Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2024 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Environmental disinfection is essential for reducing spread of healthcare associated infections (HAIs). Previous studies report conflicting results regarding the effects of ultraviolet light (UV) in reducing infections. This trial evaluated the impact of adding pulsed xenon UV (PX-UV) to standard terminal cleaning in reducing environmentally-implicated HAIs (eiHAIs). METHODS: The LAMP trial was conducted in 2 hospitals (15 inpatient wards) utilizing a cluster randomized controlled, double-blinded, interventional crossover trial comparing standard terminal cleaning followed by either pulsed xenon ultraviolet (PX-UV) disinfection (intervention arm) or sham disinfection (control arm). The primary outcome was incidence of eiHAIs from clinical microbiology tests on the 4th day of stay or later or within 3 days after discharge from the study unit. EiHAIs included clinical cultures positive for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumonia, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Acinetobacter baumannii, and stool PCR positive for Clostridiodes difficile. FINDINGS: Between May 18, 2017 to Jan 7, 2020, 25,732 patients were included, with an incidence of 601 eiHAI and 180,954 patient days. There was no difference in the rate of eiHAIs in the intervention and sham arms (3.49 vs 3.17 infections/1000 patient days respectively, RR 1.10 CI (0.94, 1.29, p= 0.23)). Study results were similar when stratified by eiHAI type, hospital, and unit type. CONCLUSION: The LAMP study failed to demonstrate an effect of the addition of UV light disinfection following terminal cleaning on reductions in rates of eiHAIs. Further investigations targeting hospital environmental surfaces and the role of no touch technology to reduce HAIs are needed.

2.
J Bone Miner Res ; 39(4): 417-424, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477744

RESUMEN

Bone histomorphometric endpoints in transilial biopsies may be associated with an increased risk of atypical femoral fracture (AFF) in patients with osteoporosis who take antiresorptives, including bisphosphonates (BPs). One way to test this hypothesis is to evaluate bone histomorphometric endpoints in age-, gender-, and treatment time-matched patients who either had AFF or did not have AFF. In this study, we performed transiliac bone biopsies in 52 White postmenopausal women with (n = 20) and without (n = 32) AFFs, all of whom had been treated for osteoporosis continuously with alendronate for 4-17 yr. Despite the matched range of treatment duration (4-17 yr), AFF patients received alendronate for significantly longer time (10.7 yr) than non-AFF patients (8.0 yr) (P = .014). Bone histomorphometric endpoints reflecting microstructure and turnover were assessed in cancellous, intracortical, and endocortical envelopes from transilial biopsy specimens obtained from BP-treated patients 3-6 mo after AFF and from non-AFF patients with similar age-, gender-, and range of BP treatment duration. However, in both cancellous and intracortical envelopes, AFF patients had significantly lower wall thickness (W.Th) and higher osteoclast surface (Oc.S/BS) than non-AFF patients. In addition, AFF patients had significantly higher eroded surface (ES/BS) only in the intracortical envelope. None of the dynamic variables related to bone formation and turnover differed significantly between the groups. In conclusion, in the ilium of BP-treated patients with osteoporosis, AFF patients have lower thickness of superficial bone (lower W.Th) of the cancellous and cortical envelopes than non-AFF patients. AFF and non-AFF patients have a similar bone turnover rate in the ilium. Furthermore, in this population, as in previous work, AFF is more likely to occur in BP-treated patients with longer treatment duration.


Bisphosphonates (BPs) are widely used to prevent osteoporotic fracture and treat osteoporosis. However, prolonged use of BPs may increase the risk of atypical femoral fracture (AFF), and their pathogenesis remains unclear. This study compared the bone histomorphometric findings in cancellous and cortical bones between White osteoporotic women with (n = 20) and without AFF (n = 32), who had received BP treatment for a matched duration of 4­17 yr. The BP-treated patients with AFF had significantly lower wall thickness (W.Th) in both cancellous and cortical bones compared to BP-treated patients without AFF. There were no significant differences in bone formation, turnover, or mineral apposition rate between BP-treated AFF and non-AFF patients. In conclusion, our study results suggest that AFF risk is increased in BP-treated patients with smaller young and healthy superficial bone areas (indicated by lower W.Th). Surprisingly, we also discovered that patients with and without AFF have similar bone turnover rates, which contradicts previous beliefs. Our findings provide valuable insights into the potential factors contributing to AFF in BP-treated patients.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Humanos , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/patología , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Posmenopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Alendronato/efectos adversos , Alendronato/farmacología , Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Blanco
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda