Systematic review of the health-related quality of life issues facing adolescents and young adults with cancer.

PURPOSE: For adolescents and young adults (AYAs), the impact of a cancer diagnosis and subsequent treatment is likely to be distinct from other age groups given the unique and complex psychosocial challenges of this developmental phase. In this review of the literature, we report the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues experienced by AYAs diagnosed with cancer and undergoing treatment. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library Databases were searched for publications reporting HRQoL of AYAs. Issues generated from interviews with AYAs or from responses to patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were extracted. RESULTS: 166 papers were reviewed in full and comprised 72 papers covering 69 primary studies, 49 measurement development or evaluation papers and 45 reviews. Of the 69 studies reviewed, 11 (16%) used interviews to elicit AYAs' descriptions of HRQoL issues. The majority of the PROMs used in the studies represent adaptations of paediatric or adult measures. HRQoL issues were organised into the following categories: physical, cognitive, restricted activities, relationships with others, fertility, emotions, body image and spirituality/outlook on life. CONCLUSION: The HRQoL issues presented within this review are likely to be informative to health care professionals and AYAs. The extensive list of issues suggests that the impact of a cancer diagnosis and treatment during adolescence and young adulthood is widespread and reflects the complexities of this developmental phase.

Kindness in healthcare leadership and management: an evaluation and analysis of the concept.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare leadership and management impacts every patient journey and every staff experience. Good leadership results in positive outcomes. Kindness is an understudied and underused leadership strategy. The research questions addressed in this study are the following: (1) Does kindness in healthcare leadership and management currently meet the criteria of a mature concept?; (2) Using concept analysis methodology, can we develop our understanding of kindness within this context? METHODS: A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted to inform a concept evaluation, followed by a concept analysis. Search terms consisted of 'leader*' or 'manage*' and 'kindness'; databases searched comprised MEDLINE, HMIC, SPP, APA PsycInfo and CINAHL. Data extraction and thematic analysis of the data were performed manually according to concept analysis principles. RESULTS: The 10 papers included from the search suggested that within healthcare leadership and management, kindness is an 'emerging' rather than a 'mature' concept. Concept analysis demonstrated a cluster of recurring attributes, allowing a theoretical definition to be put forth. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a commonly used lay term, kindness in the context of healthcare leadership and management is not yet a mature concept. Work developing this concept is needed to validate the proposed theoretical definition. Observational studies and systematic review of the grey literature are recommended.

MiR-15a/miR-16-1 expression inversely correlates with cyclin D1 levels in Men1 pituitary NETs.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterised by the combined occurrence of parathyroid, pituitary and pancreatic islet tumours, and is due to mutations of the MEN1 gene, which encodes the tumour suppressor protein menin. Menin has multiple roles in genome stability, transcription, cell division and proliferation, but its mechanistic roles in tumourigenesis remain to be fully elucidated. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are non-coding single stranded RNAs that post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression and have been associated with tumour development, although the contribution of miRNAs to MEN1-associated tumourigenesis and their relationship with menin expression are not fully understood. Alterations in miRNA expression, including downregulation of three putative 'tumour suppressor' miRNAs, miR-15a, miR-16-1 and let-7a, have been reported in several tumour types including non-MEN1 pituitary adenomas. We have therefore investigated the expression of miR-15a, miR-16-1 and let-7a in pituitary tumours that developed after 12 months of age in female mice with heterozygous knock out of the Men1 gene (Men1+/- mice). The miRNAs miR-15a, miR-16-1 and let-7a were significantly downregulated in pituitary tumours (by 2.3-fold, p<0.05; 2.1-fold p<0.01 and 1.6-fold p<0.05, respectively) of Men1+/- mice, compared to normal wild type pituitaries. MiR-15a and miR-16-1 expression inversely correlated with expression of cyclin D1, a known pro-tumourigenic target of these miRNAs, and knock down of menin in a human cancer cell line (HeLa), and AtT20 mouse pituitary cell line resulted in significantly decreased expression of miR-15a (p<0.05), indicating that the decrease in miR-15a may be a direct result of lost menin expression.

Warfarin prescription and administration: reducing the delay, improving the safety.

Warfarin is frequently administered to hospital patients. The prescription and administration of this medication are particularly susceptible to error. Factors contributing to this include the narrow therapeutic index, patient-specific target range, and the need for regular INR monitoring. NICE guidelines state that warfarin should be given at the same time every day and the Bristol Royal Infirmary guidelines are warfarin to be given at 14:00. The 14:00 dosing ensures standardisation of administration; poor adherence to this recommendation may cause patient harm. We noticed that many warfarin doses were often given outside of maximal staffing hours and it was often left to the on call doctor to prescribe warfarin at erratic and inconsistent times. Our primary aim was to reduce the number of adverse outcomes associated with warfarin prescription and administration. We targeted two system measures: the proportion of warfarin administrations occurring within an hour of the 14:00 prescription and the proportion of INR results outside target range. We employed the model for improvement and carried out our project across seven acute medical wards. Baseline data showed that only 24% of doses were being given within an hour of the recommended time and 64% of doses were being given after 17:00 during minimal staffing hours. We successfully introduced a warfarin box within our trust which demonstrated an improvement in warfarin administration from 24% of patients receiving their warfarin within an hour of 14:00 to 49% and this was subsequently associated with a reduction in INRs above target range (23% to 9%).