Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Psychiatr Serv ; 57(9): 1324-7, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16968765

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined alternative methods for obtaining feedback from people receiving anonymous mental health services via Project Liberty, an initiative that provided free counseling to residents of the New York City area after the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center. METHODS: Counselors offered all English-speaking and Spanish-speaking adults who used Project Liberty crisis counseling services the opportunity to evaluate Project Liberty via a telephone interview (eight sites) or a brief questionnaire (four sites). RESULTS: A total of 107 service recipients provided feedback via a brief 32-item questionnaire, and 153 gave feedback via a 45-minute telephone interview. Although the overall participation rates were modest (less than 20 percent), nearly three-quarters of those who volunteered to participate in the telephone interview (for which they received $20) did so. Neither gender nor racial or ethnic group was associated with a greater likelihood of participating in one method over another. CONCLUSIONS: Responses to items on the brief questionnaire and in the telephone interview were similar, and offering multiple response methods increased participation rates. Although telephone interviews were more costly than the questionnaire to administer, they provided important additional information about ongoing symptoms and problems that individuals experienced after the attacks. The modest response rates obtained in the evaluation indicate that future evaluations of postdisaster services need to use methodstomaximizeresponse rates and provider adherence to administrative tasks that are critical to the evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Retroalimentación Psicológica , Libertad , Entrevista Psicológica , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología
2.
Psychiatr Rehabil J ; 28(3): 209-216, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15690733

RESUMEN

Project Liberty provided free counseling services to those affected by the September 11th attacks. Focus groups were conducted with Project Liberty provider staff to gain feedback on their participation in the process of evaluating Project Liberty individual crisis counseling services. Focus groups provided information regarding barriers to eliciting feedback from people who used Project Liberty services that informed planning for the next phase of the evaluation. Focus groups proved to be a valuable method for collecting data from service providers across provider sites that differed geographically, culturally, ethnically, and organizationally, as well as in methods of offering services to individuals with mental health problems related to the attack on the World Trade Centers.


Asunto(s)
Consejo/métodos , Retroalimentación , Grupos Focales/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/psicología , Consejo/normas , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Desastres , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , New York , Proyectos Piloto , Técnicas de Planificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Psychiatr Clin North Am ; 26(4): 919-38, ix, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14711128

RESUMEN

After nearly 20 years of progress in general medicine, the evidence-based practice movement is becoming the central theme for mental health care reform in the first decade of 2000. Several leaders in the movement met to discuss concerns raised by six stakeholder groups: consumers, family members, practitioners, administrators, policy makers, and researchers. Recurrent themes relate to concerns regarding the limits of science, diversion of funding from valued practices, increased costs, feasibility, prior investments in other practices, and shifts in power and control. The authors recommend that all stakeholder groups be involved in further dialog and planning to ensure that practices emerge that represent the integration of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and consumer values.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Participación de la Comunidad , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Psiquiatría/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda