RESUMEN
The management of patients with pre-existing temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) undergoing orthognathic surgery remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study aimed to profile these individuals and evaluate the correlation between orthognathic surgery and alterations in TMD indicators and symptoms. We conducted a retrospective cohort investigation involving patients with skeletal malocclusion and established TMDs. Variables of interest encompassed the performance of orthognathic surgery, documented TMDs (including temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds, TMJ pain, muscle discomfort, and jaw locking), and patients' self-assessments of TMJ and muscle pain using a visual analog scale (VAS). The primary outcome measures focused on changes in TMD indicators and symptoms. Among the study cohort, 73.4% exhibited skeletal class III malocclusion, while 26.6% presented with skeletal class II malocclusion. Notably, patients classified as skeletal class III were significantly younger than their skeletal class II counterparts (mean age: 23.06±5.37 vs. 26.71±7.33; P=0.034). The most prevalent pre-existing TMD complaint was TMJ sounds (65.5%), followed by TMJ pain (39.1%), muscle discomfort (23.4%), and jaw locking (12.5%). Skeletal class II patients were more likely to experience TMJ sounds compared to skeletal class III patients (88.2% vs. 57.4%; P=0.022). Statistically significant improvements were observed in the VAS assessments among class III patients following surgery. A majority of patients with pre-existing TMDs seeking orthognathic surgery exhibited skeletal class III malocclusion and were younger than those with skeletal class II malocclusion. Importantly, orthognathic surgery was associated with positive changes in TMD indicators and symptoms in these patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Condylar hyperplasia is a non-neoplastic overgrowth of the mandibular condyle. The disorder is progressive and causes gradual jaw deviation, facial asymmetry, and dental malocclusion. The only treatment capable of stopping hyperplastic growth is surgical condylectomy to remove the upper portion of the condyle containing the deranged growth center. When this procedure is conducted in proportion to the length of the healthy side it may also correct the jaw deviation and facial asymmetry. OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree to which condylectomy corrects the asymmetry and to determine the proportion of patients after condylectomy who were satisfied with the esthetic result and did not desire further corrective surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who underwent condylectomy that was not followed by corrective orthognathic surgery for at least 1 year to determine the degree of correction of chin deviation and lip cant. Patient satisfaction from treatment or desire and undergo further corrective surgery was reported. RESULTS: Chin deviation decreased after condylectomy from a mean of 4.8° to a mean of 1.8° (P < 0.001). Lip cant decreased after condylectomy from a mean of 3.5° to a mean of 1.5° (P < 0.001). Most patients (72%) were satisfied with the results and did not consider further corrective orthognathic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Proportional condylectomy could be a viable treatment to both arrest the condylar overgrowth and achieve some correction of the facial asymmetry.