Lack of proton pump inhibitor trial prior to commencing therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis is common in the community.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by eosinophil inflammation restricted to the esophagus and the resulting symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Critical to the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is a trial of proton pump inhibitor therapy to exclude alternative causes of esophageal eosinophilia such as proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia. While consensus guidelines recommend a proton pump inhibitor trial prior to diagnosis, little is known about its implementation in clinical practice. The primary aim of this study is to assess the frequency of proton pump inhibitor trial prior to the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis in community practice. The secondary aim is to assess the frequency of other treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis, including topical steroids and/or dietary therapy, in patients who did not undergo a proton pump inhibitor trial prior to diagnosis or who had an alternative diagnosis to eosinophilic esophagitis upon completed workup. We conducted a single-center, case series of patients referred to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania for eosinophilic esophagitis management between 2010 and 2015. This case series consisted of 125 patients who were referred from community practitioners with a presumptive diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis. Upon review, 90 out of 125 (72%) patients had not had a proton pump inhibitor trial or esophageal pH testing prior to the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis being made. Of these patients, 77.8% (70/90) had already received either topical steroid or dietary therapy for presumed eosinophilic esophagitis. Of the 125 patients initially diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis, 32 (25.6%) were found to have an alternative diagnosis, and 79.2% of this subset of patients (25/32) had previously received topical steroid or dietary therapy. This study demonstrates that a substantial number of patients with presumed eosinophilic esophagitis have not had a proton pump inhibitor trial prior to diagnosis in community practice. This led to the misclassification of patients and potentially to the use of less optimal medical therapies in a substantial number of these patients.

Natural history of eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review of epidemiology and disease course.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated esophageal disorder. For its timely diagnosis, clinicians must recognize common symptoms, and understand differences in symptoms across patient groups. The aim of this study is to systematically review the epidemiology and natural history of eosinophilic esophagitis. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1974 to February 2017 for studies describing the epidemiology and natural history of eosinophilic esophagitis. Congress abstracts from 2014 to 2016 were also searched. Search results were screened against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers, and data extraction was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of 1376 articles identified, 47 met the inclusion criteria: 20 on epidemiology and 27 on natural history. Incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis varied widely across North America and Europe, and increased over time. Incidence increased 131-fold in the Netherlands (1996-2010), 20-fold in Denmark (1997-2006), and 5.1-fold in Calgary, Canada (2004-2008). The most commonly reported symptoms were emesis and abdominal pain in children, and dysphagia and food impaction in adults. Age at diagnosis was 5.9-12.0 years in children, and approximately 30 years in adults. Time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 1.2-3.5 years in children and 3.0-8.0 years in adults. Diagnostic delay was associated with an increased risk of endoscopic features of fibrostenosis. Symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis differed significantly by age and race. In conclusion, there is an increasing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis. The considerable delay between symptom onset and diagnosis suggests that clinicians do not readily recognize the disease, which may have important clinical ramifications.

Association of sporadic and familial Barrett's esophagus with breast cancer.

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Based on striking aggregation of breast cancer and BE/EAC within families as well as shared risk factors and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis, we hypothesized that BE may be associated with breast cancer. Pedigree analysis of families identified prospectively at multiple academic centers as part of the Familial Barrett's Esophagus Consortium (FBEC) was reviewed and families with aggregation of BE/EAC and breast cancer are reported. Additionally, using a matched case-control study design, we compared newly diagnosed BE cases in Caucasian females with breast cancer (cases) to Caucasian females without breast cancer (controls) who had undergone upper endoscopy (EGD). Two familial pedigrees, meeting a stringent inclusion criterion, manifested familial aggregation of BE/EAC and breast cancer in an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance. From January 2008 to October 2016, 2812 breast cancer patient charts were identified, of which 213 were Caucasian females who underwent EGD. Six of 213 (2.82%) patients with breast cancer had pathology-confirmed BE, compared to 1 of 241 (0.41%) controls (P-value < 0.05). Selected families with BE/EAC show segregation of breast cancer. A breast cancer diagnosis is marginally associated with BE. We postulate a common susceptibility between BE/EAC and breast cancer.

Clinical presentation and disease course of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.

Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, characterized by preserved peristalsis in conjunction with an elevated integrated relaxation pressure, can result from specific anatomic variants or may represent achalasia in evolution. There is limited information on the clinical significance of this diagnosis. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in our cohort of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.Consecutive adult patients who had undergone high-resolution esophageal manometry between February 2013 and November 2015 with a diagnosis of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine: (1) secondary causes of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction; (2) treatment; and (3) natural history. Improvement in symptoms noted during follow-up evaluation was considered to be a favorable outcome. Worsening of symptoms or no change in symptoms was considered to be an unfavorable outcome.Of 874 manometries performed during this time period, 83 met the criteria for esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Of these patients, 11 had secondary causes: paraesophageal hernia (4), Nissen fundoplication (2), esophageal stricture (3), prior laparoscopic band placement (1), and diverticulum (1). All of these secondary causes were identified by barium esophagram. The remaining 72 patients were categorized as idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Two patients developed type II achalasia on follow-up. An additional two patients had no symptoms as testing was performed for preoperative evaluation prior to bariatric surgery, leaving 68 patients for symptom follow-up analysis. Of these, 19 had a favorable outcome, 18 had an unfavorable outcome, and 31 were lost to follow-up. Of those with a favorable outcome, 6 patients underwent treatment: medication (3), botulinum toxin injection followed by laparoscopic Heller myotomy (1), botulinum toxin injection and medication (1), and bougie dilation (1). Of the 18 patients with an unfavorable outcome, 6 patients underwent treatment: botulinum toxin injection (5) and medication (1). Computed tomography scan or endoscopic ultrasound was performed in 40% of patients with available follow-up and none of these studies revealed secondary causes. The overall median follow-up time was 5 months.Esophagogastric outflow obstruction is a manometric finding of unclear significance. Secondary causes should first be excluded with structural studies. The evolution of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction to achalasia is rare. Symptoms in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction do not always require treatment and treatment response is variable. The challenge in managing these patients lies in distinguishing which patients will need intervention. Further studies are needed for consideration of subgrouping this disease or modifying the categorization into clinically relevant entities.

Risk of malignant progression in Barrett's esophagus indefinite for dysplasia.

Barrett's esophagus is a well-recognized risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The natural history of Barrett's esophagus classified as 'indefinite for dysplasia' (IND) is poorly characterized. The aim of this study is to characterize the natural history of IND by determining the rate of neoplastic progression and identifying risk factors for progression. Patients from the University of Pennsylvania Health System pathology database and Barrett's esophagus registry with a diagnosis of IND between 2000 and 2014 were identified. Exclusion criteria included: (1) prior diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); (2) presence of LGD, HGD, or EAC at the time of diagnosis of IND; and (3) lack of follow-up endoscopy after diagnosis. Patients with neoplastic progression were classified as having either prevalent disease (LGD, HGD, or EAC on surveillance biopsy within 12 months of IND diagnosis) or incident disease (LGD, HGD, or EAC on surveillance biopsy >12 months after IND diagnosis). One hundred six patients were eligible for analysis. Of 87 patients with follow-up endoscopy and biopsies within 1 year of IND diagnosis, 7 (8%) had prevalent disease (2 LGD, 4 HGD, 1 EAC). The prevalence of LGD was 2.3%, HGD was 4.6%, and EAC was 1.1%. Importantly, four of the seven prevalent (2 LGD, 2 HGD) cases were found to have dysplasia within 6 months of IND diagnosis. No demographic or endoscopic characteristics studied were associated with prevalent disease. Of the 106 IND patients, there were 66 patients without prevalent dysplasia with >1-year follow-up. Three (4.5%) progressed (1 to LGD after 12 months, 2 to HGD after 16.5 and 28 months), yielding an incidence rate for any dysplasia of 1.4 cases/100 person-years and HGD/EAC of 0.9/100 person-years. Risk factors for incident disease were smoking (p = 0.02) and Barrett's esophagus segment length (p = 0.03). IND is associated with considerable risk of prevalent dysplasia, especially within the first 6 months after diagnosis. However, the incidence of HGD/EAC is low and similar to previous studies of IND. These data suggest that IND patients should have repeat endoscopy within 6 months with careful surveillance protocols. Longer BE length and smoking history may help predict which patients are more likely to develop dysplasia, and therefore identify patients who may warrant even closer monitoring.

Alginate therapy is effective treatment for GERD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis, treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is highly effective. However, in some patients, especially those with nonerosive reflux disease or atypical GERD symptoms, acid-suppressive therapy with PPIs is not as successful. Alginates are medications that work through an alternative mechanism by displacing the postprandial gastric acid pocket. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the benefit of alginate-containing compounds in the treatment of patients with symptoms of GERD. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library electronic databases were searched through October 2015 for randomized controlled trials comparing alginate-containing compounds to placebo, antacids, histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), or PPIs for the treatment of GERD symptoms. Additional studies were identified through a bibliography review. Non-English studies and those with pediatric patients were excluded. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effect models to calculate odds ratios (OR). Heterogeneity between studies was estimated using the I2 statistic. Analyses were stratified by type of comparator. The search strategy yielded 665 studies and 15 (2.3%) met inclusion criteria. Fourteen were included in the meta-analysis (N = 2095 subjects). Alginate-based therapies increased the odds of resolution of GERD symptoms when compared to placebo or antacids (OR: 4.42; 95% CI 2.45-7.97) with a moderate degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 71%, P = .001). Compared to PPIs or H2RAs, alginates appear less effective but the pooled estimate was not statistically significant (OR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.27-1.22). Alginates are more effective than placebo or antacids for treating GERD symptoms.

Alginate therapy is effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis, treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is highly effective. However, in some patients, especially those with non-erosive reflux disease or atypical GERD symptoms, acid suppressive therapy with PPIs is not as successful. Alginates are medications that work through an alternative mechanism by displacing the post-prandial gastric acid pocket. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the benefit of alginate-containing compounds in the treatment of patients with symptoms of GERD.PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane library electronic databases were searched through October 2015 for randomized controlled trials comparing alginate-containing compounds to placebo, antacids, histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) or PPIs for the treatment of GERD symptoms. Additional studies were identified through bibliography review. Non-English studies and those with pediatric patients were excluded. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (OR). Heterogeneity between studies was estimated using the I2 statistic. Analyses were stratified by type of comparator. The search strategy yielded 665 studies and 15 (2.3%) met inclusion criteria. Fourteen were included in the meta-analysis (N = 2095 subjects). Alginate-based therapies increased the odds of resolution of GERD symptoms when compared to placebo or antacids (OR: 4.42; 95% CI 2.45-7.97) with a moderate degree of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 71%, P = .001). Compared to PPIs or H2RAs, alginates appear less effective but the pooled estimate was not statistically significant (OR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.27-1.22). Alginates are more effective than placebo or antacids for treating GERD symptoms.

Adherence to the 2011 American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement for the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus.

Considerable variability exists in adherence to practice guidelines for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Rapid advances in management approaches to BE led to a new American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) medical position statement in 2011. Our aim was to assess how well members of the AGA Clinical Practice section adhered to these guidelines. A self-administered survey incorporating questions on diagnostic criteria, cancer risk estimates, screening, surveillance, and therapeutics for BE was distributed electronically to 5850 North American members of the AGA Clinical Practice section. The response rate was 470 of 2040 opened e-mails (23%). Intestinal metaplasia was required for diagnosis of BE by 90%, but the Prague classification was used by only 53% of those aware of it. The annual risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma was reported as 0.1-0.5% by 76%. Screening practices were variable, with 35% screening all patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease and 15% repeating endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease following a negative screening. Surveillance guidelines were followed by 79% for nondysplastic BE and 86% for low-grade dysplasia, with expert pathology confirmation of dysplasia reported by 86%. Proton pump inhibitor dosing was variable, with 18% administering twice-daily doses and 30% titrating dose to symptoms. Ablation therapy was recommended by 6% for nondysplastic BE, 38% for low-grade dysplasia, and 52% for high-grade dysplasia. There is satisfactory adherence to the new AGA guidelines with respect to diagnosis, cancer risk estimates, and surveillance intervals in a select group of respondents. However, adherence continues to be variable in the use of the Prague classification, screening, and dosing of antisecretory therapy. Use of ablation therapy increases with grade of dysplasia. The reason for continued variability in adherence to BE practice guidelines remains unclear, and more evidence-based guidance is required to enhance clinical practice.

Brush cytology vs. endoscopic biopsy for the surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Periodic surveillance with systematic biopsies is recommended for patients with Barrett's esophagus. Brush cytology has been proposed as a simple inexpensive component of endoscopic surveillance, which may also detect abnormalities prior to detection of histologic abnormalities. The aim of the current study was to determine whether brush cytology provides any additional value over endoscopic surveillance biopsies in patients with Barrett's esophagus. PATIENTS: This retrospective cohort study included 530 patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing endoscopic surveillance with paired biopsy and cytology specimens at the Cleveland Clinic between January 1994 and July 2008. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rates of cytology and histology. RESULTS: Sensitivity of cytology for any dysplasia was 49 % and specificity was 95 %. However, sensitivity was 82 % for detection of high grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma but only 31 % for low grade/indefinite for dysplasia. The concordance rate between cytology and histology was 80 %. Histology had a higher dysplasia detection rate than cytology (24.0 % vs. 15.7 %, respectively; P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cytology has excellent specificity and good sensitivity for the detection of high grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma but poor sensitivity for low grade dysplasia. There was substantial concordance between cytology and histology for the detection of dysplasia. However, histology had a higher dysplasia detection rate and therefore the value of routine cytology in the surveillance of Barrett's esophagus is questionable.

Demographic and phenotypic features of 70 families segregating Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Based on reported familial patterns, inheritance of a predisposition of developing Barrett's oesesophagus (BO) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) likely follows an autosomal dominant model of most inherited cancer syndromes. oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) likely follows an autosomal dominant model of most inherited cancer syndromes. AIMS: We analysed the phenotypic features of 70 familial BO/OAC families accrued for the purpose of initiating a linkage study to search for genes that contribute to susceptibility for BO/OAC. METHODS: Families with young or familial BO/OAC were recruited from participating institutions and self-referral from advertisement. RESULTS: A total of 70 families (173 affected and 784 unaffected individuals) were recruited into this study. Mean ages of diagnosis of BO and OAC among males were 50.6 and 57.4 years, respectively; among females, 52.1 and 63.5 years, respectively. The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) of cancers other than OAC or oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (OGJAC), among probands was 0.71. Seventy one percent of the pedigrees have "typical" structures with less than three affected individuals. Power calculations under realistic model assumptions suggest that if genetic heterogeneity is absent or limited, then DNA collection from members of these pedigrees could enable the identification of a novel candidate susceptibility gene for BO/OAC in a genome scan. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of families with BO/OAC yet reported, features of which are consistent with inherited germline predisposition. Further, the SIR of cancers other than OAC/OGJAC was 0.71 among 70 probands, indicating these individuals were not more likely to develop non-OAC cancers.

Pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett esophagus.

Barrett esophagus is a metaplastic condition that affects the lower esophagus and is a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Under normal circumstances, the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus is prevented by a complex barrier at the esophagogastric junction. Dysfunction of the lower esophageal sphincter and the presence of a hiatal hernia lead to failure of this barrier. Esophageal mucosal damage results from the chronic exposure of the esophageal mucosa to gastroduodenal contents and the lack of an effective mucosal defense. This article is an overview of the dysfunction of the esophagogastric junction that leads to GERD. The role of the contents of the reflux and that of Helicobacter pylori infection in the pathogenesis of Barrett esophagus are also summarized.

Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. The Esomeprazole Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacologic profile of the new proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole has demonstrated advantages over omeprazole that suggest clinical benefits for patients with acid-related disease. METHODS: 1960 patients with endoscopy-confirmed reflux oesophagitis (RO) were randomized to once daily esomeprazole 40 mg (n=654) or 20 mg (n=656), or omeprazole 20 mg (n=650), the standard recommended dose for RO, for up to 8 weeks in a US, multicentre, double-blind trial. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients healed at week 8. Secondary variables included healing and heartburn resolution at week 4, time to first resolution and sustained resolution of heartburn, and per cent of heartburn-free days and nights. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Significantly more patients were healed at week 8 with esomeprazole 40 mg (94.1%) and 20 mg (89.9%) vs. omeprazole 20 mg (86.9%), using cumulative life table estimates, ITT analysis (each P < 0.05). Esomeprazole 40 mg was also significantly more effective than omeprazole for healing at week 4 and for all secondary variables evaluating heartburn resolution. The most common adverse events in all treatment groups were headache, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole was more effective than omeprazole in healing and symptom resolution in GERD patients with reflux oesophagitis, and had a tolerability profile comparable to that of omeprazole.

Cytokeratin subsets can reliably distinguish Barrett's esophagus from intestinal metaplasia of the stomach.

The histological distinction between intestinal metaplasia involving the distal esophagus (Barrett's esophagus [BE]) and intestinal metaplasia of the stomach has important clinical implications and can be difficult even with the use of histochemical mucin stains. Cytokeratin (CK) 7 and 20 are cytoplasmic structural proteins that show restricted expression in normal and malignant epithelia of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to determine the use of CK7 and 20 expression in the histological distinction of BE from gastric intestinal metaplasia. CK7 and 20 immunostaining was performed on randomly selected surgical resection (n = 31) and biopsy specimens (n = 34) from patients with long-segment BE and gastric resection specimens (n = 11) and gastric cardia biopsy specimens (n = 13) in patients with histological evidence of intestinal metaplasia. A unique pattern of immunoreactivity designated the Barrett's CK7/20 pattern showed superficial CK20 staining and strong CK7 staining of both superficial and deep glands in 29 of 31 (94%) esophageal resection specimens and 34 of 34 (100%) esophageal biopsy specimens form patients with long-segment BE. A Barrett's CK7/20 pattern was not observed in gastric cardia biopsy specimens (n = 13) or gastric resection specimens (n = 11) in patients with histological evidence of intestinal metaplasia. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of a Barrett's CK7/20 pattern for a diagnosis of long-segment BE was 97%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. CK7 and 20 reactivity patterns can reliably identify the location of intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus and stomach using histological material from both routine endoscopic biopsy and surgical resection specimens.

p53 immunoreactivity in Barrett's metaplasia, dysplasia, and carcinoma.

Barrett's esophagus is a metaplastic condition with an unpredictable potential for neoplasia. Mutations of the tumor-suppressor gene p53 have been implicated in the evolution of some carcinomas. These mutations frequently result in intranuclear protein accumulation, which can be detected immunohistochemically. This study was undertaken to determine whether p53 immunoreactivity in Barrett's esophagus is a marker of neoplasia and, if so, when it occurs in the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Twenty-eight esophageal resection specimens were studied. Barrett's mucosa was present in each specimen, low-grade dysplasia in 27, high-grade dysplasia in 26, intramucosal cancer in 18, and submucosal cancer in 5. Immunohistochemical staining with the monoclonal antibody Pab1801 was used to detect the intranuclear protein product of mutated p53. No p53 immunoreactivity was seen in specimens of Barrett's mucosa or low-grade dysplasia. p53 immunoreactivity was found only in specimens of high-grade dysplasia, intramucosal cancer, and submucosal cancer. Sixty-nine percent (18/26) of these specimens exhibited mutated p53; 18 of 26 specimens of high-grade dysplasia (69%), 12 of 18 intramucosal cancer specimens (67%), and two of five submucosal cancer specimens (40%) expressed mutated p53. When p53 staining was observed, the spectrum of neoplastic changes (high-grade dysplasia, intramucosal cancer, submucosal cancer) within the specimen was positive. We conclude that (1) p53 immunoreactivity in Barrett's esophagus is a frequent, but not inclusive, marker for high-grade dysplasia, intramucosal cancer, and submucosal cancer and (2) immunoreactivity occurs late in the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence, during the transition to high-grade dysplasia.

Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

OBJECTIVE: Experience with treatment and outcome of superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of surgical management and identify predictors of survival. METHODS: Between September 1985 and December 1999, 122 patients underwent resection. Eighty-nine percent were men (mean age 63 +/- 10 years; range 35-83 years). Sixty (49%) patients were in endoscopic surveillance programs and 48 (39%) had the preoperative diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second was less than 2 L in 12 (12%). Seventy-five (61%) patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy. Pathologic stage was N1 in 8 (7%). Pulmonary complications necessitating reintubation (respiratory failure) occurred in 10 (8%) patients. Time-related survival models were developed for decision-making (preoperative), prognosis (operative), and hospital care (postoperative). RESULTS: Operative mortality was 2.5%. Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 89%, 77%, and 68%. Preoperative decision-making factors associated with ideal outcome were 1-second forced expiratory volume of more than 2 L, surveillance, preoperative diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia, and planned transhiatal esophagectomy. Prognosis was decreased in younger patients and in those with N1 disease. Postoperative respiratory failure increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is the treatment of choice for superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The ideal patient has a preoperative diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia found at surveillance, good pulmonary function, and undergoes a transhiatal esophagectomy. Discovery of N1 disease or development of postoperative respiratory failure reduces the benefits of surgery.

Barrett's esophagus.

Barrett's esophagus is a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease that is diagnosed with increasing frequency in connection with the increased utilization of upper endoscopy. It remains unclear why some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease develop Barrett's esophagus while others do not. The association of Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma is well established; if not for this fact, Barrett's esophagus would be of little clinical importance. Endoscopic surveillance with a rigorous biopsy protocol for the detection of dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma is indicated in any patient with Barrett's esophagus who is a candidate for surgery. New therapeutic strategies, including profound acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors, laser ablation of Barrett's epithelium, and photodynamic therapy, are currently under evaluation for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus.

Omeprazole: a new drug for the treatment of acid-peptic diseases.

Omeprazole is the first of a new class of gastric antisecretory drugs, proton pump inhibitors. It inhibits the H+,K(+)-adenosinetriphosphatase enzyme of the gastric parietal cell, resulting in potent, long-lasting suppression of basal and stimulated acid secretion. The drug is currently approved for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. In clinical trials, treatment with omeprazole results in rapid healing of duodenal ulcers; it is also effective in treating gastric ulcer disease. It is uniformly well tolerated without significant adverse effects, although animal studies linked profound long-term suppression of gastric acid secretion with the development of gastric carcinoids. Potential future uses include the prophylaxis of ulceration secondary to stress or use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and the prophylaxis of recurrent peptic ulcer disease.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori in nonulcer dyspepsia: should we or shouldn't we?

Two recent trials of treatment to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in infected patients with nonulcer dyspepsia seemingly came to opposite conclusions: one found such treatment to be beneficial but the other did not. My interpretation: If a patient has unexplained dyspepsia and no abnormal findings on endoscopy, blood chemistry, or the blood count, it is reasonable to test for H pylori and to give antibiotics if he or she tests positive. However, in no more than approximately one fourth of such patients will the problem respond to therapy. Furthermore, one should never give anti-H pylori treatment without first obtaining proof of infection.

Current status of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease.

All patients with documented, past or present gastric or duodenal ulcers and who are infected with Helicobacter pylori should undergo antimicrobial therapy to eradicate it. Data do not yet support giving antimicrobial therapy to treat nonulcer dyspepsia or to prevent gastric neoplasia. H pylori infection is the main cause of chronic superficial gastritis and is associated with both gastric and duodenal ulcers. However, it has no proven relationship with nonulcer dyspepsia. H pylori infection is currently diagnosed by either endoscopic biopsy or serologic titers for a specific immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody. No noninvasive technique is available to document eradication of infection, although urea breath tests will soon simplify both the diagnosis of infection and documentation of eradication. Eradicating H pylori infection decreases the rate of ulcer recurrence. Treatment currently involves a 2-week, three-drug regimen of bismuth subsalicylate, tetracycline, and metronidazole, or a two-drug regimen of omeprazole and amoxicillin; other, simpler regimens are under investigation.

H pylori 1997: testing and treatment options.

Although the discovery of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease is revolutionizing ulcer diagnosis and treatment, the role of universal empiric therapy for infected patients with dyspepsia or peptic ulcers is not fully elucidated. This article reviews current thinking on the diagnosis of H pylori infection in 1997.