RESUMEN
Project Liberty provided free counseling services to those affected by the September 11th attacks. Focus groups were conducted with Project Liberty provider staff to gain feedback on their participation in the process of evaluating Project Liberty individual crisis counseling services. Focus groups provided information regarding barriers to eliciting feedback from people who used Project Liberty services that informed planning for the next phase of the evaluation. Focus groups proved to be a valuable method for collecting data from service providers across provider sites that differed geographically, culturally, ethnically, and organizationally, as well as in methods of offering services to individuals with mental health problems related to the attack on the World Trade Centers.
Asunto(s)
Consejo/métodos , Retroalimentación , Grupos Focales/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/psicología , Consejo/normas , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/métodos , Desastres , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , New York , Proyectos Piloto , Técnicas de Planificación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
After nearly 20 years of progress in general medicine, the evidence-based practice movement is becoming the central theme for mental health care reform in the first decade of 2000. Several leaders in the movement met to discuss concerns raised by six stakeholder groups: consumers, family members, practitioners, administrators, policy makers, and researchers. Recurrent themes relate to concerns regarding the limits of science, diversion of funding from valued practices, increased costs, feasibility, prior investments in other practices, and shifts in power and control. The authors recommend that all stakeholder groups be involved in further dialog and planning to ensure that practices emerge that represent the integration of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and consumer values.