% 1.06-2.22; p = 0.022) but not with PFS. The HR associated with the metabolic Δ4A/ABI ratio for PFS and OS were 7.80 (CI 95% 1.63-37.38; p = 0.010) and 12.52 (CI 95% 1.95-80.47, p = 0.0078), respectively. The present study shows Δ4A is unlikely to have meaningful contribution to pharmacodynamic activity of ABI in mCPRC, rather that higher plasma Δ4A concentration is associated with worse clinical outcomes. A high Δ4A/ABI metabolic ratio could help to identify mCRPC patients with poorer survival.


Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona/farmacocinética , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/farmacocinética , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/uso terapéutico , Androstenos/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetato de Abiraterona/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/sangre , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia
4.
Invest New Drugs ; 32(3): 569-72, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24399106

RESUMEN

Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor that targets the VEGF, PDGF and BRAF pathways, has demonstrated significant clinical activity in metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. However, all patients eventually experience disease progression with a median progression-free survival close to 10 months. Since sorafenib exposure is known to decrease over time, we hypothesized that dose adjustments aiming to restore adequate exposure could lead to further clinical activity. We report, as a proof of concept on a patient with radio-iodine resistant metastatic thyroid cancer, who experienced disease progression after an initial response to sorafenib (400 mg twice daily). Whereas the thyroglobulin-progression-free survival at standard doses was 6 months, iterative dose optimization led to a prolonged progression-free survival up to 41 months. Sorafenib doses were increased up to 1600 mg bid, in order to maintain clinical activity, and to restore active plasma concentration, since sorafenib exposure had decreased over the time. Toxicity was mild and manageable for more than 2 years. However, the patient eventually experienced grade 3 proteinuria leading to treatment discontinuation. This observation opens up new horizons for daily management of radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patients progressing under standard doses of sorafenib, and stress the need to monitor its plasma concentration.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/sangre , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/efectos adversos , Niacinamida/sangre , Niacinamida/farmacocinética , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/sangre , Compuestos de Fenilurea/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/sangre , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Sorafenib , Tiroglobulina/sangre , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/sangre , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología
5.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 63(7): 1025-1036, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963459

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trough abiraterone concentration (ABI Cmin) of 8.4 ng/mL has been identified as an appropriate efficacy threshold in patients treated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of the phase II OPTIMABI study was to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacokinetics (PK)-guided dose escalation of abiraterone acetate (AA) in underexposed patients with mCRPC with early tumour progression. METHODS: This multicentre, non-randomised study consisted of two sequential steps. In step 1, all patients started treatment with 1000 mg of AA once daily. Abiraterone Cmin was measured 22-26 h after the last dose intake each month during the first 12 weeks of treatment. In step 2, underexposed patients (Cmin < 8.4 ng/mL) with tumour progression within the first 6 months of treatment were enrolled and received AA 1000 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the rate of non-progression at 12 weeks after the dose doubling. During step 1, adherence to ABI treatment was assessed using the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. A post-hoc analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK) data was conducted using Bayesian estimation of Cmin from samples collected outside the sampling guidelines (22-26 h). RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), 81 patients were included in step 1. In all, 21 (26%) patients were underexposed in step 1, and 8 of them (38%) experienced tumour progression within the first 6 months. A total of 71 patients (88%) completed the Girerd self-reported questionnaire. Of the patients, 62% had a score of 0, and 38% had a score of 1 or 2 (minimal compliance failure), without a significant difference in mean ABI Cmin in the two groups. Four patients were enrolled in step 2, and all reached the exposure target (Cmin > 8.4 ng/mL) after doubling the dose, but none met the primary endpoint. In the post-hoc analysis of PK data, 32 patients (39%) were underexposed, and ABI Cmin was independently associated with worse progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-5.81; p = 0.03], in contrast to the ITT analysis. CONCLUSION: The ITT and per-protocol analyses showed no statistical association between ABI underexposure and an increased risk of early tumour progression in patients with mCRPC, while the Bayesian estimator showed an association. However, other strategies than dose escalation at the time of progression need to be evaluated. Treatment adherence appeared to be uniformly good in the present study. Finally, the use of a Bayesian approach to recover samples collected outside the predefined blood collection time window could benefit the conduct of clinical trials based on drug monitoring. OPTIMABI trial is registered as National Clinical Trial number NCT03458247, with the EudraCT number 2017-000560-15).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Androstenos/administración & dosificación , Androstenos/farmacocinética , Androstenos/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Acetato de Abiraterona/farmacocinética , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/sangre , Metástasis de la Neoplasia
7.
Eur J Cancer ; 129: 117-122, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32151941

