Gender survival differences in hepatocellular carcinoma: Is it all due to adherence to surveillance? A study of 1716 patients over three decades.

Background and Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the commonest causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Whether gender is an independent factor for HCC survival is debatable. We studied the influence of gender on the clinical characteristics of HCC and on survival. Methods: The study cohort comprised patients with HCC seen in our department from 1988 to 2021. Clinical data were prospectively collected. We studied and compared demography, HCC characteristics, and survival between females and males. Survival analysis was censored on October 31, 2015. Results: There were 1716 HCC patients. 343 (20.0%) were females. Females were significantly older at diagnosis (median 69 vs 62 years, P < 0.001). More females were diagnosed via regular HCC surveillance (37.9% vs 29.6%, P = 0.003). Hence, as expected, females had less-advanced HCC at diagnosis with smaller median tumor diameter (30 vs 39.5 mm, P = 0.038), lower frequency of portal vein tumor thrombus (19.4% vs 33.4%, P < 0.001), less distant metastases (7.7% vs 11%, P = 0.043), and earlier Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages (0/A, 39.7% vs 28.4%, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, HCC diagnosis via surveillance but not female gender was an independent predictor of improved HCC survival. Conclusions: In this large cohort of multi-ethnic Asian patients, females with HCC were significantly more adherent to surveillance and hence presented with less advanced HCC with correspondingly better overall survival than males. The gender difference in survival is likely due to females having better adherence to HCC surveillance. Surveillance to diagnose early-stage HCC remains crucial in improving outcomes.

Virtual monitoring for stable chronic hepatitis B patients does not reduce adherence to medications: A randomised controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains common in endemic regions, causing significant healthcare burden. Patients with CHB may need to be adherent to nucleoside analogue (NA) for a long period of time to prevent complications. This study aims to investigate the safety, efficacy and patient experience of a virtual monitoring clinic (VMC) in monitoring stable patients taking NA for CHB. METHODS: Patients on NA and regular follow-up were randomised to either VMC alternating with doctors' clinic visit or to a control group in which they continued standard follow-up by doctors. Therapy adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR) for NA therapy, incidence of virological breakthrough and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development at two years of follow-up. Patient acceptance was measured on a Likert scale of 1-10. RESULTS: A total 192 patients completed follow-up: 94 and 98 patients in the VMC and control groups, respectively. Mean age was 60.6 ± 10.8 years, with 95.3% Chinese ethnicity and 64.1% males. Age, gender, race, educational, employment and financial status were similar in both groups. Upon study completion, the majority of patients - 76 (80.9%) in VMC group and 74 (75.5%) in control group - had MPR ≥0.8; 88.8% were satisfied and rated VMC better than a traditional follow-up clinic with doctors only. More than 85% of patients rated ≥8/10 on the Likert scale for VMC, and preferred VMC over traditional clinic visits. Clinical outcomes observed were HCC development in one (1.1%) in the VMC group and four (4.1%) in the control group (p = 0.369). Two (2.1%) and one (1.0%) virological breakthroughs were observed in the VMC and control groups, respectively (p = 0.615). No incidence of HCC or abnormal blood tests were missed in the VMC arm. DISCUSSION: VMC is a viable and safe clinical model for monitoring stable CHB patients on NA therapy without compromising patients' adherence to medications and is preferred by patients.

A study of 3013 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma: Etiology and therapy before and during the current decade.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant global problem. With advances in HCC diagnosis and therapy, our hypothesis is that there are significant differences in the clinical characteristics and treatment of HCC over the years. METHODS: Patients with HCC between 1980 and 2018 from three major tertiary hospitals in Singapore were enrolled into a Research Electronic Data Capture database. Clinical characteristics and treatment of HCC were compared between those diagnosed before 2008 (cohort A) and during the current decade (ie from 2008 onwards) (cohort B). RESULTS: There were 3013 patients. Mean age of HCC diagnosis was significantly older in cohort B (68.6 vs 61.2 years, P < 0.001). The most common etiology remained as chronic hepatitis B infection but the proportion due to hepatitis B was significantly lower in cohort B (46.6% vs 57.2%, P < 0.0001). The prevalence of cryptogenic/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis was significantly higher in cohort B than cohort A (27.1% vs 18.6%, P < 0.0001). More patients received curative therapy in cohort B (43.7% vs 27.1%, P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: In this largest collection of HCC patients in Singapore, patients are diagnosed with HCC at an older age and cryptogenic/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is becoming more important as an etiology of HCC in the current decade. More patients also received curative therapy in the current decade.