Diroximel fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Final safety and efficacy results from the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study.

BACKGROUND: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is approved for adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in Europe and for relapsing forms of MS in the United States. DRF and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) yield bioequivalent exposure of the active metabolite monomethyl fumarate. Prior studies indicated fewer gastrointestinal (GI)-related adverse events (AEs) with DRF compared with DMF. OBJECTIVE: To report final outcomes from EVOLVE-MS-1. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-1 was an open-label, 96-week, phase 3 study assessing DRF safety, tolerability, and efficacy in patients with RRMS. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; efficacy endpoints were exploratory. RESULTS: Overall, 75.7% (800/1057) of patients completed the study; median exposure was 1.8 (range: 0.0-2.0) years. AEs occurred in 938 (88.7%) patients, mostly of mild (28.9%) or moderate (50.3%) severity. DRF was discontinued due to AEs in 85 (8.0%) patients, with < 2% discontinuing due to GI or flushing/flushing-related AEs. At Week 96, mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was significantly reduced from baseline (72.7%; p < 0.0001); adjusted annualized relapse rate was 0.13 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.15). CONCLUSION: DRF was generally well tolerated over 2 years, with few discontinuations due to AEs; radiological measures indicated decreased disease activity from baseline. These outcomes support DRF as a treatment option in patients with RRMS.

Diroximel fumarate (DRF) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Interim safety and efficacy results from the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study.

BACKGROUND: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). DRF and the approved drug dimethyl fumarate yield bioequivalent exposure to the active metabolite monomethyl fumarate; thus, efficacy/safety profiles are expected to be similar. However, DRF's distinct chemical structure may result in a differentiated gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability profile. OBJECTIVE: To report interim safety/efficacy findings from patients in the ongoing EVOLVE-MS-1 study. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-1 is an ongoing, open-label, 96-week, phase 3 study assessing DRF safety, tolerability, and efficacy in RRMS patients. Primary endpoint is safety and tolerability; efficacy endpoints are exploratory. RESULTS: As of March 2018, 696 patients were enrolled; median exposure was 59.9 (range: 0.1-98.9) weeks. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 84.6% (589/696) of patients; the majority were mild (31.2%; 217/696) or moderate (46.8%; 326/696) in severity. Overall treatment discontinuation was 14.9%; 6.3% due to AEs and <1% due to GI AEs. At Week 48, mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was significantly reduced from baseline (77%; p < 0.0001) and adjusted annualized relapse rate was low (0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.20). CONCLUSION: Interim data from EVOLVE-MS-1 suggest DRF is a well-tolerated treatment with a favorable safety/efficacy profile for patients with RRMS.

Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: NEDA-3 After Re-Baselining in the Phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are orally administered fumarate disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). The safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of DRF were evaluated in the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study. No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3) is a composite efficacy endpoint used in clinical trials for MS defined as no relapse, no 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), no new/newly enlarging T2 lesions, and no new gadolinium-enhancing lesions. As NEDA outcomes in studies may be confounded by initial disease activity, the objective of this analysis was to evaluate NEDA-3 in EVOLVE-MS-1 for newly enrolled patients and patients who were re-baselined after approximately 7 weeks. METHODS: Patients entered EVOLVE-MS-1 as either newly enrolled or having completed the 5-week phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-2 study of DRF and DMF. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed at baseline before each study (approx. 7 weeks apart) and at weeks 48 and 96 in EVOLVE-MS-1. Therefore, patients entering from EVOLVE-MS-2 were re-baselined after approximately 7 weeks. NEDA-3 outcomes on DRF are reported for prior DRF, prior DMF, and de novo patient groups. RESULTS: Of 1057 patients in EVOLVE-MS-1, 239 (22.6%) had rolled over from receiving DRF in EVOLVE-MS-2 ("prior DRF"), 225 (21.3%) had rolled over from receiving DMF in EVOLVE-MS-2 ("prior DMF"), and 593 (56.1%) were newly enrolled ("de novo"). At week 48, Kaplan-Meier estimates of NEDA-3 were 72.3% (prior DRF), 72.1% (prior DMF), and 62.1% (de novo); at week 96, estimates were 50.2% (prior DRF), 48.2% (prior DMF), and 36.5% (de novo). CONCLUSIONS: In EVOLVE-MS-1, after re-baselining at approximately 7 weeks, approximately half of DRF-treated patients achieved NEDA-3 at week 96, compared with 36.5% of patients who were not re-baselined. Re-baselining may be useful for assessing efficacy of DMTs by mitigating the influence of disease activity prior to the onset of efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: NCT03093324 (EVOLVE-MS-2); NCT02634307 (EVOLVE-MS-1).

Lymphopenia is Not the Primary Therapeutic Mechanism of Diroximel Fumarate in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analyses of the EVOLVE-MS-1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: In EVOLVE-MS-1 (NCT02634307), mean absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on diroximel fumarate (DRF) declined from baseline by approximately 28% in year 1, then stabilized, similar to ALC decline observed with dimethyl fumarate (DMF). Prior studies reported that clinical efficacy of DMF was not substantially different in patients with and without lymphopenia. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-1-an open-label, 96-week, phase 3 study-assessed DRF safety and exploratory efficacy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. This study analyzes efficacy-related outcomes comparing (1) patients with lymphopenia (≥ 1 ALC below lower limit of normal [LLN]) and without (all ALCs ≥ LLN); (2) across quartiles stratified by week 96 ALC decline from baseline: Q1 (≥ 47% decline); Q2 (30% to < 47% decline); Q3 (12% to < 30% decline); Q4 (< 12% decline). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients without (n = 593) and with lymphopenia (n = 452). At week 96, adjusted annualized relapse rate (ARR; 95% confidence interval) was 0.14 (0.11-0.17) without lymphopenia and 0.12 (0.09-0.15) with lymphopenia. Estimated proportions with 12-week confirmed disability progression (CDP12) at week 96 were 10.2% without and 9.3% with lymphopenia. When stratified by quartiles (Q1-Q4), ARR at week 96 was 0.11 (Q1), 0.09 (Q2), 0.13 (Q3), and 0.17 (Q4). Estimated proportions with CDP12 at week 96 were 9.6% (Q1), 10.2% (Q2), 5.7% (Q3), and 10.9% (Q4). At week 96, no evidence of disease activity was achieved by 47.2% (Q1), 47.8% (Q2), 45.4% (Q3), and 37.3% (Q4) of patients. CONCLUSION: In DRF-treated patients in EVOLVE-MS-1, clinical and radiological measurements indicated reduced disease activity regardless of lymphopenia or magnitude of ALC decline from baseline; however, patients who had greater ALC declines appeared to have numerically lower ARR and higher proportions free from relapses and gadolinium-enhancing lesions compared with those with smallest decline. This supports prior evidence that, while lymphopenia may contribute to fumarate efficacy outcomes, it is not the primary mechanism of action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02634307.

Markers Associated With Tumor Recurrence in Patients With Breast Cancer Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Background: Patients who achieve a tumor pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have better outcomes than patients with residual tumor. However, tumors still recur in the pCR patients. Therefore, we aim to explore factors associated with tumor recurrence in this patient population. Methods: A total of 1,913 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1995 and 2020 and received NAC were included in this analysis. Clinicopathological data of the patients were retrospectively collected. We used Cox regression analysis to assess the associations of clinicopathological factors with patients' outcome. Proteomic study of tumors was applied to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between tumors from the pCR patients with tumor recurrence and tumors from those without tumor recurrence. PPI network analysis of the corresponding genes of DEPs was used to identify the hub genes. The prognostic value of the corresponding genes of DEPs was evaluated using two online databases, Kaplan-Meier Plotter and bc-GenExMiner. The genes that were significantly associated with patients' survival in both databases, as well as being identified as hub genes, were considered as potential prognostic markers for pCR patients. Publicly available data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) was used to verify the prognostic value of the identified marker. Results: Among the 1,913 included patients, 420 had tumor pCR. The median follow-up for the pCR patients was 32.6 months (IQR, 16.3-55.5). Overall estimated 5-year risk of tumor recurrence for the pCR patients was 11%. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher pre-NAC clinical T stage and N stage were independent predictors for increased risk of tumor recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-6.51, P=0.047 for clinical T stage and HR 3.48, 95%CI 1.37-8.83, P=0.009 for clinical N stage). NAC regimens, the type of breast and axillary surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with tumor recurrence. Finally, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) 3A2 was identified by the proteomic study and was verified as a potential predictor for tumor recurrence in the pCR patients (with a median follow up of 3.78 years for dataset GSE32603 and 2.74 years for dataset GSE25066 from GEO, tumor recurrence rate: low versus high expression, 20.7% versus 4.5% [data from GSE32603]; 10.9% versus 0% [data from GSE25066]). Conclusions: Clinical T stage, clinical N stage and tumor expression of ALDH3A2 were potential markers for predicting tumor recurrence in the pCR patients after NAC.

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes with Diroximel Fumarate After Switching from Prior Therapies or Continuing on DRF: Results from the Phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) with the same active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF has a safety/efficacy profile similar to DMF but with improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and low (< 1%) treatment discontinuation due to GI adverse events (AEs). Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who switched to DRF from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have not been evaluated. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-1 is an ongoing, 2-year, open-label, phase 3 study of DRF in adults with relapsing-remitting MS. Patients either entered as newly enrolled to DRF trials, or from the 5-week, randomized, head-to-head, phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-2 study of DRF and DMF. This analysis evaluated safety and GI tolerability in patients continuing on DRF (DRF-rollover) or switching from DMF (DMF-rollover) following EVOLVE-MS-2. Safety and efficacy were evaluated in a subset of newly enrolled patients who had received prior glatiramer acetate (GA; GA/DRF) or interferons (IFN; IFN/DRF) as their most recent DMT, prior to switching to DRF in EVOLVE-MS-1. RESULTS: As of September 1, 2020, 1057 patients were enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1, including 166, 182, 239, and 225 patients in the GA/DRF, IFN/DRF, DRF-rollover, and DMF-rollover groups, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to GI AEs was < 1% in all groups. GA/DRF and IFN/DRF patients experienced improvements from baseline in clinical and radiological efficacy outcomes, including significantly reduced annualized relapse rates. Rollover patients had low rates of new or recurrent GI AEs (DRF-rollover, 26.8%/4.2%; DMF-rollover, 27.1%/4.9%). CONCLUSION: After 2 years of DRF exposure, patients with prior GA, IFN, or fumarate treatment had safety outcomes consistent with previous fumarate studies. Efficacy in patients with prior GA or IFN treatment was consistent with previous fumarate studies. The data suggest that transition to DRF from GA, IFN, or DMF is a reasonable treatment strategy, with low rates of discontinuation due to GI AEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02634307). INFOGRAPHIC.

Advantages of rectangular horizontal tubing in the semi-preparative counter-current chromatography bobbin.

Counter-current chromatography (CCC) is a widely used liquid-liquid separation technique. Much work has been performed to improve the retention of stationary phases and throughput. In previous research, high aspect ratio rectangular horizontal (RH) tubing has been proven to be able to improve resolution and throughput in comparison with standard circular (SC) tubing. However, those modifications and improvements of tubing shapes have only been tested on analytical tubing thus far. This study aims to verify whether RH tubing could achieve similar high stationary phase retention (Sf) and throughput on a semi-preparative CCC apparatus. First, a lighter and larger volume semi-preparative bobbin with thin-wall RH tubing was successfully manufactured. Then the Sf of this bobbin was tested with n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (HEMWat) and dichloromethane-methanol-water (DMW) solvent systems, and its maximum throughput was explored with the mixture of Magnolia officinalis Rehd. Et Wils. The results show that the thin-wall RH tubing bobbin can retain high Sf for these solvent systems, even at a relatively high mobile phase flow rate, which is consistent with the analytical bobbin results. The throughput test demonstrates that 2.12 × throughput can be obtained with the RH tubing column bobbin compared to the conventional SC tubing column bobbin without changing the outside dimensions of the bobbin. The present study is a necessary step for the application of the RH tubing bobbin from a laboratory analytical scale to preparative industrial scale.

Improved gastrointestinal profile with diroximel fumarate is associated with a positive impact on quality of life compared with dimethyl fumarate: results from the randomized, double-blind, phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 study.

BACKGROUND: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate approved for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). DRF demonstrated significantly improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability versus dimethyl fumarate (DMF) with fewer days of Individual Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (IGISIS) scores ⩾2, GI adverse events (AEs), and treatment discontinuations due to GI AEs. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of GI tolerability events on quality of life (QoL) for patients with relapsing-remitting MS who received DRF or DMF in EVOLVE-MS-2. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was conducted in patients who were enrolled in the randomized, blinded, 5-week, EVOLVE-MS-2 [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03093324] study of DRF versus DMF. Patients completed daily IGISIS and Global GISIS (GGISIS) eDiary questionnaires to assess GI symptom intensity and interference with daily activities and work. RESULTS: In total, 504 patients (DRF, n = 253; DMF, n = 251) received study drug and 502 (DRF, n = 253; DMF, n = 249) completed at least one post-baseline questionnaire. With DRF, GI symptoms were less likely to interfere 'quite a bit' or 'extremely' with regular daily activities [IGISIS: DRF, 9.5% (24/253) versus DMF, 28.9% (72/249)] or work productivity [GGISIS: DRF, 6.1% (10/165) versus DMF, 11.3% (18/159)]. DRF-treated patients had fewer days with ⩾1 h of missed work (DRF, 43 days, n = 20 versus DMF, 88 days, n = 26). DMF-treated patients reported highest GI symptom severity and missed work at week 2-3 shortly after completing the titration period, which coincided with the majority of GI-related treatment discontinuations [58.3% (7/12)]. GI tolerability AEs [DRF, 34.8% (88/253); DMF, 48.2% (121/251)], concomitant symptomatic medication use [DRF, 19.3% (17/88) versus DMF, 30.6% (37/121)], and GI-related discontinuations (DRF, 0.8% versus DMF, 4.8%) were lower with DRF versus DMF. CONCLUSIONS: The improved GI tolerability with DRF translated into clinically meaningful benefits to QoL, as patients experienced less impact on daily life and work and required less concomitant symptomatic medication use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03093324].

Modeling counter-current chromatography with non-ideal injection.

In general counter-current chromatography systems, there are several off-column fittings between injector and column inlet, such as bends, valves, connecting tubes and joints. Due to these off-column fittings, the sample will diffuse in the mobile phase and form an irregular distribution when it flows from the injector to the column inlet. Thus, the concentration distribution of the solutes at the column inlet is a continuous curve (called the injection profile). As some previous research reveals, it is necessary to input actual injection profile into the simulation model to mimic elution profile. Therefore, we built a non-ideal CCC model whose initial value is from the actual injection profile, and validated the rationality of this model with iteration method. The simulation analysis of different injection profiles shows the conditions whereby a discrete injection profile can replace the actual injection profile in the non-ideal CCC model for accurate simulation elution. Simulation elution under such conditions reveal that non-ideal injection model can reflect the relationship between the injection profile and elution profile, and help to explain the reasons of irregular change in elution profile, like the tailed peak and flat peak.

Visualization of Type-J counter current chromatography: Hydrodynamic behavior in a helical column.

In counter-current chromatography (CCC), the hydrodynamic motion of a two-phase solvent system in the column/coil is very important. There are some previous visualization studies on CCC using stroboscopic photography. As CCC separation is a continuous liquid-liquid extraction process, observing the distribution and movement of the solvent system on-line will be helpful to understand the hydrodynamic behavior during the whole CCC separation process. In the present study, a high-speed imaging camera was employed to take videos of a running CCC bobbin (visualized continuously on-line). The dynamic motion and phase distribution of conventional quaternary solvent system hexane/ethyl acetate/methanol/water (HEMWat) and ternary solvent system dichloromethane/methanol/water were both investigated. Wave-like mixing was observed in the area where the centrifugal force is minimum in different diameter columns. When the coil rotated, the mixing zone was "fixed" at the minimum centrifugal force position. Several photographs of the rotating coiled tube were taken which revealed that the phase dispersion hardly changes once equilibrium is established. Finally, the sample dispersion process was also recorded. These results will help us to understand the separation process in a CCC column/coil and also present some more interesting questions related to separation efficiency which are shown in discussion part of this paper.

Diroximel Fumarate Demonstrates an Improved Gastrointestinal Tolerability Profile Compared with Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Results from the Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III EVOLVE-MS-2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate approved in the USA for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. DRF is converted to monomethyl fumarate, the pharmacologically active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF 462 mg and DMF 240 mg produce bioequivalent exposure of monomethyl fumarate and are therefore expected to have similar efficacy/safety profiles; the distinct chemical structure of DRF may contribute to its tolerability profile. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the gastrointestinal tolerability of DRF and DMF over 5 weeks in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-2 was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head, 5-week study evaluating the gastrointestinal tolerability of DRF 462 mg vs DMF 240 mg, administered twice daily in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, using two self-administered gastrointestinal symptom scales: Individual Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (IGISIS) and Global Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (GGISIS). The primary endpoint was the number of days with an IGISIS intensity score ≥ 2 relative to exposure. Other endpoints included the degree of gastrointestinal symptom severity measured by IGISIS/GGISIS and assessment of safety/tolerability. RESULTS: DRF-treated patients experienced a statistically significant reduction (46%) in the number of days with an IGISIS symptom intensity score ≥ 2 compared with DMF-treated patients (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.54 [0.39-0.75]; p = 0.0003). Lower rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) were observed with DRF than DMF (34.8% vs 49.0%). Fewer patients discontinued DRF than DMF because of adverse events (1.6% vs 5.6%) and gastrointestinal adverse events (0.8% vs 4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: DRF demonstrated an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with DMF, with less severe gastrointestinal events and fewer days of self-assessed gastrointestinal symptoms, fewer gastrointestinal adverse events, and lower discontinuation rates because of gastrointestinal adverse events. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03093324).

Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum L1-cell adhesion molecule in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) has been found to be dysregulated in several types of human cancers. Here, we aimed to determine the level of soluble L1CAM in serum of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Serum levels of L1CAM were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 191 patients with ESCC and 94 normal controls. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was employed to calculate diagnostic accuracy. Cumulative survival time was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the logrank test. RESULTS: Levels of L1CAM were significantly lower in all ESCC patients than in normal controls (P < 0.001). Detection of serum L1CAM provided a sensitivity of 28.3%, a specificity of 90.4% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.644 (95% CI: 0.579-0.710) in diagnosing ESCC. Similar results were observed in the diagnosis of early-stage ESCC (26.2% sensitivity, 90.4% specificity, and an AUC of 0.629). Moreover, decreased level of L1CAM was correlated with depth of tumor invasion (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that lower serum L1CAM level was significantly related to shorter overall survival time (P = 0.036) and disease-free survival time (P = 0.021) of ESCC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that serum L1CAM might serve as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of ESCC.

Postoperative adjuvant therapy for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 426 cases.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of postoperative adjuvant therapy for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in China. We retrospectively analyzed 426 eligible patients seen between October 2007 and November 2011. Specifically, we assessed clinicopathological characteristics and the disease-free and overall survival rates. Of the 426 patients, 272 cases underwent surgery alone, and 154 cases received postoperative adjuvant therapy (67 cases with radiotherapy, 57 cases with chemotherapy, and 30 cases with simultaneous chemoradiotherapy). The median follow-up time was 48.0 months (23.0-72.0 months), and the median survival time was 48.4 months (1.0-72.0 months). We found a significant difference between the surgery-alone and adjuvant therapy groups in the status of lymph node (LN) metastasis (N stage; P < 0.01), but there were no differences between the two groups with regard to other clinicopathological characteristics, including age, sex, lesion location, T stage, differentiation grades, surgery approach, or average number of LN dissections. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the surgery-alone and adjuvant therapy groups were 48.9 and 37.1 %, respectively (P < 0.001); no significant difference was found in 5-year overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). A stratification analysis based on N stage suggested that the 5-year DFS and OS rates were similar in N0-N3 subgroups (P > 0.05), except that patients with surgery alone had a higher 5-year DFS than those with postoperative adjuvant therapy in N0 subgroup (P = 0.013). Our data suggest that patients with resectable thoracic ESCC may not benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy. Further prospective studies are required to elucidate the utility of postoperative adjuvant therapy and to standardize individualized treatments for resectable ESCC.