Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 34(5): 997-1005, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17878128

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To identify which neuropsychological tests have been used to evaluate chemotherapy-induced impairment in various domains of cognitive function in patients with breast cancer and to determine the sensitivity of each of the tests through estimation of effect size. DATA SOURCES: Original studies published from 1966-June 2006. DATA SYNTHESIS: Although an array of neuropsychological tests are available to measure the various domains of cognitive function, information is lacking regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the tests to detect changes in cognitive function from chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides initial data on the sensitivity of some neuropsychological tests to determine chemotherapy-induced changes in cognitive function in patients with breast cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The identification of sensitive neuro-psychological tests is crucial to further understanding of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairments.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Humanos , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 29(7): 1063-80, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12183755

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To review the research studies on the current treatments for radiation therapy-(RT-) induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search of the literature from 1966-2001. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four types of agents (i.e., antimicrobial, coating, anti-inflammatory, and cytokine-like agents) have been evaluated for the management of RT-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. Most of the published studies had relatively small sample sizes and used inconsistent measures to evaluate the extent and severity of oral mucositis. Therefore, definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of any of the agents tested in the prevention and treatment of RT-induced oral mucositis cannot be drawn. CONCLUSIONS: Oral mucositis remains the most common complication among patients with head and neck cancer. Although a number of strategies and products are being investigated and new directions are promising, the therapies tested to date have not produced consistent results. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The most effective measure to treat RT-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer is frequent oral rinsing with a bland mouthwash, such as saline or a sodium bicarbonate rinse, to reduce the amount of oral microbial flora. Dental care, consistent oral assessments, and the initiation of a standardized oral hygiene protocol before the initiation of cancer treatment are the most effective approaches for oral mucositis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/enfermería , Enfermería Oncológica , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/terapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Humanos , Mucosa Bucal/efectos de los fármacos , Estomatitis/enfermería
3.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 29(5): 845-52, 2002 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12058159

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between women's reported social support and their adherence to recommended breast cancer screening guidelines. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community women's organizations throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. SAMPLE: 833 mostly low-income women with a mean age of 46.2 years from three racial or ethnic groups (i.e., Latina, Caucasian, and African American) who were not breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Social support was measured with a five-item, four-point, Likert scale developed for the study (Cronbach's alpha = 0.7248). Adherence to screening guidelines was measured by asking frequency of performing breast self-examination (BSE) and frequency of obtaining a clinical breast examination (CBE) and a mammogram. Research assistants and leaders of women's organizations conducted the survey in work and community settings. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Social support, performance of BSE, obtaining a CBE and a mammogram, income, education, spoken language, and level of acculturation. FINDINGS: Higher levels of social support were related to higher income and higher education. Lower levels of social support were associated with being Latina, completing the survey in Spanish, and being born abroad. Women who did not adhere to screening guidelines (for BSE or CBE) reported less social support. CONCLUSIONS: Social support is associated with adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses should assess women's levels of social support as a factor when evaluating adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud/etnología , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Diversidad Cultural , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , San Francisco/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 30(1): 65-73, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12515985

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe the PRO-SELF(c): Pain Control Program, an educational approach that provides patients and family caregivers with the knowledge, skills, and nursing support needed to improve pain relief. DATA SOURCES: Published research studies, articles, and conference abstracts. DATA SYNTHESIS: Patients with cancer and family caregivers lack knowledge about pain management and side effects. Engaging in self-care behaviors improves patients' health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The PRO-SELF: Pain Control Program is an effective approach that can be used to help patients with cancer and their family caregivers obtain the knowledge and skills that are needed to manage pain. Three key strategies for delivering the PRO-SELF program are (a) provision of information using academic detailing, (b) skill building with ongoing nurse coaching, and (c) interactive nursing support. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Adequate pain relief is vital to decreasing cancer morbidity and improving patients' quality of life. The PRO-SELF: Pain Control Program should be implemented in all settings where cancer care takes place.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Dolor/enfermería , Dolor/prevención & control , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Autocuidado/métodos , Anciano , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Cuidadores/educación , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Humanos , Neoplasias/enfermería , Dolor/etiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Grabación de Cinta de Video
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda