ViralORFeome: an integrated database to generate a versatile collection of viral ORFs.

Large collections of protein-encoding open reading frames (ORFs) established in a versatile recombination-based cloning system have been instrumental to study protein functions in high-throughput assays. Such 'ORFeome' resources have been developed for several organisms but in virology, plasmid collections covering a significant fraction of the virosphere are still needed. In this perspective, we present ViralORFeome 1.0 (http://www.viralorfeome.com), an open-access database and management system that provides an integrated set of bioinformatic tools to clone viral ORFs in the Gateway(R) system. ViralORFeome provides a convenient interface to navigate through virus genome sequences, to design ORF-specific cloning primers, to validate the sequence of generated constructs and to browse established collections of virus ORFs. Most importantly, ViralORFeome has been designed to manage all possible variants or mutants of a given ORF so that the cloning procedure can be applied to any emerging virus strain. A subset of plasmid constructs generated with ViralORFeome platform has been tested with success for heterologous protein expression in different expression systems at proteome scale. ViralORFeome should provide our community with a framework to establish a large collection of virus ORF clones, an instrumental resource to determine functions, activities and binding partners of viral proteins.

Direct activation of caspase 8 by the proapoptotic E2 protein of HPV18 independent of adaptor proteins.

The self-activation of initiator caspases is dependent on their oligomerization driven by interaction with the death fold domains (DFD) of adaptor proteins. Here, we show that the E2 protein of human papillomavirus type 18 triggers apoptosis by assembling cytoplasmic filaments together with caspase 8, in which its efficient self-activation occurs. The E2 protein binds directly to the death effector domains (DED) of caspase 8 through non-DFD interaction. This interaction is independent of FADD, but it can cooperate with FADD homotypic binding to caspase 8 to induce its oligomerization; hence cell death, while it is antagonized by competitive binding of MC159 FLICE inhibitory protein. The amino-terminal domain of E2 contains a 27 amino-acid alpha-helix, which is necessary and sufficient to induce caspase oligomerization and cell death. Our results provide evidence for adaptor-independent oligomerization of caspase 8, mediated by non-DFD direct interactions with the HPV18 E2 protein, thus deciphering a new pathway for caspase 8 activation.

Chromatin remodelling and DNA replication: from nucleosomes to loop domains.

Organization of DNA into chromatin is likely to participate in the control of the timing and selection of DNA replication origins. Reorganization of the chromatin is carried out by chromatin remodelling machines, which may affect the choice of replication origins and efficiency of replication. Replication itself causes a profound rearrangement in the chromatin structure, from nucleosomes to DNA loop domains, allowing to retain or switch an epigenetic state. The present review considers the effects of chromatin remodelling on replication and vice versa.

The regulatory E2 proteins of human genital papillomaviruses are pro-apoptotic.

Cervical carcinomas are frequently associated with infection by human papillomaviruses (HPVs). These viruses encode two oncogenes E6 and E7, which promote cell proliferation and immortalization. The viral E2 protein represses transcription of the E6/E7 oncogenes and activates viral DNA replication together with the viral E1 helicase. The E2 protein is specifically inactivated in HPV18-associated carcinoma, suggesting that it may prevent carcinogenic progression. Indeed, E2 was shown to exhibit a strong anti-proliferative action when ectopically expressed in cervical carcinoma cells, as it induces both G1 cell cycle arrest and cell death by apoptosis. While the cell cycle arrest is due to E2-mediated transcriptional repression of the viral oncogenes, the induction of apoptosis appears to be an autonomous function of E2. The amino-terminal transactivation domain (TAD) of the E2 protein is required for its pro-apoptotic activity, but transcriptional transactivation is not involved. E2 induces apoptosis through the extrinsic pathway, involving the initiator caspase 8. In addition, E2 is cleaved by caspases during apoptosis, providing an example of an apoptotic inducer, which is itself a target for caspase cleavage. The cleaved E2 protein exhibits an enhanced apoptotic activity, suggesting that it may participate in an amplification loop. This article reviews our current knowledge of the pro-apoptotic activity of the oncogenic papillomavirus E2 proteins, and discusses the implications for the viral vegetative cycle.

Control of papillomavirus DNA replication and transcription.

Hallmarks of HPV infection include a restricted tropism for human epithelial cells and a viral life cycle tightly linked to the differentiation program of the host keratinocyte. This particular viral cycle has hampered the study of the HPV vegetative life cycle for decades, due to the lack of suitable in-vitro culture conditions. The tissue and differentiation dependence seems to be dictated by viral transcription rather than viral DNA replication. Indeed, viral transcription is restricted to epithelial cells of human origin, more specifically to keratinocytes. In contrast, HPV genomes can replicate in various undifferentiated cell lines regardless of their natural permissiveness to infection, as long as the viral replication proteins E1 and E2 are expressed.

The E2 transcriptional repressor can compensate for Sp1 activation of the human papillomavirus type 18 early promoter.

The E6/E7 early promoter (P105) of genital human papillomavirus type 18 contains binding sites for the viral regulator E2, tandemly repeated and closely flanked by two crucial promoter elements; the TATA box downstream and an Sp1 binding site upstream. We showed that binding of purified E2 and Sp1 proteins in vitro to their neighboring sites is mutually exclusive and that Sp1 is displaced by E2. However, this displacement did not result in repression of P105 transcription. In contrast, binding of E2 to its site overlapping the Sp1 binding site activated transcription of P105 derivatives lacking the E2 site most proximal to the TATA box. Surprisingly, a truncated form of E2, deleted of part of the transactivation domain and known as the E2 transcriptional repressor, as well as the E2 DNA-binding domain alone also supported transcription of these P105 derivatives. In the context of P105, the viral E2 protein can thus activate P105 transcription in place of Sp1, even in the absence of its transactivation domain.

Control of HPV 18 DNA replication by cellular and viral transcription factors.

Papillomavirus replication in vivo requires the interaction of the virally encoded proteins E1 and E2 with the origin of replication which is localised in the regulatory region (long control region or LCR) of the viral genome. In genital human papillomaviruses (HPVs), the origin overlaps promoter elements of early transcription. In this study, we analysed the replication of HPV18 DNA using the complete LCR containing mutations in transcription regulatory elements. We found that each of the three E2 binding sites proximal to the AT-rich sequence of the origin contributes to the replication rate of DNA, although not identically. In addition, two sequences important for early transcription, an Sp1 binding site and the TATA box, were also found to play a role in replication. In contrast, two AP1 binding sites required for the enhancer-mediated activation of early transcription did not affect the replication, while other upstream sequences in the LCR did contribute to the replication efficiency. Our results indicate that besides a core origin of replication containing an AT-rich sequence and three E2 binding sites, auxiliary elements affect HPV18 DNA replication in the context of the full length LCR, some of which are important for transcription.

Stability of the human papillomavirus type 18 E2 protein is regulated by a proteasome degradation pathway through its amino-terminal transactivation domain.

The E2 proteins of papillomaviruses regulate both viral transcription and DNA replication. The human papillomavirus type 18 (HPV18) E2 protein has been shown to repress transcription of the oncogenic E6 and E7 genes, inducing growth arrest in HeLa cells. Using HPV18 E2 fused to the green fluorescent protein (GFP), we showed that this protein was short-lived in transfected HeLa cells. Real-time microscopy experiments indicated that the E2-dependent signal increased for roughly 24 h after transfection and then rapidly disappeared, indicating that E2 was unstable in HeLa cells and could confer instability to GFP. Similar studies done with a protein lacking the transactivation domain indicated that this truncation strongly stabilizes the E2 protein. In vitro, full-length E2 or the transactivation domain alone was efficiently ubiquitinated, whereas deletion of the transactivation domain strongly decreased the ubiquitination of the E2 protein. Proteasome inhibition in cells expressing E2 increased its half-life about sevenfold, which was comparable to the half-life of the amino-terminally truncated protein. These characteristics of E2 instability were independent of the E2-mediated G(1) growth arrest in HeLa cells, as they were reproduced in MCF7 cells, where E2 does not affect the cell cycle. Altogether, these experiments showed that the HPV18 E2 protein was degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway through its amino-terminal transactivation domain. Tight regulation of the stability of the HPV 18 E2 protein may be essential to avoid accumulation of a potent transcriptional repressor and antiproliferative agent during the viral vegetative cycle.

The human papillomavirus type 18 (HPV18) replication protein E1 is a transcriptional activator when interacting with HPV18 E2.

The human papillomavirus type 18 E1 and E2 proteins are both required for the initiation of viral DNA replication. Whereas E2 is the major viral transcription regulator, E1 is the replication initiator protein. They interact with each other and with the origin sequences to initiate viral DNA replication. We show that the HPV18 E1 and E2 proteins, when bound to an origin sequence cloned upstream of a heterologous promoter, synergistically activate transcription. This synergy required binding of E2 to at least two binding sites, but was partially independent of E1 binding to the origin of replication. Transcriptional activation was observed even in the absence of replication of the target DNA. Only homologous E1 and E2 proteins binding to homologous origin sequences from BPV1 or HPV18 viruses could synergistically activate transcription. We show that the HPV18 E1 protein can activate transcription when targeted to the DNA by fusion of the complete polypeptide with the BPV1 E2 C-terminus dimerization/DNA binding domain, implying that HPV18 E1 is an intrinsic transcriptional activator, though less potent than E2. The interaction between E1 and E2 may form a transcriptionally active complex during initiation of viral DNA replication.

Different mechanisms contribute to the E2-mediated transcriptional repression of human papillomavirus type 18 viral oncogenes.

Transcription of the human papillomavirus type 18 (HPV18) E6 and E7 oncogenes is repressed by the viral E2 protein. In C33 cells, we have previously shown that of the four E2 binding sites (E2 BS) present in the HPV18 long control region (LCR), only the binding site adjacent to the TATA box (E2 BS 1) was involved in E2-mediated repression. In the present study, we sought to determine whether this phenomenon was conserved in other cell lines. We first showed that all three E2 BS proximal to the P105 promoter were required for full repression of its activity in HeLa and HaCaT cells. Repression by E2 at E2 BS 2 occurred through the displacement of Sp1. Second, a truncated E2 product, lacking the N-terminal transactivation domain, repressed transcription more efficiently than the full-length protein. Repression was abolished when the N-terminal domain of E2 was replaced by the activation domain of VP16. The VP16-E2 chimeric protein could activate transcription from an LCR mutated in its TATA box. DNA-protein binding studies showed that E2 associates with its four binding sites in the LCR with similar affinities. However, challenge of such complexes with excess binding sites demonstrated that interaction with E2 BS 4 was the most stable while interaction with E2 BS 1 was the least stable. Furthermore, complexes with the full-length E2 were less stable than those formed with the N-terminally truncated protein.

Expression of the papillomavirus E2 protein in HeLa cells leads to apoptosis.

The papillomavirus E2 protein plays a central role in the viral life cycle as it regulates both transcription and replication of the viral genome. In this study, we showed that transient expression of bovine papillomavirus type 1 or human papillomavirus type 18 (HPV18) E2 proteins in HeLa cells activated the transcriptional activity of p53 through at least two pathways. The first one involved the binding of E2 to its recognition elements located in the integrated viral P105 promoter. E2 binding consequently repressed transcription of the endogenous HPV18 E6 oncogene, whose product has been shown previously to promote p53 degradation. The second pathway did not require specific DNA binding by E2. Expression of E2 induced drastic physiological changes, as evidenced by a high level of cell death by apoptosis and G1 arrest. Overexpression of a p53 trans-dominant-negative mutant abolished both E2-induced p53 transcriptional activation and E2-mediated G1 growth arrest, but showed no effect on E2-triggered apoptosis. These results suggest that the effects of E2 on cell cycle progression and cell death follow distinct pathways involving two different functions of p53.

polyhomeotic appears to be a target of engrailed regulation in Drosophila.

In Drosophila, Engrailed is a nuclear regulatory protein with essential roles in embryonic segmentation and in normal development of posterior compartments. One of its regulatory targets appears to be polyhomeotic (ph), a Polycomb group gene. We observed, by immunostaining, that Engrailed protein binds to the site of the polyhomeotic locus in region 2D of polytene chromosomes. The same analysis carried out on a transgenic line containing one copy of a P(ph-lacZ) construct shows an additional Engrailed-binding site at the location of the insert. In vivo, polyhomeotic depends on engrailed function in germ-band-elongated embryos, when engrailed and polyhomeotic genes are expressed in similar patterns. By in vitro immunoprecipitations and gel shift assays, we identified two classes of high affinity Engrailed-binding sites upstream of each of the two polyhomeotic transcription units. DNA fragments containing these sites were also immunoprecipitated from embryonic UV crosslinked chromatin in presence of anti-Engrailed antibody. These results suggest that polyhomeotic activation in germ-band-elongated embryos could be mediated by Engrailed-binding to these sites.

Evidence of non-A, non-B, non-C infection in chronic hepatitis by polymerase chain reaction testing for hepatitis B and C viruses.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although hepatitis C virus is clearly the major cause of non-A, non-B acute and chronic hepatitis, there is a group of patients with histologically documented chronic hepatitis with no serological marker of hepatitis B and C, nor any other risk factors for liver disease. METHODS: We have investigated 17 well-characterized patients with chronic active hepatitis. HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA were tested by polymerase chain reaction in 17 serum samples and in six liver biopsies. RESULTS: Four of the 17 patients had serum HCV-RNA detectable by polymerase chain reaction, while none had HBV-DNA detectable by polymerase chain reaction. Three of the six liver samples gave a positive signal by cyclin A and HLA, and only these were considered for the study. One of the three was HCV-RNA positive, while none was HBV-DNA positive. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, obtained through careful elimination of all known risk factors for liver disease, strongly suggest that non-A, non-B, non-C hepatotropic virus(es) could be involved in some cases of chronic active liver disease.