Perfusion education and training in Europe anno 2023.

Background: In the absence of uniform European regulations, there have been many differences in the training of perfusionists across Europe. Furthermore, there has been no uniform or single European accreditation of the profession. One of the objectives of The European Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (EBCP) is to standardise and monitor training of perfusionists across Europe whilst offering support in accordance with national regulations. This goal is particularly imminent as there have been numerous newly founded National perfusion societies, particularly from Eastern European countries, which are now established members of EBCP.Purpose: In this article, we provide an updated overview or 'snapshot' of current European perfusion training programs that were accessible in 2022. Nationally acquired data refers to 2022 unless stated otherwise. The last overview of Perfusion education in Europe was reported over 15 years ago including 20 countries.Research Design: For this report thirty-two national EBCP delegates plus representatives from Austria were contacted at the beginning of 2023 to complete a pro forma questionnaire about their national perfusion training programmes. The data has been summarized in this article and five additional derived parameters were calculated.Results: We received responses from 31 countries, providing specific national training characteristics which are summarized, listed and benchmarked by country in this article.Conclusion: There have been several national and supranational initiatives towards the recognition of perfusion as a profession in Europe, however so far without success for the majority of countries. For this reason, it remains essential for EBCP, as the only European professional perfusionist body, to define education standards and competencies for perfusionists and to monitor training by accreditation of dedicated perfusion schools across Europe.

Clinical evaluation of the novel Capiox NX19 adult oxygenator-a multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: The novel Capiox NX19 adult oxygenator is, compared to its predecessors, improved with enhanced air removal technology, a polymer heat exchanger and smaller, innovative hollow fibers resulting in a surface area reduction and a lower priming volume. The aim of this study was to evaluate the NX19 oxygenator performance in a clinical setting. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was performed involving three large European university hospitals. The Capiox NX19 (n = 150) performance was assessed during adult cardiopulmonary bypass and involved gaseous microemboli handling and gas transfer efficiency. The heat exchanger performance was evaluated separately in vitro. RESULTS: The heat exchanger performance factors were 0.80 ± 0.03 and 0.58 ± 0.04 at pump flow rates of 3 L/min and 6 L/min, respectively. After priming, residual post-oxygenator gaseous microemboli count and volume were decreased by 91% and 93.7%, respectively. The gas compartment pressure was 6.0 ± 2.5 mmHg, while the O2 transfer was 69 ± 30 mL/min/m2 and the CO2 transfer 73 ± 34 mL/min/m2. The O2 gradient was 44 ± 19 mmHg/LPM and the O2 diffusing capacity 0.38 ± 0.14 mL/min/mmHg. The shunt fraction was 0.19 ± 0.13, whereas oxygenator resistance and shear stress were 10.5 ± 3.7 mmHg/LPM and 5.1 ± 3.1 dyn/cm2, respectively. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study displayed good clinical safety and performance of the NX19 oxygenator.

Evaluation of university and training standards in clinical perfusion, an European-wide survey.

OBJECTIVES: Adequate theoretical and practical training of prospective clinical perfusionists is essential for maintaining clinical standards and ensuring patient safety during cardiac surgery procedures. Perfusion schools play a crucial role in establishing and maintaining higher education and training standards in clinical perfusion. The aim of this study is to obtain a comprehensive overview of European training standards in clinical perfusion in 2023. METHODS: For this study, 53 perfusion schools in Europe were found and contacted, of which 30 (56.6%) responded, giving a sample size of n = 30, which were then included in the data analysis. The quantitative data of the survey are analysed using descriptive methods. RESULTS: The university and training standards in clinical perfusion in Europe vary in many respects. Starting with the entry criterion for studies (most frequently a required bachelor's degree 36.7% or 2nd most common an university entrance qualification 30%), the duration [from <12 months (13.3%) up to 36 months (13.3%)] and regarding the content of the teaching in clinical perfusion [<30 European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) (33.3%) and more than 180 ECTS (6.7%)]. The mean value for teaching in clinical perfusion content is 62.63 ECTS credits. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained results show important differences between countries and schools. As such, they form a valuable database for future discussions establishing a common European curriculum and training standards for perfusionists. For the generalizability of the results, further evaluations and larger samples are needed.

Outcome, compliance with inclusion criteria and cost of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: The primary aim was to describe the outcome, the compliance with inclusion criteria and the characteristics of patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The secondary aim was to calculate the cost of ECPR for the patients and the public Belgian healthcare system. Methods: Single-centre retrospective cohort study in Antwerp University Hospital. We included all patients who underwent ECPR for OHCA from 2018 to 2020. Medical records were assessed to determine the clinical outcome and invoices were assessed to calculate the charged fees. We collected all relevant cost components at the most detailed level (micro costing technique). Results: Sixty-five patients who received ECPR for OHCA were included. Thirty-eight patients (58%) died within one week after ECPR initiation. After one year, twelve patients (18.5%) were still alive of which ten (15.4%) had a good neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2). Forty-nine patients (75.4%) met the ECPR inclusion criteria. A total of 2,552,498.34 euro was charged. The patients and the public Belgian healthcare system contributed to a 255,250 euro cost for each survivor after one year with good neurological outcome. Conclusion: Our analysis highlights the complex interplay between clinical efficacy and financial implications in the utilization of ECPR. While ECPR demonstrates potential in improving survival rates and neurological outcomes among cardiac arrest patients, its adoption presents substantial economic challenges. Inappropriate patient selection may lead to significant increases in resource utilisation without improved outcome.