Distal Repair After Total Aortic Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk in Patients With Chronic Multilevel Thoracic Aortic Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the management of distal aortic disease after total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk (TAR + FET) in patients with chronic thoracic aortic disease. METHODS: Two centre retrospective study of consecutive patients treated between January 2010 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was 30 day or in hospital death. The secondary endpoint was midterm survival. Data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). The χ2 or Fisher's exact test was used as appropriate. Estimated survival (standard error) was assessed by calculating the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator with right censoring of survival data. A p value of < .050 was considered statistically significant. STROBE guidelines were followed. RESULTS: A total of 158 patients (72 men; median age 70 years, IQR 64, 75; median distal aortic diameter 58 mm, IQR 46, 68; 127 aneurysmal disease, 31 chronic dissection) underwent TAR + FET. The peri-operative mortality rate was 10.1% (9/107 elective, 7/51 non-elective). Of 74 (46.8%) patients with a primary distal seal, seven (9.5%) died peri-operatively, the distal seal was maintained during follow up in 51, nine underwent late distal repair (two planned, seven unplanned; one open, eight endovascular; one peri-operative death) with a median interval to unplanned repair of 777 days (IQR 462, 1480), and seven with loss of seal had no intervention. Distal seal failed in 2/28 (7%) patients with a distal seal length > 30 mm and device oversizing > 10%, compared with 12/39 (31%) patients who did not meet these criteria (p = .031). In 84 patients without a primary distal seal, nine (10.7%) died peri-operatively, the distal aorta remained below the size threshold for repair during follow up in 12 patients, 44 had distal repair (median aortic diameter 64 mm, IQR 60, 75; eight open, one hybrid, 35 endovascular repairs; no deaths) at a median of 256 days (IQR 135, 740), and 19 did not have distal repair at the end of the follow up period: six died before planned repair at a median interval of 115 days (IQR 85, 120); eight were considered unfit; one was assessed as fit but declined; and four patients were awaiting assessment. Median follow up was 46 months (IQR 26, 75): no patients were lost to follow up. Estimated ± standard error five year survival was 61.5 ± 4.1%: elective 70.6 ± 4.7%, non-elective 43.2 ± 7.2%. CONCLUSION: TAR + FET achieved primary distal seal in 47% of patients, but late failure occurred in 21%. Distal repair was ultimately indicated in 84% of survivors without a primary distal seal and of these 70% underwent repair, almost 10% died before planned repair, and 13% were considered unfit. Earlier distal endovascular repair and better assessment of patient fitness may improve midterm outcomes.

The Complementary Roles of Open and Endovascular Repair of Extent I - III Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a United Kingdom Aortic Centre.

OBJECTIVE: A multidisciplinary approach offering both open surgical repair (OSR) and complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR) is essential if patients with thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are to receive optimal care. This study reports early and midterm outcomes of elective and non-elective OSR and cEVAR for extent I - III TAAA in a UK aortic centre. METHODS: Retrospective study of consecutive patients treated between January 2009 and December 2021. Primary endpoint was 30 day/in hospital mortality. Secondary endpoint was Kaplan-Meier estimates of midterm survival. Data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: In total, 296 patients (176 men; median age 71 years [IQR 65, 76]; median aneurysm diameter 66 mm [IQR 61, 75]) underwent repair (222 elective, 74 non-elective). OSR patients (n = 66) were significantly younger with a higher incidence of heritable disease and chronic dissection, while cEVAR patients (n = 230) had a significantly higher prevalence of coronary, pulmonary, and renal disease. Overall, in hospital mortality after elective and non-elective repair was 3.2% (n = 7) and 23.0% (n = 17), respectively, with no significant difference between treatment modalities (elective OSR 6.5% vs. cEVAR 2.3%, p = .14; non-elective OSR 25.0% vs. cEVAR 20.3%, p = .80). Major non-fatal complications occurred in 15.3% (33/215) after elective repair (OSR 39.5%, 17/43, vs. cEVAR 9.3%, 16/172; p < .001) and 14% (8/57) after non-elective repair (OSR 26.7%, 4/15, vs. cEVAR 9.5%, 4/42; p = .19). Median follow up was 52 months (IQR 23, 78). Estimated survival ± standard error at 1, 3, and 5 years for the entire cohort was 89.6 ± 2.0%, 76.6 ± 2.9%, and 69.0% ± 3.2% after elective repair, and 67.6 ± 5.4%, 52.1 ± 6.0%, and 41.0 ± 6.2% after non-elective repair. There was no difference in 5 year survival comparing modalities after elective repair for patients younger than 70 years and those with post-dissection aneurysms. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach offering OSR and cEVAR can deliver comprehensive care for extent I - III TAAA with low early mortality and good midterm survival. Further studies are required to determine the optimal complementary roles of each treatment modality.

Multicenter Study to Evaluate Endovascular Repair of Extent I-III Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms Without Prophylactic Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage.

OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of Extent I-III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) without prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD). BACKGROUND: Prophylactic CSFD has been routinely used during endovascular TAAA repair, but concerns about major drain-related complications have led to revising this paradigm. METHODS: We reviewed a multicenter cohort of 541 patients treated for Extent I-III TAAAs by FB-EVAR without prophylactic CSFD. Spinal cord injury (SCI) was graded as ambulatory (paraparesis) or nonambulatory (paraplegia). Endpoints were any SCI, permanent paraplegia, response to rescue treatment, major drain-related complications, mortality, and patient survival. RESULTS: There were 22 Extent I, 240 Extent II and 279 Extent III TAAAs. Thirty-day mortality was 3%. SCI occurred in 45 patients (8%), paraparesis occurring in 23 (4%) and paraplegia in 22 patients (4%). SCI was more common in patients with Extent I-II compared with Extent III TAAAs (12% vs. 5%, P =0.01). Rescue treatment included permissive hypertension in all patients, with CSFD in 22 (4%). Symptom improvement was noted in 73%. Twelve patients (2%) had permanent paraplegia. Two patients (0.4%) had major drain-related complications. Independent predictors for SCI by multivariate logistic regression were sustained perioperative hypotension [odds ratio (OR): 4.4, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.7-11.1], patent collateral network (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.6), and total length of aortic coverage (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10). Patient survival at 3 years was 72%±3%. CONCLUSION: FB-EVAR of Extent I-III TAAAs without CSFD has low mortality and low rates of permanent paraplegia (2%). SCI occurred in 8% of patients, and rescue treatment improved symptoms in 73% of them.

Multicenter trans-Atlantic experience with fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter international study aimed to describe outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repairs (FB-EVAR) in a cohort of patients treated for chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAAs). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of all consecutive patients treated by FB-EVAR for repair of extent I to III PD-TAAAs in 16 centers from the United States and Europe (2008-2021). Data were extracted from institutional prospectively maintained databases and electronic patient records. All patients received off-the-shelf or patient-specific manufactured fenestrated-branched stent grafts. Endpoints were any cause mortality and major adverse events at 30 days, technical success, target artery (TA) patency, freedom from TA instability, minor (endovascular with <12 Fr sheath) and major (open or ≥12 Fr sheath) secondary interventions, patient survival, and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM). RESULTS: A total of 246 patients (76% male; median age, 67 years [interquartile range, 61-73 years]) were treated for extent I (7%), extent II (55%), and extent III (35%) PD-TAAAs by FB-EVAR. The median aneurysm diameter was 65 mm (interquartile range, 59-73 mm). Eighteen patients (7%) were octogenarians, 212 (86%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3, and 21 (9%) presented with contained ruptured or symptomatic aneurysms. There were 917 renal-mesenteric vessels targeted by 581 fenestrations (63%) and 336 directional branches (37%), with a mean of 3.7 vessels per patient. Technical success was 96%. Mortality and rate of major adverse events at 30 days was 3% and 28%, including disabling complications such as new onset dialysis in 1%, major stroke in 1%, and permanent paraplegia in 2%. Mean follow-up was 24 months. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated patient survival at 3 and 5 years was 79% ± 6% and 65% ± 10%. KM estimated freedom from ARM was 95% ± 3% and 93% ± 5% at the same intervals. Unplanned secondary interventions were needed in 94 patients (38%), including minor procedures in 64 (25%) and major procedures in 30 (12%). There was one conversion to open surgical repair (<1%). KM estimated freedom from any secondary intervention was 44% ± 9% at 5 years. KM estimated primary and secondary TA patency were 93% ± 2% and 96% ± 1% at 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FB-EVAR for chronic PD-TAAAs was associated with high technical success and a low rate of mortality (3%) and disabling complications at 30 days. Although the procedure is effective in the prevention of ARM, patient survival was low at 5 years (65%), likely due to the significant comorbidities in this cohort of patients. Freedom from secondary interventions at 5 years was 44%, although most procedures were minor. The significant rate of reinterventions highlights the need for continued patient surveillance.

Interventions For the Treatment of Lower Limb Telangiectasias and Reticular Veins: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of available interventions in the treatment of lower limb reticular veins and telangiectasias. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was performed on Scopus, Embase, and Google scholar. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Following data extraction and processing, a Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression was undertaken. The primary endpoint was telangiectasia and reticular vein clearance. RESULTS: Nineteen studies, 16 randomised controlled trials and three prospective case series, including 1 356 patients and 2 051 procedures, were finally incorporated. All interventions, apart from 0.5% sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STS) and 0.25% STS displayed statistically significantly superior telangiectasia and reticular vein clearance compared with normal saline (N/S), Meta-regression analysis employing the type of the venule treated (telangiectasia or reticular vein) as a covariable, revealed a positive correlation between Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser and telangiectasia clearance (ß = 1.38, 95% CI 0.56 - 2.14). Further exploration unveiled the superiority of Nd:YAG 1064 nm in the treatment of telangiectasias compared with all included interventions except 72% chromated glycerin (CG). STS 0.25% increased the risk of hyperpigmentation compared with all interventions except 0.5% STS, and 1% polidocanol. CG 72% decreased the risk of matting compared with polidocanol foam (risk ratio [RR] 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 - 0.80) and STS (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.92). Non-statistically significant differences were identified between interventions regarding pain outcomes. CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis has demonstrated a proportional relationship between sclerosant potency and side effect occurrence in the treatment of telangiectasias and reticular veins and the superiority of laser therapy compared with injection sclerotherapy in treating telangiectasias. The transition of telangiectasia and reticular vein treatment from highly potent detergent solutions to equally effective but milder sclerosants could potentially reduce undesirable adverse events.

Fenestrated-branched endovascular repair for distal thoracoabdominal aortic pathology after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair (FBEVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic pathology after total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (TAR+FET). METHODS: Interrogation of prospectively maintained databases from four high-volume aortic centers identified consecutive patients treated with distal FBEVAR after prior TAR+FET between August 2013 and September 2020. The primary end point was 30-day/in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points were technical success, early clinical success, midterm survival, and freedom from reintervention. Data are presented as median (interquartile range). RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (21 men; median age, 73 years [67-75 years]) with degenerative (n = 22) and postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (n = 17) (median diameter, 71 mm [61-78 mm]) were identified. Distal FBEVAR was intended in 27 patients (median interval, 9.8 months [6.2-16.6 months]), anticipated in 7, and unexpected in 5. A total of 31 patients had a two- (n = 24) or three-stage (n = 7) distal FBEVAR. Renovisceral target vessel preservation was 99.3% (145 of 146). Early primary and secondary technical success was 92% and 97%, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 2.6% (n = 1; respiratory failure and spinal cord ischemia [SCI]). Six survivors also developed SCI, which was associated with complete (n = 4) or partial recovery (n = 2) at hospital discharge. No patients required renal replacement therapy or suffered a stroke. Early clinical success was 95%. Median follow-up was 30.5 months (23.7-49.7 months). Eleven patients required 16 late reinterventions. Estimated 3-year survival and freedom from reintervention were 84% ± 6% and 63% ± 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Distal FBEVAR after prior TAR+FET is associated with high technical success and low early mortality. The risk of SCI is significant although the majority of patients demonstrate full or partial recovery before hospital discharge. Midterm patient survival is favorable, but there remains a high requirement for late reintervention. FBEVAR represents an acceptable alternative to distal open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Complex Endovascular Repair of Paravisceral Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To report the early and mid-term outcome of complex endovascular repair (EVAR) for paravisceral infective native aortic aneurysms (INAA). METHODS: Interrogation of a prospectively maintained database identified consecutive patients who underwent non-elective complex EVAR for paravisceral INAAs in a single institution between December 2013 and June 2020. All patients were considered to have definite INAAs based on diagnostic criteria. Patients who had prior aortic repair were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients (19 men; mean age 67 years [SD = 11.4]; median diameter 60 mm [IQR: 55-73]) with acute symptomatic (n = 24) or contained ruptured (n = 2) aneurysms underwent surgeon-modified fenestrated EVAR (SM-FEVAR; n = 24) or chimney-periscope EVAR (CHIMPS; n = 2). Median observed follow-up was 36.2 months (18.3-53.5). Nine patients had positive venous blood cultures and a further seven had recent or concomitant infection. All patients received pre- and post-operative antibiotic therapy and rifampicin-soaked endografts. A total of 95 vessels were targeted for preservation and 86 were stent-grafted. One vessel occluded intra-operatively and a further 3 occluded within 30 days. The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 11.5% (n = 3), and the estimated 1- and 3-year survival (±SD) was 85% ± 7%. Infection-related complications (IRCs) occurred in two patients: both developed new INAA within 30 days of index repair and were treated by EVAR with no mortality. Estimated 3-year freedom from late re-intervention was 100%. One patient required infrarenal EVAR for a non-infective aneurysm at 43 months. CONCLUSION: Complex EVAR for paravisceral INAAs is associated with acceptable early and mid-term outcomes and is an acceptable alternative to open surgery. We propose that these patients are managed with long-term antimicrobials, impregnation of graft material with rifampicin, and rigorous post-operative surveillance. CLINICAL IMPACT: A multi-disciplinary approach is required to deliver the best possible outcome for patients with this challenging aortic pathology.

Endovascular Treatment of Post Type A Chronic Aortic Arch Dissection With a Branched Endograft: Early Results From a Retrospective International Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of endovascular aortic arch repair for chronic dissection with a custom-made branched endograft. BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissections are often treated with prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta. During follow-up, repair of an aneurysmal evolution of the false lumen distal to the ascending prosthesis can be a challenge both for the surgeon and the patient. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of consecutive patients from 14 vascular units treated with a custom-made, inner-branched device (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) for chronic aortic arch dissection. Rates of in-hospital mortality and stroke, technical success, early and late complications, reinterventions, and mortality during follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy consecutive patients were treated between 2011 and 2018. All patients were considered unfit for conventional surgery. In-hospital combined mortality and stroke rate was 4% (n = 3), including 1 minor stroke, 1 major stroke causing death, and 1 death following multiorgan failure. Technical success rate was 94.3%. Twelve (17.1%) patients required early reinterventions: 8 for vascular access complication, 2 for endoleak correction, and 2 for pericardial effusion drainage. Median follow-up was 301 (138-642) days. During follow-up, 20 (29%) patients underwent secondary interventions: 9 endoleak corrections, 1 open repair for prosthetic kink, and 10 distal extensions of the graft to the thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta. Eight patients (11%) died during follow-up because of nonaortic-related cause in 7 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of aortic arch chronic dissections with a branched endograft is associated with low mortality and stroke rates but has a high reintervention rate. Further follow-up is required to confirm the benefits of this novel approach.

Fenestrated-Branch Endovascular Repair After Prior Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome of fenestrated and branch endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR-BEVAR) for asymptomatic and acute symptomatic proximal aortic pathology in patients with prior open (OSR) or endovascular (EVAR) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: This was a single centre retrospective study of consecutive patients with non-ruptured (asymptomatic and acute symptomatic) proximal aortic pathology after prior OSR or EVAR treated between December 2007 and February 2020. The primary endpoint was 30 day/in hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were technical success, primary clinical success, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of medium term survival and freedom from re-intervention. Data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). The effect of covariates on medium term survival was estimated using multivariable (Cox proportional hazards model) analysis. A p value < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (83 men; median age 75 years [IQR 71 - 80 years]; median diameter 73 mm [IQR 64 - 89 mm]; 82 elective, 10 acute) underwent FEVAR-BEVAR after prior OSR (n = 47) or EVAR (n = 45). Indications for intervention were aneurysmal degeneration with or without type 1a endoleak (n = 57; four juxtarenal [JR] AAA, 21 extent II/III, 32 extent IV thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms); type 1a endoleak alone (n = 27) and to create a more durable repair after acute infrarenal EVAR (n = 8; JRAAA). In total, 348 renovisceral vessels were targeted for preservation and 324 were stent grafted. Twenty-four unstented vessels comprised one bypass, 11 scallops and six fenestrations intentionally not stent grafted, two vessels occluded before graft implantation, and four vessels occluded intra-operatively. Primary technical success was 95.6%. The thirty day mortality rate was 1.1% and one patient each (1.1%) required permanent dialysis or developed temporary spinal cord ischaemia. Early primary clinical success was 94.6%. Median follow up was 36 months (IQR 23 - 64 months). Estimated overall survival (± standard error) at one, two, and three years was 86% ± 4%, 85% ± 4%, and 70% ± 5%, respectively. Multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any independent predictors of survival. Four target vessels occluded during follow up. Nineteen patients underwent 28 late re-interventions, with almost half performed for issues arising distal to the FEVAR-BEVAR. Patients treated with a cuff were statistically significantly more likely to require distal re-intervention compared with those treated by relining (9/49 vs. 1/43, p = .018 [odds ratio 9.3, 95% confidence interval 1.2 - 423]). In patients with prior EVAR alone, this did not reach statistical significance (cuff 7/25 vs. relining 1/20, p = .059 [odds ratio 7.1, 95% confidence interval 0.8 - 350]). Estimated freedom from re-intervention at one, two, and three years was 88% ± 3%, 81% ± 4%, and 81% ± 4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FEVAR-BEVAR after prior OSR or EVAR is associated with low peri-operative morbidity and mortality, and acceptable medium term survival and freedom from re-intervention. Treatment with a FEVAR-BEVAR cuff is associated with a higher requirement for distal re-intervention than relining of the original repair.

Endovascular repair of acute juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with surgeon-modified fenestrated endografts.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report the short- and medium-term outcome of surgeon-modified fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (SM-FEVAR) for acute complex aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Interrogation of a prospectively maintained database identified consecutive patients who underwent SM-FEVAR for acute complex aortic aneurysms (including mycotic aneurysms treated with rifampicin-soaked endografts) in a single institution between October 2009 and November 2018. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (37 men; median age, 73 years [range, 50-85 years]; aneurysm diameter, 76 mm [interquartile range, 58-90 mm]) with acute thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (n = 50; 40 symptomatic, 10 ruptured; 19 extent I-III, 31 extent IV) or symptomatic type IA endoleaks after infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (n = 4) underwent SM-FEVAR. Seven of the patients had adjunct chimney and periscope stent grafts or surgical bypasses. A total of 187 vessels (mean, 3.4 [range, 1-5] per patient) were targeted for preservation; nine occluded intraoperatively or within 30 days. The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 16.7% (n = 9; symptomatic, 7.4%; rupture, 50%) and fell significantly from 29.6% (n = 8) in the first 27 patients to 3.7% (n = 1) in the most recent 27 patients (P = .0243). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in one patient (1.9%) who died within 30 days. No survivors required permanent renal dialysis. Estimated survival at 12 and 24 months was 73.2% (standard error [SE], 6.2%). Eight patients underwent 12 late aorta- or graft-related reinterventions. Estimated freedom from reintervention at 12 months and 24 months was 87.9% (SE, 5.2%) and 81.6% (SE, 6.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute complex aneurysms, SM-FEVAR provides a customized solution that is associated with good medium-term survival and durability. The knowledge and skills to perform safe SM-FEVAR should be within the capabilities of high-volume specialist aortic centers.

Elective Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Repair with Supracoeliac Sealing Zones and without Prophylactic Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage: Early and Medium-term Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To report the outcome of elective fenestrated and branch (FEVAR-BEVAR) endovascular aortic repair with supracoeliac (SC) sealing zones and the impact of staged repair without prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage on the incidence of spinal cord ischaemia (SCI). METHODS: Two hundred and seventy consecutive patients (217 men; mean [SD] age, 72.8 ± 6.3 years; median (IQR) diameter 65 mm [62-75 mm]) with juxtarenal (JRAAA) (n = 69) or thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) (n = 201) underwent elective FEVAR (n = 192) or BEVAR (n = 78) with renovisceral stent grafting, proximal SC (Zones 1-5; <40 mm [n = 83]; ≥40 mm [n = 187]) and distal infrarenal aorto-iliac sealing zone (Zones 9-11) between December 2008 and September 2017. A spinal cord protection protocol (SCPP) including staging without prophylactic CSF drainage was introduced in September 2012. RESULTS: A total of 1026 renovisceral vessels (mean 3.8 ± 0.5 per patient) were targeted for preservation. One patient (0.4%) died in the institution within 30 days and 31 (11.4%) developed 36 major non-fatal complications including unplanned permanent dialysis (n = 1, 0.4%) and non-ambulatory SCI (n = 6, 2.2%). In patients with <40 mm SC coverage, none were staged or had prophylactic CSF drains and none developed SCI. In patients with ≥40 mm SC coverage, SCI occurred in 3.3% (pre-SCPP: 4/20 [20%; none staged, 13 prophylactic CSF drains] vs. post-SCPP: 2/167 [1.2%; 89 staged, no prophylactic CSF drains]; p = .001 [OR = 19.9]). Estimated survival (±SE) at one, two and three years was 92.6% ± 1.6%, 86.5% ± 2.4%, and 73.8% ± 3.5%, respectively, with no significant difference comparing extent of aneurysm or SC coverage. Forty-three (15.9%) patients required late re-intervention. Estimated freedom from re-intervention at one, two and three years was 91.9% ± 1.8%, 85.1% ± 2.5%, and 79.5% ± 3.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elective endovascular thoraco-abdominal aortic repair with SC sealing zones can be performed with low peri-operative risk and good medium-term outcomes. Selective staging without prophylactic CSF drainage contributed to a significant reduction in the incidence of SCI.

Endovascular Repair of Acute Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: The outcome of endovascular repair (EVAR) for acute thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) is reported and the applicability of the t-Branch off the shelf (OTS) device is determined. METHODS: Interrogation of a prospectively maintained database identified all patients who underwent EVAR for acute TAAA between September 2012 (when the first non-elective t-Branch case was performed) and November 2015. Early and medium-term outcomes were analysed. Survival and re-intervention-free survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (27 men; mean ± SD age, 72 ± 8 years) were treated for acute symptomatic (n = 29) or ruptured (n = 10) TAAA (20 anatomical extent I-III, 19 extent IV). Fourteen patients had mycotic aneurysms. The mean aneurysm diameter was 80 ± 20 mm. The mean ± SD follow-up was 21.4 ± 15.4 months. Surgeon modified fenestrated EVAR was used in 24 patients, chimney/periscope EVAR in two, and t-Branch in 13 (33%) patients. Aortic coverage was greater than 40 mm above the coeliac axis in all patients. A total of 127 target vessels (TVs) were preserved (mean 3.3 per patient) and two occluded within 30 days. The 30 day mortality was 26%. Four (10%) patients developed spinal cord ischaemia (SCI): two with paraplegia died within 30 days, and two with paraparesis recovered completely with blood pressure manipulation and cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Estimated overall survival (±SD) at 12 and 24 months was 71.8 ± 7.2% and 63.2 ± 7.9%, respectively. Estimated freedom from re-intervention at 12 and 24 months was 93 ± 4.8% and 85.3 ± 6.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR for acute TAAA is associated with acceptable early and mid-term results in patients who have no other treatment options. Only one third of these patients were suitable for the t-Branch device, indicating that further advances in device design are required to treat the majority of acute TAAA patients with commercially available OTS technology.

Open surgical replacement of the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta in patients with confirmed Marfan and Loeys-Dietz syndromes: A 20-year single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: A relatively small proportion of patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease require open surgical replacement of the distal thoracic aorta. We reviewed the outcome in patients with Marfan and Loeys-Dietz syndromes treated in an aortic centre in the United Kingdom. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective study of consecutive patients treated between October 1999 and December 2019. The primary end point was 30-day mortality. Secondary end points were Kaplan-Meier estimates of medium-term survival and freedom from distal reintervention. Data are presented as median (interquartile range). RESULTS: A total of 58 patients [33 men; 51 with Marfan syndrome; median age 41 years (35-48); median aneurysm diameter 60 mm (55-74)] underwent open descending (n = 21) or thoracoabdominal aortic replacement (n = 37). All repairs were performed using cardiopulmonary bypass with hypothermic circulatory arrest in 31 patients. The 30-day mortality was 5.2% (n = 3, including 2 patients ≥ 60 years with significant comorbidity). Major non-fatal complications included early reoperation (n = 7), tracheostomy (n = 9), temporary renal replacement therapy (n = 3), permanent spinal cord deficit (n = 2) and permanent stroke (n = 1). Median follow-up was 81 months (48-127). Estimated (±standard error) 5-year survival was 85% ±5%. Seven patients had distal aortic reintervention with no deaths or spinal cord deficit: estimated 5-year freedom from distal reintervention was 94% ±3%. There was no difference in survival or freedom from distal reintervention comparing: elective vs. non-elective; type of heritable thoracic aortic disease; DeBakey type; or extent of surgical repair. CONCLUSIONS: Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic replacement in patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease can be performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality, satisfactory long-term survival and low requirement for distal reintervention.

Intravascular mucormycosis as a cause of arm ischemia in an immunocompromised patient.

Mucormycosis is an opportunistic fungal infection primarily affecting patients with immunosuppression. We present a case of upper limb ischemia secondary to mucormycosis. A 59-year-old man with myelodysplasia presented with an acutely ischemic arm. The patient underwent numerous revascularisation attempts. Following the final procedure, he developed a cerebral infarct and subsequently died. The most common presentations of mucormycosis are of local character. Once established, it can spread rapidly with vascular invasion and in situ thrombosis. Mortality rate is 76%-96%. In this case, it led to fulminant intravascular coagulopathy resulting in recurrent upper and lower limb ischemia, and finally cerebral infarction.

A reproducibility study of a TDI-based method to calculate indices of arterial stiffness.

The aim of the study was to investigate the reproducibility of estimation of Young's modulus E and pressure strain elastic modulus Ep, derived from a tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) wall motion technique. Healthy subjects had their arteries insonated at the same sitting by two different observers and at two different sittings by the same observer. From 32 subjects in the reproducibility study, within-scan coefficient of variation (CV) was 4.5%. Intraobserver between-scan CV for E was 12.7% and for Ep 11.0%. Interobserver CVs were 8.3% and 9.3%, respectively. TDI is a reproducible, valid and highly sensitive direct assessment of arterial wall parameters. It is at least as reproducible as other ultrasound based methods for assessing arterial stiffness and also provides increased information about the arterial distension waveform.

Effect of ramipril on renal function in patients with intermittent claudication.

BACKGROUND: The Heart Outcomes Prevention Study (HOPE) demonstrated that ramipril resulted in a blood-pressure-independent 25% reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Despite this, general practitioners and vascular surgeons remain reluctant to prescribe ACE inhibitors in this group of patients because of concerns about renal artery stenosis (RAS). We aimed to define the effect of ramipril on renal function in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 132 unselected patients with IC entering the study 78 (59%) were excluded due to: current ACE inhibitor use (38%), renal impairment (serum creatinine above normal range) (15%), known severe RAS (1%) or unwillingness to participate (5%). The remaining 54 patients were titrated to 10 mg ramipril and renal function was monitored at 1, 5, and 12 weeks. Treatment was discontinued during titration in 5 patients due to symptoms (3) or lack of compliance (2). In the remainder, median [IQR] serum creatinine increased (94 [85.8-103.3] to 98 [88.0-106.5] micromol/L, p < or = 0.001) and median [IQR] GFR decreased (71.5 [64.6-82.3] to 68.7 [59.8-74.7] mL/min per 1.73 m2, p < or = 0.001) between baseline and 5 weeks. These changes were not considered clinically significant. By 12 weeks these values had returned almost to baseline (Cr 95.5 [88.0-103.25] micromol/L, GFR 71.8 [65.3-77.4] mL/min). No patient had a serum creatinine rise > 30%. CONCLUSION: Most of patients with IC and a normal serum creatinine can be safely commenced on ramipril provided they are screened, titrated and monitored as described above. Studies in patients with borderline renal impairment (serum creatinine up to 30% above baseline) are on-going.

Screening for popliteal aneurysms should not be a routine part of a community-based aneurysm screening program.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have found an increased incidence of peripheral aneurysms in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this study was to determine whether screening for popliteal aneurysms should be part of an AAA screening programme. SETTING: A community-based AAA screening programme. METHODS: The diameters of the internal abdominal aorta and both popliteal arteries were assessed by B-Mode ultrasound in a subgroup of the screened population. An AAA was defined as an infrarenal aortic diameter > 29 mm. A popliteal aneurysm was defined as a popliteal diameter > 19 mm. RESULTS: Information was available for 283 subjects, 112 subjects with a small AAA, and 171 subjects with a normal aorta. No popliteal aneurysms were found in the subjects with a normal aorta. Three popliteal aneurysms were found in patients with a small AAA. Scanning both popliteal arteries took an experienced sonographer on average three times as long as scanning for an AAA (5 vs 15 minutes). CONCLUSION: Popliteal artery aneurysms are seen in less than 3% of men with a small AAA and not at all in men with a normal aortic diameter. It is therefore not cost effective to include screening for popliteal aneurysms in population screening for AAA.

Open aortic arch replacement in high-risk patients: the gold standard.

OBJECTIVES: Open total aortic arch replacement (TAR) in high-risk patients is considered by some to be associated with a prohibitively perioperative risk. Recent reports describe hybrid techniques to treat this group. We reviewed our outcomes of open surgery in a 'high-risk' group of patients. METHODS: All patients who underwent open TAR between 2000 and 2013 were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Patients comparable with the ones who underwent hybrid repair in previous studies (logistic EuroSCORE between 20 and 60 without intervention on the aortic root or on the mitral/tricuspid valve) were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were identified. Median logistic EuroSCORE was 27.4 (range 20-57) and median age was 76 years (34.5% male). There were 11 resternotomies (18.9%) and 20 procedures were urgent/emergency (34.5%). Preoperative comorbidities included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (31%), coronary artery disease (22.4%), peripheral vascular disease (48.3%), previous stroke (5.2%), previous myocardial infarction (3.4%) and left ventricular dysfunction (12%). Concomitant procedures included aortic valve replacement/resuspension (58.7%), coronary artery bypass grafting (22.4%), open descending aorta replacement (10.3%) and frozen elephant trunk (19%). Overall in-hospital mortality, permanent stroke and spinal cord injury rate were 6.9, 1.7 and 0%, respectively. There were no deaths or stroke in the elective group. One-year, 5-year and 10-year estimates of survival were 82.7, 70.0 and 37.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Open TAR can be performed with low mortality and morbidity and excellent long-term results even in high-risk patients. Total endovascular repair may represent an option for patients not suitable for open surgery.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with increased aortic stiffness.

OBJECTIVES: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) have been shown to retard aneurysm growth in animal models. In vitro studies have shown an inhibitory effect of NSAIDS on matrix metalloproteinase-9, interleukin-1beta, and IL-6 mediated arterial wall elastolysis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of NSAIDs on arterial stiffness, a surrogate marker of elastolysis. METHODS: 447 subjects enrolled in a community-based abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening program were assessed for age, blood pressure, smoking status, and drug history. Aortic diameter and stiffness were measured by M-Mode ultrasound. The concentration of the amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen was used as a proxy measurement of type III collagen turnover. RESULTS: NSAID ingestion was significantly (p = 0.006) associated with increased aortic wall stiffness after adjusting for age, aortic diameter, blood pressure, and smoking status. No such effect was seen for beta-blockers, calcium channel antagonists, nitrates, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, or antiplatelet agents. DISCUSSION: These novel data show that NSAIDS are associated with increased aortic stiffness, possibly through the effects of cytokine mediated elastolysis. This in turn may prevent aortic expansion and the development of AAA.