Management of patients treated with oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: the PERSEO Registry.

In patients on oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent (PCI), international guidelines endorse the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) rather than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) rather than triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT). Aim of this study was to evaluate contemporary real-world data on antithrombotic regimens and outcome in patients on OAC undergoing PCI with stent. Consecutive patients on OAC undergoing PCI were enrolled in the multicentre, prospective, observational PERSEO registry (NCT03392948). Primary end-point was net adverse clinical events (NACE) with VKA vs DOAC, whereas a secondary pre-specified end-point was NACE with DAT vs TAT both at 1-year follow-up. From February 2018 to February 2022, 1234 consecutive patients were included. The main indication for OAC was atrial fibrillation (86%) and the mean CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4±2 and 3.6±1, respectively. Of the 1228 patients discharged alive, 222 (18%) were on VKA and 1006 (82%) on DOAC (p<0.01). DAT was employed in 197 patients whereas TAT in 1028. At follow-up, NACE rate was significantly higher with VKA compared to DOAC (23% vs 16%, p=0.013) and confirmed after propensity score adjustment. TAT and DAT did not differ as regards NACE rate (17% vs 19%, p=0.864) even though, compared to TAT, DAT was associated with less major bleedings (2% vs 5%, p= 0.014), confirmed after propensity score adjustment. In conclusion, in patients on OAC undergoing PCI, DOAC, compared to VKA, was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of NACE and DAT reduced bleedings compared to TAT.

[Conduction disorders after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence, characteristics, and clinical management]. / I disturbi di conduzione dopo impianto transcatetere di protesi aortica: incidenza, caratteristiche e gestione clinica.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation may be complicated by the development of conduction disturbances, including left bundle branch block and high-grade atrioventricular blocks, especially in patients with predisposing risk factors, such as pre-existing right bundle branch block. Permanent pacemaker implantation is a procedure with potential short- and long-term complications, and it should be reserved to patients with appropriate indications. Electrophysiological testing and/or prolonged ambulatory ECG monitoring are valuable tools for stratifying the risk of pacemaker implantation. However, the management of new-onset conduction disorders is not always straightforward, and there are different approaches depending on the center's attitude. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to define clinical management based on current evidence, while awaiting data from randomized trials.

To Treat or Not to Treat? This Is the Question About the Incidental Finding of Double Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm in A 91-Year-Old Woman.

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a very uncommon clinical finding and often requires emergency surgery due to its high risk of rupture. This educational text reports the case of a 91-year-old Italian women who was incidentally discovered to have a huge double aneurysm of the sinuses of Valsalva.

Periprocedural management and in-hospital outcome of patients with indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary artery stenting.

PURPOSE: In patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing coronary stenting (PCI-S), procedural management and in-hospital outcome have never been specifically and prospectively investigated. Also, the contribution of early bleeding to the relevant hemorrhagic rate reported at follow-up with triple therapy of OAC, aspirin, and clopidogrel is largely unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients with indication for OAC undergoing PCI-S at 5 centers were enrolled and prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 3410 patients undergoing PCI-S in the study period, indication for OAC was present in 4.8%. Femoral approach and bare metal stents were the most frequently used. During PCI-S, OAC was continued in about 30% of patients, whereas in about 20% heparin bridging was carried out. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were rarely used (11%), whereas a standard bolus of unfractionated heparin was given in 93% of cases. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 4.8% of patients and major bleeding in 4.3%. No predictors of MACE or bleeding were identified, although the femoral approach was of borderline significance for major bleeding (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.0-20.8; P = 0.05). A history of previous hemorrhage (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.6-18.1; P = 0.007) predicted Carbofilm-coated stent implantation. CONCLUSIONS: A limited, albeit clinically relevant, proportion of patients undergoing PCI-S has indication for OAC. Procedural management appears not substantially different from that of common patients. In-hospital major bleeding is relevant and should be taken into account when evaluating the overall hemorrhagic rate at a medium- to long-term follow-up.

[Premature ventricular beats: are they always benign? Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects]. / Extrasistolia ventricolare: è sempre benigna? Aspetti diagnostici e terapeutici.

Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are usually benign, and commonly only severely symptomatic patients are treated. In the literature, frequent PVCs have been reported to cause ventricular dysfunction, which may improve after PVC treatment. PVCs can also worsen the prognosis in patients with structural heart disease. Catheter PVC ablation is often the treatment of choice considering the high success rates. Ventricular dysfunction due to frequent PVCs is not always easy to identify as patients can be asymptomatic and the interpretation of imaging tests may be challenging in the presence of frequent PVCs. Treatment of patients with mild ventricular dysfunction is still a matter of debate.

Periprocedural and medium-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with an indication for long-term anticoagulation undergoing coronary angiography and intervention.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal antithrombotic treatment for patients on long-term anticoagulation undergoing invasive coronary procedures is currently undefined. The strategies adopted periprocedurally and medium-term after coronary stenting (percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation) at our Institution, were reviewed, and the safety and efficacy of the various regimens evaluated. METHODS: All patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures between January 2002 and December 2004 were retrospectively identified. RESULTS: Out of 3709 patients overall, 104 (2.8%; 95% confidence interval 2.3-3.4) were on warfarin (because of atrial fibrillation in >50% of cases), whereas this was the case for 49 (3.1%; 95% confidence interval 2.3-4.1) of 1584 undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. The antithrombotic strategies were highly variable, both periprocedurally (i.e. warfarin withdrawal or substitution by heparin, followed by aspirin with or without a thienopyridine) and medium-term after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (i.e. combination of warfarin and single or dual antiplatelet agents or pure dual antiplatelet treatment). Overall, periprocedural hemorrhages occurred in five patients (4.8%; 95% confidence interval 1.56-11.22). No thromboembolic events were observed, whereas one subacute stent thrombosis occurred (2%; 95% confidence interval 0.05-11) during warfarin and aspirin treatment. Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation, 1-month hemorrhagic rate was 10% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-23.8); most hemorrhages (major bleeds in three-quarters of cases) occurred during triple therapy with warfarin (or low-molecular-weight heparin), aspirin and a thienopyridine. CONCLUSIONS: At our Institution (where standardized protocols are currently not in use), periprocedural and medium-term antithrombotic treatment in patients on long-term anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation showed substantial variability. As a result of the relevant 1-month complication rate, further properly sized and designed studies are warranted to identify the optimal strategies for this patient subset, which is foreseen to progressively increase over the next years.

To Treat or Not to Treat? This Is the Question… About the Incidental Finding of Double Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm in A 91-Year-Old Woman

ABSTRACT Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a very uncommon clinical finding and often requires emergency surgery due to its high risk of rupture. This educational text reports the case of a 91-year-old Italian women who was incidentally discovered to have a huge double aneurysm of the sinuses of Valsalva.

Antithrombotic treatment after coronary artery stenting in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation: an international survey of current clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of evidence-based data, the optimal antithrombotic treatment after coronary artery stenting in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) remains unknown. In order to investigate current practice in this setting, an international survey was carried out. METHODS: A questionnaire was e-mailed to 40 internationally renowned, foreign Interventional Centers worldwide. RESULTS: Out of the 24 Centers (60%) replying, only in 13 (54%) is antithrombotic treatment carried out in accordance with a standardized protocol. OAC is stopped in favor of aspirin plus ticlopidine/clopidogrel in selected (low thromboembolic risk) conditions in 13 (54%) Centers. When OAC is continued, the association with a single antiplatelet is employed in a few Centers only, as opposed to triple antithrombotic treatment (OAC and aspirin plus ticlopidine/clopidogrel) which is adopted, selectively or systematically, in the majority (83%) of Centers. In 8 (33%) Centers adopting triple antithrombotic treatment, the dose of OAC is decreased in all patients, whereas in 9 (38%) it is left unchanged. Upon completion of 1 to 3-6 months of antithrombotic treatment with OAC and single/dual antiplatelets, in 9 (38%) Centers this regimen is continued indefinitely, whereas in 10 (41%) antiplatelets are systematically withdrawn. Out of the 13 Centers, selectively exchanging OAC for aspirin plus ticlopidine/clopidogrel, low- or full-dose low-molecular-weight heparin is added in selected (high thromboembolic risk) cases in 3 (23%) and 5 (38%) Centers, respectively. Following 1 to 3-6 months of aspirin plus ticlopidine/clopidogrel antithrombotic treatment, OAC is resumed in all cases in 9 (69%) Centers and in no cases in 1 (8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our survey shows a high variability in the current antithrombotic treatment of patients on chronic OAC undergoing coronary artery stenting. Although various regimens may be adopted, the optimal antithrombotic treatment for this patient subset still needs to be identified.

Antithrombotic strategies in patients with an indication for long-term anticoagulation undergoing coronary artery stenting: safety and efficacy data from a single center.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy is the antithrombotic treatment generally recommended after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-S). However, the optimal antithrombotic treatment after PCI-S in case of a concomitant indication for anticoagulation (AC) is unknown. The aim of our study was to determine the strategies adopted at our Institution (where the management of these patients is at the physician's discretion), and to evaluate their relative efficacy and safety. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all PCI-S performed between January 2002-April 2004, was carried out. All patients on AC at the time of PCI-S were identified and the hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (21 males, 6 females, mean age 66.9 +/- 10.6 years) on AC because of atrial fibrillation, post-myocardial infarction cardiomyopathy, left ventricular or arterial thrombus, previous cerebrovascular event, and mechanical aortic or mitral valve, were identified. The adopted antithrombotic treatment included: dual antiplatelet therapy in 6 patients (22%), a combination of a single antiplatelet with either aspirin or a thienopyridine and oral AC in 5 (19%), and triple therapy with dual antiplatelet and either oral AC or low-molecular-weight heparin administration in 16 (59%). The overall complication rate at 32.3 +/- 5.4 days was 18%, accounted for by two in-hospital major hemorrhages requiring blood transfusion (7%), two minor hemorrhages treated conservatively (7%), and one subacute stent thrombosis requiring emergency percutaneous reintervention (4%). CONCLUSIONS: At our Institution, variable antithrombotic strategies are adopted after PCI-S in patients with an indication for AC. Since the overall complication rate was relevant, further properly sized and designed studies are warranted in order to identify the optimal antithrombotic treatment in this patient subset.