RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Few studies evaluate the interplay of attending and resident learning curves in surgical education. Anastomotic time is known to be correlated with transplant outcomes in kidney transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between the combination of resident and attending experience and anastomotic time in kidney transplantation. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of deceased donor kidney transplants from 2006 to 2019. To analyze the effect of attending and resident experience, dyads were classified as six combinations of early versus later practice attending and resident postgraduate year (PGY-2, PGY-3, and PGY-4/5). Attendings with less than 3 y of postfellowship practice were considered early practice. Linear mixed effects models tested the effects of attending experience, resident PGY, recipient body mass index, and technical operative characteristics (number of donor arteries, operative side) on anastomosis time. RESULTS: The final linear mixed effects model included 1306 transplants. Compared to later practice attendings with PGY-4/5 residents as reference, early practice attendings paired with PGY-2 or PGY-3 residents had longer anastomotic times (P ≤ 0.005) when adjusted for recipient body mass index, number of donor arteries, and transplant side. When PGY-4/5 residents were paired with early practice attendings, no difference in anastomotic time was demonstrated. When paired with later practice attendings, PGY-2 residents had longer anastomotic times (P < 0.001) while PGY-3 anastomotic times did not differ from PGY-4/5. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the correlation between trainee and attending experience jointly and anastomotic time, suggesting that pairing residents and attendings by experience may improve surgical training and potentially patient-related outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Escolaridad , Competencia ClínicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Data on long-term outcomes following A2/A2B to B kidney transplants since the 2014 kidney allocation system (KAS) changes are few. The primary aim of this study is to report our 7-year experience with A2/A2B to B kidney transplants and to compare post-transplant outcomes of A2/A2B to a concurrent group of B to B kidney transplants. Additionally, the study evaluates the impact of pre-transplant anti-A1 titers on survival outcomes in A2/A2B transplants. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center analysis included all adults who received A2/A2B to B deceased donor kidney transplants from December 2014 to June 2021 compared to B to B recipients. The effects of pre-transplant IgM/IgG titers, stratified as ≤1:8 and ≥1:16, on death-censored, rejection-free, and overall graft survival were tested. RESULTS: Fifty-three A2/A2B and 114 B to B adults were included with a median follow-up time of 32 months. Overall graft survival, patient survival, and rejection-free graft survival did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences between the groups' overall kidney function values (p > .80) or their temporal trajectories (time by group interaction p > .11). Unadjusted death-censored graft survival was lower in A2/A2B to B compared to B recipients (p = .03), but the effect was not significant (p = .195) after adjusting for any readmissions (p = .96), rejection episodes (p < .001) or BK infection (p = .76). We did not detect an effect of pre-transplant titer group on death-censored (p = .59), rejection-free (p = .61), or overall graft survival (p = .26) CONCLUSIONS: A2/A2B to B kidney transplants have comparable overall patient and graft survival, rejection-free graft survival, and longitudinal renal function compared to B to B transplants at our center. Allograft survival outcomes were not significantly different between patients with low and high pre-transplant anti-A1 IgM/IgG titers.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Isoanticuerpos , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Supervivencia de Injerto , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABORESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Utilization of hepatitis C viremic (HCV+) deceased donor kidneys (DDKT) for aviremic recipients increases opportunities for transplantation with excellent short-term outcomes. Our primary aim was to understand longer-term outcomes, specifically assessing kidney and liver function in the first year posttransplant. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study of adult DDKT recipients of HCV+ kidneys (cases) matched 1:1 to recipients of HCV- kidneys (comparators). Between-group outcomes were analyzed using comparisons of means and proportions, survival analysis methods, and multivariable mixed effects models. RESULTS: Sixty-five cases and 65 comparators had statistically comparable demographic and clinical characteristics. There were no between-group differences in serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 12 (p = .662) or in their trajectories over months 1-12 (p > .292). Within the first 60 days, rates of liver function values >3 times upper limit of normal among cases were comparable to comparators for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (14% vs. 6%, p = .242) and higher for alanine transaminase (ALT) (23% vs. 6%, p = .011). AST declined during the first 8 weeks (p = .005) and stabilized for both groups (p = .406) during the following 10 months. ALT declined during the first 8 weeks (p < .001), continued to decline over months 3-12 (p = .016), and the trajectory was unrelated to antiviral therapy initiation among cases. CONCLUSIONS: Aviremic recipients of HCV+ kidneys had comparable kidney outcomes to matched recipients of HCV- kidneys. Despite more HCV+ recipients having an elevation in ALT within the first 60 days, ALT values normalized with no identified liver complications attributed to HCV.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Riñón , Hepacivirus , Donantes de Tejidos , Viremia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transplantation of hearts from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors has increased substantially in recent years following development of highly effective direct-acting antiviral therapies for treatment and cure of HCV. Although historical data from the pre-direct-acting antiviral era demonstrated an association between HCV-positive donors and accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in recipients, the relationship between the use of HCV nucleic acid test-positive (NAT+) donors and the development of CAV in the direct-acting antiviral era remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective, single-center observational study comparing coronary angiographic CAV outcomes during the first year after transplant in 84 heart transplant recipients of HCV NAT+ donors and 231 recipients of HCV NAT- donors. Additionally, in a subsample of 149 patients (including 55 in the NAT+ cohort and 94 in the NAT- cohort) who had serial adjunctive intravascular ultrasound examination performed, we compared development of rapidly progressive CAV, defined as an increase in maximal intimal thickening of ≥0.5 mm in matched vessel segments during the first year post-transplant. In an unadjusted analysis, recipients of HCV NAT+ hearts had reduced survival free of CAV ≥1 over the first year after heart transplant compared with recipients of HCV NAT- hearts. After adjustment for known CAV risk factors, however, there was no significant difference between cohorts in the likelihood of the primary outcome, nor was there a difference in development of rapidly progressive CAV. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support larger, longer-term follow-up studies to better elucidate CAV outcomes in recipients of HCV NAT+ hearts and to inform post-transplant management strategies.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic allowed for the rapid implementation of telemedicine for kidney transplant patients; however, widespread adoption may worsen existing health care inequities among vulnerable populations. This study aimed to characterize telemedicine utilization by kidney transplant patients during the early pandemic with particular attention to healthcare equity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of kidney transplant patients interacting with telemedicine was performed. Patient demographic data and distance to the transplant center were obtained. The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and Brokamp Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) score were used to characterize patients' counties of residence. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between patient and community characteristics and the likelihood of an encounter being telemedicine. RESULTS: This study included 1033 patients who participated in 3727 encounters from March 11 through October 2020. Characteristics associated with decreased likelihood of telemedicine use were increased age (OR = .993; 95% CI = .986-.999, P = .022), non-White vs. White race (OR = .826, 95% CI = .697-.979; P = .028), male vs. female sex (OR = .746, 95% CI = .632-.880; P < .001), and a higher Brokamp Neighborhood Deprivation Index score (OR = .159; 95% CI = .029-.873; P = .034). The effect of distance to the transplant center on the likelihood of a telemedicine encounter differed by NCHS Urban-Rural designation (interaction P = .018), with its likelihood increasing by 2%-3% with each 10-mile increment among persons residing in medium-, small-, and non-metropolitan counties compared to those residing in the most rural counties. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine visits were less often completed by patients of older age, non-white race, male sex, and those residing in counties having higher NDI scores. While telemedicine has the potential to improve healthcare access and decrease costs, proactive efforts need to be taken to mitigate disparities in vulnerable populations.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Telemedicina , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Societal factors that influence wait-listing for transplantation are complex and poorly understood. Social determinants of health (SDOH) affect rates of and outcomes after transplantation. METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated the impact of SDOH on additions to state-level, 2017-2018 kidney and liver wait-lists. Principal components analysis, starting with 127 variables among 3142 counties, was used to derive novel, comprehensive state-level composites, designated (1) health/economics and (2) community capital/urbanicity. Stepwise multivariate linear regression with backwards elimination (n = 51; 50 states and DC) tested the effects of these composites, Medicaid expansion, and center density on adult disease burden-adjusted wait-list additions. RESULTS: SDOH related to increased community capital/urbanicity were independently associated with wait-listing (starting models: B = .40, P = .010 Kidney; B = .36, P = .038 Liver) (final models: B = .31, P = .027 Kidney, B = .34, P = .015 Liver). In contrast and surprisingly, no other covariates were associated with wait-listing (P ≥ .122). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that deficits in community resources are important contributors to disparities in wait-list access. Our composite SDOH metrics may help identify at-risk communities, which can be the focus of local and national policy initiatives to improve access to organ transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
Despite the divergent disease biology of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), wait-list prioritization is identical for both diagnoses. We compared wait-list and posttransplant outcomes between CCA and HCC liver transplantation patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exceptions using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. The 408 CCA candidates listed between 2003 and mid-2017 were matched to 2 HCC cohorts by listing date (±2 months, n = 816) and by Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) region and date (±6 months, n = 408). Cumulative incidence competing risk regression examined the effects of diagnosis, OPTN region, and center-level CCA listing volume on wait-list removal due to death/being too ill (dropout). Cox models evaluated the effects of diagnosis, OPTN region, center-level CCA volume, and waiting time on graft failure among deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. After adjusting for OPTN region and CCA listing volume (all P ≥ 0.07), both HCC cohorts had a reduced likelihood of wait-list dropout compared with CCA candidates (HCC with period matching only: subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P = 0.02 and HCC with OPTN region and period matching: SHR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.87; P = 0.007). The cumulative incidence rates of wait-list dropout at 6 and 12 months were 13.2% (95% CI, 10.0%-17.0%) and 23.9% (95% CI, 20.0%-29.0%) for CCA candidates, 7.3% (95% CI, 5.0%-10.0%) and 12.7% (95% CI, 10.0%-17.0%) for HCC candidates with region and listing date matching, and 7.1% (95% CI, 5.0%-9.0%) and 12.6% (95% CI, 10.0%-15.0%) for HCC candidates with listing date matching only. Additionally, HCC DDLT recipients had a 57% reduced risk of graft failure compared with CCA recipients (P < 0.001). Waiting time was unrelated to graft failure (P = 0.57), and there was no waiting time by diagnosis cohort interaction effect (P = 0.47). When identically prioritized, LT candidates with CCA have increased wait-list dropout compared with those with HCC. More granular data are necessary to discern ways to mitigate this wait-list disadvantage and improve survival for patients with CCA.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Colangiocarcinoma , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Trasplante de Hígado , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Colangiocarcinoma/epidemiología , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The EPIC-26 (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-Short Form) is a validated questionnaire for measuring health related quality of life. However, the relationship between domain scores and functional outcomes remains unclear, leading to potential confusion about expectations after treatment. For instance, does a sexual function domain score of 80 mean that a patient can achieve erection sufficient for intercourse? Consequently we sought to determine the relationship between the domain score and the response to obtaining the best possible outcome for each question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the CEASAR (Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation) study, a multicenter, prospective study of men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, we analyzed 11,464 EPIC-26 questionnaires from a total of 2,563 men at baseline through 60 months of followup who were treated with robotic prostatectomy, radiotherapy or active surveillance. We dichotomized every item into its best possible outcome and assessed the percent of men at each domain score who achieved the best result. RESULTS: For every EPIC-26 item the frequency of the best possible outcome was reported by domain score category. For example, a score of 80 to 100 on sexual function corresponded to 97% of men reporting erections sufficient for intercourse while at a score of 40 to 60 only 28% reported adequate erections. Also, at a score of 80 to 100 on the urinary incontinence domain 93% of men reported rarely or never leaking vs 6% at a score of 61 to 80. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a novel way to interpret EPIC-26 domain scores, demonstrating large variations in the percent of respondents reporting the best possible outcomes over narrow domain score differences. This information may be valuable when counseling men on treatment options.
Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía , Radioterapia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The United Network for Organ Sharing recently altered current liver allocation with the goal of decreasing Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) variance at transplant. Concerns over these and further planned revisions to policy include predicted decrease in total transplants, increased flying and logistical complexity, adverse impact on areas with poor quality health care, and minimal effect on high MELD donor service areas. To address these issues, we describe general approaches to equalize critical transplant metrics among regions and determine how they alter MELD variance at transplant and organ supply to underserved communities. We show an allocation system that increases minimum MELD for local allocation or preferentially directs organs into areas of need decreases MELD variance. Both models have minimal adverse effects on flying and total transplants, and do not disproportionately disadvantage already underserved communities. When combined together, these approaches decrease MELD variance by 28%, more than the recently adopted proposal. These models can be adapted for any measure of variance, can be combined with other proposals, and can be configured to automatically adjust to changes in disease incidence as is occurring with hepatitis C and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/normas , Trasplante de Hígado , Evaluación de Necesidades , Selección de Paciente , Asignación de Recursos/normas , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pronóstico , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The United Network for Organ Sharing system allocates deceased donor kidneys based on the kidney donor profile index (KDPI), stratified as sequences (A ≤ 20%, B > 20-<35%, C ≥ 35-≤85%, and D > 85%), with increasing KDPI associated with decreased graft survival. While health-related quality of life (HRQOL) may improve after transplantation, the effect of donor kidney quality, reflected by KDPI sequence, on post-transplant HRQOL has not been reported. METHODS: Health-related quality of life was measured using the eight scales and physical and mental component summaries (PCS, MCS) of the SF-36® Health Survey. Multivariable mixed effects models that adjusted for age, gender, rejection, and previous transplant and analysis of variance methods tested the effects of time and KDPI sequence on post-transplant HRQOL. RESULTS: A total of 141 waitlisted adults and 505 recipients (>1700 observations) were included. Pretransplant PCS and MCS averaged, respectively, slightly below and within general population norms (GPN; 40-60). At 31 ± 26 months post-transplant, average PCS (41 ± 11) and MCS (51 ± 11), overall and within each KDPI sequence, were within GPN. KDPI sequence was not related to post-transplant HRQOL (P > .134) or its trajectory (interaction P > .163). CONCLUSION: Increasing KDPI does not adversely affect the medium-term values and trajectories of HRQOL after kidney transplantation. This may reassure patients and centers when considering using high KDPI kidneys.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/normas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: With improvements in medical management and survival of patients with end-stage renal disease, maintaining durable vascular access is increasingly challenging. This study compared primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency, and procedure-specific complications, and evaluated whether the number of interventions to maintain or restore patency differed between prosthetic femoral-femoral looped inguinal access (thigh) grafts and Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO; Hemosphere Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) grafts. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective, intention-to-treat analysis was conducted of consecutive thigh and HeRO grafts placed between May 2004 and June 2015. Medical history, interventions to maintain or restore patency, and complications were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Data were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric statistical tests, Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and multivariable proportional hazards regression and logistic regression. RESULTS: Seventy-six (43 thigh, 33 HeRO) grafts were placed in 61 patients (54% male; age 53 [standard deviation, 13] years). Median follow-up time in the intention-to-treat analysis was 21.2 months (min, 0.0; max, 85.3 months) for thigh grafts and 6.7 months (min, 0.0; max, 56.3 months) for HeRO grafts (P = .02). The groups were comparable for sex, age, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and smoking history (all P ≥ .12). One thigh graft (2%) and five HeRO (15%) grafts failed primarily. In the intention-to-treat analysis, patency durations were significantly longer in the thigh grafts (all log-rank P ≤ .01). Point estimates of primary patency at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 61%, 46%, and 4% for the thigh grafts and 25%, 15%, and 6% for the HeRO grafts. Point estimates of assisted primary patency at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 75%, 66%, and 54% for the thigh grafts and 41%, 30%, and 10% for the HeRO grafts. Point estimates of secondary patency at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years were 88%, 88%, and 70% for the thigh grafts and 53%, 43%, and 12% for the HeRO grafts. There were no differences in ischemic (P = .63) or infectious (P = .79) complications between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that after adjusting for follow-up time, HeRO grafts were associated with an increased number of interventions (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Thigh grafts have significantly better primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency compared with HeRO grafts. There is no significant difference between thigh grafts and HeRO grafts in ischemic or infectious complications. Our logistic regression model demonstrated an association between HeRO grafts and an increased number of interventions to maintain or restore patency. Although HeRO grafts may extend the use of the upper extremity, thigh grafts provide a more durable option for chronic hemodialysis.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Vena Femoral/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Muslo/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Vena Femoral/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/terapia , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diseño de Prótesis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tennessee , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The new United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) kidney allocation system (KAS) incorporates A2 and A2B to B transplantation to reduce wait times for blood group B candidates. Few studies have employed multicenter data or comprehensively defined donor-to-recipient ABO classification systems. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed UNOS data from 1987-2013 to evaluate the effect of A2 incompatible (A2i) kidney transplantation on graft and patient survival. Records of 314 056 adults (340 150 transplants) were classified as A2i (560 transplants in A2 to B or O, A2B to B) or compatible. Methods included Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Graft survival after A2i transplant (median = 116 months) did not differ (log-rank p ≥ 0.101) from any compatible class (medians = 106-119 months); there was no effect of A2i on patient survival (log-rank p ≥ 0.286). After adjusting for age, race, donor type, pancreas, or previous kidney transplant, A2i was not associated with graft (p ≥ 0.263) or patient (p ≥ 0.060) survival in this largest cohort to date. CONCLUSIONS: A2i kidney transplantation does not adversely affect graft or patient survival. A2i kidney transplantation has been included in the new KAS and represents a viable option for transplant centers to increase transplant volume and reduce wait times for disadvantaged B waitlist recipients.
Asunto(s)
Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO/inmunología , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Obtención de Tejidos y ÓrganosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effect of awarding MELD exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is unknown. We evaluated the physical and mental health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptoms of anxiety and depression in liver transplant recipients with HCC compared to patients without HCC. METHODS: The single-center sample measured PROs before and after transplant, which included 1521 multisurvey measurement points among 502 adults (67% male, 28% HCC, follow-up time: <1-131 months). Data were analyzed using multivariable mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Longitudinal PRO values did not differ between persons who received HCC exception points and those who did not have HCC. Patients with HCC who did not receive exception points had reduced physical HRQOL (P=.016), a late decline in mental HRQOL, and delayed reduction in anxiety (time-by-outcome interaction P<.050) compared to patients with HCC who received exception points. CONCLUSION: Transplant recipients who received HCC exception points had PROs that were comparable to those of patients without HCC, and reported better physical HRQOL and reduced symptoms of anxiety compared to patients with HCC who did not receive exception points. These analyses demonstrate the impact of HCC exception points on PROs, and may help inform policy regarding HCC exception point allocation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Hígado , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Variation exists in the management of choledocholithiasis (CDL). This study evaluated associations between demographic and practice-related characteristics and CDL management. METHODS: A 22-item, web-based survey was administered to US general surgeons. Respondents were classified into metropolitan or nonmetropolitan groups by zip code. Univariate tests and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine factors associated with CDL management preferences. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 32,932 surgeons; 9902 performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy within the last year; 750 of 771 respondents had a valid US zip code and were included in the analysis. Mean practice time was 18 ± 10 years, 87% were male, and 83% practiced in a metropolitan area. For preoperatively known CDL, 86% chose preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Those in metropolitan areas were more likely to select preoperative ERCP than those in nonmetropolitan areas (88 vs. 79%, p < 0.001). For CDL discovered intraoperatively, 30% selected laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) as their preferred method of management with no difference between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas (30 vs. 26%, p = 0.335). The top reasons for not performing LCBDE were: having a reliable ERCP proceduralist available, lack of equipment, and lack of comfort performing LCBDE. Factors associated with preoperative ERCP were: metropolitan status, selective intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), and availability of a reliable ERCP proceduralist. Those who perform selective IOC were 70% less likely to prefer LCBDE (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.57, p < 0.001). Those with a reliable ERCP proceduralist available were 90% less likely to prefer LCBDE (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.26, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of respondents preferred ERCP for the management of CDL. Having a reliable ERCP proceduralist available, use of selective IOC, and metropolitan status were independently associated with preoperative ERCP. Postoperative ERCP was preferred for managing intraoperatively discovered CDL. Many surgeons are uncomfortable performing LCBDE, and increased training may be needed.
Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Coledocolitiasis/cirugía , Adulto , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cirujanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses (arteriovenous fistulas [AVFs]) are preferred for chronic hemodialysis access. Preoperative vein mapping by duplex ultrasound is recommended before AVF creation, but there are few data correlating vein diameter with postoperative outcomes. Also, vein diameter has not been included in prior predictive models of fistula maturation. This study aims to test whether preoperative vein diameter is associated with failure of AVF maturation and long-term (secondary) patency. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical variables of patients undergoing brachiobasilic or brachiocephalic AVF creation. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models tested whether preoperative minimum vein diameter (MVD) and clinical covariates were associated with failure of AVF maturation and secondary patency. RESULTS: The sample included 158 adults (54 ± 14 years; 45% male; 61% white; 56% diabetes; body mass index, 32 ± 8; MVD, 3.4 ± 1.1 mm; follow-up, 12 ± 9 months [range, <1-40 months]). Increased MVD was associated with decreased risk of AVF failure. More than one third of AVFs with MVD <2.7 mm failed to mature within 6 months. Multivariate models that adjusted for age, diabetes, race, gender, body mass index, and preoperative dialysis status demonstrated that increased MVD was associated with decreased risk of failure of maturation and better long-term patency overall (P = .005 and P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a larger MVD on preoperative vein mapping are at lower risk for failure of fistula maturation and have increased long-term AVF patency. MVD is the only clinical or demographic factor associated with both AVF maturation and long-term patency. MVD is an important preoperative indicator of fistula success in assessment of potential AVF sites. Future predictive models of fistula maturation and patency should include MVD.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Venas Braquiocefálicas/cirugía , Diálisis Renal , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Adulto , Anciano , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Venas Braquiocefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Braquiocefálicas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
Most health literacy assessments are time consuming and administered verbally. Written self-administration of measures may facilitate more widespread assessment of health literacy. This study aimed to determine the intermethod reliability and concurrent validity of the written administration of the 3 subjective health literacy questions of the Short Literacy Survey (SLS). The Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and the shortened test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) were the reference measures of health literacy. Two hundred ninety-nine participants completed the written and verbal administrations of the SLS from June to December 2012. Intermethod reliability was demonstrated when (a) the written and verbal SLS score did not differ and (b) written and verbal scores were highly correlated. The written items were internally consistent (Cronbach's α = .733). The written total score successfully identified persons with sixth-grade equivalency or less for literacy on the REALM (AUROC = 0.753) and inadequate literacy on the S-TOFHLA (AUROC = 0. 869). The written administration of the SLS is reliable, valid, and is effective in identifying persons with limited health literacy.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Escritura , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A major change to deceased-donor kidney allocation in the United States, Kidney Allocation System 250 (KAS250), was implemented on March 15, 2021. Evaluating the consequences of this policy on critical system performance metrics is critical to determining its success. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of critical performance measures of the kidney transplant system by reviewing all organs procured during a 4-y period in the United States. To mitigate against possible effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients records were stratified into 2 pre- and 2 post-KAS250 eras: (1) 2019; (2) January 1, 2020-March14, 2021; (3) March 15, 2021-December 31, 2021; and (4) 2022. Between-era differences in rates of key metrics were analyzed using chi-square tests with pairwise z-tests. Multivariable logistic regression and analysis of variations methods were used to evaluate the effects of the policy on rural and urban centers. RESULTS: Over the period examined, among kidneys recovered for transplant, nonuse increased from 19.7% to 26.4% (all between-era P < 0.05) and among all Kidney Donor Profile Index strata. Cold ischemia times increased (P < 0.001); however, the distance between donor and recipient hospitals decreased (P < 0.05). Kidneys from small-metropolitan or nonmetropolitan hospitals were more likely to not be used over all times (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of KAS250 was associated with increased nonuse rates across all Kidney Donor Profile Index strata, increased cold ischemic times, and shorter distance traveled.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Severe obesity is a barrier to listing for kidney transplantation due to concern for poor outcomes. This study aims to compare bariatric surgery with medical weight loss as a means of achieving weight loss and subsequent listing for renal transplant. We hypothesize that bariatric surgery will induce greater frequency of listing for transplant within 18 months of study initiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized study of metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) vs medical weight loss (MM) in patients on dialysis with a body mass index (BMI) of 40-55 kg/m2. The primary outcome was suitability for renal transplant within 18 months of initiating treatment. Secondary outcomes included weight loss, mortality, and complications. RESULTS: Twenty patients enrolled, only 9 (5 MBS, 4 MM) received treatment. Treated groups did not differ in age, gender, or race (P ≥ .44). There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint: 2 MBS (40%) and 1 MM (25%) listed for transplant ≤18 months (P = 1.00). With additional time, 100% MBS and 25% MM patients achieved listing status (P = .048); 100% of MBS and 0 MM received kidney transplants to date (P = .008). Weight, weight loss, and BMI trajectories differed between the groups (P ≤ .002). One death from COVID-19 occurred in the MM group, and 1 MBS patient had a myocardial infarction 3.75 years after baseline evaluation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest MBS is superior to MM in achieving weight loss prior to listing for kidney transplantation. Larger studies are needed to ensure the safety profile is acceptable in patients with ESRD undergoing bariatric surgery.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: During this study, we instituted a phased quality improvement initiative designed to educate referring clinicians and departmental radiologists about the recommendations of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria for dual-phase (without and with contrast material) head CT examinations. The primary aims of the study were to evaluate whether the quality improvement initiative was associated with an improvement in ACR Appropriateness Criteria appropriateness ratings and a reduction in the number of unindicated dual-phase head CT examinations performed. A secondary aim was to assess the impact of the quality improvement initiative on health care costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included-with the exception of the examinations performed during a 3-month training period-all single- and dual-phase head CT examinations performed of adult patients at a tertiary care medical center from January 2009 through October 2011. Both inpatients and outpatient examinations were included. There were no exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Implementation of the initiative enhanced patient safety and reduced health care costs by achieving a significant reduction (p = 0.006) in the number of unindicated dual-phase head CT examinations performed from a median number of 40 per month to 17 per month. CONCLUSION: Although there are potential benefits for dual-phase head CT examinations, the medical and economic risks should be measured against these potential benefits. Incorporating the ACR Appropriateness Criteria applies evidence-based medicine to this algorithm. In this outcomes-driven study, the number of unindicated dual-phase head CT examinations was reduced and imaging efficacy improved primarily through physician education and monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Innecesarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Medios de Contraste/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness in liver transplantation (LT) of utilizing organs donated after cardiac death (DCD) compared with organs donated after brain death (DBD). METHODS: A Markov-based decision analytic model was created to compare two LT waitlist strategies distinguished by organ type: (i) DBD organs only, and (ii) DBD and DCD organs. The model simulated outcomes for patients over 10 years with annual cycles through one of four health states: survival; ischaemic cholangiopathy; retransplantation, and death. Baseline values and ranges were determined from an extensive literature review. Sensitivity analyses tested model strength and parameter variability. RESULTS: Overall survival is decreased, and biliary complications and retransplantation are increased in recipients of DCD livers. Recipients of DBD livers gained 5.6 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of US$69 000/QALY, whereas recipients on the DBD + DCD LT waitlist gained 6.0 QALYs at a cost of US$61 000/QALY. The DBD + DCD organ strategy was superior to the DBD organ-only strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The extension of life and quality of life provided by DCD LT to patients on the waiting list who might otherwise not receive a liver transplant makes the continued use of DCD livers cost-effective.