Contemporary management of acute heart failure in the emergency department and the potential impact of early diuretic therapy on outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Acute heart failure (AHF) is one of the most common conditions presenting to the ED and patients often require hospitalisation. Emerging evidence suggests early diagnosis and administration of diuretics are associated with improved patient outcomes. Currently, there is limited literature on the management of AHF in the Australian ED context. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive AHF presentations to the ED in a metropolitan hospital. Patient demographics, clinical status and management were assessed including timeliness of diuretics administration and association with outcomes including ED length of stay (LOS) and inpatient mortality using linear regression. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-one presentations (median age 81 years, 50.8% male) were identified. Common cardiovascular comorbidities were prevalent. Fifty-four patients (28.3%) had ≥1 clinical high-risk feature at presentation. The median time from presentation to furosemide administration was 187 min (interquartile range 97-279 min); only 35 patients received diuretics within 60 min of presentation. Early diuretics was associated with shorter ED LOS (246 min vs 275 min, P = 0.03) and a lower but non-significant inpatient mortality (4.9% vs 6.3%, P = 0.21) and a non-significant increased rate of discharge home from ED (8.6% vs 4.7%, P = 0.15). The likelihood of discharge home was significantly more pronounced in patients receiving early diuretics without clinical high-risk features (16.7% vs 4.3%, P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Despite symptoms and signs being well recognised at presentation, time to diuretics was relatively long. Early diuretics administration was associated with improved patient outcomes, particularly in clinically more stable patients. Due to the limitations of the study design, results should be interpreted with caution and warrant further research to identify factors that delay timely administration of diuretics.

Spot urinary sodium guided titration of intravenous diuretic therapy in acute heart failure: A pilot randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Spot urinary sodium concentration (UNa) is advocated in guidelines to assess diuretic response and titrate dosage in acute heart failure (AHF). However, no randomised controlled trial data exists to support this approach. We performed a prospective pilot trial to investigate the feasibility of this approach. METHODS: 60 patients with AHF (n = 30 in each arm) were randomly assigned to titration of loop diuretics for the first 48 hours of admission according to UNa levels (intervention arm) or based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion (standard care arm). Diuretic insufficiency was defined as UNa < 50 mmol/L. Endpoints relating to diuretic efficacy, safety and AHF outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: UNa-guided therapy patients experienced less acute kidney injury (20% vs 50%, p = 0.01) and a tendency towards less hypokalaemia (serum K+<3.5 mmol, 7% vs 27%, p = 0.04), with greater weight loss (3.3 kg vs 2.1 kg, p = 0.01). They reported a greater reduction in the clinical congestion score (-4.7 vs -2.6, p < 0.01) and were more likely to report marked symptom improvement (40% vs 13.3%, p = 0.04) at 48 hours. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay (median LOS: 8 days in both groups, p = 0.98), 30-day mortality or readmission rate. CONCLUSION: UNa-guided titration of diuretic therapy in AHF is feasible and safer than titration based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion, with more effective decongestion at 48 hours. Further large-scale trials are needed to determine if the superiority of this approach translates into improved patient outcomes.

Wait times are not the problem! Detailed analysis of unsolicited patient complaints from a metropolitan Australian emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics of ED admissions that resulted in unsolicited complaints and compare with overall ED admissions. The site utilised is an inner city tertiary hospital, with 630 beds, with approximately 82 600 annual presentations, where 32.5% were children. METHODS: Complaints between the dates of 27 November 2012 and 10 March 2016 were reviewed. Performance indicators and the distribution of presentations by diagnostic code were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 572 different complaint reasons were found and grouped into 12 categories. The most common reasons for complaints were treatment (33.2%) and communication (28.3%), and most complaints concerned medical staff. Other variables including wait times have no effect on patient complaints. Utilising aggregate numbers, the overall paediatric complaint ratio was 0.98:1000 presentations, and the total adult department complaints were 1.78:1000 presentations. CONCLUSION: As seen in this study the vast majority of patient complaints were associated with treatment and communication issues and skewed towards doctors. It may be feasible for medical staff to undertake communication training as clinician-patient communication in the ED is an important aspect in the improvement of patient satisfaction and in decreasing patient complaints as waiting times and triage categories had no major influence on patient complaints.

What is the nature of the emergence phenomenon when using intravenous or intramuscular ketamine for paediatric procedural sedation?

OBJECTIVE: Ketamine has become the drug most favoured by emergency physicians for sedation of children in the ED. Some emergency physicians do not use ketamine for paediatric procedural sedation (PPS) because of concern about emergence delirium on recovery. The present study set out to determine the true incidence and nature of this phenomenon. METHODS: Prospective data relating to any emergence agitation, crying, hallucinations, dreams, altered perceptions, delirium and necessary interventions were recorded in consecutive cases of ketamine PPS from March 2002 to June 2007, and analysed. Standard inclusion and exclusion criteria for the use of ketamine were followed. RESULTS: A total of 745 prospective data collection records were available for analysis over the 5 year period. Of all, 93 (12.5%) children cried on awakening when recovering from PPS, 291 (39%) experienced pleasant altered perceptions and 16 (2.1%) experienced what was called 'emergence delirium'. None required any active treatment and all except one settled within 20 min. There was no evidence of an increased rate of nightmares on telephone follow up in the weeks post procedure. CONCLUSION: The belief that ketamine, in the doses used for ED PPS, causes frequent emergence delirium is flawed. A pleasant emergence phenomenon is common, but is not distressing for the child, and has no long-term (up to 30 days) negative sequelae. Rarely, there is anxiety or distress on awakening from ketamine sedation, which settles spontaneously. This should not deter emergency physicians from using ketamine for PPS.