Anatomical liver resection using the ultrasound-guided compression technique in minimal access surgery.

BACKGROUND: Segmental or subsegmental anatomical resection (AR) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in minimal access liver surgery (MALS) has been technically proposed. The Glissonean approach or dye injection technique are generally adopted. The tumor-feeding portal pedicle compression technique (C-AR) is an established approach in open surgery, but its feasibility in the MALS environment has never been described. METHODS: Eligible patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo laparoscopic or robotic ultrasound-guided C-AR based on HCC location and preoperative identification of a single tumor-feeding portal pedicle. Initial C-AR experience was gained with laparoscopic cases in the beginning of 2020. Following our progressive experience in laparoscopic C-AR, patients requiring AR for HCC were consecutively selected for robotic C-AR. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients underwent minimal access C-AR. All patients had Child-Pugh A HCC. The surgical procedures included 6 laparoscopic and 4 robotic C-AR. Median tumor size was 3.1 cm (range 2-7 cm). All procedures had R0 margin. Postoperative complications were nil. CONCLUSION: C-AR technique is a feasible and promising technique for patients eligible for laparoscopic and robotic AR for HCC. Further data are necessary to validate its applicability to more complex minimal access AR.

Laparoscopic Ultrasound-Guided R1 Vascular Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases at Caval Confluence.

BACKGROUND: Patients with tumors involving the hepatic vein (HV) at the caval confluence (CC) usually receive major hepatectomies or HV grafting. For colorectal liver metastases (CLM), tumor-vessel detachment (R1vasc) has proven to be oncologically adequate.1-3 However, parenchyma-sparing R1vasc surgery has usually been confined to the open approach. The technical tricks for accomplishing this kind of surgery in laparoscopy are disclosed. METHODS: A patient with a CLM in contact with the middle HV (MHV) and left HV (LHV) at the CC underwent liver resection. No signs of vascular invasion were observed at preoperative imaging. On the basis of the low rate of tumor-vessel regression after chemotherapy,4 technical feasibility, and low tumor burden, patient was considered for upfront surgery. Surgery consisted in: (1) left liver mobilization with full exposure of the CC; (2) identification of the common trunk's root and its encirclement by tape; (3) the use of ultrasound to rule out HV invasion and to define a resection area favoring a transection plane smoothly approaching the point of vascular contact; and (4) careful vascular detachment by blunt dissection in a caudocranial fashion to separate the lesion from HVs. RESULTS: A limited resection of segments, four superior and two with MHV-LHV detachment, was performed. Operation time was 285 min, with 52 min of cumulative Pringle time and 20 ml of blood loss. Postoperative course was uneventful. The in-hospital stay was 6 days. CONCLUSION: Similarly to open surgery, laparoscopic R1vasc surgery for CLM at CC is feasible and represents an alternative to major hepatectomy. HV control by tape is recommended to manage any bleeding that may occur during tumor-vessel detachment.

Ultrasound-guided anatomical liver resection using a compression technique combined with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical resection (AR) is a recommended surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the conventional procedure (dye injection) for AR is difficult to reproduce. As an alternative, the tumour-feeding portal pedicle compression technique (finger-compression technique) has been proposed as an easy and reversible procedure. Here, we propose a new method combining indocyanine green (ICG) imaging with the finger-compression technique. METHODS: Eligible patients were prospectively enrolled to undergo ICG compression (ICG-C) anatomical hepatectomy for HCC. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent AR using the ICG-C technique. Overall, the surgical procedures included six segmentectomies, seven subsegmentectomies, and two right posterior sectionectomies. The median tumour size was 5.8 cm (range 2-7 cm). All procedures had an R0 margin. There were no major complications among patients, and minor morbidity occurred in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: ICG-C is a safe, feasible and effective technique for patients eligible for AR.

Prediction of remnant liver volume using 3D simulation software in patients undergoing R1vasc parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases: reliability, clinical impact, and learning curve.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the future liver remnant (FLR) is routinely performed before major hepatectomy. In R1-vascular one-stage hepatectomy (R1vasc-OSH), given the multiplanar dissection paths, the FLR is not easily predictable. Preoperative 3D-virtual casts may help. We evaluated the predictability of the FLR using the 3D-virtual cast in the R1vasc-OSH for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with multiple bilobar CLMs scheduled for R1vasc-OSH were included. Predicted and real-FLRs were compared. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to determine the impact of 3D-virtual cast on postoperative complications. RESULTS: Median number of CLM and resection areas were 12 (4-33) and 3 (1-8). Median predicted-FLR was 899 ml (558-1157) and 60% (42-85), while for the real-FLR 915 ml (566-1777) and 63% (43-87). Median discrepancy between predicted and real-FLR was -0.6% (p = 0.504), indicating a slight tendency to underestimate the FLR. The difference was more evident in more than 12 CLMs (p = 0.013). A discrepancy was not evident according to the number of resection areas (p = 0.316). No mortality occurred. Patients in virtual-group had lower major complications compared to nonvirtual-group (0% vs 18%, p-value 0.014). CONCLUSION: FLR estimation based on 3D-analysis is feasible, provides a safe surgery and represents a promising method in planning R1vasc-OSH for patients with multiple bilobar CLMs.

Development of a nomogram to predict outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in Child-Pugh B cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment allocation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on a background of Child-Pugh B (CP-B) cirrhosis is controversial. Liver resection has been proposed in small series with acceptable outcomes, but data are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection for HCC in CP-B cirrhosis, focusing on the surgical risks and survival. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively pooled from 14 international referral centers from 2002 to 2017. Postoperative and oncological outcomes were investigated. Prediction models for surgical risks, disease-free survival and overall survival were constructed. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were included, of whom 57.3% of patients had a preoperative platelet count <100,000/mm3, 43.5% had preoperative ascites, and 56.9% had portal hypertension. A minor hepatectomy was most commonly performed (84.6%) and 122 (48.2%) were operated on by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Ninety-day mortality was 4.3% with 6 patients (2.3%) dying from liver failure. One hundred and eight patients (42.7%) experienced complications, of which the most common was ascites (37.5%). Patients undergoing major hepatectomies had higher 90-day mortality (10.3% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.04) and morbidity rates (69.2% vs. 37.9%; p <0.001). Patients undergoing an open hepatectomy had higher morbidity (52.7% vs. 31.9%; p = 0.001) than those undergoing MIS. A prediction model for surgical risk was constructed (https://childb.shinyapps.io/morbidity/). The 5-year overall survival rate was 47%, and 56.9% of patients experienced recurrence. Prediction models for overall survival (https://childb.shinyapps.io/survival/) and disease-free survival (https://childb.shinyapps.io/DFsurvival/) were constructed. CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection should be considered for patients with HCC and CP-B cirrhosis after careful selection according to patient characteristics, tumor pattern and liver function, while aiming to minimize surgical stress. An estimation of the surgical risk and survival advantage may be helpful in treatment allocation, eventually improving postoperative morbidity and achieving safe oncological outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in advanced cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B score) is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. However, due to the limited therapeutic alternatives in this setting, recent studies have shown promising results after accurate patient selection. In our international multicenter study, we provide 3 clinical models to predict postoperative surgical risks and long-term survival following liver resection, with the aim of improving treatment allocation and eventually clinical outcomes.

Indocyanine Green Compression Technique for Anatomical S8 Dorsal Subsegmentectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical resection (AR) is a recommended surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although the conventional procedure (dye injection) for AR is difficult to reproduce.1,2 The tumor-feeding portal pedicle compression technique has been proposed as an easy, reversible, repeatable, and oncologically suitable procedure,3-5 and its only drawback is the sometimes faint discoloration of the compressed area. For enhancing its visibility, indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been introduced. This technique is herein disclosed while performing an anatomical S8 dorsal subsegmentectomy. METHODS: A 66-year-old male was admitted for a 3.7 cm HCC in segment 8 dorsal (S8d) grown in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. The preoperative liver function was graded as Child-Pugh class A. After adequate liver mobilization, the subsegmental Glissonian pedicle to S8d was identified by intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) and compressed transparenchymally between the probe and the surgeon's fingertip positioned at the opposed side of the liver. Once IOUS-guided vessel compression had begun, ICG was administered intravenously. The compressed vessel created a non-stained area, which was marked using electrocautery. RESULTS: An anatomical S8d subsegmentectomy using the ICG compression technique was performed. There was no congested area and the right hepatic vein was exposed at the hepatocaval confluence because the resection was conducted in a subsegmental fashion. There was no morbidity and no blood transfusions were necessary. The patient was discharged on day 6 after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This video shows, for the first time, the finger compression technique successfully implemented by ICG imaging for performing an AR for HCC.

Rapid automated diagnosis of primary hepatic tumour by mass spectrometry and artificial intelligence.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Complete surgical resection with negative margin is one of the pillars in treatment of liver tumours. However, current techniques for intra-operative assessment of tumour resection margins are time-consuming and empirical. Mass spectrometry (MS) combined with artificial intelligence (AI) is useful for classifying tissues and provides valuable prognostic information. The aim of this study was to develop a MS-based system for rapid and objective liver cancer identification and classification. METHODS: A large dataset derived from 222 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, 117 tumours and 105 non-tumours) and 96 patients with mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (MFCCC, 50 tumours and 46 non-tumours) were analysed by Probe Electrospray Ionization (PESI) MS. AI by means of support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) algorithms was employed. For each classifier, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy exceeded 94% in both the AI algorithms. For identification of HCC vs non-tumour tissue, RF was the best, with 98.2% accuracy, 97.4% sensitivity and 99% specificity. For MFCCC vs non-tumour tissue, both algorithms gave 99.0% accuracy, 98% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The herein reported MS-based system, combined with AI, permits liver cancer identification with high accuracy. Its bench-top size, minimal sample preparation and short working time are the main advantages. From diagnostics to therapeutics, it has the potential to influence the decision-making process in real-time with the ultimate aim of improving cancer patient cure.

Inpatient Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Italian Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a potentially fatal disease that is of great global public health concern. OBJECTIVE: We explored the clinical management of inpatients with COVID-19 in Italy. METHODS: A self-administered survey was sent by email to Italian physicians caring for adult patients with COVID-19. A panel of experts was selected according to their clinical curricula and their responses were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,215 physicians completed the survey questionnaire (17.4% response rate). Of these, 188 (15.5%) were COVID-19 experts. Chest computed tomography was the most used method to detect and monitor COVID-19 pneumonia. Most of the experts managed acute respiratory failure with CPAP (56.4%), high flow nasal cannula (18.6%), and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (8%), while an intensivist referral for early intubation was requested in 17% of the cases. Hydroxychloroquine was prescribed as an antiviral in 90% of cases, both as monotherapy (11.7%), and combined with protease inhibitors (43.6%) or azithromycin (36.2%). The experts unanimously prescribed low-molecular-weight heparin to patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, and half of them (51.6%) used a dose higher than standard. The respiratory burden in patients who survived the acute phase was estimated as relevant in 28.2% of the cases, modest in 39.4%, and negligible in 9%. CONCLUSIONS: In our survey some major topics, such as the role of non-invasive respiratory support and drug treatments, show disagreement between experts, likely reflecting the absence of high-quality evidence studies. Considering the significant respiratory sequelae reported following COVID-19, proper respiratory and physical therapy programs should be promptly made available.

Oncological outcome of R1 vascular margin for mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma. A single center observational cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies validated the possibility to detach colorectal liver metastases from vessels (R1vasc) featuring R1vasc equivalent to R0 and superior to tumor exposure along the transection plane (R1par). To clarify the outcome of R1 surgery (margin <1 mm) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MFCCC), distinguishing R1par and R1vasc resections. METHODS: Patients undergoing resection for MFCCC between 2008 and 2016 were considered. Tumor detachment from 1st/2nd-order Glissonean pedicles or hepatic veins was performed in advanced diseases. R0, R1par, and R1vasc were compared. RESULTS: The study included 84 resection areas in 59 patients (17 R1vasc). R1vasc group had local recurrence risk similar to R1par group (per-patient analysis 29% vs. 36%; per-resection area analysis 29% vs. 32%), higher than R0 group (3% and 2%, p = 0.003 and p = 0.0003). R1vasc and R1par groups had similar overall and recurrence-free survival (median OS 30 vs. 30 months; RFS 10 vs. 8 months), lower than R0 group (70 and 39 months, p = 0.066 and p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In MFCCC patients, R1vasc resection is not an adequate treatment. Local disease control and survival after R1vasc resection are lower than after R0 resection and similar to R1par resection. R1vasc resection could be exclusively considered to achieve resectability in otherwise unresectable patients.

The Liver Tunnel: Intention-to-treat Validation of a New Type of Hepatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective intention-to-treat validation study evaluated the liver tunnel (LT) technique for patients having ≥1 deep centrally located liver tumor, with or without middle hepatic vein (MHV) invasion. BACKGROUND: Conservative surgery has been proposed for patients with deep liver tumors having complex relationships. LT is one such novel technique. METHODS: Eligible patients were prospectively enrolled for LT. LT relies on tumor-vessel detachment, and the presence of communicating veins if MHV resection is necessary. RESULTS: Twenty consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria: 17 had colorectal liver metastases, 1 had hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 had mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 had mixed hepatocellular carcinoma-mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma. Nineteen patients underwent LT. The MHV was resected in 6 patients, always sparing segments 4i and 5. Overall, 180 lesions were removed (median 7; range 1-37): 79 lesions were included in the LT specimen (median 3; range 1-13). There was no in-hospital 90-day mortality. Overall morbidity occurred in 10 (50%) patients: major in 2 (10%). All complications were managed conservatively. After a median 15-month follow-up (range 6-48), 2 instances of cut-edge local recurrences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that LT is technically feasible and safe. Further studies are needed for standardizing its use.

Prospective Evaluation of Intrahepatic Microscopic Occult Tumor Foci in Patients with Numerous Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Patients with numerous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) have high risk of early recurrence after liver resection (LR). The presence of intrahepatic occult microscopic metastases missed by imaging has been hypothesized, but it has never been assessed by pathology analyses. METHODS: All patients with > 10 CLM who underwent LR between September 2015 and September 2016 were considered. A large sample of liver without evidence of disease ("healthy liver") was taken from the resected specimen and sent to the pathologist. One mm-thick sections were analyzed. Any metastasis, undetected by preoperative and intraoperative imaging, but identified by the pathologist was classified as occult microscopic metastasis. RESULTS: Ten patients were prospectively enrolled (median number of CLM n = 15). In a per-lesion analysis, the sensitivity of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging was 91 and 98% respectively. The pathology examination confirmed all the CLM. All patients had an adequate sample of "healthy liver" (median number of examined blocks per sample n = 14 [5-33]). No occult microscopic metastases were detected. After a median follow-up of 15 months, 5 patients were disease-free. Recurrence was hepatic and bilobar in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant occult microscopic disease in patients with numerous CLM is excluded. These results support the indication to resection in such patients and exclude the need for de principe major hepatectomy to increase the completeness of surgery.

Outcomes of enhanced one-stage ultrasound-guided hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases compared to those of ALPPS: a multicenter case-match analysis.

BACKGROUND: In case of bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM) associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been proposed. Enhanced one-stage ultrasound-guided hepatectomy (e-OSH) may represent a further solution for these patients. Aim of this study was to compare by case-match analyses the outcome of ALPPS and e-OSH. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, patients undergoing ALPPS for bilobar CLM were matched 1:2 with patients receiving e-OSH. Patients were matched according to the Fong Score (1-3/4-5), the number of CLM (3-7/≥8), the number of CLM in the left liver (1-2/≥3) and preoperative chemotherapy. All the patients in the e-OSH group had a right -sided major vascular contact. The main endpoints of the study were perioperative outcomes, overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were selected (26 ALPPS and 52 e-OSH) based on matching process. The two treatments differed significantly in major morbidity (26.9% ALPPS vs 7.7% e-OSH, p = 0.017). Median OS (31.7 vs 32.6 months) and DFS (10.6 vs 7.8 months) were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ALPPS and e-OSH for bilobar CLM achieve comparable long-term results, despite higher morbidity reported after ALPPS. These findings should drive to reposition e-OSH in managing these patients.

The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) is a Novel Cost Assessment Tool for Surgical Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify a readily available, reproducible, and internationally applicable cost assessment tool for surgical procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Strong economic pressure exists worldwide to slow down the rising of health care costs. Postoperative morbidity significantly impacts on cost in surgical patients. The comprehensive complication index (CCI), reflecting overall postoperative morbidity, may therefore serve as a new marker for cost. METHODS: Postoperative complications and total costs from a single tertiary center were prospectively collected (2014 to 2016) up to 3 months after surgery for a variety of abdominal procedures (n = 1388). CCI was used to quantify overall postoperative morbidity. Pearson correlation coefficient (rpears) was calculated for cost and CCI. For cost prediction, a linear regression model based on CCI, age, and type of surgery was developed and validated in an international cohort of patients. RESULTS: We found a high correlation between CCI and overall cost (rpears = 0.75) with the strongest correlation for more complex procedures. The prediction model performed very well (R = 0.82); each 10-point increase in CCI corresponded to a 14% increase to the baseline cost. Additional 12% of baseline cost must be added for patients older than 50 years, or 24% for those over 70 years. The validation cohorts showed a good match of predicted and observed cost. CONCLUSION: Overall postoperative morbidity correlates highly with cost. The CCI together with the type of surgery and patient age is a novel and reliable predictor of expenses in surgical patients. This finding may enable objective cost comparisons among centers, procedures, or over time obviating the need to look at complex country-specific cost calculations (www.assessurgery.com).

Progression of Colorectal Liver Metastases from the End of Chemotherapy to Resection: A New Contraindication to Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Not all patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) benefit from liver resection (LR); only patients with disease progression during chemotherapy are excluded from surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine whether tumor behavior (stable disease/progression) from the end of chemotherapy to LR impacts prognosis. METHODS: Patients undergoing LR after tumor response or stabilization during chemotherapy were considered. Overall, 128 patients who underwent examination by two imaging modalities (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) after chemotherapy with a > 3-week interval between the two imaging modalities were analyzed. Any variation in CLM size was registered. Tumor progression was defined according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria. RESULTS: Among 128 patients with stable disease or partial response to preoperative chemotherapy, 32 (25%) developed disease progression in the chemotherapy to LR interval, with a disease progression rate of 17% when this interval was < 8 weeks. Survival was lower among patients with progression than those with stable disease [3-year overall survival (OS) 23.0 vs. 52.4%, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) 6.3% vs. 21.6%; p < 0.001]. Survival was extremely poor in patients with early progression (< 8 weeks) (0.0% 2-year OS, 12.5% 6-month RFS). Disease progression in the chemotherapy to LR interval was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS and RFS [hazard ratio 3.144 and 2.350, respectively; p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Early disease progression in the chemotherapy to LR interval occurred in approximately 15% of patients and was associated with extremely poor survival. Even if these data require validation, the risk for early disease progression after chemotherapy should be considered, and, if progression is evident, the indication for surgery should be cautiously evaluated.

Measurement of Total Liver Volume Using the Energy Expenditure: A New Formula.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of liver volume (LV) is important before surgical resection or transplantation to reduce the risk of hepatic insufficiency. LV is usually measured using computed tomography or with some formulas. The aim of this study was to develop a new dynamic formula to predict LV. METHODS: Using computed tomography, LV was calculated in 101 patients without liver disease. LV was correlated with patient metabolic status, calculated with the Harris-Benedict equation for basal energy expenditure (BEE). Activity energy expenditure (AEE) was also calculated. Using linear regression analysis, a new formula was derived and was compared with Heinmann's, Urata's, Emre's, Vauthey's, Yoshizumi's, Yu's, and Hashimoto's formulas. RESULTS: A new basal formula was established: LV = (0.789 × BEE) + 272. It was found to be the most accurate (R2 = 0.39, p < 0.001). Heinmann's, Emre's, and Vauthey's formulas tend to overestimate LV, while Urata's, Yoshizumi's, Yu's, and Hashimoto's formulas tend to underestimate LV. A new AEE formula was also established: LV = (0.789 × AEE) + 272. CONCLUSIONS: These formulas give a dynamic perspective of LV, which may be influenced by the patient's actual clinical status. Using these formulas, it is possible to estimate an increased value of LV, which may contribute to a reduction in the risk of postoperative hepatic insufficiency.

Is Enhanced One-Stage Hepatectomy a Safe and Feasible Alternative to the Two-Stage Hepatectomy in the Setting of Multiple Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases? A Comparative Analysis between Two Pioneering Centers.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) is the present standard for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases (CLM). As alternative, ultrasound-guided one-stage hepatectomy (E-OSH) has been proposed even for deep-located nodules to compare TSH and E-OSH. METHODS: All consecutive TSH at the Paul Brousse Hospital and E-OSH at the Humanitas Research Hospital were considered. The inclusion criteria were ≥6 CLM, ≥3 CLM in the left liver, and ≥1 lesion with vascular contact. A total of 74 TSH and 35 E-OSH were compared. RESULTS: The 2 groups had similar characteristics. Drop-out rate of TSH was 40.5%. In comparison with the cumulated hepatectomies of TSH, E-OSH had lower blood loss (500 vs. 1,100 mL, p = 0.009), overall morbidity (37.1 vs. 70.5%, p = 0.003), severe morbidity (14.3 vs. 36.4%, p = 0.04), and liver-specific morbidity (22.9 vs. 40.9%, p = 0.02). R0 resection rate was similar between groups. E-OSH and completed TSH had similar overall survival (5-year 38.2 vs. 31.8%), recurrence-free survival (3-year 17.6 vs. 17.7%), and recurrence sites. CONCLUSIONS: E-OSH is a safe alternative to TSH for multiple bilobar deep-located CLM. Whenever feasible, E-OSH should even be considered the preferred option because it has excellent safety and oncological outcomes equivalent to completed TSH, without the drop-out risk.

Parenchymal-Sparing Surgery for the Surgical Treatment of Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases Is a Safer Approach than Major Hepatectomy Not Impairing Patients' Prognosis: A Bi-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The performance of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) versus major hepatectomy (MH) in patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is a matter that is yet debated. We investigated the outcome of patients with multiple CLM undergoing PSH instead of MH. METHODS: Databases at 2 institutions were reviewed. A propensity score-matched analysis was applied. Among 554 patients, 110 undergoing PSH and 110 undergoing MH were matched. They were similar in baseline characteristics, comorbidity, and tumor features. Primary outcomes were short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Morbidity was significantly higher in the MH group, while mortality was not significantly different. There were no differences in free-margins width, but a trend of increased survival was seen in the PSH group with a median advantage of 6 months over the MH group. Among the prognostic factors, the T status (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6; p = 0.001), the N status (HR 2.9; p = 0.001), the timing of CLM diagnosis (HR 2.1; p = 0.002), the tumor number (HR 2.0; p = 0.001), the tumor size (HR 2.2; p = 0.015), and the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.7; p = 0.023) were found to be statistically and independently significant for survival. CONCLUSIONS: PSH conveys advantage over MH in terms of decreased postoperative morbidity, and a trend of survival benefit. PSH should be considered a suitable alternative to MH whenever it is technically feasible.

Hepatectomy with or without the thoraco-abdominal approach: impact on perioperative outcome.

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy using the thoraco-abdominal approach (TAA) compared to the abdominal approach (AA) remains under debate. This study assessed the perioperative outcomes of patients operated with or without TAA. METHODS: 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was applied in 744 patients operated between 2007 and 2013, identifying 246 patients who underwent hepatectomy with TAA compared to 246 patients with AA. These groups were matched for demographics, liver disease, comorbidity, tumor features, and extent of resection. Rates of morbidity and mortality were the study endpoints. RESULTS: The rates of morbidity or mortality were not different. With the TAA length of the operations (P = 0.002), length of the Pringle maneuver (P = 0.012), and rate of blood transfusions (P = 0.041) were significantly different. Hospital stay was similar. Independent significant prognostic factors for adverse perioperative outcome were: renal comorbidity (OR = 2.7; P = 0.001), extent of the resection (OR = 3.7; P = 0.001), and increased BILCHE score (OR = 2.4; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy using the TAA was not associated with adverse perioperative outcome. The associations with length of operation, Pringle maneuver and blood transfusions may have reflected the complexity of the tumor presentation rather than the technical approach.