Measurement of biceps tendon retraction after arthroscopic tenotomy.

BACKGROUND: One of the treatment options for long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology is tenotomy. To our knowledge, no study in the literature has evaluated the degree of retraction after tenotomy. The goals of this study were to determine the distance of this retraction and to identify its relationship with patient characteristics. METHODS: We conducted an observational prospective survey over a 3-month period among 30 patients operated on arthroscopically by the same surgeon between August 2018 and April 2019. A radiopaque device was introduced inside the LHBT before tenotomy. Radiographs were obtained to evaluate the distance of retraction on day 1, day 30, and day 90. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included, of whom 63.3% (19) were women. Surgery was performed for a rotator cuff tear in 10 patients (33.3%) and for subacromial impingement in the remainder of patients (66.7%) after failure of conservative management. The mean retraction of the LHBT (distance between the glenoid and clip) increased from 1.9 cm (day 1) to 3.5 cm (day 90). Three radiographic measurements were performed, and all 3 showed significant increases from day 1 to day 90. According to the Student t test, the mean retraction in the subacromial impingement group was significantly higher than that in the rotator cuff tear group on day 1, day 30, and day 90. Body mass index, younger age, sex, and dominant hand did not show any relation with LHBT retraction (P > .05). The mean LHBT retraction was significantly higher on day 90 in patients presenting with a positive Popeye sign (P < .05). CONCLUSION: At 3 months of follow-up, the mean LHBT retraction was 3.5 cm from the glenoid and 2.5 cm from the greater tuberosity. It dynamically increased from day 1 to day 90. The LHBT will retract and sit beyond the transverse humeral ligament in the bicipital groove. The LHBT retracts significantly more when early mobilization of the shoulder is allowed.

The Use of Linear Formulas to Estimate Glenoid Bone Loss in the Lebanese Population: A 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Study.

Background: Glenoid bone loss (GBL) is common in patients with shoulder instability and plays a major role in surgical decision-making. While a plethora of GBL estimation methods exist, all of which present specific challenges, recent studies have developed simple linear formulas estimating GBL based on glenoid height. Purpose: To assess the correlation between glenoid height and width, and to develop specific formulas based on age and sex to calculate the native glenoid width in the Lebanese population. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Computed tomography scans for 202 normal shoulders were extracted from our database. The glenoids were reconstructed in 3 dimensions and their width and height were measured. Glenoid width and height were compared between male and female groups. Correlation analysis was also performed on the width, height, age, and body mass index. Formulas estimating glenoid width were developed using regression analysis including all variables significantly influencing the model. Results were then compared with the values calculated using previously published formulas to determine the external validity when using linear formulas to estimate GBL. Results: Significant differences were found between men and women. Regression analysis found that glenoid height and width strongly influenced the model, and that age showed a weak but significant correlation; therefore, the following 2 sex-specific formulas were developed: width (mm) = 6.1 + 0.51 ×height+ 0.03 ×age, and width (mm) = 4.55 + 0.51 ×height+ 0.03 ×age, in men and women, respectively. The values yielded from the formulas developed in this study and the true width significantly differed from those calculated from previous reports. Conclusion: A strong correlation was found between glenoid height and width in a the Lebanese population and demonstrated that glenoid width can be accurately calculated based on the glenoid height and patient's age and sex using the following simplified formulas: width (mm) = 6 + 0.5 ×height+ 0.03 ×age, and width (mm) = 4.5 + 0.5 ×height+ 0.03 ×age, in men and women, respectively.