RESUMEN
Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the fourth ventricle represent a rare subtype associated with an aggressive natural course.1,2 In this case, a woman in her early 50s presented with dizziness. An AVM was diagnosed in the left superior cerebellar peduncle extending into the fourth ventricle. The AVM was supplied by superior cerebellar artery branches and classified as a Spetzler-Martin grade III and a Lawton-Young grade III, with a supplemented grade of 6.3,4 Being a single case report, institutional review board approval was not needed. Patient consent was obtained. The lesion was accessed through a torcular craniotomy and posterior interhemispheric-transtentorial approach, employing gravity to naturally retract the parietooccipital lobe.5-7 Dissection continued into the quadrigeminal and ambient cisterns, where the tentorium was incised parallelling the straight sinus to reach the superior vermis. Partial resection of the lingual and central lobules of the vermis facilitated access to the superior medullary velum. The superior cerebellar artery feeders were divided and followed to the superior cerebellar peduncle and through the superior medullary vellum. A vertical incision in the superior medullary velum facilitated entry into the fourth ventricle, where the AVM nidus was dissected circumferentially and resected en bloc. Intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography and postoperative digital subtraction angiography confirmed complete obliteration of the AVM. After surgery, the patient experienced mild ataxia, but motor symptoms greatly improved during 3-month follow-up. This video illustrates resection of a complex fourth ventricular AVM through a posterior interhemispheric-transtentorial approach, highlighting pivotal considerations of patient positioning and approach selection to optimize treatment outcome for complex posterior fossa AVM resection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical management of lumbar spondylolisthesis requires neural decompression, stabilization, and alignment restoration. Minimally invasive spine approaches offer a wide variety of advantages for spondylolisthesis management. This intraoperative note describes the treatment of L4-L5 lumbar spondylolisthesis with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PSF). METHODS: The surgical technique for treating L4-L5 lumbar spondylolisthesis using a minimally invasive approach with LLIF and percutaneous PSF is described. This operative technique is illustrated with figures, and an intraoperative case example of its application is described. RESULTS: LLIF with percutaneous PSF can be a safe, effective, and reliable option for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis when applied with appropriate surgical technique in a selected patient population. This technique is a valuable addition to the range of available spine surgical options. CONCLUSIONS: LLIF with percutaneous PSF can be an effective technique for treating lumbar L4-L5 spondylolisthesis.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) experience progressive neurological impairment. Surgical intervention is often pursued to halt neurological symptom progression and allow for recovery of function. In this paper, the authors explore predictors of patient satisfaction following surgical intervention for CSM. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the multicenter Quality Outcomes Database. Patients who underwent surgical intervention for CSM with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Patient-reported satisfaction was defined as a North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction score of 1 or 2. Patient demographics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were assessed as related to patient satisfaction. Patient quality of life scores were measured at baseline and 24-month time points. Univariate regression analyses were performed using the chi-square test or Student t-test to assess patient satisfaction measures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess for factors predictive of postoperative satisfaction at 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients at 14 institutions with CSM who underwent surgical intervention were included, and 944 completed a patient satisfaction survey at 24 months postoperatively. The baseline modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score was 12.0 ± 2.8. A total of 793 (84.0%) patients reported satisfaction (NASS score 1 or 2) after 2 years. Male and female patients reported similar satisfaction rates (female sex: 47.0% not satisfied vs 48.5% satisfied, p = 0.73). Black race was associated with less satisfaction (26.5% not satisfied vs 13.2% satisfied, p < 0.01). Baseline psychiatric comorbidities, obesity, and length of stay did not correlate with 24-month satisfaction. Crossing the cervicothoracic junction did not affect satisfactory scores (p = 0.19), and minimally invasive approaches were not associated with increased patient satisfaction (p = 0.14). Lower baseline numeric rating scale neck pain scores (5.03 vs 5.61, p = 0.04) and higher baseline mJOA scores (12.28 vs 11.66, p = 0.01) were associated with higher satisfaction rates. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of CSM results in a high rate of patient satisfaction (84.0%) at the 2-year follow-up. Patients with milder myelopathy report higher satisfaction rates, suggesting that intervention earlier in the disease process may result in greater long-term satisfaction.