Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País como asunto
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Eur Urol ; 84(3): 313-320, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37270392

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent years have seen the development of a new generation of temporary urethral stents as an adjuvant option after direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU). Despite some early promising results, large series addressing their safety and outcomes are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: To report complications and outcomes from the largest series of patients receiving a temporary bulbar urethral stent to date. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of bulbar urethral stenting procedures after DVIU in seven centers. Patients either refused urethroplasty or were not fit for surgery. The stents were removed after at least 6 mo in place unless complications requiring earlier removal occurred. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: DVIU with a cold knife or laser is performed, followed by stent placement. At the end of the treatment period, the stent is removed under cystoscopy with gripping forceps. MEASUREMENTS: All patients underwent postoperative follow-up (FU) for assessment of complications while the stent was in place. After removal, the FU schedule consisted of office evaluation at 6 mo and 12 mo, and then annually. Failure was defined as any treatment for urethral stricture after stent removal. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 49% of the patients experienced complications. The most frequent were discomfort (23.8%), stress incontinence (17.5%), and stent dislocation (9.8%). Some 85% of the adverse events observed were Clavien-Dindo grade <3. The overall success rate at median FU of 38.2 mo was 76.9%. The success rate was significantly lower if the stent was removed before 6 mo (53.3% vs 79.7%; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary urethral stents may be a safe choice with satisfactory results in patients not undergoing urethroplasty. A stent indwelling time shorter than 6 mo provides worse outcomes that are comparable to those with DVIU alone. PATIENT SUMMARY: We assessed complications and outcomes after placement of a temporary narrow tube in the urethra after surgery to widen a narrowing of the urethra. The treatment is safe and easily reproducible with satisfactory results. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
Uretra , Estrechez Uretral , Humanos , Masculino , Uretra/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Stents , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos
2.
Infect Genet Evol ; 87: 104639, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33246086

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of ethnicity in COVID-19 outcome disparities in a cohort in Kuwait. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 405 individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Kuwait. Outcomes such as symptoms severity and mortality were considered. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to report the odds ratios (OR) for ICU admission and dying from COVID-19. RESULTS: The cohort included 290 Arabs and 115 South Asians. South Asians recorded significantly higher COVID-19 death rates compared to Arabs (33% vs. 7.6%, P value<0.001). When compared to Arabs, South Asians also had higher odds of being admitted to the ICU (OR = 6.28, 95% CI: 3.34-11.80, p < 0.001). South Asian patients showed 7.62 (95% CI: 3.62-16.02, p < 0.001) times the odds of dying from COVID-19. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with South Asians ethnicity in Kuwait are more likely to have worse prognosis and outcome when compared to patients with Arab ethnicity. This suggest a possible role for ethnicity in COVID-19 outcome disparities and this role is likely to be multifactorial.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Kuwait/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
3.
Pathol Res Pract ; 207(11): 671-3, 2011 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21996318

RESUMEN

Factor V Leiden (FVL; G1691A) is an autosomal dominant mutation with a high risk for thrombosis. Speculation that founders of FVL lived in the Middle East is supported by a prevalence of FVL that is higher in Arabs residing in Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria (12-14%) than in other white populations like Europeans (4-5%, up to 15% in the South of Sweden). We sought to verify the appropriate use of skin color as a clinical sign by which Arab individuals in Kuwait are included or excluded from testing for FVL. After institutional approval, 200 healthy Arabs residing in Kuwait consented to participate. Skin type was distinguished for the participants by Fitzpatrick natural skin color classification: 76 (38%) skin type II (white), 96 (48%) Mediterranean skin type IV (brown), and 28 (14%) skin type VI (black). FVL was tested by real-time PCR, and the percentage of carriers was calculated in each group. FVL was positive in 17 (8.5%) of the total subjects: 8 (10.5%) skin type II, 7 (7.3%) skin type IV, and 2 (7.1%) skin type VI. Therefore, FVL shows an even distribution in Arabs, and all Arabs residing in Kuwait should be tested for FVL irrespective of skin color.


Asunto(s)
Árabes/genética , Factor V/genética , Heterocigoto , Pigmentación de la Piel , Trombosis/genética , Árabes/etnología , Factor V/aislamiento & purificación , Frecuencia de los Genes , Genotipo , Humanos , Kuwait , Mutación , Prevalencia , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Factores de Riesgo , Pigmentación de la Piel/genética , Trombosis/etnología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda