Frontal sinus surgery and sinus distribution of nasal irrigation.

BACKGROUND: Effective mucus lavage and delivery of topical pharmaceuticals are central to successful management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The frontal sinus remains difficult to penetrate with topical therapies. This study evaluates the benefit of Draf III frontal dissection compared to traditional Draf IIa for distribution of topical therapies. METHODS: Fresh human cadaver heads were dissected sequentially with Draf IIa frontal sinusotomy and then Draf III procedures. Each cavity was irrigated with pediatric (120 mL) and adult (240 mL) irrigation bottles with 1/1000 10% fluorescein-labeled free water in 2 fixed positions (vertex and Frankfort horizontal). An endoscope at a fixed position within the frontal sinus recorded frontal sinus and frontal recess penetration. The images then underwent blinded evaluation of fluid distribution scored as 0 to 4 (nasal cavity only, frontal recess, medial one-half, lateral one-half, and lavage). Ordinal distribution score was analyzed with Kendall's tau-b. RESULTS: Eight specimens (age 76 ± 11.2 years; 50% female) were assessed. Draf III was superior to Draf IIa in ability to achieve frontal sinus distribution of irrigation (90.6% vs 50.1%, p < 0.001). Vertex head position improved distribution (90.6% vs 50.1%, p < 0.001), was synergistic with Draf III (100% with 87.5% lavage, p < 0.001), but was unable to overcome Draf IIa (81.2% with 25% lavage, p < 0.001). Irrigation volume trended toward improved distribution with larger volume irrigations. CONCLUSION: Successful treatment of sinonasal disease may require postoperative delivery of topical therapies. Draf III frontal sinusotomy achieves superior topical access, and access to the frontal sinus with Draf IIa appears limited, despite large volumes and positioning.

Laryngotracheal stenosis and airway surgery--an outcomes based approach.

OBJECTIVES: To review the outcomes of endoscopic, open or a combination of both surgical modalities for laryngotracheal stenosis and establish which factors influence results. METHODS: Records of all children undergoing laryngotracheal procedures (excluding laryngomalacia and aspirated foreign bodies) by the Department of Otolaryngology at The Children's Hospital at Westmead between January 2003 and November 2011 were reviewed. Specific data on population, intervention, covariates and outcomes were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients undergoing 277 procedures were included. 211 (76%) of the procedures were endoscopic, remaining 66 (24%) open. Patients undergoing open surgery were more likely to have significant co-morbidity, prior intubation, require ICU admission or tracheostomy and have a longer hospital stay. 57 (54.8%) patients were successfully treated with a single procedure (48 endoscopic and 9 open). Of the endoscopic patients requiring further surgery, 16 were managed with multiple endoscopic procedures, whilst 12 underwent subsequent open procedures. Open surgery was performed on 66 patients, 63.6% (42/66) of all open procedures required further endoscopic intervention and 45.2% (19/42) of these avoided further open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Both open and endoscopic surgery have a role in laryngotracheal stenosis, and many patients benefit from a combination of both. Ultimately the decision depends on experience of the treating team, social considerations, and institutional capabilities. A multi-centre prospective data collection would be a useful tool to further investigate optimal management approach.