RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and End-stage Renal Failure) and AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network) criteria for diagnosis of acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Retrospective cohort. 169 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2007 through December 2008 were analyzed. Information was entered into a database and analyzed using STATA 9.0. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 63.43 1 9.01 years old. Predominantly male patients (66.86%) were studied. Acute Kidney Injury was present in 33.14% by AKIN and in 29.59% by RIFLE. Hemodialysis was required by 3.57% and 4.0% of the patients when AKIN and RIFLE were applied respectively. There was 4.0% and 3.57% mortality of patients with Acute Kidney Injury according to the RIFLE and AKIN criteria, respectively. In 88.76% of the cases, there was good agreement between the two methods in the detection (kappa=0.7380) and stratification (kappa=0.7515) of Acute Kidney Injury. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the RIFLE and AKIN criteria have a good agreement in the detection and stratification of acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Anciano , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Diálisis Renal , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and End-stage Renal Failure) and AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network) criteria for diagnosis of acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Retrospective cohort. 169 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2007 through December 2008 were analyzed. Information was entered into a database and analyzed using STATA 9.0. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 63.43 1 9.01 years old. Predominantly male patients (66.86%) were studied. Acute Kidney Injury was present in 33.14% by AKIN and in 29.59% by RIFLE. Hemodialysis was required by 3.57% and 4.0% of the patients when AKIN and RIFLE were applied respectively. There was 4.0% and 3.57% mortality of patients with Acute Kidney Injury according to the RIFLE and AKIN criteria, respectively. In 88.76% of the cases, there was good agreement between the two methods in the detection (kappa=0.7380) and stratification (kappa=0.7515) of Acute Kidney Injury. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the RIFLE and AKIN criteria have a good agreement in the detection and stratification of acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting.
OBJETIVO: Comparar os critérios RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and EndStage Renal Failure) e AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network) para diagnóstico de lesão renal aguda em pacientes no pós-operatório de revascularização do miocárdio. MÉTODOS: Coorte retrospectiva, a partir dos prontuários de 169 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio, de janeiro de 2007 a dezembro de 2008. As informações foram inseridas em um banco de dados e analisadas pelo software STATA 9.0. RESULTADOS: A média de idades dos pacientes foi de 63,43 1 9,01 anos, havendo predominância do gênero masculino (66,86%). A lesão renal aguda foi detectada em 33,14% pelo AKIN e 29,59% pelo RIFLE. A hemodiálise foi necessária em 3,57% e em 4% dos pacientes, quando o AKIN e RIFLE foram aplicados, respectivamente. Foram a óbito 4% e 3,57% dos pacientes com Lesão Renal Aguda pelos critérios RIFLE e AKIN, respectivamente. Em 88,76% dos casos, ambos os métodos demonstraram boa concordância para detecção (kappa=0,7380) e estratificação (kappa=0,7515) de lesão renal aguda. CONCLUSÃO: O presente estudo permitiu concluir que os critérios RIFLE e AKIN possuem boa concordância na detecção e estratificação da lesão renal aguda no pós-operatório de revascularização do miocárdio.