Lymphocyte recovery after bendamustine therapy in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Results of a retrospective analysis and prognostic impact in the CAR-T era.

Bendamustine in combination with rituximab (BR) or with rituximab and cytarabine (R-BAC) is the standard first-line immunochemotherapy in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) for elderly patients and patients ineligible for intensive regimens or autologous transplantation. As bendamustine causes prolonged lymphopenia and the literature lacks evidence of its persistence in patients with MCL, this retrospective analysis aims to estimate the lymphocyte recovery time, also in view of potential immunotherapy with CAR-T cells. Data were collected from 44 consecutive MCL patients who received bendamustine (BR or R-BAC) as first-line therapy at the Hematology Unit of Sapienza University Hospital between May 2011 and April 2022. Twenty patients (45%) were treated with R-BAC and 24 (55%) with BR. At baseline, the median lymphocyte count was 1795/µl (range: 370-11730/µL). One month after the end of therapy, it was 450/µl (range: 50-3300/µl) and 3 months after 768/µl (range: 260-1650/µl). After 6 and 9 months, we observed a gradual increase in median lymphocyte count of 900/µl (range: 370-2560/µl and 130-2770/µl, respectively). After 12 months median lymphocyte count was 1256/µl (range: 240-4140/µl). Median lymphocyte count at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months post-treatment was significantly lower than baseline but showed recovery by the 12 months. This finding is crucial for MCL patients considering CAR-T cell therapy, suggesting a minimum 9-month interval between bendamustine administration and leukapheresis.

Secondary Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) with Low Dose Apixaban or Rivaroxaban: Results from a Patient Population with More than 2 Years of Median Follow-up.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nowadays, DOACs represent the gold standard for long-term anticoagulation, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit low-intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban are approved for clinical usage as secondary VTE prophylaxis, there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety with a long follow-up. Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who required long-term anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent VTE, treated with apixaban 2.5 mg BID or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily with a follow-up ≥ 12 months. Results: The examined patients were 323. The median low-dose DOAC administration time was 25.40 months (IQR 13.93-45.90). Twelve (3.7%) VTE recurrences were observed; 21 bleeding events were registered (6.5%), including one episode of Major bleeding (MB) (0.3%), 8 Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) (2.5%) and 12 minor bleeding (3.7%). No statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE recurrence and/or bleeding events emerged between the rivaroxaban and apixaban groups. Patients included in the study for multiple episodes of VTE presented a significantly higher risk of a new VTE recurrence during low-intensity DOAC. Conclusions: Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and safe in secondary VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence; however, attention might be needed in their choice in such a scenario for patients who experienced multiple episodes of VTE.

Reduced transmission of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) in patients with haematological malignancies hospitalized in an Italian hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: During the lockdown that started in Italy on 10 March 2020 to address the COVID-19 pandemic, aggressive procedures were implemented to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients with haematological malignancies. These efforts progressively reduced Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) spread among these patients. Here we evaluated the potential effects of measures against COVID-19 that reduced KPC-KP transmission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed KPC-KP spread among 123 patients with haematological malignancies, hospitalized between March and August 2020, who were managed using measures against COVID-19. Their outcomes were compared with those of 80 patients hospitalized during the preceding 4 months (November 2019-February 2020). RESULTS: During March-August 2020, 15.5% of hospitalized patients were KPC-KP positive, compared with 52.5% in November 2019-February 2020 (P < 0.0001); 8% and 27.5% of patients in these two groups were newly KPC-KP positive, respectively (P = 0.0003). There were eight new KPC-KP-positive patients during January 2020 and none during June 2020. The weekly rate of hospitalized KPC-KP-positive patients decreased from 50% during March 2020 to 17% during August 2020. Four KPC-KP bloodstream infections (BSIs) were experienced by 123 patients (3%) in March-August 2020, and seven BSIs (one fatal) by 80 patients (8%) in November 2019-February 2020 (P = 0.02). Consumption and expense of ceftazidime/avibactam administered to KPC-KP-positive patients significantly decreased in March-August 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive strategies to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission were applied to all hospitalized patients, characterized by high levels of KPC-KP endemicity and nosocomial transmission. Such measures prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection acquisition and KPC-KP horizontal transmission. Reduced KPC-KP spread, fewer associated clinical complications and decreased ceftazidime/avibactam consumption represented unexpected 'collateral benefits' of strategies to prevent COVID-19.