The financial costs of healthcare treatment for people with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes in the UK with particular reference to differing severity of peripheral neuropathy.

AIMS: To characterize symptom severity of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in people with diabetes and to characterize its association with healthcare resource use. METHODS: The study was undertaken in Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan, UK. A postal survey was posted to subjects identified as having diabetes. Demography, quality of life (EQ-5D and SF-36) and symptoms of neuropathy (NTSS-6 and QOL-DN) data were collected. These data were linked to routine healthcare data coded into healthcare resource groups (HRGs) and subsequently costed according to UK National reference costs. RESULTS: Survey responses were received from 1298 patients, a 32% response rate. For patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of DPN, the mean NTSS-6-SA score was 6.16 vs. 3.19 (P < 0.001). Duration of diabetes did not change across groups defined by severity of neuropathy symptoms, but mean HbA(1c) and body mass index values did increase with symptom severity (range 7.6-8.1%, P = 0.023; and 28.0-30.9 kg/m(2), P < 0.001, respectively). General linear modelling showed that the NTSS-6-SA score was a significant predictor of both annual health resource costs and yearly prescribed drug costs. On average, each 1-point increase in NTSS-6-SA score predicted a 6% increase in primary and secondary care costs and a 3% increase in log transformed drug costs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that severity of DPN symptoms was associated with increased healthcare resource use, thus costs.

The health-related utility and health-related quality of life of hospital-treated subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with particular reference to differing severity of peripheral neuropathy.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We characterised symptom severity of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in people with diabetes, and correlated this with health-related utility and health-related quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was undertaken in Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan, Wales. A postal survey was mailed to a random sample of subjects identified as having diabetes. Data were collected on the symptoms of neuropathy using the Neuropathic Total Symptom Score (self-administered) (NTSS-6-6A) and on quality of life using the Quality of Life in Diabetes Neuropathy Instrument (QoL-DN), EueroQoL five dimensions (EQ5D) and Short Form 36 (SF36). Other information, such as demographics and self-reported drug use, was also collected. The anonymised data were linked to routine inpatient and outpatient healthcare data. RESULTS: Responses were received from 1,298 patients. For patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of DPN, the mean NTSS-6-SA score was 6.16 vs 3.19 in patients without DPN (p<0.001). Four categories of severity were defined, ranging from none to severe. All quality of life measures showed a deterioration between these groups: the EQ5D(index) fell from an average of 0.81 in those without symptoms to 0.25 in those with severe symptoms, the SF36 general health profile fell from 59.9 to 25.5 (p<0.001) and the QoL-DN increased from 25.8 to 48.1 (p<0.001). Multivariate models also demonstrated that this relationship remained after controlling for other factors. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrated that severity of DPN symptoms was predictive of poor health-related utility and decreased quality of life. Furthermore, it provides detailed utility data for economic evaluation of treatment of typical diabetes-related morbidity states. Reducing DPN morbidity should be a priority.

Receipt of recommended prenatal interventions and birth weight among African-American women: analysis of data from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey.

OBJECTIVES: While the importance of exploring and better measuring elements of prenatal care have been noted in the public health literature, the components and timing of such services have been poorly examined for the overall pregnant population and specifically for African-Americans, who traditionally have had higher rates of low birth weight and premature delivery. This study explores the association between patient receipt of selected recommended prenatal care interventions and infant birth weight in a nationally representative sample of African-American women, while controlling for the influence of low birth weight risk indicators. METHOD: This is a retrospective case-control analysis using survey data of women who delivered normal birth weight, moderate low birth weight, and very low birth weight newborns in 1988. A sample of 3905 African-American women who responded to the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey is examined based on maternal recall of receipt of six clinical screening procedures and seven health-promotion recommendations. Birth weight measures were obtained from linked 1988 birth certificate data. RESULTS: The initial results indicated that women who do not receive all of the recommended health-promotion advice are more likely to deliver very low birth weight infants than women who receive all of the advice in the content of their prenatal care, after controlling for low birth weight risks (OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.7). However, when breast-feeding advice is removed from the aggregation of health-promotion advice, the significant effect of advice on very low birth weight is negated. No other significant group variations in the receipt of clinical screening procedures or health-promotion advice for women who gave birth in the remaining birth weight categories are observed. CONCLUSIONS: Nationally recommended initial clinical screening procedures and health-promotion advice in prenatal care content do not appear to be associated with a reduction in low birth weight for African-American women. More research is needed to better assess the impact of other antenatal interventions, particularly those given to women with a higher prevalence of poor birth outcomes.