Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Food Microbiol ; 52: 154-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26338130

RESUMEN

Following the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 in food-producing animals, both livestock and wildlife, and derived products, are considered potential sources of MRSA in humans. There is a paucity of data on MRSA in foods in Italy, and the data regarding wild animals are particularly scarce. A total of 2162 food samples collected during official monitoring activities in 2008 were analyzed for the detection of S. aureus. Also, samples from 1365 wild animals collected by the National Reference Center for Wild Animal Diseases in 2003-2009 were subjected to anatomopathological examination. S. aureus isolates were processed for phenotypic and molecular methicillin resistance determinations. S. aureus was found in 2.0% of wild animal carcasses and in 3.2% of wild boar lymph nodes: none showed methicillin resistance. The prevalence of S. aureus in food was 17.1%. Two MRSA strains, both from bulk tank milk (prevalence 0.77%) were isolated: the strains were resistant to tetracycline, had spa-type t899, and were negative for the Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene. The low prevalence of MRSA suggests that the risk of transmission to humans via food is limited. However, attention should be paid to the cattle food chain, which may be a potential route of transmission of LA-MRSA.


Asunto(s)
Animales Salvajes/microbiología , Microbiología de Alimentos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/veterinaria , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bovinos , Cabras , Caballos , Italia/epidemiología , Carne/microbiología , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Leche/microbiología , Prevalencia , Conejos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Porcinos
2.
Infection ; 39(6): 555-61, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22048926

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of empiric appropriate treatment and the risk factors associated with mortality in patients with bacteremia by E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis producing ESBL. METHODS: Data were reviewed in an 8-year retrospective study, and 128 bacteremias were found: 80 caused by E. coli (62.5%), 28 by K. pneumoniae (21.9%) and 20 by P. mirabilis (18.6%). RESULTS: The initial antibiotic treatment, administered within 72 h after the first positive blood culture, was appropriate with carbapenems or other antimicrobial agents with documented in vitro sensitivity in 53.8 and 16% of patients, respectively. The overall mortality 21 days after diagnosis was 17.2%, and it was 14.9 and 35.2% for patients adequately and inadequately treated, respectively. At univariate analysis the p value for mortality with and without appropriate treatment was 0.05, and significant differences were found only for previous positive blood cultures (p = 0.004) and presence of septic shock at diagnosis (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: In this case series there was a high rate of initial appropriate empiric treatment, and only a marginal impact on mortality was found with regard to appropriate and inappropriate treatment. This report shows that the knowledge of ESBL-producing characteristics varies widely among the different case series for reasons that still have to be clarified.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidad , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteus mirabilis/enzimología , Proteus mirabilis/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Eur Respir J ; 28(1): 31-4, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16540502

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the T-SPOT.TB test, a T-cell-based test, with the tuberculin skin test (TST) in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection. The study was carried out in 138 immunosuppressed haematology patients who had been nosocomially exposed to a case of smear-positive TB. Overall, 44.2% of the contacts were positive by T-SPOT.TB test, and 17.4% by TST (concordance 67.8%). The apparent prevalence of infection fell from 25.9 to 14.5% with the TST with increasing immunosuppression, although this difference was not significant. In contrast, the apparent prevalence of infection with the T-SPOT.TB test was unaffected at 44.6 and 44.3%, respectively. The T-SPOT.TB test had an overall indeterminate rate of 4.3%, and this was also unaffected by the level of immunosuppression. This study suggests that the T-SPOT.TB test maintains its sensitivity and performance in immunocompromised patients, identifying a large number of truly infected patients anergic to the tuberculin skin test.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Hematológicas/métodos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Linfocitos T/microbiología , Prueba de Tuberculina/métodos , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Linfocitos T/citología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda