Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Laryngoscope ; 134(6): 2793-2798, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38174824

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative measurement and analysis of glottic abduction is used to assess laryngeal function and success of interventions; however, the consistency of measurement over time has not been established. This study assesses the consistency of glottic abduction measurements across visits in healthy patients and anatomic factors impacting these measurements. METHODS: Review of patients with two sequential flexible stroboscopic exams over seven months from 2019-2022. Images of maximal glottic abduction were captured and uploaded into and measured with ImageJ. Cadaver heads were used to assess the impact of visualization angles on glottic measurements with a monofilament inserted into the supraglottis of each cadaver as a point of reference. Comparisons were done with a paired T-test, T-test, or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients and twenty-six cadaveric exams were included. Absolute change in maximum glottic abduction angle (MGAA) was 6.90° (95% CI [5.36°, 8.42°]; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in change in MGAA by gender or age. Twenty percent of patients had a change of at least 25% in their MGAA between visits. Absolute differences in glottic angle between nasal side for cadaveric measurements was 4.77 ± 4.59° (p < 0.005)-2.22° less than the change in MGAA seen over time (p = 0.185). CONCLUSION: Maximal glottic abduction angles varied significantly between visits. Factors considered to be contributing to the differences include different viewing windows between examinations due to the position and angulation of the laryngoscope and changes in patient positioning, intra- and inter-rater variations in measurement, and patient effort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/a Laryngoscope, 134:2793-2798, 2024.


Asunto(s)
Cadáver , Glotis , Estroboscopía , Humanos , Glotis/anatomía & histología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estroboscopía/métodos , Anciano , Variación Anatómica , Laringoscopía/métodos
2.
OTO Open ; 8(3): e180, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39157741

RESUMEN

Objective: To characterize presentation, disease course, and treatment of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) in non-Caucasian women and compare this cohort to the predominantly female, Caucasian patient cohorts identified in the literature. Study Design: Retrospective review. Results are compared to systematic review of demographics. Setting: Multiple California institutions from 2008 to 2021. Methods: Patients with intubation within 2 years of disease or who met exclusion criteria listed in prior publications were excluded. A systematic review of iSGS patient demographics was also completed for comparison. Results: Of 421 patients with iSGS, 58 self-identified as non-Caucasian women, with 50 ultimately included. Mean age of onset was 45.1 years old (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.5-48.8), and mean age at diagnosis was 47.2 years (95% CI, 43.6-50.7). Mean Charlson comorbidity index was 1.06 (n = 49, 95% CI, 0.69-1.44). At diagnosis, Cotton-Meyer severity scores (documented in n = 45) were Cotton-Myer (CM) I (28.9%), CM II (40%), and CM III (31.1%). Mean age at first endoscopic surgery was 47.7 (95% CI, 44.2-51.3) years. 64% experienced disease recurrence with a median of 11 months between their first and second surgery. Our systematic review identified 60 studies that reported demographic features in patients with iSGS. 95% of pooled patients were Caucasian, while other demographic features were similar to the current cohort. Conclusion: The non-Caucasian population, almost 14% of this Californian cohort, does not differ from the majority Caucasian population detailed in contemporary literature. This cohort supports the presence of some racial and ethnic heterogeneity in this disease population.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda