Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med ; 153(9): 923-5, 1999 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10482206

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the utility of radiographs taken immediately after the application of a cast in the management of pediatric torus (or buckle) fractures and to determine the need for serial radiographs taken at follow-up visits. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review; survey questionnaire of a panel of experts. SETTING: The pediatric emergency department (PED) and the pediatric orthopedic clinic at an urban, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: All children with torus fractures referred to the pediatric orthopedic clinic for follow-up visits between February 1995 and February 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of patients whose postcast studies was obtained in the PED; number of follow-up visits and studies conducted at the pediatric orthopedic clinic; usual regional practices as extracted from a panel of experts by survey questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 70 patients, 46 (66%) were evaluated by a single, precast study in the PED, and 24 (34%) were evaluated by both precast and postcast studies in the PED. The time range of the first follow-up study was the first to fifth week after the patient's injury. The range of the number of follow-up studies for each patient was 0 to 5. Our cohort's total radiology charges for 70 patients were $27251. Regional directors of pediatric orthopedic surgery unanimously agreed that postcast studies in the PED are unnecessary. The range of the number of follow-up studies they obtained is 0 to 3 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Postcast studies of torus fractures are unnecessary. Multiple radiographs taken during follow-up visits, especially early in the healing process, do not change fracture management. Relying on the clinical examination, perhaps combined with a single follow-up study, is a more appropriate regimen for the management of pediatric torus fractures and translates into a cost savings of over $ 10000 for our 70 patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Fracturas del Radio/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Cúbito/diagnóstico por imagen , Boston , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía/economía , Radiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economía
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 90(12): 1617-22, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19043134

RESUMEN

Heterotopic ossification occurring after the use of commercially available bone morphogenetic proteins has not been widely reported. We describe four cases of heterotopic ossification in patients treated with either recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 or recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 7. We found that while some patients were asymptomatic, heterotopic ossification which had occurred around a joint often required operative excision with good results.


Asunto(s)
Proteína Morfogenética Ósea 7/efectos adversos , Proteínas Morfogenéticas Óseas/efectos adversos , Osificación Heterotópica/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Factor de Crecimiento Transformador beta/efectos adversos , Adulto , Matriz Ósea/cirugía , Proteína Morfogenética Ósea 2 , Receptores de Proteínas Morfogenéticas Óseas/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Húmero/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osificación Heterotópica/diagnóstico por imagen , Osificación Heterotópica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda