RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In an era of rising maternal mortality, a thorough first prenatal visit is essential; however, in our clinic we confirmed that many important topics were not being addressed. To rectify this problem, we redesigned the first prenatal visit to improve the coverage of topics, collect social determinants of health, increase patient access, and maintain patient satisfaction. METHODS: We designed a quality improvement project to improve the first prenatal visit in a faculty obstetrics and gynecology clinic. To assess effectiveness, data before and after the implementation were compared. The intervention divided the first prenatal visit into two patient encounters: a nurse-led telemedicine visit and an in-person visit with an obstetric clinician. RESULTS: The median percentage of topics covered in the first prenatal visit increased from 70.0% to 95.6%, and improvements were observed for all key themes ( p < .001). Social determinants of health was routinely collected postintervention (98.8%). A reduction in no-shows (9.9%-4.2%) improved patient access for all patients. Patient satisfaction for the first prenatal visit remained unchanged ( p = .370). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in addressing important topics at the first prenatal visit are achievable by separating one prenatal visit into two visits while increasing patient access and maintaining high patient satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Obstetricia , Telemedicina , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Atención Prenatal , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Batteries are known to cause damage to mucosal surfaces. Unfortunately, the timing of serious sequelae and recommendations for removal of a vaginally inserted battery in a premenopausal patient are not well characterized. This case report aims to detail the timeline of events and complications after vaginal insertion of a 9-volt alkaline battery and to further clarify the recommendation for urgent removal. CASE: A 24-year-old nulliparous woman with significant psychiatric and trauma history was admitted for ingestion and insertion of multiple foreign objects, including a 9-volt battery that she inserted into her vagina during her hospital admission. Examination under anesthesia was required for removal of the battery, with cervical and vaginal necrosis and partial-thickness burns noted. Removal occurred approximately 5.5 hours after insertion. Management included vaginal irrigation and topical estrogen. CONCLUSION: Given our findings of rapid and severe damage to the vaginal mucosa, urgent removal of a vaginally inserted battery is indicated.
Asunto(s)
Cuerpos Extraños , Enfermedades Vaginales , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Corrosión , Vagina/cirugía , Vagina/lesiones , Enfermedades Vaginales/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Suministros de Energía EléctricaRESUMEN
The objective was to quantify resources devoted to quality and patient safety initiatives, to document the development and use of key performance indicator reports regarding patient outcomes and patient feedback, and to assess the culture of safety within academic obstetrics and gynecology departments. Chairs of academic obstetrics and gynecology departments were asked to complete a quality and safety assessment survey. Surveys were distributed to 138 departments, yielding 52 completed responses (37.7%). Five percent of departments reported including a patient representative on a quality committee. Most committee leaders (60.5%) and members (67.4%) received no compensation. Formal training was required in 28.8% of responding departments. Most departments monitored key performance metrics for inpatient outcomes (95.9%). Leaders scored their departments' culture of safety highly. Most departments provided no protected time to faculty devoted to quality efforts, generation of key performance indicators for inpatient activities was prevalent and integrating patient and community input remain unrealized opportunities.
Asunto(s)
Ginecología , Obstetricia , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Benchmarking , Pacientes Internos , Seguridad del PacienteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This is a prospective observational cohort study with the objective of assessing adherence to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines regarding the first prenatal visit and determining what patient and provider factors are associated with high adherence in a faculty obstetric clinic at an academic medical center. METHODS: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines recommend addressing 72 topics early in prenatal care. A research assistant observed the first prenatal encounter and noted which topics were discussed during the visit. Patient and clinic characteristics were also collected. The primary outcome was the percentage of topics covered at each visit. After analyzing all encounters, patient encounters that scored above the median score were compared with encounters scoring below the median using bivariate comparisons with respect to patient and clinic characteristics. A multivariable Poisson regression model with robust error variance was performed on characteristics with a p value of ⩽0.2. RESULTS: Fifty-one patient encounters met inclusion criteria and the median score for topics covered was 74%. Patients with chronic disease were more likely to have a higher percentage of topics covered (odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-3.09). Patients who completed a prenatal questionnaire were also more likely to have a higher percentage (odds ratio 2.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-5.15) as well as patients who had nurse-led education integrated into their visit during (odds ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-2.78). Patient satisfaction had no correlation with the number of topics covered. CONCLUSION: The number of topics to cover at the first prenatal visit has expanded creating challenges for patients and providers. Integration of prenatal questionnaires and nurse-led education has the potential to address gaps in antenatal care.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Prenatal , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that all pregnant women should be offered prenatal genetic counseling, which includes discussions of aneuploidy and carrier screening. Previous studies have demonstrated racial and ethnic disparities in the completion of prenatal genetic testing, but few studies have evaluated for disparities in the offering of these tests. Prenatal genetic screening is a covered provision of Colorado Medicaid. We hypothesized that in the absence of a financial barrier, disparities in prenatal genetic counseling would be eliminated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate disparities in prenatal genetic counseling by directly assessing if patients received counseling at the time of their first prenatal visit. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients presenting for their first prenatal visit at <20 weeks' gestation. Patients who completed prenatal genetic testing were classified as counseled, and the remaining patients' medical records were reviewed. Moreover, patients were divided into 2 groups based on their counseling status (yes or no), separately for aneuploidy and carrier screening. RESULTS: Of 1103 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 97.2% were counseled for aneuploidy screening, whereas 73.3% were counseled on carrier screening. For aneuploidy, younger age, Black race, a relationship status of single, and presentation at a later gestational age were associated with lack of aneuploidy counseling on univariate analysis. After multivariable analysis, only maternal age (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.19) and gestational age (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.93) were statistically significantly associated with aneuploidy counseling. Treatment by a physician care team, having a comorbidity score of ≥1, and presenting at a later gestational age were associated with not receiving carrier screening counseling (univariate analysis). Multivariable analysis indicated significant associations with gestational age (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.94) and having a comorbidity (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.94). CONCLUSION: Prenatal genetic counseling was less likely to be provided to women who present for prenatal care at a later gestational age. This finding was of concern because women who are less privileged were more likely to present to prenatal care at a later gestational age. Providing access to early prenatal care and developing specialized care pathways for women entering prenatal care in the second trimester of pregnancy could address disparities in prenatal genetic counseling.
Asunto(s)
Asesoramiento Genético , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Aneuploidia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Approximately 50% of twin pregnancies deliver preterm, and major complications associated with prematurity include respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, and sepsis. These complications drive the perinatal mortality rate of twins to seven times that of singletons. Although delivery may take place due to iatrogenic or spontaneous etiologies-no matter what the indication-optimizing the route of delivery for twins is an important component of care that must be thoughtfully considered.