RESUMEN
Angioplasty is the usual method for the treatment of stenosis of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis, along with fibrinolysis and thrombus aspiration. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of interventional radiology procedures in the treatment of stenosis or occlusion of arteriovenous fistulas. One hundred thirteen patients suffering from malfunction of arteriovenous fistulas underwent interventional radiological procedures (140 treatments). In all patients color-Doppler was performed beforehand. Stenosis at the site of the fistula was found in all patients and was treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); stenosis at the anastomosis site was found in 63 cases and was treated by angioplasty with a microcatheter. In 40 patients suffering from recent thrombotic occlusion, locoregional thrombolysis and PTA were necessary. Technical and clinical success was achieved in 107 patients (94.6%); in 1 of 6 unsuccessful treatments the procedure had to be interrupted due to the rupture of a vein. Follow-up exams demonstrated primary patency in 92.5%, 71.9% and 49.5% of patients at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years, respectively. In 19 patients (17.7%) hemodynamically significant restenosis was observed, which was treated with multiple PTAs (27 treatments, only 1 of which with a negative outcome), resulting in a 94.2% success rate; only 1 patient had to undergo a fourth PTA. The overall patency rate was 95%, 87.2%, 62.3% at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years, respectively. In our experience immediate success and excellent patency rates were observed, which persisted in the medium and long term. PTA, with thrombolysis and thromboaspiration, is the treatment of choice in cases of malfunctioning arteriovenous fistulas. PTA should always be attempted before making a new surgical access in order to preserve the vascular tree.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Radiografía Intervencional , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Aims of the study was validate the venous stenting technique as the treatment of choice in patients affected by stenosis or occlusion of the central venous area. To evaluate the long-term patency of placed stents in our series and to detect factors predisposing to restenosis. Twenty-three hemodialyzed patients were treated by PTA or placement of a metallic self-expandable stent in the central venous area because of occlusion or severe stenosis caused by repeated central venous access puncture for Port-A-Cath or pacemaker placement. All patients were examined every 3 months after treatment by clinical examination and color-Doppler ultrasound. Stents were placed with success in all cases but one, where it was impossible to get past the occlusion. Restenosis was observed in 12 cases at 4 to 12 months (average 8 months). Intrastent restenoses were treated with success by PTA alone and stent placement in 4 cases. A new restenosis was observed in 4 retreated patients in whom the stent was short or angled. In the other patients restenosis was attributable to disregard of anticoagulant therapy. In conclusions, the availability of new devices and dedicated stents is still necessary. There is a limited relationship between patency and wrong stent placement. Patients undergoing stenting should be controlled by clinical examination and color-Doppler ultrasound in hospitals where skilled interventional radiologists are available.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Diálisis Renal , Stents , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
In order to estimate the outcome of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis, we reviewed our experience in the construction of AVFs using the venae comitantes in patients without an adequate superficial venous vascular territory. The study included 34 patients affected by end-stage renal disease in whom an AVF was created using the deep venous system. In 26 of them we performed an anastomosis between the brachial artery and its vena comitans. Immediate success, defined by the presence of a thrill at the end of the anastomosis, was obtained in 84%, while primary failure of the AVF (immediate postoperative failure) occurred in 3 patients (12%). Early failure, defined as failure within 6 weeks of AVF placement, occurred in 4% of patients. Of the 22 patients with a functioning AVF, 8 (36%) subsequently requested a second operation to bring the fistula to the surface. Some of these involved the placement of synthetic grafts for better accessibility. The primary patency of the AVFs was equal to 64%, while the patency after a second intervention was 91%. Among the 26 AVFs created with venae comitantes, total patency at 50 weeks was 62%. Our experience with the placement of prosthetic grafts draining into the venae comitantes has not provided encouraging results. We believe that for adequate exploitation of venae comitantes it is important to use native veins that have to meet specific anatomical and functional requirements. The creation of an AVF with a native vein, taking advantage of the deep venous system, is feasible under the right circumstances.