Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(5): 1639-47, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25740779

RESUMEN

Diarrhea due to enteric bacterial pathogens causes significant morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide. However, bacterial pathogens may be infrequently identified. Currently, culture and enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are the primary methods used by clinical laboratories to detect enteric bacterial pathogens. We conducted a multicenter evaluation of the BD Max enteric bacterial panel (EBP) PCR assay in comparison to culture for the detection of Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, and Campylobacter coli and an EIA for Shiga toxins 1 and 2. A total of 4,242 preserved or unpreserved stool specimens, including 3,457 specimens collected prospectively and 785 frozen, retrospective samples, were evaluated. Compared to culture or EIA, the positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) values for the BD Max EBP assay for all specimens combined were as follows: 97.1% and 99.2% for Salmonella spp., 99.1% and 99.7% for Shigella spp., 97.2% and 98.4% for C. jejuni and C. coli, and 97.4% and 99.3% for Shiga toxins, respectively. Discrepant results for prospective samples were resolved with alternate PCR assays and bidirectional sequencing of amplicons. Following discrepant analysis, PPA and NPA values were as follows: 97.3% and 99.8% for Salmonella spp., 99.2% and 100% for Shigella spp., 97.5% and 99.0% for C. jejuni and C. coli, and 100% and 99.7% for Shiga toxins, respectively. No differences in detection were observed for samples preserved in Cary-Blair medium and unpreserved samples. In this large, multicenter study, the BD Max EBP assay showed superior sensitivity compared to conventional methods and excellent specificity for the detection of enteric bacterial pathogens in stool specimens.


Asunto(s)
Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Toxina Shiga I/análisis , Toxina Shiga II/análisis , Shigella/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Campylobacter/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Diarrea/diagnóstico , Diarrea/microbiología , Heces/química , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salmonella/genética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Toxina Shiga I/genética , Toxina Shiga II/genética , Shigella/genética , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 51(11): 3579-84, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23966484

RESUMEN

Assays that expedite the reporting of organism identification and antibiotic susceptibility status in positive blood cultures can fast track interventions that improve clinical outcomes. We evaluated the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture nucleic acid test (BC-GP) in two pediatric hospitals. Positive BacT/Alert Pediatric FAN blood cultures with Gram-positive organisms were tested using the BC-GP in tandem with routine laboratory procedures. To test organisms underrepresented in the clinical blood culture evaluation, blood culture bottles were spiked with diluted organism suspensions at concentrations of 10 to 100 CFU per milliliter. A total of 249 Gram-positive bacterial isolates were recovered from 242 blood cultures. The BC-GP detected Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus with sensitivities of 100%, 99%, and 100% and specificities of 100%, 100%, and 99.5%, respectively. The BC-GP detected Staphylococcus epidermidis, methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis, and methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis with sensitivities of 95%, 80%, and 96%, respectively, and 100% specificity. The BC-GP correctly identified 14/15 cases of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium bacteremia and 9 cases of Streptococcus pneumoniae. It misidentified 5/15 clinical blood cultures with Streptococcus mitis/Streptococcus oralis and 1/3 blood cultures spiked with Streptococcus anginosus group as S. pneumoniae. The BC-GP detected a case of Streptococcus pyogenes bacteremia but failed to detect 2/3 clinical blood cultures with Streptococcus agalactiae. BC-GP's rapid accurate detection of Staphylococcus spp., E. faecium, and E. faecalis and its ability to ascertain mecA, vanA, and vanB status may expedite clinical decisions pertaining to optimal antibiotic use. False-positive S. pneumoniae results may warrant reporting of only "Streptococcus spp." when this organism is reported by the BC-GP.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococcus/clasificación , Enterococcus/genética , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Staphylococcus/clasificación , Staphylococcus/genética , Streptococcus/clasificación , Streptococcus/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda