Comparison of equiosmolar hypertonic saline and mannitol for brain relaxation during craniotomies: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

There is a controversy about the effects of hypertonic saline (HS) used for brain relaxation in patients requiring craniotomies. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of equiosmolar hypertonic saline with mannitol on intraoperative brain relaxation in patients undergoing craniotomies. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcome indicators included brain relaxation, hemodynamic status, fluid volume, and blood chemistry. A total of nine RCTs involving 665 patients were identified and included. There was a greater increase in the odds of good intraoperative brain relaxation in the HS group (odds ratio (OR) 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40~3.01; P = 0.0002) compared with mannitol. In comparison with HS, mannitol slightly reduced the central venous pressure (CVP) (mean difference (MD) 1.03, 95% CI 0.03~2.03; P = 0.04) as well as significantly increasing the diuretic effect regardless of the dosage of HS (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.86, 95% CI -1.35~-0.37; P = 0.0006). HS increased the plasma sodium level significantly (MD 7.86, 95% CI 2.78 ~ 12.95, P = 0.002) but reduced the intraoperative fluid intake (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.98~-0.15, P = 0.008). However, there were no significant differences in plasma osmolality and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Our results suggest that there appears to be better brain relaxation without a significant increase in urine volume in the HS group compared with mannitol in patients requiring craniotomies. High-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes will be required in the future to confirm the conclusions.

The efficacy and safety of high-dose statins in acute phase of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: a systematic review.

Inconsistent findings in the studies have been observed concerning the higher dose of statins use in the acute phase of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Therefore, we performed a systematic review to assess this issue. A computerized literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. The efficacy outcome indicators were National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, infarct volume, and recurrence of stroke; the safety outcome indicators were intracranial hemorrhage events, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and all-cause death. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were carried out. A total of seven RCTs with 1089 patients were included. Six studies reported the results of the NHISS score. A great reduction was found in NIHSS score in the statins group, and the difference is statistically significant [mean difference (MD) -1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.64 to -0.66, P < 0.00001]. However, no significant differences in the effect on recurrence of stroke [odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.65-1.69, P = 0.85] (available in 3 studies), infarct volume [std. mean difference (SMD) 0.04, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.63, P = 0.89] (available in 2 studies), intracerebral hemorrhage events (OR 3.25, 95% CI 0.34-31.52, P = 0.31) (available in 2 studies), cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.35-1.43, P = 0.33) (available in 2 studies), and all-cause death (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.60-2.35, P = 0.63) (available in 2 studies) were found. High-dose statin therapy in the acute phase of ischemic stroke and TIA significantly reduce the NIHSS score and improve short-term functional outcome without increasing related adverse events.

The optimal discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation. Nevertheless, optimal discontinuation of DAPT remains a controversy. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate optimal discontinuation of DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES. METHODS: We searched electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov from database RCTs that reported different modes of discontinuation of DAPT in patients with DES. The primary endpoints were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) and probably or definite stent thrombosis (ST). Secondary endpoints were repeat revascularization, stroke, major bleeding and net adverse clinical events (NACE). RESULTS: We included 13 RCTs meeting the criteria with a total of 36,749 patients. No significant difference was observed in all-cause death (RR [95% CI]=0.87 [0.75, 1.01], P=0.07, I2=0%), cardiovascular death (RR [95% CI]=0.97 [0.79, 1.19], P=0.76, I2=0%), repeat revascularization (RR [95% CI]=1.07 [0.92, 1.25], P=0.36, I2=0%), and stroke (RR [95% CI]=1.01 [0.80, 1.28], P=0.94, I2=0%). Compared with shorter DAPT, longer DAPT was associated with a significant reduction in MI (RR [95% CI]=1.46 [1.26, 1.69], P<0.00001, I2=28%) and ST (RR [95% CI]=1.93 [1.45, 2.58], P<0.00001, I2=32%), and a significant increase in major bleeding (RR [95% CI]=0.60 [0.49, 0.74], P<0.00001, I2=0%). However, there was no difference in NACE (RR [95% CI]=1.03 [0.91, 1.17], P=0.63, I2=0%). In subgroup analyses based on stent type, we demonstrated that longer DAPT was associated with a significant reduction in thrombotic events (MI and ST) after first-generation DES implantation (RR [95% CI]=2.58 [1.85, 3.58], I2=0%) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES, RR [95% CI]=1.54 [1.12, 2.11], I2=0%). Conversely, there was no difference in thrombotic events in patients with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES, RR [95% CI]=1.17 [0.83, 1.63], I2=75%) and biodegradable polymer DES (BP-DES, RR [95% CI]=1.15 [0.74, 1.79]). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Compared with shorter DAPT, longer DAPT was associated with a significant reduction in thrombotic events (MI and ST) and a higher rate of major bleeding. 2) By the assessment of the trade-off between thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, shorter DAPT was non-inferior to longer DAPT. 3) The benefit of longer DAPT was significant in patients with first-generation DES and EES and weakened with other second-generation DES (ZES and BP-DES).

Efficacy and safety of short-term dual- versus mono-antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials.

Stroke is still a primary disease for death and disability all over the world. The optimal antiplatelet therapy for treatment of stroke is under controversy. We performed a meta-analysis to justify whether short-term (≤1 year) dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has advantages over mono-antiplatelet therapy. We systematically searched the databases of Cochrane library, Pubmed and Embase up to July 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DAPT with mono-antiplatelet therapy were included in our meta-analysis. Totally ten trials involving 8969 patients were satisfied with our inclusion criteria. At the end of follow-up, DAPT is associated with a significant reduction in recurrent stroke [risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.76, P < 0.00001] and the net clinical outcome (ischemic stroke (IS) recurrence plus major bleeding) (RR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.58-0.79, P < 0.00001). In terms of safety outcomes of major bleeding (RR 1.44, 95 % CI 0.72-2.88, P = 0.30) and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.29, 95 % CI 0.56-2.93, P = 0.55), DAPT has a homologous safety profile compared with mono-antiplatelet therapy. The subgroup analysis according to different races, antiplatelet combinations or initiation time produced similar outcomes as comprehensive outcomes. Given short-term treatment regimen, DAPT can be superior to mono-antiplatelet therapy in treating IS or transient ischemic attack (TIA). No matter in acute or non-acute phase of IS, short-term DAPT has more efficacy than mono-antiplatelet therapy and has equivalent safety as mono-antiplatelet therapy.