Combined strategies following surgical drainage for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: failure rates and prognostic factors.

AIM: The medico-surgical strategy for the treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) following surgical drainage remains challenging and debated. Our aims were to describe the failure rate of therapeutic interventions after drainage of the fistula tract and determine the factors associated with failure to optimize medico-surgical strategies. METHOD: All consecutive patients with perianal fistulizing CD who underwent surgical drainage with at least a 12-week follow-up were included. Failure was defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following items: abscess recurrence, purulent discharge from the tract, visible external opening and further drainage procedure(s). RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-nine patients were included. The median follow-up was 4.0 years. The cumulative failure rates were 20%, 30% and 36% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The cumulative failure rates in patients who had sphincter-sparing surgeries or seton removal were significantly higher than in those who had a fistulotomy. Anterior fistula [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.52 (1.13-5.61), P = 0.024], supralevator extension [HR = 20.78 (3.38-127.80), P = 0.001] and the absence or discontinuation of immunosuppressants after anal drainage [HR = 3.74 (1.11-12.5), P = 0.032] were significantly associated with failure in the multivariate analysis model. CONCLUSION: Combined strategies for perianal fistulizing CD lead to a failure rate of 36% at 5 years. Where advisable, fistulotomy may be preferred because it has a lower rate of recurrence. The benefits of immunosuppressants require a dedicated prospective randomized trial.

Protocol of a multicentric prospective cohort study for the VALIDation of the IBD-disk instrument for assessing disability in inflammatory bowel diseases: the VALIDate study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) affect psychological, family, social and professional dimensions of patients' life, leading to disability which is essential to quantify as part of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) newly included in the targets to reach in IBD patients. Up to now, the IBD-Disability Index (IBD-DI) was the only validated tool to assess disability, but it is not appropriate for use in clinical practice. The IBD Disk was developed, a shortened and self-administered tool, adapted from the IBD-DI, in order to give immediate representation of patient-reported disability. However, the IBD Disk has not been validated yet in clinical practice. The aims of the VALIDate study are to validate this tool in a large population of IBD patients and to compare it to the already validated IBD-DI. METHODS: The VALIDate study is an ongoing multicentric prospective cohort study launched in April 2018 in 3 French University Hospitals (Nantes, Rennes, Angers), with an objective to reach a sample of 400 patients over a period inclusion of 6 months. Each patient will fill in the two questionnaires IBD Disk and IBD-DI at baseline, then between 3 and 12 months later, during a follow-up visit. Clinical and socio-demographic data will also be collected. During these two consultations, gastroenterologists and patients will evaluate disease activity thanks to a semi-quantitative 4-grade scale, named respectively PGA (Physician Global Assessment) and PtGA (Patient Global Assessment). This cohort will allow to evaluate the validity of the IBD Disk with respect to the IBD-DI in order to generalize its use for clinical practice. Other psychometric criteria of the IBD Disk will also be analysed as its reliability or its discriminant capacity. Close attention will nonetheless be needed to minimize the number of lost to follow-up patients between baseline and follow-up. DISCUSSION: The VALIDate study is the study designed to validate the IBD Disk, a visual tool easily useable in daily practice to assess disability in IBD patients. The results of this trial should enable the diffusion of this tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov with registration number NCT03590639. First posted: July 18, 2018.

The behavioral component of sexual inhibition and its relation with testosterone levels: An fMRI study in transgender and cisgender individuals.

Many transgender individuals report having difficulties with initiating and seeking sexual contacts. Relatively to cisgender individuals, transgender individuals are more likely to avoid sexual activity, indicating that the groups might differ in the neural underpinnings of the behavioral component of sexual inhibition. In this fMRI study, transgender (n = 33) and cisgender (n = 34) participants performed an Approach Avoidance Task (AAT) assessing sexual inhibition. We found that over the entire sample, the task elicited brain activation commonly associated with general and sexual inhibition, for instance in the bilateral insula, right inferior parietal lobule, and right inferior and middle frontal gyri. Upon investigating group differences between transgender and cisgender participants, we mainly found similarities in neural activation during the task. However, there were group differences in regions involved in decision making processes (left middle temporal gyrus) and sexual response inhibition (right anterior cingulate cortex and left inferior parietal lobule). In order to investigate whether these group differences were modulated by testosterone levels, we performed ROI-analyses assessing the relationship between testosterone and neural activation during the AAT (controlling for sex assigned at birth), but no correlations were found. On the whole brain level, however, we found that testosterone correlated positively with cerebral activation in the right claustrum (a region associated with sexual arousal) during the approach of sexual stimuli in the transgender group. Overall, these findings indicate that transgender and cisgender individuals mostly show similarities in their neural response to a sexual Approach-Avoidance task, and that testosterone levels are unlikely to play an important role.

A clinical study assessing the tolerability and biological effects of infliximab, a TNF-alpha inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is an important regulator of the chronic inflammation contributing to tumour progression. Infliximab, an anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody was investigated in this trial of patients with advanced cancer. The primary objectives were to determine the safety profile and biological response of infliximab in a cancer population. Clinical response was a secondary objective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients received infliximab at 5 mg/kg (n = 21) or 10 mg/kg (n = 20) i.v. at 0 and 2 weeks and then every 4 weeks. Post-treatment samples were measured for changes in plasma and serum TNF-alpha, CCL2, IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: Infliximab was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxic effects. At both doses of infliximab, neutralisation of serum TNF-alpha was observed after 1 h while plasma CCL2, IL-6 and serum CRP were decreased 24 and 48 h following infliximab administration. Seven patients experienced disease stablisation (range 10-50+ weeks). There was no evidence of disease acceleration in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab treatment was safe and well tolerated in patients with advanced cancer. There was evidence of biological activity with baseline TNF-alpha and CCL2 being correlated with infliximab response.

Optimal combination therapy with tropisetron in 445 patients with incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma, Basle, Switzerland)-based combination therapy in patients who had incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting when using tropisetron as a single antiemetic agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand seventy-two patients, who were scheduled to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy, were treated with 5 mg tropisetron once daily in their first chemotherapy course. A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used to evaluate three additional treatments to the recommended 5 mg once daily (intravenously [i.v.] on day 1; orally on days 2 through 6) tropisetron regimen during course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of course 1. Four hundred forty-five patients were centrally randomized to receive, in addition, open-label dexamethasone (day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; days 2 through 6, 8 mg orally) and/or open-label alizapride (day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg orally; days 2 through 6, 4 x 50 mg orally) and/or double-blind tropisetron (ie, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily) or corresponding placebo. RESULTS: Complete response rates (no nausea and no vomiting) were 72% for day 1 and 48% for days 1 through 6 of course 1. During course 2, more complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added, both for day 1 (76% v 66%, P = .020) and for days 1 through 6 (50% v 34%, P = .0004). A moderate increase in the complete response rate was seen with the addition of conventional-dose alizapride (day 1, 75% v 68%, P = .14; days 1 through 6: 47% v 37%, P = .041). Doubling the dose of tropisetron did not change the complete response rate. CONCLUSION: The addition of dexamethasone significantly increases the complete response rate of both acute and delayed emesis in patients who have incomplete disease control with tropisetron alone.

Oral topotecan as single-agent second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate oral topotecan as single-agent, second-line therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with a platinum-based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 116) received oral topotecan 2.3 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 21 days. Eligibility criteria included histologic diagnosis of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, bidimensionally measurable disease, prior platinum-containing chemotherapy, age > or = 18 years, performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 21.6% (25 of 116 patients). Median duration of response was 25.0 weeks; median time to response was 8.4 weeks. Median time to progression was 14.1 weeks; median survival was 62.2 weeks. Grade 4 neutropenia was experienced by 50.4% of patients in 13.4% of courses administered. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was experienced by 22.1% of patients in 5.1% of courses. Grade 3 or 4 anemia was experienced by 29.2% of patients in 8.5% of courses. Most frequent nonhematologic toxicities were predominantly (> 90%) grade 1 or 2 and included nausea, alopecia, diarrhea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Second-line oral topotecan administered at 2.3 mg/m2 for 5 days every 21 days demonstrated activity in patients with progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. This activity was comparable to that seen in previous studies with intravenous topotecan. Grade 4 neutropenia was less frequent with oral topotecan than previously reported for intravenous topotecan. Oral topotecan is an active, tolerable, and convenient formulation of an established agent for the second-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and may also facilitate exploring prolonged treatment schedules.

Severe idiopathic congenital aplastic anemia: role of hematopoietic growth factors.

A baby boy with constitutional aplastic anemia refractory to treatment with hematopoietic growth factors underwent BMT from an unrelated HLA-compatible donor. The BM failed to engraft but the combination of a conditioning regimen, immunosuppression and hematopoietic growth factors resulted in a recovery of the patient's own BM and a good outcome.