Normothermic with or without hypothermic oxygenated perfusion for DCD before liver transplantation: European multicentric experience.

Grafts from donors with cardiac death (DCD) are subject to warm ischemia time (WIT) due to the no-touch-period (20 min in Italy and 5 min in France). These livers (LT) have higher rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), primary non-function (PNF), and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) compared to LT from brain dead donors (DBD). Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is a beneficial strategy to mitigate organ damage; a further approach is the application of ex vivo hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) after cold storage (CS). We retrospectively analyzed LTs performed from 2016 to 2019 at three transplant centers using NRP-DCD grafts: Bologna and Milan treated with HOPE (group A), Rennes preserved using CS (group B). No-flow period, total and functional WIT were significantly higher in group A than in group B (30.5±7.7 vs. 20.5±4.1; 56.5±20.4 vs. 39.1±21.6; 41.9±12.5 vs. 25.5±3.7; respectively, P < .05), without differences in the postoperative course. In particular, the two groups had similar rates of EAD (21.1% vs. 25.0%), PNF (5.3% vs. 6.3%), IC (0% vs. 12.5%, P = .112), and non-IC biliary complications (0% vs. 6.3%, P = .457), re-LT (10.5% vs.12.5%). This occurred despite a high rate of UK DCD risk score > 10 (63.2% A vs. 17.6% B, P = .000), which theoretically would make a large number of these transplants "futile." In conclusion, Italian and French groups had similar post-LT outcomes, probably related to the use of HOPE after CS in the case of long WIT.

Impact of Pre-Liver Transplant Treatments on the Imaging Accuracy of HCC Staging and Their Influence on Outcomes.

The outcome of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocarcinoma (HCC) is strongly influenced by HCC staging, which is based on radiological examinations in a pre-LT setting; concordance between pre-LT radiological and definitive pathological staging remains controversial. To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed our LT series to assess concordance between radiology and pathology and to explore the factors associated with poor concordance and outcomes. We included all LTs with an HCC diagnosis performed between 2013 and 2018. Concordance (Co group) was defined as a comparable tumor burden in preoperative imaging and post-transplant pathology; otherwise, non-concordance was diagnosed (nCo group). Concordance between radiology and pathology was observed in 32/134 patients (Co group, 24%). The number and diameter of the nodules were higher when nCo was diagnosed, as was the number of pre-LT treatments. Although concordance did not affect survival, more than three pre-LT treatments led to a lower disease-free survival. Patients who met the Milan Criteria (Milan-in patients) were more likely to receive ≥three prior treatments, leading to a lower survival in multi-treated Milan-in patients than in other Milan-in patients. In conclusion, the concordance rate between the pre-LT imaging and histopathological results was low in patients with a high number of nodules. Multiple bridging therapies reduce the accuracy of pre-LT imaging in predicting HCC stages and negatively affect outcomes after LT.