Mineral metabolism management in Canadian peritoneal dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal mineral metabolism is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare a) mineral metabolism control among a cohort of Canadian peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients to K/DOQI-defined targets and b) the effect of different treatment strategies on mineral metabolism parameters. METHODS: We looked at a cohort of 317 Canadian PD patients from 9 clinics that used the PhotoGraph™ software program which tracks mineral metabolism management. Serum phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) values were collected for the patients. Data were categorized and analyzed by the type of phosphate binder prescribed, vitamin D use, and dosing and reimbursement criteria for the phosphate binder, sevelamer. RESULTS: The majority of patients achieved K/DOQI-set targets for serum P. Patients who resided in Quebec (QC), which had greater access to sevelamer, had lower mean concentrations of P and Ca, were less likely to take Ca-based phosphate binders (CBBs) exclusively and were exposed to less exogenous Ca than in Ontario (ON). CONCLUSION: Availability of the phosphate binder sevelamer and reduced doses of elemental Ca were associated with more mineral metabolism parameters within suggested target ranges. Further studies that focus on patient outcomes are warranted.

A prospective, randomized trial comparing a transparent dressing and a dry gauze on the exit site of long term central venous catheters of hemodialysis patients.

The objective of this study was to assess the risk of bacteremia, estimate the cost and evaluate the quality of life by using a transparent dressing (TD) versus (vs) a dry gauze (DG) on the exit site of long term central I.V. catheters (LTCC) of hemodialysis patients. This 6-months preliminary study was conducted on 58 patients (pts) randomized to receive DG replaced 3 times/week (29 pts) or TD replaced every 7 days (29 pts). Data on patients, conditions of the exit site, local infection, bacteremia, quality of life and cost related to each type of dressing were collected. Two pts in the DG group experienced bacteremia related to their LTCC vs 1 pt in the group TD. A total of 7 (DG) vs 13 (TD) pts experienced skin condition changes at the catheter exit site. Some skin reactions, erythema and pruritus, did occur initially in the group TD and was due in part to insufficient drying time of the skin preparation solution. The estimated individual, weekly costs for using the DG was $7.60 vs $4.72 Canadian dollars for the TD. The SF-36trade mark scores did not show a significant difference between the 2 groups during the study (3.8 (PCS), 6.4 (MCS) at study end). Although this study was statistically underpowered, it suggests that the incidence of bacteremia was not increased with the use of a TD. Moreover, the use of a TD allowed fewer dressing changes, lowered total treatment costs, with no observed unfavorable impact on the quality of life and without significant local complications of the exit site. Based on the positive results observed in this pilot study, further study is warranted to examine the cost effectiveness of long-term use of TD dressings on dialysis catheter exit sites.