Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 27(6): 481-490, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37160596

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential benefits associated with the short-term (6 months) treatment with transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients suffering from functional constipation (FC), functional fecal incontinence (FI), and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). METHODS: A multicenter observational study (12 centers; 369 patients) was conducted to assess the following primary and secondary objectives: to evaluate the level of satisfaction regarding bowel control and quality of life (QoL); to evaluate bowel symptoms severity and dropout frequency and reason. To this aim, validated questionnaires were provided to the patients at baseline (T0) and after 6 months of TAI treatment (T6) performed with the medical device Peristeen® Plus (Coloplast A/S, Denmark). Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes obtained at T0 and T6. RESULTS: A 6-month treatment with TAI enabled a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement of QoL scores, satisfaction scores regarding bowel control, and severity indexes of disorder-related symptoms in patients suffering from FC, FI, and LARS. Globally, 8.0% of patients discontinued the treatment after 6 months as a result of occurrence of symptoms (2.4%) or other justifications (3.8%) such as personal reasons. None of the dropouts were due to treatment inefficacy. CONCLUSION: Results of the present study suggest that short-term TAI treatment is beneficial for patients suffering from functional bowel disorders and LARS. Future analysis of prospective data will focus on the clinical outcomes associated with the long-term use (up to 24 months) of TAI when dealing with these types of medical conditions.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Colon Irritable , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/terapia , Síndrome de Resección Anterior Baja
3.
Tech Coloproctol ; 18(1): 53-64, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23564270

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Representatives from the Italian centers experienced in sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for the treatment of bowel dysfunction met in order to define the current clinical practice in Italy and to produce a consensus statement regarding indications for this therapy and patient management. METHODS: Fifty Italian colonproctologists were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning their clinical practice in SNM (290 questions, grouped within 4 broad areas). Physicians expressed their opinion by completing the questionnaire, assigning to each statement their level of agreement according to the 5-point Likert scale; the data were analyzed by attributing to each expert's answers a weight proportional to the degree of experience. During a meeting held 2 months later, the critical aspects of the therapy were re-examined and discussions held with the goal of reaching an agreement on controversial topics. The available literature was reviewed. RESULTS: Patient selection criteria, etiology, diagnostic investigations, test procedures and implantation, follow-up and evaluation of results have been reviewed. The aim was to achieve an algorithm for patient management, showing the place of SNM in the treatment of bowel dysfunction. The approach in case of treatment failure was also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the data collected reveals substantial consensus at the national level concerning all the main points with regard to the therapy. The recommendations expressed in this article can be considered as national guidelines and taken into account by the principal international implantation centers.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/terapia , Incontinencia Fecal/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Sacro/inervación , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio , Consenso , Humanos , Enfermedades Intestinales/terapia , Italia , Plexo Lumbosacro , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Hernia ; 15(1): 7-14, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20676711

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate pain and other complications following inguinal hernioplasty performed by the Lichtenstein technique with mesh fixation by fibrin glue or sutures. METHODS: Five hundred and twenty patients were enrolled in this 12-month observational multicenter study and received either sutures or fibrin glue (Tissucol(®)/Tisseel(®)) based on the preference of the surgeon. Pain, numbness, discomfort, recurrence, and other complications were assessed postoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain intensity was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain]). RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients received sutures and 349 received fibrin glue. During the early postoperative phase, 87.4% of patients in the fibrin glue group and 76.6% of patients in the sutures group were complication-free (P = 0.001). Patients who received fibrin glue were also less likely to experience hematoma/ecchymosis than those in the suture group (both P = 0.001). The mean pain score was significantly lower in the fibrin group than the sutures group (2.5 vs. 3.2, P < 0.001). At 1 month, significantly fewer patients in the fibrin glue group reported pain, numbness, and discomfort compared with patients in the sutures group (all P < 0.05). Fibrin glue patients also experienced less intense pain (0.6 vs. 1.2; P = 0.001). By 3 months, the between-group differences had disappeared, except for numbness, which was more prevalent in the sutures group. By 12 months, very few patients reported complications. CONCLUSIONS: Tissucol fibrin glue for mesh fixation in the Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia shows advantages over sutures, including lower incidence of complications such as pain, numbness, and discomfort, and should be considered as a first-line option for mesh fixation in hernioplasty.


Asunto(s)
Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina/efectos adversos , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Hipoestesia/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Suturas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Adulto Joven
8.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 9(2): 105-9, 1994 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8064189

RESUMEN

To investigate the pathophysiology of faecal incontinence in diabetes mellitus, two groups of diabetic patients were studied: 14 subjects (7 females and 7 males, mean age 57 +/- 9 years) with faecal incontinence (Group A) and 15 subjects (6 females and 9 males, mean age 54.7 +/- 8 years) without faecal incontinence but affected by somatic peripheral neuropathy. A third group (C) of 10 healthy volunteers was used as controls. All subjects underwent electroneurographic evaluation of peripheral neuropathy, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, anorectal manometry and rectal sensitivity tests. All the patients of group A had somatic peripheral neuropathy. Maximum squeeze pressure was lower in A compared to C (P < 0.025) and sustained for a shorter period in A compared with B (P < 0.0005) and C (P < 0.0005). All rectal sensitivity thresholds were higher in A compared with B and C. Pudendal Nerve Terminal Motor Latency was prolonged in 93% of patients studied in group A and in 73% of patients in group B (A vs B P < 0.005), with a significant difference in comparison with C: A vs C P < 0.0005, B vs C P < 0.005. Our findings suggest that somatic neuropathy plays an important role in faecal incontinence in diabetic patients, combined with sensation threshold impairment as a feature of an autonomic involvement.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/fisiopatología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Neuropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Manometría , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Reacción
9.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 43(5): 609-13; discussion 613-4, 2000 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10826419

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The recent introduction of the immune suppressor cyclosporin for treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis has required surgeons to perform a colectomy in those patients who eventually fail this rescue treatment, thus raising questions as to the safety of surgery as performed in patients with a heavily manipulated immune system. To assess the rates of mortality and morbidity in this setting, we studied a cohort of consecutive patients who had surgery after failing cyclosporin for refractory ulcerative colitis at our center. METHODS: Between January 1991 and December 1996, 25 patients with ulcerative colitis underwent restorative proctocolectomy performed in three steps (21 patients) and in two steps (4 patients). Seventeen of the 25 patients (68 percent) were initial nonresponders to a dose of 2 mg/kg/day of intravenous cyclosporin and underwent surgery immediately, the remaining 8 (32 percent) relapsed as outpatients on oral cyclosporin and were readmitted for surgery. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Nine patients of the 25 developed postoperative (early) complications (36 percent). The three-step operation subset had a 28 percent complication rate, the two-step 75 percent. Three patients needed reoperation. A total of 11 patients (44 percent) reported with late complications: two patients required surgical treatment, one for obstruction and one for pouch-perianal fistula. Three cases of pouchitis were recorded. No patient required pouch removal. CONCLUSION: Given the absence of postoperative mortality and a low overall complication rate, restorative proctocolectomy can safely be performed in patients who fail rescue treatment with a dose of 2 mg/kg of cyclosporin for steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Corollary evidence in this article hints but does not prove that the three-step procedure is safer than the two-step operation.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Adulto , Colitis Ulcerosa/mortalidad , Ciclosporina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda