Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 29(4): 222-229, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382901

RESUMEN

AIM: Patients undergoing dialysis are at high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Haemoglobin (Hb) levels may be changed in patients infected with the Omicron variant of COVID-19 who are undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Therefore, we aimed to explore the effect of anti-anaemia treatment on such patients. METHODS: This study enrolled patients undergoing PD who were infected with the Omicron variant of COVID-19 at our centre between November 2022 and February 2023. We retrospectively analysed changes in Hb levels and explored the effectiveness of roxadustat and recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) for patients infected with the Omicron variant of COVID-19. RESULTS: Among 125 enrolled patients, 83 (66.4%) were infected with the Omicron variant and 75 (90.4%) patients mainly experienced mild or moderate disease. During infection, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were higher than those before infection (p < .001). Additionally, their CRP levels were negatively correlated with Hb levels (p = .002). However, Hb levels were decreased 1 month after infection (109.61 ± 10.64 g/L vs. 115.69 ± 12.04 g/L; p < .001). The roxadustat treatment group did not exhibit significantly decreased Hb levels 1 month after infection (114.57 ± 14.11 vs. 117.51 ± 10.74 g/L; p = .225). Conversely, the rhEPO treatment group experienced a mild decrease in Hb levels (108.69 ± 11.20 vs. 115.03 ± 12.23 g/L; p = .001). Ferritin levels increased in both groups during infection (p = .495). Two months after infection, ferritin levels (median, 205.0 ng/mL) were significantly decreased compared with during infection (median, 377.4 ng/mL) (p < .001) in the roxadustat treatment group. CONCLUSION: Roxadustat was effective than rhEPO for treating anaemia in patients undergoing PD who were infected with the Omicron variant of COVID-19.

2.
BMC Nephrol ; 25(1): 273, 2024 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39187762

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Refractory exit-site infections (ESIs) and tunnel infections (TIs) are challenging complications for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study compared the outcomes of surgical intervention, notably the cuff-shaving (CS) procedure coupled with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), and conservative management strategies for patients with refractory ESI and TI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent PD at our center, focusing on the incidence and management of ESI and TI. We evaluated and compared treatment outcomes, including ESI scores, frequency of ESI and/or TI, identification of causative microorganisms, and duration of catheter survival or time until removal. RESULTS: We identified 97 episodes of catheter-related ESI and/or TI across 71 patients with an incidence rate of 0.15 episodes per patient-year. Of the 23 patients with refractory ESI and/or TI, surgical intervention was performed in 8, while 15 chose conservative management. In the one-month follow-up, patients who underwent CS combined with NPWT showed no complications such as leakage, and their local symptoms resolved completely. The mean PD catheter survival time was significantly longer in the surgical group (29.38 ± 7.25 months) than in the conservative group (7.86 ± 2.13 months). Surgical intervention demonstrated a significantly higher therapeutic efficacy and extended catheter survival. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CS and NPWT as a surgical approach is crucial for eradicating infectious foci and significantly improving the longevity of PD catheter function. This integrated surgical strategy offers a promising solution for the management of refractory ESI and TI in patients undergoing PD.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Anciano , Diálisis Peritoneal , Resultado del Tratamiento , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Tratamiento Conservador
3.
Ren Fail ; 45(2): 2278301, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994433

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conscious sedation anesthesia (CSA) is an anesthetic method during peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation. However, lack of optimal CSA strategies for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effects and safety of CSA using different doses of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine during peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. METHODS: Patients who underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement via open surgical incision were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups based on the tertile dose of remifentanil. The bispectral index (BIS) was used to monitor the depth of anesthesia. Data regarding clinical findings, the effects of anesthesia, and the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were collected. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients completed the surgery successfully and safely. The dose of remifentanil was 0.02-0.07 µg/kg/min, 0.08-0.13 µg/kg/min, and 0.14-0.20 µg/kg/min in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Only seven patients reported mild pain during the surgery. No significant differences were observed among the numeric rating scale scores of the three groups (p > 0.05). Intraoperative hemodynamics were stable. The incidence of respiratory depression was 8.3%, 20.0%, and 41.9% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p < 0.01). The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms in Group C (51.6%) was higher than that in Groups A and B (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Low-dose remifentanil (0.02-0.07 µg/kg/min) combined with dexmedetomidine achieved satisfactory anesthetic effects with fewer adverse drug reactions during PD catheter implantation, indicating its potential for use in patients undergoing PD catheter placement.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Dexmedetomidina , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Remifentanilo , Dexmedetomidina/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Catéteres
4.
J Adv Nurs ; 77(5): 2293-2306, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33432661

RESUMEN

AIMS: To investigate practice patterns in exit-site care and identify the risk factors for exit-site infection. DESIGN: A quantitative cross-sectional design. METHODS: Data were collected in 12 peritoneal dialysis (PD) centres in 2018. Daily exit-site care practice patterns and exit-site status of patients receiving PD were assessed through interviews and questionnaires. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Most of the 1,204 patients adhered with the protocols about main aspects of exit-site care, such as cleansing agents selection, frequency of cleansing, catheter fixation, and following the catheter protective measures. However, their adherence levels on hand hygiene, mask wearing, observing exit site, examining secretion, and communicating with PD staff were rather low. Eighty-four patients' exit sites were evaluated as problematic exit site (PES). And 186 patients had catheter-related infection (CRI) history. After multivariable logistic regression analysis, diabetes (OR = 1.631), traction bleeding history (OR = 2.697), antibiotic agents use (OR = 2.460), compliance on mask wearing (OR = 0.794), and observing exit site (OR = 0.806) were influencing factors of CRI history. Traction bleeding history (OR = 2.436), CRI history (OR = 10.280), and effective communication (OR = 0.808) with PD staff were influencing factors for PES. CONCLUSIONS: The adherence levels on different aspects of exit-site care were varied in patients having PD. Their self-care behaviours did correlate with the exit-site status. IMPACT: The adherence level of patients' exit-site care practice needs attention of medical staff. Further studies about the optimal procedure in exit-site care were warranted.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Diálisis Peritoneal , Catéteres de Permanencia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Autocuidado
5.
Plant Sci ; 349: 112247, 2024 Sep 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39313002

RESUMEN

Phytophthora root and stem rot caused by Phytophthora sojae (P. sojae) is one of the most destructive diseases to affect soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) production. GmSRC2 that encodes a C2 domain-containing protein can respond to various stresses, however, the molecular mechanism of GmSRC2 in resistance of soybean to P. sojae is yet to be fully elucidated. In this study, GmSRC2 was found to be significantly up-regulated under P. sojae treatment; GmSRC2-overexpression (OE) transgenic lines and GmSRC2-silencing transient plants were generated via Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation and virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) system, respectively. Infected leaves and cotyledons of OE-GmSRC2-1 and OE-GmSRC2-2 lines showed significant decreases in the disease symptoms and P. sojae biomass than those of wild type (WT); the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) confirmed the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in overexpressed transgenic lines. Whereas, silencing of GmSRC2 severely increased the disease symptoms and the biomass of P. sojae. Further, we confirmed that GmSRC2 interacted with the effector PsAvh23 of P. sojae, and the C2 domain was crucial for the interaction. Overexpression of GmSRC2 upregulated the ADA2/GCN5 module upon P. sojae. The aforementioned results demonstrated that GmSRC2 played vital roles in regulating soybean resistance to oomycetes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda