RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to patient-centered care in orthopaedics. PROMIS measures have demonstrated reliability, validity, responsiveness, and minimal floor and ceiling effects in various populations of patients receiving orthopaedic care but have not yet been examined in hip fracture patients. This pilot study sought to evaluate the psychometric performance of the PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS PF) and Pain Interference (PROMIS PI) computer adaptive tests and compare these instruments with legacy outcome measures in hip fracture patients. METHODS: This study included 67 patients who were 27-96 years old (median 76) and underwent osteosynthesis for a proximal femoral fracture. At 3, 6, and/or 12 months follow-up, patients completed both legacy (mHHS, SF-36-PCS, and VAS for pain) and PROMIS questionnaires (PROMIS PF and PROMIS PI). Respondent burden and floor/ceiling effects were calculated for each outcome measure. Correlation was calculated to determine concurrent validity between related constructs. RESULTS: A strong correlation was found between PROMIS PF and mHHS (rho = 0.715, p < 0.001) and moderately strong correlation between PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS (rho = 0.697, p < 0.001). There was also a moderately strong correlation between the VAS and the PROMIS PI (rho = 0.641, p < 0.001). Patients who completed PROMIS PF were required to answer significantly fewer questions as compared with legacy PROMs (mHHS, SF-36). For the PROMIS measures, 1% of patients completing PROMIS PF achieved the highest allowable score while 34% of patients completing PROMIS PI achieved the lowest allowable score. Of the legacy outcome measures, 31% of patients completing the VAS for pain achieved the lowest allowable score and 7% of patients completing the mHHS achieved the highest allowable score. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the validity of PROMIS CATs for use in hip fracture patients. The PROMIS PF was significantly correlated with SF-36 PCS and mHHS while requiring fewer question items per patient relative to the legacy outcome measures.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Computadores , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ankle plantarflexion and the axial location of measurement on quantitative syndesmosis assessment. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were secured in three positions of ankle plantarflexion (0°, 15°, and 30°) using an ankle-spanning external fixator and underwent CT scans at each position. Syndesmotic measurements were obtained on axial images using three previously described methods (six measurements) at the level of the tibial plafond and 1 cm proximal to the plafond. Method 1 evaluated the distance between the most anterior and posterior aspects of the fibula and tibia. Method 2 measured medial-lateral diastasis of the anterior and posterior aspects of the fibula, and fibular anterior-posterior translation. Method 3 evaluated axial rotation of the fibula. All measurements were performed by two independent observers. Inter-rater reliability of each measurement was evaluated using intra-class coefficients. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was performed to evaluate within-specimen differences in measurements obtained at varying ankle positions. RESULTS: The anterior incisura component of method 1 demonstrated poor-to-moderate inter-rater reliability across all ankle positions and at both measurement locations. Inter-rater reliability was highest for method 2, especially when measured 1 cm proximal to the plafond. Method 3 demonstrated moderate reliability 1 cm proximal to the plafond. After correcting for multiple comparisons, RM-ANOVA and pairwise analysis revealed that none of the measurements changed significantly with varying ankle position. CONCLUSION: The inter-rater reliability of the most common method of syndesmotic evaluation (method 1) was found to be lower than in previous studies. The most reliable syndesmotic evaluation can be made by measuring diastasis and anteroposterior translation 1 cm proximal to the plafond (method 2). Ankle position from 0° to 30° of plantarflexion did not change the measurements obtained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Postura/fisiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Peroné/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normasRESUMEN
Background and purpose - Insufficient initial fixation or early micromotion of an implant is associated with a thin layer of fibrous tissue at the peri-implant interface. It is unknown if bone loss is induced by the fibrous tissue interface acting as an active biological membrane, or as a membrane that will produce supraphysiologic fluid flow conditions during gait, which activates the mechanosensitive osteocytes to mediate osteoclast differentiation. We investigated whether mechanically induced osteolysis is dependent on the fibrous tissue interface as a biologically active scaffold, or if it merely acts as a conduit for fluid flow, affecting the mechanosensitive osteocytes in the peri-prosthetic bone.Methods - Using a rat model of mechanically instability-induced aseptic loosening, we assessed whether the induction of osteoclast differentiation was dependent on the presence of a peri-implant fibrous interface. We analyzed the amount of osteoclast differentiation, osteocyte apoptosis, pro-resorptive cytokine expression and bone loss using immunohistochemistry, mRNA expression and micro-CT.Results - Osteoclast differentiation and bone loss were induced by mechanical instability but were not affected by the presence of the fibrous tissue membrane or associated with osteocyte apoptosis. There was no increased mRNA expression of any of the cytokines in the fibrous tissue membrane compared with the peri-implant bone.Interpretation - Our data show that the fibrous tissue membrane in the interface plays a minor role in inducing bone loss. This indicates that the peri-implant bone adjacent to loose bone implants might play an important role for osteoclast differentiation.
Asunto(s)
Apoptosis , Diferenciación Celular , Citocinas/metabolismo , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/metabolismo , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Osteocitos/metabolismo , Falla de Prótesis , Tibia/metabolismo , Animales , Resorción Ósea/diagnóstico por imagen , Resorción Ósea/genética , Resorción Ósea/metabolismo , Interfase Hueso-Implante/diagnóstico por imagen , Citocinas/genética , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Inmunohistoquímica , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico por imagen , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/genética , Osteoclastos/citología , Osteocitos/citología , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Ratas , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Microtomografía por Rayos XRESUMEN
Vitamin D is necessary for the regulation of calcium and phosphate in the human body. Decreased vitamin D levels can alter the bone mineralization process. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the general population is high, and low vitamin D levels are associated with disorders such as rickets and osteoporosis. As knowledge about vitamin D metabolism increases, physicians of all specialties are becoming more attentive to the vitamin D status of their patients. Similarly, orthopaedic surgeons, through various initiatives such as "Own the Bone," are making greater efforts to medically manage skeletal disorders. Unfortunately, universal guidelines for the optimization of vitamin D levels have not been adopted by orthopaedic surgeons, and, despite substantial efforts, vitamin D is not an integral part of most orthopaedic residency training programs. Although this may be partially attributed to attitudes among orthopaedic surgeons, the large number of vitamin D recommendations in the literature may be confusing and require substantial effort to synthesize into a viable approach for a given patient. Despite this confusion, orthopaedic surgeons should understand how to diagnose and manage disorders related to vitamin D and calcium deficiency.
RESUMEN
Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of locked and nonlocked diaphyseal fixation in a model of distal femur fractures using osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic human cadaveric bone. Methods: A supracondylar osteotomy was created to mimic a fracture (OTA/AO 33A3) in osteoporotic (n = 4) and nonosteoporotic (n = 5) cadaveric distal femurs. The left and right femurs of each pair were instrumented with a distal femoral locking plate and randomly assigned to have diaphyseal fixation with either locked or nonlocked screws. The construct was cyclically axially loaded, and construct stiffness and load to failure were evaluated. Results: In osteoporotic bone, locked constructs were more stiff than nonlocked constructs (mean 143 vs. 98 N/mm when all time points combined, P < 0.001). However, in nonosteoporotic bone, locked constructs were less stiff than nonlocked constructs (mean 155 N/mm vs. 185 N/mm when all time points combined, P < 0.001). In osteoporotic bone, the average load to failure was greater in the locked group than in the nonlocked group (mean 1159 vs. 991 N, P = 0.01). In nonosteoporotic bone, the average load to failure was greater for the nonlocked group (mean 1348 N vs. 1214 N, P = 0.02). Bone mineral density was highly correlated with maximal load to failure (R2 = 0.92, P = 0.001) and stiffness (R2 = 0.78, P = 0.002) in nonlocked constructs but not in locked constructs. Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, locked plating constructs are not necessarily stiffer than nonlocked constructs. In healthy nonosteoporotic bone, locked diaphyseal fixation does not provide a stiffer construct than nonlocked fixation. Bone quality has a profound influence on the stiffness of nonlocked (but not locked) constructs in distal femur fractures.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Distal femur fractures remain treatment challenges with a considerable postoperative non-union rate. Concern remains that surgery may compromise osseous vascularity. This study aimed to determine effects of retrograde femoral intramedullary nailing (RFIN) on distal femur vascularity, and the locations of the middle genicular artery terminal branches in relation to the standard RFIN entry point. METHODS: Five lower limb cadaveric pairs were obtained (ten specimens). Experimental limbs were randomly assigned, and contralateral limbs served as controls. An 11 mm femoral nail was implanted in experimental specimens. Controls only underwent a medial parapatellar incision with capsulotomy. Quantitative pre- and post-contrast-MRI was performed to assess arterial contributions to distal femur regions. Osseous vascularity was further evaluated with contrast-CT imaging. Next, specimens were injected with latex medium, and dissection was performed to assess extraosseous vasculature. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found with quantitative-MRI in experimental and control groups for the entire distal femur or individual regions. The experimental group demonstrated a small mean decrease of 1.4% in distal femur arterial contributions. CT and anatomic dissection confirmed maintenance of middle genicular artery terminal branches. On average, 3.3 (±1.3) terminal branches entered along the posterior intercondylar notch. A mean distance of 15.2 mm (±6.9 mm) was found between the posterior RFIN entry point and these terminal branches. CONCLUSIONS: RFIN did not significantly alter arterial contributions to the distal femur or disrupt the middle genicular artery terminal branches. However, care must be taken to ensure nail entry point accuracy given proximity of the entry point to terminal branches.
Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Cadáver , Fracturas del Fémur , Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Humanos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Fémur/irrigación sanguínea , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , AncianoRESUMEN
Salmonella infection causes a self-limiting gastroenteritis in humans but can also result in a life-threatening invasive disease, especially in old, young, and/or immunocompromised patients. The prevalence of antimicrobial and multidrug-resistant Salmonella has increased worldwide since the 1980s. However, the impact of antimicrobial resistance on the pathogenicity of Salmonella strains is not well described. In our study, a microarray was used to screen for differences in gene expression between a parental strain and a strain of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis with reduced susceptibility (SRS) to the widely used antimicrobial sanitizer dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC). Three of the genes, associated with adhesion, invasion, and intracellular growth (fimA, csgG, and spvR), that showed differences in gene expression of 2-fold or greater were chosen for further study. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (real-time RT-PCR) was used to confirm the microarray data and to compare the expression levels of these genes in the parental strain and four independently derived SRS strains. All SRS strains showed lower levels of gene expression of fimA and csgG than those of the parental strain. Three of the four SRS strains showed lower levels of spvR gene expression while one SRS strain showed higher levels of spvR gene expression than those of the parental strain. Transmission electron microscopy determined that fimbriae were absent in the four SRS strains but copiously present in the parental strain. All four SRS strains demonstrated a significantly reduced ability to invade tissue culture cells compared to the parental strains, suggesting reduced pathogenicity of the SRS strains.
Asunto(s)
Desinfectantes/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Compuestos de Amonio Cuaternario/farmacología , Salmonella enteritidis/efectos de los fármacos , Salmonella enteritidis/patogenicidad , Células CACO-2 , Fimbrias Bacterianas/ultraestructura , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Análisis por Micromatrices , Microscopía Electrónica de Transmisión , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Salmonella enteritidis/genética , Salmonella enteritidis/ultraestructura , Virulencia , Factores de Virulencia/biosíntesis , Factores de Virulencia/genéticaRESUMEN
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: Tibial lengthening can be performed by distraction osteogenesis via lengthening and then nailing (LATN) or by using a magnetic lengthening nail (MLN). MLN avoids the complications of external fixation while providing accurate and easily controlled lengthening. Concerns exist still regarding the high upfront cost of the magnetic nail, which serves to limit its use in resource-poor areas and decrease adoption among cost-conscious surgeons. The purpose of this study was to compare the hospital, surgeon, and total cost between LATN and MLN when used for tibial lengthening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed comparing consecutive tibial lengthening using either LATN (n = 17) or MLN (n = 15). The number of surgical procedures and time to union were compared. Surgeon and hospital payments were used to perform cost analysis after adjusting for inflation using the consumer price index (CPI). RESULTS: Patients treated with MLN underwent fewer surgeries (3.6 vs 2.8; p < 0.001) but had a longer time to union as compared with patients treated with LATN (19.79 vs 27.84 weeks; p = 0.006). Total costs were similar ($50,345 vs $46,162; p = 0.249) although surgeon fees were lower for MLN as compared with LATN ($6,426 vs $4,428; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LATN and MLN had similar overall costs in patients undergoing tibial lengthening. MLN was associated with fewer procedures but a longer time to union as compared with LATN. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Despite an increased upfront cost in MLN, there was no difference in total cost between LATN and MLN when used for tibial lengthening. Thus, in cases where either method is feasible, cost may not be a deciding factor when selecting the appropriate treatment. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Dvorzhinskiy A, Zhang DT, Fragomen AT, et al. Cost Comparison of Tibial Distraction Osteogenesis Using External Lengthening and Then Nailing vs Internal Magnetic Lengthening Nails. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):14-19.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Current methods of managing osteomyelitic voids after debridement are inadequate and result in significant morbidity to patients. Synthetic ceramic void fillers are appropriate for non-infected bone defects but serve as a nidus of re-infection in osteomyelitis after debridement. CERAMENT G (CG) is an injectable ceramic bone void filler which contains gentamicin and is currently being evaluated for use in osteomyelitic environments after debridement due to its theoretical ability to serve as a scaffold for healing while eliminating residual bacteria after debridement through the elution of antibiotics. The goal of this study was to evaluate (1) the rate of persistent infection and (2) new bone growth of a debrided osteomyelitic defect in a rat model which has been treated with either gentamicin-impregnated ceramic cement (CERAMENT G) or the same void filler without antibiotics (CERAMENT, CBVF). Methods: Osteomyelitis was generated in the proximal tibia of Sprague Dawley rats, subsequently debrided, and the defect filled with either (1) CG ( n = 20 ), (2) CBVF ( n = 20 ), or (3) nothing ( n = 20 ). Each group was euthanized after 6 weeks. Infection was detected through bacterial culture and histology. Bone growth was quantified using microCT. Results: Infection was not detected in defects treated with CG as compared with 35â¯% of defects ( 7 / 20 ) treated with CBVF and 50â¯% ( 10 / 20 ) of empty defects ( p = 0.001 ). Bone volume in the defect of CG-treated rats was greater than the CBVF (0.21 vs. 0.17, p = 0.021 ) and empty groups (0.21 vs. 0.11, p < 0.001 ) at 6 weeks after implantation. Conclusions: Ceramic void filler with gentamicin (CERAMENT G) decreased the rate of persistent infection and increased new bone growth as compared to the same void filler without antibiotics (CERAMENT) and an empty defect in a rat model of debrided osteomyelitis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic had a devastating effect on New York City in the spring of 2020. Several global reports suggested worse early outcomes among COVID-positive patients with hip fractures. However, there is limited data comparing baseline comorbidities among patients treated during the pandemic relative to those treated in non-pandemic conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed at two Level 1 Trauma centers and one orthopedic specialty hospital to assess demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 67 hip fracture patients treated (OTA/AO 31, 32.1) during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City (March 20, 2020 to April 24, 2020), including 9 who were diagnosed with COVID-19. These patients were compared to a cohort of 76 hip fracture patients treated 1 year prior (March 20, 2019 to April 24, 2019). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, treatment characteristics, and respiratory symptomatology were evaluated. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Relative to patients treated in 2019, patients with hip fractures during the pandemic had worse Charlson Comorbidity Indices (median 5.0 vs 6.0, P = .03) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (mean 2.4 vs 2.7, P = .04). Patients during the COVID-19 pandemic were more likely to have decreased ambulatory status (P<.01) and a smoking history (P = .04). Patients in 2020 had longer inpatient stays (median 5 vs 7 days, P = .01), and were more likely to be discharged home (61% vs 9%, P<.01). Inpatient mortality was significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (12% vs 0%, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic had worse comorbidity profiles and decreased functional status compared to patients treated the year prior. This information may be relevant in negotiations regarding reimbursement for cost of care of hip fracture patients with COVID-19, as these patients may require more expensive care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal method for the determination of ankle stability remains controversial in rotational ankle fractures without medial bony injury. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate whether posterior malleolar (PM) fracture displacement is associated with deltoid ligament injury in supination-external rotation (SER) ankle fractures and (2) compare the diagnostic accuracy of PM displacement and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of the deep deltoid ligament in identifying fractures with deltoid ligament incompetence. METHODS: Patients with rotational bimalleolar injuries containing lateral malleolar and PM fractures without bony medial injury were included. After operative lateral and PM fixation, an external rotation stress test was performed to evaluate deltoid ligament stability. Operative dictations were reviewed to confirm injury pattern, stability on stress test, and visual inspection of the deltoid ligament. Maximum PM displacement was assessed on lateral X-ray. Pre-operative MRI of the ankle was performed following closed reduction and splinting. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 13 trimalleolar equivalent fractures (torn deltoid ligament) and 20 bimalleolar fractures (medial malleolus and deltoid ligament intact). Average PM displacement was significantly higher for SER trimalleolar equivalent patterns when measured on lateral X-ray. The sensitivity of detecting trimalleolar equivalent fracture was higher on all reported X-ray findings than the sensitivity obtained by the reported MRI findings of deltoid ligament injury. CONCLUSION: PM displacement on X-ray is a useful adjuvant along with external rotation stress radiography and MRI evaluation of deep deltoid integrity to distinguish between stable and unstable fracture patterns and thus helps facilitate treatment decisions.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The long incubation period and asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 present considerable challenges for health-care institutions. The identification of infected individuals is vital to prevent the spread of illness to staff and other patients as well as to identify those who may be at risk for disease-related complications. This is particularly relevant with the resumption of elective orthopaedic surgery around the world. We report the results of a universal testing protocol for COVID-19 in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery during the coronavirus pandemic and to describe the postoperative course of asymptomatic patients who were positive for COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult operative cases between March 25, 2020, and April 24, 2020, at an orthopaedic specialty hospital in New York City was performed. Initially, a screening questionnaire consisting of relevant signs and symptoms (e.g., fever, cough, shortness of breath) or exposure dictated the need for nasopharyngeal swab real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for all admitted patients. An institutional policy change occurred on April 5, 2020, that indicated nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR testing for all orthopaedic admissions. Screening and testing data for COVID-19 as well as relevant imaging, laboratory values, and postoperative complications were reviewed for all patients. RESULTS: From April 5, 2020, to April 24, 2020, 99 patients underwent routine nasopharyngeal swab testing for COVID-19 prior to their planned orthopaedic surgical procedure. Of the 12.1% of patients who tested positive for COVID-19, 58.3% were asymptomatic. Three asymptomatic patients developed postoperative hypoxia, with 2 requiring intubation. The negative predictive value of using the signs and symptoms of disease to predict a negative test result was 91.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.0% to 97.1%). Including a positive chest radiographic finding as a screening criterion did not improve the negative predictive value of screening (92.5% [95% CI, 81.8% to 97.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol for universal testing of all orthopaedic surgery admissions at 1 hospital in New York City during a 3-week period revealed a high rate of COVID-19 infections. Importantly, the majority of these patients were asymptomatic. Using chest radiography did not significantly improve the negative predictive value of screening. These results have important implications as hospitals anticipate the resumption of elective surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Protocolos Clínicos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Evaluación de SíntomasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inpatient outcomes among patients with hip fracture treated during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One Level 1 trauma center and one orthopaedic specialty hospital in New York City. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (average age 85 years, range: 65-100 years) treated for a hip fracture (OTA/AO 31, 32.1) over a 5-week period, March 20, 2020, to April 24, 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 crisis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: COVID-19 infection status was used to stratify patients. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were admission to the intensive care unit, unexpected intubation, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, urinary tract infection, and transfusion. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, treatment characteristics, and COVID-related symptomatology were also evaluated. RESULTS: Ten patients (15%) tested positive for COVID-19 (COVID+) (n = 9; 7 preoperatively and 2 postoperatively) or were presumed positive (n = 1), 40 (68%) patients tested negative, and 9 (15%) patients were not tested in the primary hospitalization. American Society of Anesthesiologists' scores were higher in the COVID+ group (d = -0.83; P = 0.04); however, the Charlson Comorbidity Index was similar between the study groups (d = -0.17; P = 0.63). Inpatient mortality was significantly increased in the COVID+ cohort (56% vs. 4%; odds ratio 30.0, 95% confidence interval 4.3-207; P = 0.001). Including the one presumed positive case in the COVID+ cohort increased this difference (60% vs. 2%; odds ratio 72.0, 95% confidence interval 7.9-754; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection had worse American Society of Anesthesiologists' scores but similar baseline comorbidities with significantly higher rates of inpatient mortality compared with those without concomitant COVID-19 infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Intervalos de Confianza , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas de Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s11420-020-09765-5.].
RESUMEN
In physiologically young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, surgical treatment is aimed at achieving fracture union while preserving native hip anatomy and biomechanics. The intracapsular environment, tenuous vascular supply, and unfavorable hip biomechanics contribute to the high complication rates seen after osteosynthesis of these fractures. Conventional fixation methods for osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures include multiple cancellous screws, fixed-angle dynamic implants, and fixed-angle length-stable constructs. Despite several biomechanical and clinical studies evaluating various surgical options, the optimal fixation construct to allow healing and prevent nonunion of displaced femoral neck fractures is not known. This article will review the clinical data regarding conventional fixation constructs and describe the technique and rationale behind 2 novel alternative treatment options for these challenging fractures. The surgical technique and clinical examples for constructs involving multiple cannulated screws/Pauwels screw augmented with a fibular strut graft, as well as a novel fixed-angle locking plate with controlled dynamic compression, are presented.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Tornillos Óseos , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
This study summarizes presentations of a symposium on biomechanically related hot topics of the 2015 Basic Science Focus Forum. Each topic emphasizes a biomechanical challenge common to all 4 of these presentations: an ideal fixation technique should deliver ample stability and sufficient flexibility to prevent fixation failure and to restore normal function.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fijadores Internos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Soporte de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term fixation of uncemented joint implants requires early mechanical stability and implant osseointegration. To date, osseointegration has been unreliable and remains a major challenge in cementless total knee arthroplasty. We developed a murine model in which an intra-articular proximal tibial titanium implant with a roughened stem can be loaded through the knee joint. Using this model, we tested the hypothesis that intermittent injection of parathyroid hormone (iPTH) would increase proximal tibial cancellous osseointegration. METHODS: Ten-week-old female C57BL/6 mice received a subcutaneous injection of PTH (40 µg/kg/day) or a vehicle (n = 45 per treatment group) five days per week for six weeks, at which time the baseline group was killed (n = 6 per treatment group) and an implant was inserted into the proximal part of the tibiae of the remaining mice. Injections were continued until the animals were killed at one week (n = 7 per treatment group), two weeks (n = 14 per treatment group), or four weeks (n = 17 per treatment group) after implantation. Outcomes included peri-implant bone morphology as analyzed with micro-computed tomography (microCT), osseointegration percentage and bone area fraction as shown with backscattered electron microscopy, cellular composition as demonstrated by immunohistochemical analysis, and pullout strength as measured with mechanical testing. RESULTS: Preimplantation iPTH increased the epiphyseal bone volume fraction by 31.6%. When the data at post-implantation weeks 1, 2, and 4 were averaged for the iPTH-treated mice, the bone volume fraction was 74.5% higher in the peri-implant region and 168% higher distal to the implant compared with the bone volume fractions in the same regions in the vehicle-treated mice. Additionally, the trabecular number was 84.8% greater in the peri-implant region and 74.3% greater distal to the implant. Metaphyseal osseointegration and bone area fraction were 28.1% and 70.1% higher, respectively, in the iPTH-treated mice than in the vehicle-treated mice, and the maximum implant pullout strength was 30.9% greater. iPTH also increased osteoblast and osteoclast density by 65.2% and 47.0%, respectively, relative to the values in the vehicle group, when the data at post-implantation weeks 1 and 2 were averaged. CONCLUSIONS: iPTH increased osseointegration, cancellous mass, and the strength of the bone-implant interface. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our murine model is an excellent platform on which to study biological enhancement of cancellous osseointegration.