RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is pivotal in decreasing the incidence of contagious infections in hospital settings. In this study, we assessed the knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding HCWs' recommended vaccines among medical students and interns in Egypt. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured, pilot-tested, and self-administered questionnaire among Egyptian medical students and interns. We invited 1332 participants to our survey using a systematic random sampling that included participants across nine medical schools in Egypt during the 2021-2022 academic year. RESULTS: Out of 1332 participants, 1141 completed our questionnaire with a response rate of 85.7%. Overall, 43% of the participants had intermediate knowledge (knew 2-3 HCWs' recommended vaccines). Furthermore, 36.7% had received a booster dose of at least one of the HCWs' recommended vaccines over the last 10 years, with only 6.1% having received all recommended vaccines. Hepatitis B vaccine was the most widely known (71%) and received (66.7%). Interns were more likely to know, receive, and recommend HCWs' recommended vaccines. The majority (> 90%) agreed that vaccination is beneficial and safe, with a median score of eight (interquartile range [IQR: Q25-Q75]: 7-9) out of ten for vaccine efficacy and eight (IQR: 7-8) for safety. However, the median score for hesitancy was five (IQR: 2-7). The most common influential and limiting factors for vaccination were scientific facts (60.1%) and fear of vaccine side effects (44.9%). CONCLUSION: Although medical students in Egypt have good knowledge of and attitudes towards vaccination, there is a gap in their practices. Interventions are needed to improve vaccination uptake among medical students in Egypt.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Egipto , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Personal de Salud/educación , Actitud del Personal de SaludRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Open inguinal hernia repair in children with bladder exstrophy is challenging and associated with a high recurrence rate (15%-22%). We report our initial experience with laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias in five children with repaired bladder exstrophy. This study is the third describing inguinal hernia repair in bladder exstrophy patients using the laparoscopic approach. In this study, we report a different laparoscopic technique. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on data regarding laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair collected over one year (July 2019-2020). We carried out the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, closing the internal inguinal ring using a non-resorbable sliding knot suture and incorporating the transversalis fascia for reinforcement, followed by purse-string closure of the peritoneum. Peri- and postoperative outcome parameters, including recurrence rate, were evaluated over a follow-up period of 14 months. RESULTS: A total of seven male patients from July 2019 to 2020 were admitted to our center with a history of repaired bladder exstrophy and reducible inguinal hernias. Two patients had open inguinal hernia repair due to parental preference and five patients had laparoscopic repair. In the laparoscopic group three patients had bilateral inguinal hernias in one of them a metachronous hernia was discovered intraoperstively, and the remaining two patients had unilateral hernias, one on the right side and the other on the left side. All patients in the laparoscopic group had an uneventful recovery and were discharged within 24 h and there were no complications or recurrences during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a better alternative to managing inguinal hernias in children with bladder exstrophy.
RESUMEN
Background: Several reports of unheeded complications secondary to the current mass international rollout of SARS-COV-2 vaccines, one of which is myocarditis occurring with the FDA fully approved vaccine, Pfizer, and others. Main body of the abstract: Certain miRNAs (non-coding RNA sequences) are involved in the pathogenesis in viral myocarditis, and those miRNAs are interestingly upregulated in severe COVID-19. We hypothesize that the use of mRNA-based vaccines may be triggering the release of host miRNAs or that trigger the occurrence of myocarditis. This is based on the finding of altered host miRNA expression promoting virus-induced myocarditis. Short conclusion: In conclusion, miRNAs are likely implicated in myocarditis associated with mRNA vaccines. Our hypothesis suggests the use of miRNA as a biomarker for the diagnosis of mRNA vaccine-induced myocarditis. Additionally, the interplay between viral miRNA and the host immune system could alter inflammatory profiles, hence suggesting the use of therapeutic inhibition to prevent such complications.