Early angiography versus conservative treatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: MITI Investigators. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To compare short- and long-term outcome after early invasive or conservative strategies in the treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether or not there is benefit from emergent invasive diagnosis and treatment of AMI in patients without ST segment elevation on the admission electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: In a cohort of 1,635 consecutive patients with AMI who presented to hospitals without ST segment elevation on their admission ECG, we compared treatments, hospital course and outcome in 308 patients who presented to hospitals whose initial strategy favored early angiography and appropriate intervention when indicated versus 1,327 similar patients who presented to hospitals that favor a more conservative initial approach. RESULTS: At baseline, patients admitted to hospitals favoring an early invasive strategy were younger, more predominately Caucasian and had less comorbidity. Early coronary angiography occurred in 58.8% versus 8% (p < 0.001), and early angioplasty was performed in 44.8% versus 6.1% (p < 0.001) in the two different cohorts. Patients treated in hospitals favoring the early invasive strategy had a lower 30-day (5.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.026) and four-year mortality (20% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a trend towards lower hospital mortality (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29 to 1.09) and a significant lower long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.80) in patients admitted to hospitals favoring an early invasive strategy. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that an early invasive strategy in patients with AMI and nondiagnostic ECG changes is associated with lower long-term mortality.

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to examine recent trends in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify clinical factors associated with ACE inhibitor prescribing patterns. BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have demonstrated a significant mortality benefit in patients treated with ACE inhibitors after AMI. Numerous studies have demonstrated underuse of other beneficial treatments for patients with AMI, such as beta-adrenergic blocking agents, aspirin and immediate reperfusion therapy. METHODS: Demographic, procedural and discharge medication data from 190,015 patients with AMI were collected at 1,470 U.S. hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. RESULTS: Prescriptions for ACE inhibitor therapy at hospital discharge increased from 25.0% in 1994 to 30.7% in 1996. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40% or evidence of congestive heart failure while in the hospital were discharged with ACE inhibitor treatment 42.6% of the time. Of patients experiencing an anterior wall myocardial infarction and no evidence of heart failure, 26.1% of patients were discharged with this treatment. Of the remaining patients, 15.6% received ACE inhibitors at discharge. ACE inhibitors were prescribed more often to elderly and diabetic patients as well as those requiring intraaortic balloon pump placement. This therapy was given less often to patients who underwent revascularization with coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery or were treated with calcium channel blocking agents. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians are prescribing ACE inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction with increasing frequency. Those patients with the greatest expected benefit receive ACE inhibitor treatment most often. However, the majority of even these high risk patients were not discharged with this life-saving therapy.

Influence of coronary bypass surgery on subsequent outcome of patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest.

The effect of coronary bypass surgery on recurrent cardiac arrest was estimated in 265 patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest between 1970 and 1988. From this cohort, 85 patients (32%) underwent coronary bypass surgery after recovery from cardiac arrest and 180 patients (68%) were treated medically. A multivariate Cox analysis was used to estimate the effect of coronary bypass surgery on subsequent survival after adjusting for effects of age, prior cardiac history, ejection fraction, year of the event, history of angina, antiarrhythmic drug use and whether the arrest was related to acute myocardial infarction. The use of coronary bypass surgery had a significant effect in reducing the incidence of subsequent cardiac arrest during follow-up study (risk ratio [RR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24 to 0.97, p less than 0.04). There was also a trend consistent with a reduction in total cardiac mortality (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.10, p = 0.10). These findings suggest that coronary bypass surgery may reduce the incidence of sudden death in suitable patients resuscitated from an episode of ventricular fibrillation.

Resource utilization in treatment of acute myocardial infarction: staff-model health maintenance organization versus fee-for-service hospitals. The MITI Investigators. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the use of invasive procedures and length of stay for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to health maintenance organization (HMO) and fee-for-service hospitals. BACKGROUND: The HMOs have reduced costs compared with fee-for-service systems by reducing discretionary admissions and decreasing hospital length of stay. It has not been established whether staff-model HMO hospitals also reduce the rate of procedure utilization. METHODS: Using data from a retrospective cohort, we performed univariate and multivariate comparisons of the use of cardiac procedures, length of stay and hospital mortality in 998 patients admitted to two staff-model HMO hospitals and 7,036 patients admitted to 13 fee-for-service hospitals between January 1988 and December 1992. RESULTS: The odds of undergoing coronary angiography were 1.5 times as great for patients admitted to fee-for-service hospitals than for those admitted to HMO hospitals (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 1.9). Similarly, the odds of undergoing coronary revascularization were two times greater in fee-for-service hospitals (odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.5). However, higher utilization was strongly associated with the greater availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities in fee-for-service hospitals. The length of hospital stay, by contrast, was approximately 1 day shorter in the fee-for-service cohort (7.3 vs. 8.0 days, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians in staff-model HMO hospitals use fewer invasive procedures and longer lengths of stay to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction than physicians in fee-for-service hospitals. This finding, however, appears to be associated with the lack of on-site catheterization facilities at HMO hospitals.

Length of hospital stay after acute myocardial infarction in the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify current trends in length of stay in patients with an acute myocardial infarction and to evaluate which demographic, clinical, procedural and hospital-related factors explain the variation and reduction in length of stay observed during the study period. BACKGROUND: Hospital length of stay is an important contribution to cost of care. Previous studies of length of stay after acute myocardial infarction have been performed largely on administrative data bases and do not reflect current practice patterns. METHODS: We used univariate and multivariate models to evaluate which demographic, clinical and administrative factors influenced length of stay in 11,932 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to 19 Seattle-area hospitals between 1988 and 1994. RESULTS: Length of hospital stay decreased from (mean +/- SD) 8.5 +/- 8.2 to 6.0 +/- 5.8 days during the study period. Demographic and clinical characteristics known at the time of admission explained only 6% of variation in length of stay, whereas hospital complications, procedure use and type of admitting hospital explained an additional 27% of variation. The use of primary angioplasty and early diagnostic coronary angiography predicted a shorter length of stay; however, none of the measured variables explained the 29% reduction in length of stay that occurred between 1988 and 1994. CONCLUSIONS: Although hospital complications, procedure use and hospital characteristics are important predictors of length of hospital stay, none of these factors explains the 29% reduction in length of stay observed in postmyocardial infarction patients between 1988 and 1994. It is likely that unmeasured economic and administrative factors play important roles in influencing hospital length of stay.

A comparison of the national registry of myocardial infarction 2 with the cooperative cardiovascular project.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to evaluate whether or not the simpler case identification and data abstraction processes used in National Registry of Myocardial Infarction two (NRMI 2) are comparable with the more rigorous processes utilized in the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP). BACKGROUND: The increased demand for quality of care and outcomes data in hospitalized patients has resulted in a proliferation of databases of varying quality. For patients admitted with myocardial infarction, there are two national databases that attempt to capture critical process and outcome data using different case identification and abstraction processes. METHODS: We compared case ascertainment and data elements collected in Medicare-eligible patients included in the industry-sponsored NRMI 2 with Medicare enrollees included in the Health Care Financing Administration-sponsored CCP who were admitted during identical enrollment periods. Internal and external validity of NRMI 2 was defined using the CCP as the "gold standard." RESULTS: Demographic and procedure use data obtained independently in each database were nearly identical. There was a tendency for NRMI 2 to identify past medical histories such as prior infarct (29% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) or heart failure (21% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) less frequently than the CCP. Hospital mortality was calculated to be higher in NRMI 2 (19.7% vs. 18.1%, p < 0.001) due mostly to the inclusion of noninsured patients 65 years and older in NRMI 2. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the simpler case ascertainment and data collection strategies employed by NRMI 2 result in process and outcome measures that are comparable to the more rigorous methods utilized by the CCP. Outcomes that are more difficult to measure from retrospective chart review such as stroke and recurrent myocardial infarction must be interpreted cautiously.

Treatment and outcome of myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without invasive capability. Investigators in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the extent to which the capability of a hospital to perform invasive cardiovascular procedures influences treatment and outcome of patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Patients with AMI are usually transported to the closest hospital. However, relatively few hospitals have the capability for immediate coronary arteriography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), should these interventions be needed. METHODS: The 1,506 hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 were classified according to their highest level of invasive capability: 1) none (noninvasive, 28.1%); 2) coronary arteriography (cath-capable, 25.2%); 3) coronary angioplasty (PTCA-capable, 7.4%); and 4) bypass surgery (CABG-capable, 39.2%). Treatment and in-hospital outcomes were assessed for 305,812 patients admitted from June 1994 through October 1996. Follow-up through 90 days was ascertained in a subset of 30,402 patients enrolled simultaneously in both the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) 2 and the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (CCP). RESULTS: The proportion of patients receiving initial reperfusion intervention was only slightly higher at the more invasive hospitals (noninvasive 32.5%, cath-capable 31.2%, PTCA-capable 32.9% and CABG-capable 35.9%, p < 0.001 by chi-square statistic). Among thrombolytic recipients, median door-to-drug time interval differed little among hospital types and ranged from 42 to 45 minutes. At cath-capable, PTCA-capable and CABG-capable hospitals, coronary arteriography was performed in 32.9%, 37.4% and 64.9%, respectively, and PTCA in 0.0%, 5.1% and 31.4%, both p < 0.001 by chi-square statistic. The proportion of patients transferred out to other facilities was 51.0%, 42.2%, 39.9% and 4.4% (p < 0.0001) among noninvasive, cath-capable, PTCA-capable and CABG-capable hospitals, respectively. Among patients in the combined NRMI and CCP data set, mortality at 90 days postinfarction was similar among patients initially admitted to each of the four hospital types. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with AMI admitted to hospitals without invasive cardiac facilities have a high likelihood of subsequent transfer to other facilities, their likelihood of receiving a reperfusion intervention at the first hospital, their door to thrombolytic drug intervals and their 90-day survival rates are similar to those of patients initially admitted to more invasively equipped hospitals. These data suggest that a policy of initial treatment of myocardial infarction at the closest medical facility is appropriate medical practice.

Influence of insurance type on the use of procedures, medications and hospital outcome in patients with unstable angina: results from the GUARANTEE Registry. Global Unstable Angina Registry and Treatment Evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether or not there is an association between managed care insurance and the delivery and outcome of care in patients presenting with unstable angina. BACKGROUND: The proportion of U.S. patients with managed care health insurance is increasing. This may be associated with recent improvements in the control of health care costs. It is unknown whether or not there is a difference in process of care in angina patients presenting with managed care versus fee-for-service health insurance. METHODS: We compared baseline characteristics, process and outcome of care in 636 patients with managed care insurance (MC) and 1,404 patients with fee-for-service (FFS) insurance who presented with unstable angina to 35 hospitals participating in the global Unstable Angina Registry and Treatment Evaluation (GUARANTEE) Registry. RESULTS: Although, there was little difference in baseline characteristics and hospital treatments between cohorts, MC patients were more likely to be discharged on guideline-recommended medications (aspirin and beta-adrenergic blocking agents). In addition, FFS patients were more likely to undergo cardiac catheterization (odds ratio = 1.25 95% confidence interval = 1.1 to 1.5), but not revascularization during the hospitalization. There was no difference in hospital mortality (0.9% versus 1.2% in MC versus FFS; p = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: In patients admitted with suspected unstable angina, MC patients are less likely to undergo coronary angiography, but are more likely to be discharged on indicated medications.

Health outcomes associated with beta-blocker and diltiazem treatment of unstable angina.

OBJECTIVE: We compared long-term health outcomes associated with beta-adrenergic blocking agents and diltiazem treatment for unstable angina. BACKGROUND: No long-term data have been published comparing these two antianginal treatments in this setting. METHODS: Eligible veterans were discharged from the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System (VAPSHCS), Seattle Division, between October 1989 and September 1995 with an unstable angina diagnosis and were prescribed monotherapy beta-blocker or diltiazem treatment at discharge. Medication data were collected from medical records and computerized VAPSHCS outpatient pharmacy files. Follow-up death and coronary artery disease rehospitalization data were collected through 1996. Proportional hazards regression compared survival among diltiazem and beta-blocker users, controlling for patient characteristics with propensity scores. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-seven veterans (24% on beta-blockers, 76% on diltiazem) were included in this study. There were 54 (22%) deaths during an average follow-up of 51 months. After propensity score adjustment, there was no difference in risk of death comparing diltiazem to beta-blocker treatment (hazards ratios [HR] 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 2.4). Among Washington residents (n=207), there were 146 (71%) coronary artery disease rehospitalizations or deaths during follow-up. After adjustment, there was a nonsignificant increase in risk of rehospitalization or death associated with diltiazem use (HR 1.4; 95% CI 0.80 to 2.4). For both analyses, similar risks were found among veterans without relative contraindications to beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: We found no survival benefit of diltiazem over beta-blocker treatment for unstable angina in this cohort of veterans.

A randomized trial of the effects of early cardiac serum marker availability on reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the serial markers, acute myocardial infarction and rapid treatment trial (SMARTT).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the immediate availability of serum markers would increase the appropriate use of thrombolytic therapy. BACKGROUND: Serum markers such as myoglobin and creatine kinase, MB fraction (CK-MB) are effective in detecting acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the emergency setting. Appropriate candidates for thrombolytic therapy are not always identified in the emergency department (ED), as 20% to 30% of eligible patients go untreated, representing 10% to 15% of all patients with AMI. Patients presenting with chest pain consistent with acute coronary syndrome were evaluated in the EDs of 12 hospitals throughout North America. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, physicians received either the immediate myoglobin/CK-MB results at 0 and 1 h after enrollment (stat) or conventional reporting of myoglobin/CK-MB 3 h or more after hospital admission (control). The primary end point was the comparison of the proportion of patients within the stat group versus control group who received appropriate thrombolytic therapy. Secondary end points included the emergent use of any reperfusion treatment in both groups, initial hospital disposition of patients (coronary care unit, monitor or nonmonitor beds) and the proportion of patients appropriately discharged from the ED. RESULTS: Of 6,352 patients enrolled, 814 (12.8%) were diagnosed as having AMI. For patients having AMI, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients treated with thrombolytic therapy between the stat and control groups (15.1% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.45). When only patients with ST segment elevation on their initial electrocardiogram were compared, there were still no significant differences between the groups. Also, there was no difference in the hospital placement of patients in critical care and non- critical care beds. The availability of early markers was associated with more hospital admissions as compared to the control group, as the number of patients discharged from the ED was decreased in the stat versus control groups (28.4% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The availability of 0- and 1-h myoglobin and CK-MB results after ED evaluation had no effect on the use of thrombolytic therapy for patients presenting with AMI, and it slightly increased the number of patients admitted to the hospital who had no evidence of acute myocardial necrosis.

Association of gender and survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: During the last 5 years, many studies have produced conflicting results concerning the survival of women hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). OBJECTIVE: To determine if gender is associated with hospital mortality and long-term survival in individuals with AMI. METHODS: This prospective study included 4255 consecutive women (34%) and 8076 (66%) men who developed AMI in 19 Seattle, Wash, area hospitals between January 1988 and June 1994. Key information was abstracted from hospital records and entered in the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention registry database. In addition, data concerning survival and rehospitalization were obtained from the state of Washington and linked to the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention registry. RESULTS: In comparison with men, women were 8 years older, more often had history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus, and less often had history of myocardial infarction or coronary surgery. During hospitalization, women were less likely to undergo coronary angiography, thrombolytic therapy, coronary angioplasty, or bypass surgery. After adjustment for covariates, women were 20% more likely to die in the hospital (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.39), yet long-term survival was similar in the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.05). The use of thrombolytic therapy or revascularization during the index hospitalization did not change the association between gender and survival. CONCLUSIONS: All things being equal, women with AMI were more likely to die in the hospital, yet survival after hospital discharge did not differ according to gender. Appropriate treatment to reduce hospital mortality in women is needed.

The influence of clinical risk factors on the use of angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization provides the greatest survival advantage in those patients with the greatest mortality risk. This study examines the relationship between variables that predict mortality and the use of angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Study of 4823 survivors of acute myocardial infarction, who underwent angiography between 6 hours and 5 days of admission, to determine the relationship between factors that predict mortality and the use of angiography (n = 2274), angioplasty (n = 692), and bypass surgery (n = 469). RESULTS: Except for recurrent angina, clinical factors that predict higher mortality were associated with a lower use of angiography (the multivariable adjusted odds ratio was 0.47 for older age, 0.85 for a history of infarction, 0.50 for patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, 0.64 for new heart failure, and 2.75 for recurrent angina [P < .001 for all factors]). A similar relationship was observed among patients selected for angioplasty (the odds ratio was 0.51 for an ejection fraction of < 40%, 0.72 for those patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, 0.74 for a history of infarction, and 1.94 for recurrent angina [P < .001 for all factors]). In contrast, patients with unfavorable prognostic profiles were much more likely to undergo coronary bypass surgery (the odds ratio was 1.46 for recurrent angina, 1.28 for older age groups, 2.23 for new heart failure, 1.28 for patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, and 1.46 for a history of infarction [P < .001 for all factors]). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that aside from symptoms of recurrent angina, the use of angiography and angioplasty is not driven by mortality risk stratification. In contrast, bypass surgery is preferentially performed in patients at increased risk for mortality.

Blood pressure, insulin, and C-peptide levels in San Luis Valley, Colorado.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the associations between blood pressure and both fasting insulin and C-peptide levels. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of 895 normoglycemic members of a bi-ethnic community in Colorado who were selected from a control group recruited for a geographically based study of diabetes mellitus prevalence and risk factors. All subjects included in this study had normal glucose tolerance as judged by a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test interpreted using World Health Organization criteria. None of the subjects were taking antihypertensive medication. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine relationships between fasting insulin and C-peptide levels and blood pressure. RESULTS: Among all subjects, diastolic blood pressure was found to significantly increase with increasing levels of both hormones (insulin coefficient = 0.197, P = 0.013; C-peptide coefficient = 0.0436, P = 0.004), whereas systolic blood pressure was significantly related to fasting C-peptide level (coefficient = 0.0295, P = 0.050). These relationships were similar in magnitude for both Hispanic and non-Hispanic white subjects, but were diminished among women and subjects with a higher body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Higher fasting insulin and C-peptide levels are associated with higher blood pressure, but these relationships are modified by sex and degree of obesity.

Outcomes of coronary angioplasty procedures performed in rural hospitals.

PURPOSE: To determine how many rural hospitals in the United States performed coronary angioplasty; to compare patient outcomes in rural and urban hospitals; and to assess whether outcomes were better in rural hospitals in which more procedures were performed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 1996, among patients 65 years of age and older, 201,869 coronary angioplasties were performed in 996 hospitals that were included in the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review files. Geographic location was defined as rural or urban, according to U.S. Census Bureau criteria. Outcome variables were in-hospital death and coronary artery bypass surgery performed during the same admission. Hospital volumes were categorized as low (< or = 100 cases or fewer per year), medium (101 to 200 cases per year), or high (> 200 cases per year). RESULTS: Fifty-one rural hospitals accounted for 4% of all angioplasties performed. After angioplasty, in-hospital mortality was greater in rural hospitals (8.1% versus 6.4%, P = 0.001) among patients with acute myocardial infarction, but was not different for patients without infarction (1.4% versus 1.3%, P = 0.41). Coronary artery bypass surgery rates during the same admission were similar in rural and urban hospitals. In general, in-hospital mortality and same-admission surgery rates were lower in high-volume centers in both rural and urban areas. CONCLUSION: Although in-hospital mortality after angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction was worse in low- and medium-volume rural centers, overall outcomes in rural and urban hospitals were similar.

Underutilization of reperfusion therapy in eligible African Americans with acute myocardial infarction: Role of presentation and evaluation characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Immediate reperfusion therapy to restore coronary blood flow is recommended for all eligible patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, reperfusion therapy is reportedly underutilized among African Americans, even when they are eligible. Reasons for the lack of use have not been fully explored. METHODS: We examined the demographic, clinical, and treatment data of 10,469 African Americans with acute myocardial infarction who were eligible for reperfusion therapy, enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-2 from June 1994 through March 1998. RESULTS: The mean age was 62.58 (+/-14.4) years, and 44.7% were female. Although eligible, 47% of the African Americans in this study did not receive reperfusion therapy. In a multivariate analysis, the absence of chest pain at presentation (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% CI 0.26-0.37) and initial admission diagnoses other than definite myocardial infarction (OR for receipt of reperfusion <0.12) were the strongest predictors of lack of early reperfusion therapy. Progressive delays in hospital arrival and hospital evaluation predicted a lower likelihood of early reperfusion. Prior stroke (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.78), myocardial infarction (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.86), and congestive heart failure (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40-0.60) were all associated with lack of reperfusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Almost half of eligible African American patients with myocardial infarction did not receive reperfusion therapy. Potential reasons may include atypical presentation, patient and institutional delay, and underappreciation of myocardial infarction by care providers. Strategies to address these factors may improve the rate of use of reperfusion therapy.

Factors associated with rehospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Rehospitalization of patients surviving acute myocardial infarction is common, but why it occurs is not well documented. In Seattle area hospitals, rehospitalization was frequent, particularly for women and those with extensive cardiac histories.

Comparison of outcomes of coronary stenting versus conventional coronary angioplasty in the department of veterans affairs medical centers.

Although the short-term benefits of stent deployment have been established, less is known about long-term outcomes. This study compares short- and long-term outcomes in veterans undergoing stenting and conventional coronary angioplasty. We used Department of Veterans Affairs databases to identify 27,224 veterans who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Veterans Affairs medical centers between October 1994 and September 1999. Patients were classified according to whether they had acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as the principal diagnosis. Baseline characteristics were similar in the stent and conventional groups. In AMI, hospital mortality was 2.9% for those with stents and 4.8% for those who underwent conventional coronary angioplasty (p <0.0001), whereas for patients without AMI, hospital mortality was similar (1.2% vs 1.4%, p = 0.12). For AMI, same-admission bypass surgery rates were lower in the stent group (0.7% vs 3.2%, p <0.0001) and in the group without AMI (1.2% vs 3.3%, p <0.0001). Two-year survival was better for stenting in veterans with (90% vs 88%, p = 0.006) and without (92% vs 91%, p = 0.008) AMI. For AMI, 2-year rehospitalization rates for PCI (10% vs 13%, p <0.0001), coronary artery bypass surgery (4% vs 6%, p <0.0001), and unstable angina (17% vs 23%) were lower for those who had stenting. In the no-AMI group, 2-year rehospitalization rates for PCI (14% vs 17%, p <0.0001), coronary artery bypass surgery (5% vs 8%, p <0.0001), and unstable angina (22% vs 29%, p <0.0001) were lower in the stent group. Veterans who underwent stenting had lower hospital mortality, reduced rates of same-admission bypass surgery, marginally better survival, and lower rates of rehospitalization than their counterparts who had conventional coronary angioplasty.

Early use of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the United States: experience from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 participants.

This study was undertaken to examine recent trends in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors within 24 hours of admission in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to identify clinical factors associated with ACE inhibitor-prescribing patterns. Demographic, procedural, and acute medication use from 202,438 patients with AMI were collected at 1,470 US hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 from June 1994 through June 1996. Acute ACE inhibitor use increased from 14.0% in 1994 to 17.3% in 1996. After controlling for all important clinical variables, we found that there was a significant increase in the odds of acute ACE inhibitor treatment over time (odds ratio [OR]1.07 for each 180-day period; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.06 to 1.08; p<0.0001). Univariate data suggested that patients treated acutely with ACE inhibitors tended to be older (70.9 vs. 67.2 years) and had lower rates of in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs. 11.0%). Independent predictors of receiving an ACE inhibitor acutely included anterior wall infarction (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.40), Killip class 2 or 3 (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.72 to 1.83), prior myocardial infarction (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.37), prior history of congestive heart failure (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.82 to 1.95), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.30 to 1.38). Physicians are prescribing ACE inhibitors acutely in patients with AMI with increasing frequency. Patients with evidence of congestive heart failure and those with anterior myocardial infarction have the greatest expected benefit from such therapy, and these persons receive such treatment most often. However, most patients hospitalized with AMI do not receive this potentially life-saving therapy.

A comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the Department of Veterans Affairs and in the private sector in the State of Washington.

Coronary angioplasty is performed > 1,000 times daily in a variety of health care settings in the public and private sectors in the USA. How outcomes for this procedure differ in the Department of Veterans Affairs and the private sector is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of coronary angioplasty performed in hospitals in the Department of Veterans Affairs and the State of Washington. This study used administrative data from the Department of Veterans Affairs patient treatment file (n = 8,326) and the State of Washington episode of illness file (n = 6,666) and included men who underwent coronary angioplasty in 1993 and 1994. Outcomes included (1) in-hospital mortality and mortality at 10 and 30 days after hospital admission, and (2) the use of coronary artery bypass surgery at similar intervals. Patients with a principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction were analyzed separately. Men in the Department of Veterans Affairs had more comorbid conditions than their counterparts in Washington State, and the length of hospital stay was longer in the former group. After using logistic regression to adjust for patient differences, mortality rates for the 2 groups of patients with acute myocardial infarction were similar, although bypass surgery was used more frequently in patients in Washington State. For patients without myocardial infarction, hospital and 10-day mortality did not differ with respect to health care system, and the use of bypass surgery subsequent to angioplasty was similar. In the Department of Veterans Affairs, most hospitals had low institutional caseloads (< 150 procedures per year), whereas > 40% of Washington State hospitals performed > or = 300 procedures per year. Although there were greatly differing institutional caseloads, mortality and the need for early bypass surgery were similar in the 2 systems.

Coronary angioplasty outcomes in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 1993-1994.

It is estimated that >400,000 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures are performed in the Unites States annually. This study reports patient characteristics and outcomes for 163,527 PTCAs performed in 214 hospitals in 17 states from 1993 to 1994. These hospitals were a 20% random sample of hospitals in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, which was designed to reflect hospitalization in the United States, generally. Cases with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes 36.01, 36.02, and 36.05 were defined as PTCA and were categorized as to whether acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was the principal discharge diagnosis. The average age of 44,270 AMI discharges (27%) was 62 +/- 12 years and that of 119,257 no-AMI cases (73%) was 64 +/- 11 years; 1/3 of both groups were women, 88% were white, and almost 90% had Medicare or private insurance as the primary payer. The states contributing the most cases were Florida (26%), California (12%), and Wisconsin (10%). Hospital mortality was 1.7% overall and was 3.8% for AMI and 0.8% for no-AMI cases. Bypass surgery performed during the same admission was 3.4% overall and was 4.5% and 3.0% for AMI and no-AMI cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age, diabetes, female gender, and Medicaid payer status were associated with increased risk of mortality. National estimates from this 20% sample indicate that >850,000 PTCAs were performed in the 2 years, with 452,319 cases estimated for 1994. In 1994 there were an estimated 2,789 deaths and 9,903 bypass surgeries in the no-AMI subset of 327,856 procedures. For the AMI group of 124,463 procedures, there were 4,486 deaths and 5,799 bypass surgeries in 1994. This study of PTCA outcomes contains the largest number of cases as well as the most representative sample reported to date.