Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Med J ; 37(11): 714-716, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972913

RESUMEN

We describe the expansion and adaptation of a frailty response team to assess older people in their usual place of residence. The team had commenced a weekend service to a limited area in February 2020. As a consequence of demand related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we expanded it and adapted the model of care to provide a 7-day service to our entire catchment area. Five hundred and ninety two patient reviews have been completed in the first 105 days of operation with 43 patients transferred to hospital for further investigation or management following assessment.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Anciano Frágil , Evaluación Geriátrica , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/organización & administración , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Br J Nurs ; 29(8): S4-S10, 2020 Apr 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324461

RESUMEN

Replacing peripheral vascular catheters when clinically indicated rather than routinely has multiple benefits for patients and practitioners. Managing vascular catheters based on clinical indication provides early opportunities for intervention, or catheter removal or replacement. Where clinically indicated, peripheral vascular catheters can be used for a long time, and this is aided by decision-making tools such as the visual infusion phlebitis score and care bundles. Fewer cannulations result in less pain, better patient comfort and a lower risk of infection. For each cannulation avoided, about 20 minutes can be saved for other care activities. Replacing peripheral vascular catheters according to clinical indication can improve patient safety and optimise resource use.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Remoción de Dispositivos/normas , Seguridad del Paciente , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36168481

RESUMEN

Objectives: Molecular epidemiological description of an OXA-48 CPE outbreak affecting a tertiary-care hospital ward in Ireland over an extended period (2018-2019). Methods: Microbiological testing and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were performed on all 56 positive OXA-48 outbreak case isolates. Results: In total, 7 different species were identified: Enterobacter hormaechei (n = 35, 62.5%), Escherichia coli (n = 12, 21.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 5, 8.9%), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 1, 1.8%), Klebsiella michiganensis (n = 1, 1.8%), Citrobacter freundii (n = 1, 1.8%), and Serratia marcesens (n = 1, 1.8%). E. hormaechei ST78 was the most common genotype (n = 14, 25%). Two major pOXA-48 plasmid types were identified throughout the outbreak, 'types' 1 and 2, and 5 major E. hormaechei clonal groupings were identified: ST78, ST108, ST1126, ST135, and ST66. Within each of the ST108, ST1126, ST135 and ST66 groups, the pOXA-48 harbored within each isolate were the same. Within ST78, 9 isolates contained the pOXA48 'type 2' plasmid and 5 contained the 'type 1' plasmid. Environmental specimens were taken from different outbreak ward locations: handwash basins, sink and shower drains, and taps. Of 394 environmental specimens, OXA-48 CPE was isolated from 26 (6.6%). Conclusions: This prolonged outbreak of OXA-48 CPE was confined to one ward, but it exemplifies the complexity and difficulty in the control of these organisms. With multiple species and genotypes involved, they may be better described as 'plasmid outbreaks.' WGS provided insights into this diversity and potential transmission among cases, though its usefulness would be enhanced by analysis as close as possible to real time so that interventions can be implemented as soon as data are available.

4.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 9: 50, 2008 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18412974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite emphasis on patient centred healthcare, healthcare professionals have been slow to use validated measurements of patient satisfaction in physiotherapy practice. The aim of this cross sectional survey was to measure patient satisfaction with private physiotherapy in Ireland, for patients with musculoskeletal pain, using a previously validated survey instrument. METHODS: A multidimensional patient satisfaction questionnaire 'PTOPS', which assesses patient satisfaction with outpatient physiotherapy treatment, was translated from American English to European English, and relevant demographic and global satisfaction items were included. This was then circulated to patients with musculoskeletal pain (n = 240) for anonymous completion and return to the research team. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, v.12). RESULTS: In total 55% (n = 131/240) of questionnaires were returned. Just over half of the respondents were male (53.4%, n = 70), with a mean age (SD) of 37.7 years (12.4), and had previous experience of physiotherapy (65.6%, n = 86). The most common site of musculoskeletal pain was spinal (51.5% n = 66). The mean (SD) number of treatments was 8.3 (8.3), at a mean total cost (SD) of 350.2 euros (322.8 euros). The 'PTOPS' questionnaire categorised and scored satisfaction items under four domains, Enhancer, Detractor, Location and Cost. The mean score (SD), optimum score, and scoring range for each domain were: 'Enhancer' 41.2 (3.8), 50, 10-50; 'Detractor' 19.4 (4.4), 10, 10-50; 'Location' 28.0 (4.1), 35, 7-35; 'Cost' 18.9 (2.8), 7, 7-35. "Overall satisfaction with physiotherapy experience" was scored on a five-point scale "excellent to poor", with a modal response of "Very Good" (42%; n = 55). CONCLUSION: This study measured patient satisfaction with private physiotherapy treatment for musculoskeletal pain in Ireland using a previously validated outcome measure and provides a template for future studies of this increasingly important topic. Results demonstrated high levels of satisfaction with all components of physiotherapy treatment, except cost, and provided valuable patient feedback regarding their physiotherapy treatment for musculoskeletal pain. Results can be used by physiotherapists to improve future patient experiences with a view to improving patient attendance and compliance with physiotherapy treatment protocols for patients with musculoskeletal pain.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Manejo del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Privado/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Irlanda , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/organización & administración , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda