[The S2k guideline: Indications for knee endoprosthesis : Evidence and consent-based indications for total knee arthroplasty]. / S2k-Leitlinie: Indikation Knieendoprothese : Evidenz- und konsensbasierte Indikationsstellung in der Knie-Endoprothetik (EKIT-Knie).

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequent surgical procedures in orthopaedic surgery. Until now there have not been any standardized indication criteria, which might contribute to the large geographical differences in the frequency of TKA. This guideline aims to consent minimal requirements (main criteria), additional important aspects (minor criteria), as well as relative and absolute contraindications for TKA. The following main criteria have been consented: knee pain, radiological confirmation of osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis, inadequate response to conservative treatment, adverse impact of knee disease on the patient's quality of life and the burden of suffering due to the knee disease. Relative contraindications have been consented as severe general disease with reduced life expectancy and a BMI ≥40; absolute contraindications are an active infection and if the patient is not able to undergo major surgery.

EULAR/EFORT recommendations for management of patients older than 50†years with a fragility fracture and prevention of subsequent fractures.

The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) have recognised the importance of optimal acute care for the patients aged 50 years and over with a recent fragility fracture and the prevention of subsequent fractures in high-risk patients, which can be facilitated by close collaboration between orthopaedic surgeons and rheumatologists or other metabolic bone experts. Therefore, the aim was to establish for the first time collaborative recommendations for these patients. According to the EULAR standard operating procedures for the elaboration and implementation of evidence-based recommendations, 7 rheumatologists, a geriatrician and 10 orthopaedic surgeons met twice under the leadership of 2 convenors, a senior advisor, a clinical epidemiologist and 3 research fellows. After defining the content and procedures of the task force, 10 research questions were formulated, a comprehensive and systematic literature search was performed and the results were presented to the entire committee. 10 recommendations were formulated based on evidence from the literature and after discussion and consensus building in the group. The recommendations included appropriate medical and surgical perioperative care, which requires, especially in the elderly, a multidisciplinary approach including orthogeriatric care. A coordinator should setup a process for the systematic investigations for future fracture risk in all elderly patients with a recent fracture. High-risk patients should have appropriate non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment to decrease the risk of subsequent fracture.

A new responder criterion (relative effect per patient (REPP) > 0.2) externally validated in a large total hip replacement multicenter cohort (EUROHIP).

OBJECTIVE: To validate a new method to identify responders (relative effect per patient (REPP) >0.2) using the OMERACT-OARSI criteria as gold standard in a large multicentre sample. METHOD: The REPP ([score before - after treatment]/score before treatment) was calculated for 845 patients of a large multicenter European cohort study for THR. The patients with a REPP >0.2 were defined as responders. The responder rate was compared to the gold standard (OMERACT-OARSI criteria) using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for sensitivity, specificity and percentage of appropriately classified patients. RESULTS: With the criterion REPP>0.2 85.4% of the patients were classified as responders, applying the OARSI-OMERACT criteria 85.7%. The new method had 98.8% sensitivity, 94.2% specificity and 98.1% of the patients were correctly classified compared to the gold standard. CONCLUSION: The external validation showed a high sensitivity and also specificity of a new criterion to identify a responder compared to the gold standard method. It is simple and has no uncertainties due to a single classification criterion.

A comprehensive fracture prevention strategy in older adults: the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) statement.

Prevention of fragility fractures in older people has become a public health priority, although the most appropriate and cost-effective strategy remains unclear. In the present statement, the Interest Group on Falls and Fracture Prevention of the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society, in collaboration with the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics for the European Region, the European Union of Medical Specialists, and the International Osteoporosis Foundation-European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis, outlines its views on the main points in the current debate in relation to the primary and secondary prevention of falls, the diagnosis and treatment of bone fragility, and the place of combined falls and fracture liaison services for fracture prevention in older people.

[Influence of registries on the quality of care]. / Einfluss von Registern auf die Versorgungsqualität.

Registries are a topic of lively debate amongst all stakeholders in healthcare, politics and economics. In general, registries are national or international (prospective) databases documenting the current state of diagnostic, therapeutic and long-term outcome variables of subjects with a distinct condition or health problem. The access to and handling of registry information is subject to strict legal, methodological and ethical principles and regulations before these data can be scientifically utilized and reentered into the routine daily practice. Because of the representativeness and reality of data, registries are widely regarded as the backbone of health systems and budgets.Currently there is only indirect evidence that registries influence outcomes and the quality of care. Recent statistical techniques may allow quasi-experimental modelling of observational information. In orthopedic and trauma surgery, current and upcoming registries should be wisely utilized to develop and evaluate innovations and to make informed decisions relevant to care.

[Rehabilitation concepts and return to sport after interventions on the shoulder]. / Rehabilitative Konzepte und Rückkehr zum Sport nach Eingriffen an der Schulter.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation of athletes following surgical interventions for shoulder injuries is of utmost importance for recovery and return to sport. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine adequate concepts for rehabilitation following shoulder surgery in athletes. METHODS: A selective literature search was carried out in PubMed and a review of the available concepts is given taking personal experiences as well as national and international recommendations into consideration. RESULTS: This article presents the basic principles of functional rehabilitation, the kinetic chain and the different phases in rehabilitation. Specific rehabilitation concepts and return to sport strategies following traumatic dislocation, superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions and rotator cuff tears are presented. There is little high-level scientific evidence available for the treatment of these patients and most concepts are based on clinical experience and expert opinion. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation of athletes with shoulder injuries requires a broad consensus strategy with respect to the next steps. Individual concepts for rehabilitation should take surgical and patient-specific criteria into consideration. Further research is urgently required to develop evidence-based recommendations.

EULAR/EFORT recommendations for the diagnosis and initial management of patients with acute or recent onset swelling of the knee.

OBJECTIVES: The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) have recognised the importance of variation in diagnostic and therapeutic performance across disciplines, have found consensus in starting task forces aiming at achieving diagnostic and therapeutic uniformity, and have identified medical conditions with which representatives of both organisations will frequently be confronted in common clinical practice. The aim of the present work was to establish recommendations for the diagnosis and initial management of patients presenting with acute or recent onset swelling of the knee. METHODS: The EULAR standard operating procedures for the elaboration and implementation of evidence-based recommendations were followed. RESULTS: In all, 11 rheumatologists from 11 countries and 12 orthopaedic surgeons from 7 countries met twice under the leadership of 2 conveners, a clinical epidemiologist and a research fellow. After carefully defining the content and procedures of the task force, research questions were developed, a comprehensive literature search was performed and the results were presented to the entire committee. Subsequently, a set of 10 recommendations was formulated based on evidence from the literature if available, and after discussion and consensus building. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first combined interdisciplinary project of rheumatologists and orthopaedic surgeons, successfully aiming at achieving consensus in the diagnosis and initial management of patients presenting with acute or recent onset swelling of the knee.

[Methods of health economic evaluation for health services research]. / Methoden der gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation in der Versorgungsforschung.

On August 30, 2010, the German Network for Health Services Research [Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e. V. (DNVF e. V.)] approved the Memorandum III "Methods for Health Services Research", supported by the member societies mentioned as authors and published in this Journal [Gesundheitswesen 2010; 72: 739-748]. The present paper focuses on methodological issues of economic evaluation of health care technologies. It complements the Memorandum III "Methods for Health Services Research", part 2. First, general methodological principles of the economic evaluations of health care technologies are outlined. In order to adequately reflect costs and outcomes of health care interventions in the routine health care, data from different sources are required (e. g., comparative efficacy or effectiveness studies, registers, administrative data, etc.). Therefore, various data sources, which might be used for economic evaluations, are presented, and their strengths and limitations are stated. Finally, the need for methodological advancement with regard to data collection and analysis and issues pertaining to communication and dissemination of results of health economic evaluations are discussed.

[Using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in trauma care]. / Anwendung der Internationalen Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF) in der Traumatologie.

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a comprehensive and structured treatment management and outcome evaluation in trauma care based on specific ICF core sets and the ICF-based Rehab-CYCLE. The Rehab-CYCLE allows the problem-based assessment of functioning in a multi-professional team under physician-guidance and the definition of long-term, intervention and cycle goals. Defined intervention goals are assigned to the appropriate intervention principles and techniques as well as the specific evaluation instruments. Together with the patient additional intervention goals are identified, intervention principals adapted and the further treatment setting planned based on a multi-professional outcome evaluation. The standardized documentation is reported multi-professionally on the ICF assessment sheet which reflects the patient perspective with all their problems and needs as well as the perspective of the treatment team.

[Introduction to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)]. / Einführung in die International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

The WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) allows a standardized description of functioning and disability based on individual and contextual factors. The ICF adopts a biopsychosocial model of disability and functioning and is complementary to the ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases). For its implementation in clinical practice ICF-based instruments, such as the ICF core sets were developed in a standardized scientific process. These consist of the ICF categories which are most relevant for patients with specific diseases or in specific health care situations. In trauma care the ICF and ICF core sets can be applied in defined health problems and treatment situations for documentation of functioning, structured planning and implementation of interventions as well as outcome assessment.

[Outcome assessment in geriatric trauma]. / Outcomes bei Alterstrauma.

The number of elderly and old patients with fractures is steadily increasing. Identification of relevant functional deficits and comorbidities is crucial for an efficient treatment strategy and outcome assessment in this patient group. For this reason the integration of a geriatric assessment in every orthopedic traumatology practice seems recommendable. Assessing the outcome of frequent fragility fractures (hip, radius) requires instruments oriented to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) which allow analysis of bodily function and structure as well as activity and participation. A combination of disease and body region-specific scores with generic scores seems to be reasonable. It can also be sensible to include instruments for health economic analyses.

[Sports and osteoarthrosis]. / Sport und Arthrose.

Many risk factors for developing osteoarthrosis exist. Osteoarthrosis is the most common cause of chronic disability in middle-aged and older people. On the one hand, physical exercise can lead to arthrosis; on the other hand, physical exercise is commonly used in preventing and treating it. Experimental and clinical studies have shown that increased high-impact running or competitive sports result in a higher risk for osteoarthrosis than moderate low-impact running. In particular, sudden-impact loading and twisting movements of the joints can result in premature osteoarthrosis. Also, sports with a high risk for injuries can lead to secondary osteoarthrosis. Preventive exercises to strengthen the skeletal muscles seem to have a pivotal role. There are different therapeutic approaches to osteoarthrosis, which will be more important in the future. Exercise should be a core treatment for people with osteoarthritis, irrespective of age, comorbidity, pain severity, or disability. Exercise should include local muscle strengthening and general aerobic fitness.

A global call to action to improve the care of people with fragility fractures.

The ageing of society is driving an enormous increase in fragility fracture incidence and imposing a massive burden on patients, their families, health systems and societies globally. Disrupting the status quo has therefore become an obligation and a necessity. Initiated by the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) at a "Presidents' Roundtable" during the 5th FFN Global Congress in 2016 several leading organisations agreed that a global multidisciplinary and multiprofessional collaboration, resulting in a Global Call to Action (CtA), would be the right step forward to improve the care of people presenting with fragility fractures. So far global and regional organisations in geriatrics/internal medicine, orthopaedics, osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease, rehabilitation and rheumatology were contacted as well as national organisations in five highly populated countries (Brazil, China, India, Japan and the United States), resulting in 81societies endorsing the CtA. We call for implementation of a systematic approach to fragility fracture care with the goal of restoring function and preventing subsequent fractures without further delay. There is an urgent need to improve: To address this fragility fracture crisis, the undersigned organisations pledge to intensify their efforts to improve the current management of all fragility fractures, prevent subsequent fractures, and strive to restore functional abilities and quality of life.

A Comprehensive Fracture Prevention Strategy in Older Adults: The European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) Statement.

Prevention of fragility fractures in older people has become a public health priority, although the most appropriate and cost-effective strategy remains unclear. In the present statement, the Interest Group on Falls and Fracture Prevention of the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), in collaboration with the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics for the European Region (IAGG-ER), the European Union of Medical Specialists (EUMS), the International Osteoporosis Foundation - European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis, outlines its views on the main points in the current debate in relation to the primary and secondary prevention of falls, the diagnosis and treatment of bone fragility, and the place of combined falls and fracture liaison services for fracture prevention in older people.

Differences in the views of orthopaedic surgeons and referring practitioners on the determinants of outcome after total hip replacement.

In order to assess current opinions on the long-term outcome after primary total hip replacement, we performed a multicentre, cross-sectional survey in 22 centres from 12 European countries. Different patient characteristics were categorised into 'decreases chances', 'does not affect chances', and 'increases chances' of a favourable long-term outcome, by 304 orthopaedic surgeons and 314 referring practitioners. The latter were less likely to associate age older than 80 years and obesity with a favourable outcome than orthopaedic surgeons (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) and more likely to associate age younger than 50 years with a favourable outcome (p = 0.006). Comorbidity, rheumatoid arthritis, and poor bone quality were thought to be associated with a decreased chance of a favourable outcome. We found important differences in the opinions regarding long-term outcome after total hip replacement within and between referring practitioners and orthopaedic surgeons. These are likely to affect access to and the provision of total hip replacement.

Metastasis-free survival after local recurrence of soft-tissue sarcoma.

We analysed metastasis-free survival after local recurrence in a population-based series of 432 patients treated for soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities or trunk wall. Local recurrence was found in 124 patients; of these, 73 had no detectable metastases when the last local recurrence was diagnosed. No patient received chemotherapy for local recurrence. The 73 patients had a 5-year metastasis-free survival rate of 0.73 after the last local recurrence, compared with 0.47 in all 124 patients with local recurrence. The 5-year metastasis-free survival rate was 0.76 in the 308 patients who had never developed local recurrence, and 0.68 in the whole series. The selection of patients with local recurrence but no concurrent metastasis creates a subset of the population with a good prognosis; this makes it difficult to evaluate the effect of treatment for local recurrence on survival rate. In studies of prognosis this group of patients should be analysed separately from patients with primary tumours.

Isolated traumatic dislocation of the hip. Long-term results in 50 patients.

From 1974 to 1989, we treated 50 patients with a simple dislocation of the hip: 38 were posterior dislocations and 12 were anterior. All dislocations primarily treated at our hospital were reduced by closed methods within three hours (mean 85 minutes (10 to 180)) and 43 were reviewed after an average follow-up of 8 years (2 to 17). It is widely held that isolated hip dislocation reduced within six hours gives an excellent outcome, but we found a significant number of complications. There were radiological signs of partial avascular necrosis in two, mild osteoarthritis in seven, and moderate degeneration in two. Heterotopic ossification was seen in four patients, but 29 of 33 MRI examinations were normal. Objective evaluation according to the Thompson and Epstein (1951) criteria showed fair and poor results in 3 of 12 anterior dislocations, but in 16 of 30 posterior dislocations. In six of the seven patients with no other severe injury, the hip had an excellent or good result; in only three of the eight patients with severe multiple injuries was this the case. The important factors in the long-term prognosis appear to be the direction of the dislocation and the overall severity of injuries.

Giant-cell tumours with fracture at diagnosis. Curettage and acrylic cementing in ten cases.

Between 1971 and 1991 we treated 98 patients with giant-cell tumours, 15 of whom presented with a pathological fracture. They were most common around the knee (12). Nine fractures were intra-articular. The tumours were treated by curettage and acrylic cementing (10), excision and endoprosthesis (1), excision and allograft (1), curettage and autologous graft (2) or by resection of the fibular head (1). Four patients had local recurrence, three of whom were cured by repeat curettage and cementing. Pathological fracture through a giant-cell tumour is not a contraindication to treatment by curettage and acrylic cementing.

Cytogenetic studies on fine-needle aspiration samples from osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma.

The preoperative multidrug chemotherapy of osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma patients requires a reliable diagnosis. There are several advantages with obtaining the diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and cytologic examination. Although cytologic criteria have been defined, adjunctive methods such as cytogenetic analysis are valuable to support the diagnosis. We have cytogenetically analyzed FNAs from 18 primary bone sarcomas (six osteosarcomas and 12 Ewing's sarcomas). Two of the osteosarcomas showed abnormal, complex karyotypes seen in most highly-malignant osteosarcomas. Seven Ewing's sarcoma aspirates displayed abnormal karyotypes; five of these had the characteristic 11;22 translocation, and in one of these cases molecular genetic analysis revealed the hybrid EWS/FLI1 transcript. Since only two of six osteosarcomas showed clonal changes, chromosomal analysis of FNAs from suspected osteosarcoma seems to be of limited value, but may in some cases support the diagnosis of high-grade malignancy. In Ewing's sarcomas, however, the finding of an 11;22 translocation was valuable and strongly supported the cytologic diagnosis. As shown in one case, the material obtained by FNA is sufficient for cytologic, cytogenetic, and molecular genetic analysis.