Insulin administered by needle-free jet injection corrects marked hyperglycaemia faster in overweight or obese patients with diabetes.

AIMS: To test whether jet injection of insulin resulted in faster correction of marked hyperglycaemia than when insulin is injected by a conventional pen in patients with diabetes. METHODS: Adult, overweight or obese (BMI ≥25 and ≤40 kg/m(2)) patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 10) or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (n = 10) were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, crossover study. On two separate occasions, patients were instructed to reduce insulin dose(s) to achieve marked hyperglycaemia (18-23 mmol/l). Subsequently, insulin aspart was administered either by jet injection or by conventional pen, in a dose based on estimated individual insulin sensitivity. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles were derived from plasma glucose and insulin levels, measured for 6 h after injection. RESULTS: After conventional injection, plasma glucose concentration dropped by ≥10 mmol/l after 192.5 ± 13.6 min. The jet injector advanced this time to 147.9 ± 14.4 min [difference 44.6 (95% confidence interval 4.3, 84.8); P = 0.03], except in 3 patients who failed to reach this endpoint. The time advantage exceeded 1.5 h in patients with a BMI above the median. Jet injection also reduced the hyperglycaemic burden during the first 2 h (2042 ± 37.2 vs 2168 ± 26.1 mmol/min; P = 0.01) and the time to peak insulin levels (40.5 ± 3.2 vs 76.8 ± 7.7 min; P < 0.001), but did not increase the risk for hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of rapid-acting insulin by jet injection results in faster correction of marked hyperglycaemia in overweight or obese patients with insulin-requiring diabetes.

Body mass index and the efficacy of needle-free jet injection for the administration of rapid-acting insulin analogs, a post hoc analysis.

We recently showed in a euglycaemic glucose clamp study among 18 healthy volunteers that using jet injectors rather than conventional pens significantly improved the time-action profiles of rapid-acting insulin analogs. Here, we investigated whether such profiles were modified by body mass index (BMI) and related weight parameters by comparing insulin administration by jet injection to that by conventional pen in subgroups defined by BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference and insulin dose. After conventional administration, times to peak insulin levels (T-INS(max)) occurred 31.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.7-48.5] min later and time to maximum glucose requirement (T-GIR(max)) 56.9 (95%CI 26.6-87.3) min later in more obese (BMI > 23.6 kg/m(2)) than in lean subjects (BMI < 23.6 kg/m(2)). In contrast, T-INS(max) and T-GIR(max) were similar in subjects with high and low BMI, when insulin was administered by jet injection. We conclude that using jet injection for insulin administration may especially benefit subjects with higher body weight.

A comparison of the pharmacodynamic profiles of jet-injected regular human insulin versus conventionally administered insulin aspart in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: Rapid-acting insulin analogues are generally preferred over regular human insulin because of their more immediate onset of action and shorter time-action profile. However, these analogues may not always be tolerated by or universally available for people with insulin-requiring diabetes. Jet injection has been demonstrated to facilitate faster insulin absorption. We determined whether administration of regular human insulin by jet injection achieves the same pharmacological properties as that of a rapid-acting insulin analogue. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers received regular human insulin (0.2units/kg) by jet injection. Glucose 20% was infused intravenously to maintain euglycaemia over six hours. The glucose infusion rates (GIR) were determined to compare pharmacological profiles. These profiles were compared with data from two other studies in which a similar dose of insulin aspart was administered by conventional pen. RESULTS: Regular human insulin by jet injection had a faster onset of glucose-lowering effect compared to aspart by conventional pen (T-GIR50%, 30.8±2.9 versus 43.1±3.2min, P<0.01). There were no differences in time to maximal GIR (106.1±11.9 versus 95.8±9.2min, P=0.50), maximal GIR (8.6±0.7 versus 7.7±0.7mg/kg/min, P=0.0.33), total glucose-lowering effect (101.0±9.8 versus 87.6±7.0g, P=0.28), and time until 50% of glucose disposal (144.8±5.6 versus 151.3±5.1min, P=0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Jet-injected regular human insulin had a pharmacological profile that was essentially not dissimilar from that of aspart insulin administered by conventional pen, and can therefore be used as an alternative for conventionally administered rapid-acting insulin analogues.