[Medication and comedication in COVID-19 patients]. / Geneesmiddelen bij COVID-19.

This paper discusses the possible effects of comedication on COVID-19 and the current treatment options for this infection. It is very doubtful that comedication has a disadvantageous effect on the course of the disease. NSAIDs should be avoided in any patient with a possible severe disease, because of potential side effects. Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system should be continued when there is a solid indication, and stopped in case of hemodynamic problems. There is no preference for either ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor inhibitors. Currently, chloroquine and remdesivir are possible treatment options. There is no sound evidence for either treatment. Chloroquine has side effects (nausea, QT prolongation) and there are several drug interactions. The treatment should be reconsidered in the event of side effects and when inferior medication for comorbidity must be prescribed because of possible interactions. Lopinavir/ritonavir is not effective. Supportive care is at present the mainstay of the treatment.

Application of NHG guidelines in patients referred for stable chest pain syndromes.

UNLABELLED: Purpose. Guidelines of the Dutch Association of General Practitioners (NHG) dictate the evaluation, treatment, and referral process of patients with stable chest pain syndromes (CPS). Adherence to this guideline was assessed in a consecutive group of patients referred to our hospital. Methods. We retrospectively studied the records of 296 subjects referred to our outpatient department in 2007 for evaluation of stable CPS. Referral letters were checked for completeness (past and present history, mentioning of risk factors for cardiovascular disease, physical examination, listing of medication) and used to judge adherence to the guideline. In a subset of patients, additional information regarding the referral process was gathered by telephone interview.Results. The referral letter was complete in only 67 patients (23%); items most often not reported were physical examination (63%) and cardiovascular risk factors (62%). Judging from the referral letter, 23 patients (8%) were evaluated in accordance with the NHG guideline prior to their referral. In patients in whom the final diagnosis of angina pectoris was made by the cardiologist, this was 20%. Seventy-nine patients were contacted by telephone after their work-up by the cardiologist; 36 of them (44%) reported being referred at their first visit to their primary physician, while 14 (18%) were referred at their own request. CONCLUSION: Prior to referral, only a minority of patients with stable CPS were evaluated and treated in accordance with NHG guidelines. Furthermore, their referral letter was often incomplete. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:178-82.).