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate (abiraterone) combined with prednisone is a standard of care in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Recently, benefit in overall survival was reported in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer also, and an extension of indication has been granted. Abiraterone is seldom associated with liver toxicity. The clinical management and the outcome of patients with transaminase increase while on abiraterone have not been described. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We identified 25 men with metastatic prostate cancer and liver function test disorders occurring while on abiraterone treatment from December 2009 to September 2017 in three oncology centres in France. RESULTS: Forty-six liver disorder events occurred in 25 patients while on abiraterone treatment. The median age at liver function test increase was 67 (55-85) years. The incidence of aspartate aminotransférase (AST) (24 events) and that of alanine aminotransférase (ALT) (22 events) increases were similar. Liver toxicity was of grade 1, 2 and 3 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. version 4) in 7 (32%), 6 (27%) and 9 (41%) patients for ALT, and in 12 (50%), 6 (25%) and 6 (25%) for AST, respectively. The median time from abiraterone initiation to the detection of liver toxicity was 7.1 (4-95) weeks. The median time from highest ALT/AST increase to normalisation was 6.2 [2-14] weeks. In 13 patients (52%), liver tests spontaneously returned to baseline values, while abiraterone was continued at full dose. CONCLUSION: Liver function test increase is a rare event that typically occurs within the first two months on abiraterone. Most patients experience normalisation of the tests, either spontaneously or after dose reduction/discontinuation.


Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/sangre , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/prevención & control , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Incidencia , Pruebas de Función Hepática/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Metástasis Linfática/tratamiento farmacológico , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Remisión Espontánea
8.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 18(2): 155-160, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31630979

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Enzalutamide (ENZA) is an oral androgen receptor inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). ENZA is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 into N-desmethyl ENZA (NDE), an active metabolite. We aimed to explore the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship for ENZA and NDE in metastatic CRPC patients from a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Trough plasma concentration (Ctrough) of ENZA and NDE were assayed using liquid chromatography coupled with UV detection. The relationship between ENZA, NDE, and composite (ENZA with NDE) plasma concentration and requirement of ENZA dose reduction was investigated using the Mann-Whitney test. A survival univariate analysis was conducted to explore association between progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and plasma Ctrough (ENZA, NDE, and composite). RESULTS: Twenty-two metastatic CRPC patients treated with ENZA (median age, 75.5 years; 13 patients (59%) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0-1) were prospectively included. Mean plasma Ctrough of ENZA and NDE were 12.4 ± 3.0 µg/mL and 8.8 ± 2.1 µg/mL, respectively. Neither PFS nor OS were statistically associated with ENZA, NDE, or composite plasma Ctrough. In 4 patients (18%) who required ENZA dose reduction because of severe clinical toxicity, an increased ENZA plasma Ctrough was observed compared with 18 remaining patients (16.1 ± 2.4 µg/mL vs. 11.6 ± 2.6 µg/mL, respectively; P = .027). CONCLUSION: The low interindividual variability in ENZA and NDE Ctrough and the lack of relationship with survival do not support the need for plasma drug monitoring. Severe asthenia might be related to higher exposure and could be improved by decreasing ENZA dosing.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/administración & dosificación , Astenia/diagnóstico , Monitoreo de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/farmacocinética , Astenia/inducido químicamente , Benzamidas , Variación Biológica Poblacional , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangre , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína/administración & dosificación , Feniltiohidantoína/efectos adversos , Feniltiohidantoína/farmacocinética , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
9.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 11: 2801-2811, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29033542

RESUMEN

Since 2005, the approved first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma consists in tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs). Axitinib is an oral second-generation TKI and a potent VEGFR inhibitor with a half maximal inhibitory concentration for the VEGF family receptors 10-fold lower than other TKIs. Axitinib activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients has been studied in various settings and particularly as second-line treatment. In this setting, axitinib with clinically based dose escalation compared to sorafenib has demonstrated an improvement in progression-free survival in a randomized Phase III trial leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval. In the first-line setting, axitinib failed to demonstrate improved efficacy over sorafenib, but the field of RCC treatment is rapidly changing with novel TKIs as cabozantinib or the emergence of check point inhibitors as nivolumab and the place of axitinib in therapy is therefore challenged. In this review, we focus on axitinib pharmacological and clinical properties in RCC patients and discuss its place in the treatment of patients with RCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Axitinib , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Imidazoles/farmacocinética , Imidazoles/toxicidad , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Indazoles/toxicidad , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad
10.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 79(5): 1051-1055, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28361167

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Abiraterone acetate combined with prednisone improves survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. This oral anticancer agent may result in drug-drug interactions (DDI). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of DDI with abiraterone and the possible determinants for the occurrence of these DDI. METHODS: We performed a single centre retrospective review from electronic medical records of mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone from 2011 to 2015. Potential DDI with abiraterone were identified using Micromedex and were categorized by a 4-point scale severity. RESULTS: Seventy-two out of ninety-five mCRPC pts (median age: 77 years [68-82]) had comorbidities. The median number of drugs used per patient was 7 [5-9]. 66 potential DDI with abiraterone were detected in 49 patients (52%): 39 and 61% were classified as major and moderate DDI, respectively. In the univariate analysis, pain (p < 0.0001), hypo-albuminemia (p = 0.032), and higher ECOG performance status (PS) (p = 0.013) were significantly associated with a higher risk of DDI with abiraterone. Pain (p < 0.0001) and PS (p = 0.018) remained significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy is an issue among mCRPC patients. In our study, half of the patients have potential DDI with abiraterone. Patients with pain and poor PS are at higher risk of DDI with abiraterone. A medication review by a pharmacist is of crucial importance to prevent DDI with abiraterone.


Asunto(s)
Androstenos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Androstenos/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Dolor/epidemiología , Farmacéuticos , Polifarmacia , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 15(5): 499-507, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25907705

RESUMEN

Axitinib is the most recent targeted therapy approved by the US FDA and EMA in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). It is a second-generation, orally available, potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting selectively VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2 and -3, resulting in inhibition of angiogenesis, metastasis and tumor growth. Based on the results of a randomized pivotal Phase III clinical trial, axitinib stands as one of the two recommended agents for patients with mRCC who progressed after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Its potent and selective inhibition of VEGFR was the rationale for its development in the second-line setting after failure of prior cytokines or sunitinib. Here we examine the preclinical and clinical data of axitinib for mRCC, and its use in the treatment algorithm.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Algoritmos , Axitinib , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Imidazoles/farmacología , Indazoles/farmacología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores
12.
F1000Res ; 3: 159, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25254107

RESUMEN

Patients with the Birt-Hogg-Dubé cancer susceptibility syndrome are at high risk of developing renal cell carcinoma, pulmonary cysts and pneumothorax, and skin lesions called fibrofolliculomas. Here we report the case of a Birt-Hogg-Dubé patient with a primary clear cell carcinoma of the thyroid (a very rare type of thyroid cancer), and FLCN loss of heterozygosity within the tumour, providing molecular evidence for this association. Our findings expand the tumour spectrum associated with this syndrome. It is paramount to identify individuals with Birt-Hogg-Dubé so that they, and subsequently their affected relatives, can benefit from tailored cancer screening and prevention.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda