Long-term results of tricuspid valve repair using three-dimensional versus flexible rings in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: Significant functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) should be corrected in patients undergoing surgery for left-sided valvular diseases. We hypothesized that ring type may affect outcomes in tricuspid annuloplasty. Herein, we report our experience with three-dimensional semi-rigid rings compared to open simple-band annuloplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective study that included all patients who underwent tricuspid annuloplasty concomitant to left-sided valvular surgery. The study's main outcome measure was long-term recurrent TR probability. RESULTS: Of the 781 study patients, 611 (78%) underwent annuloplasty using flexible band and 170 (22%) underwent rigid ring implantation. Early mortality did not differ significantly between the rigid and flexible groups (4.4% vs 4.1%, P = 1.000). Long-term mortality was similar between the groups [hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.36, P = 0.847]. At a mean follow-up of 62 (50) months, freedom from TR grade 3+/4+ was 96.4% and 96.7% in the rigid and flexible groups, respectively (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.55-3.61, P = 0.476). Furthermore, 2.4% of the rigid and 1.3% of the flexible groups required reoperation (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.21-4.82, P = 0.988). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that rheumatic valve aetiology (HR 1.92, CI 1.04-2.98, P = 0.042) and mitral stenosis (HR 1.44, CI 1.01-2.2, P = 0.044) were predictors for recurrent TR (3+/4+). Ring type was not associated with recurrence (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.3-2.47, P = 0.787). CONCLUSIONS: Open bands performed at least as well as three-dimensional rings. Our results suggest that late clinical results of tricuspid annuloplasty depend on left-sided pathology and patient factors and less on the type of ring used.

Comparison of Speckle Tracking Echocardiography During Different Pacing Modalities for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response Prediction.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate left ventricular mechanical activation pattern by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure. Methods: Echocardiography was performed during no pacing, right ventricular pacing (RVP), biventricular pacing (BVP) and multipolar pacing (MPP) immediately after CRT implantation in 16 patients at a single centre. Seven patients were diagnosed as responders and 9 patients as non-responders after 6 months of standard CRT pacing. All had adequate short axis views, and 1 CRT responder and 2 CRT non-responders had limited longitudinal views. Results: Longitudinal and circumferential global strain (GS) and global strain rate (GSR) or their change analysis, did not yield any CRT response prediction. However, the longitudinal BVP/RVP GS ratio was significantly higher in the responder group (1.32 ± 0.2%, 2.0 ± 0.4% and 1.9 ± 0.4%), compared with the non-responder group (1.06 ± 0.2%, 1.1 ± 0.4% and 1.2 ± 0.4%) in the apical two-chamber, APLAX and four-chamber views, respectively. Similarly, the longitudinal BVP/RVP GSR at active systolic phase (GSRs) was significantly higher in the responder group (1.9 ± 0.9% and 1.7 ± 0.4%) compared with the non-responder group (1.0 ± 0.4% and 1.1 ± 0.2%) in the apical APLAX and four-chamber views, respectively. Measurements of the strain delay index showed predictive power regarding CRT response in non-paced patients. Conclusion: Post implantation, longitudinal BVP/RVP GS and GSRs ratios of 1.4% and above may be useful as a CRT response prediction tool. Furthermore, our findings support the usefulness of strain delay index prior to CRT implantation in non-paced patients.

Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Examination on Triage of Patients With Suspected Cardiac Disease.

Complementing the physical examination with a point-of-care ultrasound study (POCUS) can improve patient triage. We aimed to study the impact of POCUS on the diagnosis and management of outpatients and hospitalized patients with suspected cardiac disease. In this multicenter study, a pocket-sized device was used to perform POCUS when the diagnosis or patient management was unclear based on anamnesis, physical examination, and basic diagnostic testing. Eighteen physicians (cardiac fellows 49%, cardiologists 30%, and echocardiographers 21%) performed physical examinations extended by POCUS on 207 patients (inpatients 83% and outpatients 17%). POCUS findings resulted in a change in the primary diagnosis in 14% of patients. In patients whose diagnosis remained unchanged, POCUS results reinforced the initial diagnosis in 48% of the cases. In 39% of the patients, the diagnostic plan was altered, including referral (16%) or deferral (23%) to other diagnostic techniques. Alteration in medical treatment (drug discontinuation or initiation) occurred in 11% of the patients, and in 7% POCUS results influenced the decision whether to perform a therapeutic procedure. Hospitalization or discharge was determined after POCUS in 11% of the patients. In conclusion, during patient triage, extension of the physical examination by POCUS can cause physicians to alter their initial diagnosis, resulting in an immediate change of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Based on POCUS results, physicians altered the diagnostic plan either by avoiding or referring patients to other diagnostic procedures in almost half of the studied population.