Diagnostic delay and outcome in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma in Spain: a multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the management of immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 327 immunocompetent patients with histologically confirmed PCNSL diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 in 27 Spanish hospitals. RESULTS: Median age was 64 years (range: 19-84; 33% ≥ 70 years), 54% were men, and 59% had a performance status (PS) ≥ 2 at diagnosis. Median delay to diagnosis was 47 days (IQR 24-81). Diagnostic delay > 47 days was associated with PS ≥ 2 (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.13-3.50; p = 0.016) and treatment with corticosteroids (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.14-5.40; p = 0.023), and it did not improve over the years. Patients treated with corticosteroids (62%) had a higher risk of additional biopsies (11.7% vs 4.0%, p = 0.04) but corticosteroids withdrawal before surgery did not reduce this risk and increased the diagnostic delay (64 vs 40 days, p = 0.04). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months [95% CI 5.9-11.7] for the whole series, including 52 (16%) patients that were not treated, and 14.1 months (95%CI 7.7-20.5) for the 240 (73.4%) patients that received high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy. Median OS was shorter in patients ≥ 70 years (4.1 vs. 13.4 months; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 65 years, PS ≥ 2, no treatment, and cognitive/psychiatric symptoms at diagnosis as independent predictors of short survival. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids withdrawal before surgery does not decrease the risk of a negative biopsy but delays diagnosis. In this community-based study, only 73.4% of patients could receive HD-MTX-based chemotherapy and OS remains poor, particularly in elderly patients ≥ 70 years.

Prospective study of prognostic factors in asymptomatic patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia-like lymphocytosis: the cut-off of 11 × 10(9)/L monoclonal lymphocytes better identifies subgroups with different outcomes.

The arbitrary threshold of 5 × 10(9)/L chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-like lymphocytes differentiates monoclonal B lymphocytosis (MBL) from CLL. There are no prospective studies that search for the optimal cut-off of monoclonal lymphocytes able to predict outcome and simultaneously analyze the prognostic value of classic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic variables in patients with asymptomatic clonal CLL lymphocytosis (ACL), which includes MBL plus Rai 0 CLL patients. From 2003 to 2010, 231 ACL patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with 11q deletion and atypical lymphocyte morphology at diagnosis had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.007 and p = 0.015, respectively) and treatment-free survival (TFS) (p = 0.009 and p = 0.017, respectively). Elevated beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) also correlated with worse TFS (p = 0.002). The optimal threshold of monoclonal lymphocytes independently correlated with survival was 11 × 10(9)/L (p = 0.000 for PFS and p = 0.016 for TFS). As conclusion, monoclonal lymphocytosis higher than 11 × 10(9)/L better identifies two subgroups of patients with different outcomes than the standard cut-off value of 5 × 10(9)/L. Atypical lymphocyte morphology, 11q deletion and elevated B2M had a negative impact on the survival in ACL patients.

Administration of taurolidine-citrate lock solution for prevention of central venous catheter infection in adult neutropenic haematological patients: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (TAURCAT).

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is one of the most frequent complications in patients with cancer who have central venous catheters (CVCs) implanted and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Taurolidine is a non-antibiotic agent with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, which has been used as a lock solution to prevent CRBSI in some settings. However, little is known about its usefulness in high-risk adult neutropenic patients with cancer. This prospective randomised clinical trial aims to test the hypothesis that taurolidine-citrate lock solution is more effective than placebo for preventing catheter infection in neutropenic haematological patients. METHODS: This study is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, parallel, superiority, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with haematological cancer who are expected to develop prolonged neutropenia (> 7 days) and who have a non-tunnelled CVC implanted will be randomised to receive prophylactic taurolidine-citrate-heparin solution using a lock technique (study group) or heparin alone (placebo group). The primary endpoint will be bacterial colonisation of the CVC hubs. The secondary endpoints will be the incidence of CRBSI, CVC removal, adverse events, and 30-day case-fatality rate. DISCUSSION: The lock technique is a preventive strategy that inhibits bacterial colonisation in the catheter hubs, which is the initial step of endoluminal catheter colonisation and the development of infection. Taurolidine is a nontoxic agent that does not develop antibiotic resistance because it acts as an antiseptic rather than an antibiotic. Taurolidine has shown controversial results in the few trials conducted in cancer patients. These studies have important limitations due to the lack of data on adult and/or high-risk neutropenic patients, the type of catheters studied (tunnelled or ports), and the lack of information regarding the intervention (e.g. dwelling of the solution, time, and periodicity of the lock technique). If our hypothesis is proven, the study could provide important solid evidence on the potential usefulness of this preventive procedure in a population at high risk of CRBSI, in whom this complication may significantly impair patient outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN47102251 . Registered on 9 September 2015.

Plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma: effectiveness in cases with very low circulating CD34+ cell levels and preemptive intervention vs remobilization.

This retrospective study presents data from 105 consecutive multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients who had PB CD34+ cell counts <10/µL on day 4 of steady-state G-CSF mobilization for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Our results confirm the capacity of plerixafor to improve mobilization outcomes in this clinical setting. In addition, they show that the effectiveness of plerixafor, compared with G-CSF only, translates to patients with very low (<3.5/µL) circulating CD34+ cell counts: overnight CD34+ cell count expansion (5.3- vs 1.7-fold), overall CD34+ cell yield (2.29 vs 0.15 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg) and patients yielding ⩾2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (63% vs 3%). Furthermore, our data also show that preemptive plerixafor is significantly more effective and more efficient than in remobilization: CD34+ cell yield in the first apheresis (3.28 vs 2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg) and overall (3.73 vs 2.44 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg), patients yielding ⩾2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg in the first apheresis (85% vs 44%) and overall (92% vs 64%), all this requiring less days and doses of plerixafor treatment (1.08 vs 1.48). These data would advocate using plerixafor as an early preemptive intervention based on day 4 circulating CD34+ counts, including very high-risk patients with very low circulating levels.

Individually adjusted prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions after CD34-selected allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

T cell depletion of the graft increases graft failure and relapse rate in allogeneic PBSC transplantation. Delayed lymphocyte add-back after T cell-depleted transplants might prevent these complications. We present 22 consecutive allogeneic PBSC transplants from related histocompatible donors with positive selection of CD34+ cells. Recipients received prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) depending on their risk of relapse and of developing GVHD. Patients were considered at high risk of relapse with AML > first CR, ALL > second CR, and CML in accelerated or blastic phase. Patients were considered at high risk of developing GVHD if older than 35 years, or with a donor sensitized through previous pregnancy or blood transfusion. Patients at high risk of relapse and low risk of GVHD were scheduled to receive three DLI. Patients at low risk of relapse and high risk of GVHD did not receive DLI. The remaining patients were scheduled to receive two DLI. The DLI were administered on days +28 (2 x 10(5)/kg), +60 (2 x 10(5)/kg) and +90 (2 x 10(6)/kg) after transplant. G-CSF mobilized peripheral stem cells from healthy donors were positively selected by an immunomagnetic method. The mean CD34+ cells and CD3+ cells infused were 4.4 x 10(6)(range 1.9-10.6) and 0.085 x 10(5) (range 0.01-0.67). Cyclosporin A was given to prevent GVHD. All the patients engrafted. Twenty-two prophylactic DLI were performed in 12 patients: seven developed acute GVHD (one case grade III-IV) and none presented pancytopenia. At a mean follow-up of 585 days (range 89-1103), 14 patients were alive in CR, one patient was alive in relapse, four patients had died of relapse and three had died of transplant-related complication. Individually adjusted prophylactic DLI at the doses we used with an escalating schedule allowed an acceptable GVHD rate and a good engraftment of donor hematopoiesis.

Clinical efficacy and safety of primary antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole vs itraconazole in allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation.

Posaconazole has been recently approved for primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with prolonged neutropenia after AML induction chemotherapy and patients with GVHD. We now present the first experience of the efficacy and safety of posaconazole during the early phase of post-allogeneic BMT (n=33; from June 2007), in comparison with itraconazole primary prophylaxis (n=16; up to May 2007). More patients receiving posaconazole were T-cell depleted (P=0.003). Groups were otherwise comparable in terms of age, sex, disease, neutrophil engraftment, incidence of GVHD, use of unrelated donors and type of conditioning. Safety data as well as the incidence of fever (84%) and persistent fever (27%) during the 100-day treatment period were comparable for both antifungal agents. Patients receiving posaconazole had a lower cumulative incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal disease, as defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria (0 vs 12%; P=0.04), which associated with a higher probability of fungal-free survival (91 vs 56%; P=0.003) and an improved probability of OS (91 vs 63%; P=0.011) compared with patients receiving itraconazole. Our single-centre experience suggests that antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole may lead to a better outcome than itraconazole for patients in the early high-risk neutropenic period after allogeneic BMT.